rwessel From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 1989 posts, RR: 2 Reply 10, posted (6 months 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 3511 times:
Quoting United_fan (Reply 2): Though it has the capability , it has never refuel in-flight. Strictly for emergency use.
While the VC-25s have probably not ever been air-to-air refueled with the president on board (or likely on any operational mission), they've certainly done it in test and training.
bikerthai From United States of America, joined Apr 2010, 1590 posts, RR: 4 Reply 12, posted (6 months 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 3508 times:
Never really thought about it but the 747 seems to be the only airplane with the refueling receptacle in front of the pilot. Not including all the probe aircraft of course.
Never really thought about it but the 747 seems to be the only airplane with the refueling receptacle in front of the pilot. Not including all the probe aircraft of course.
A-10s have the receptacle in front of the pilot as does the B-1.
South Carolina - too small to be its own country, too big to be a mental asylum.
Max Q From United States of America, joined May 2001, 3289 posts, RR: 19 Reply 15, posted (6 months 2 days ago) and read 3444 times:
Quoting Cadet985 (Reply 14):
In theory, she also could have used the back-up VC-25, although I don't know how the Secret Service/Air Force would feel about that.
How would it be a back up if she was using it ?!
The best contribution to safety is a competent Pilot.
Cadet985 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 1408 posts, RR: 5 Reply 16, posted (6 months 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 3374 times:
Quoting Max Q (Reply 15): How would it be a back up if she was using it ?!
He could have figured that since the primary carries enough spare parts (seriously...it carries spares of any part that might break down), and that the C-32 lacks the range to make it from Southeast Asia to the Middle East (considering that it would be flying against a headwind and over some not-so-friendly countries), that he could sacrifice the spare VC-25.
Using Google Earth, I figure it to be some 3358.07 miles on a heading of 296 from Burma (which is where I believe where Hillary left from) to TLV. That's a straight line flight which would take it over such countries as Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iran, etc...countries that we might be hesitant to fly our VIP's over.
The only other way she could have gone would have been on a C-17.
Max Q From United States of America, joined May 2001, 3289 posts, RR: 19 Reply 21, posted (5 months 4 weeks ago) and read 2859 times:
Quoting Cadet985 (Reply 16):
He could have figured that since the primary carries enough spare parts (seriously...it carries spares of any part that might break down), and that the C-32 lacks the range to make it from Southeast Asia to the Middle East (considering that it would be flying against a headwind and over some not-so-friendly countries), that he could sacrifice the spare VC-25.
Not my point, the second VC25 is a back up for the first when it's operating as AF1.
So it can't be a back up for anything else.
The best contribution to safety is a competent Pilot.
bikerthai From United States of America, joined Apr 2010, 1590 posts, RR: 4 Reply 22, posted (5 months 3 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 2656 times:
Quoting Cadet985 (Reply 16):
The only other way she could have gone would have been on a C-17.
Quoting dkswim (Reply 18): c-32 has inflight refuling capability and unrefuled range of 5,500nm
Sponsor Message: 
From Antigua and Barbuda, joined Dec 2007, 64 posts, 
From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 2595 posts, 
From Malaysia, joined Jan 2005, 200 posts, 
From Thailand, joined May 2000, 38501 posts, 
Sponsor Message: 
Printer friendly format
