Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Viper Engine Larceny  
User currently onlineDevilfish From Philippines, joined Jan 2006, 4794 posts, RR: 1
Posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 4602 times:

Veering away from the usual fare on MilAv, here's another case of pilfered defense items.....

http://www.defensenews.com/article/2...odyssey=tab|topnews|text|FRONTPAGE

Quote:
"JERUSALEM — Thieves have made off with several U.S.-made engines for F-16 warplanes worth millions of dollars from an airbase in central Israel, army radio reported Dec. 6.

Israel’s Walla Internet site said preliminary findings after an investigation by military police indicated there may have been collusion between the thieves and personnel, either military or civilian, at the base.

It said the military police suspect the engines may have been stolen to be sold as scrap metal. It is not known when the thefts took place."



Given the cost of the missing articles, it definitely cannot be called as grand larceny.....and considering the security implications, robbery will be too mild a classification.

Sabotage or treason would not be a far fetched charge if you add where it happened.

It stretches credulity a bit to think those were destined for the scrappers.   


"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Garfield
11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineNewark727 From United States of America, joined Dec 2009, 1340 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 4406 times:

Quoting Devilfish (Thread starter):
It stretches credulity a bit to think those were destined for the scrappers.

Yeah, if you were just out to steal specific kinds of metal to sell for scrap, wouldn't there be way easier and less dangerous ways to find it?

On the other hand, a jet engine seems like one of those things that, upon stealing, is pretty darn hard to sell on without someone noticing. Weird stuff.


User currently offlineBMI727 From United States of America, joined Feb 2009, 15727 posts, RR: 26
Reply 2, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 4382 times:

Quoting Newark727 (Reply 1):
Yeah, if you were just out to steal specific kinds of metal to sell for scrap, wouldn't there be way easier and less dangerous ways to find it?

Yes, but that may not be what they were after.

Quoting Newark727 (Reply 1):
On the other hand, a jet engine seems like one of those things that, upon stealing, is pretty darn hard to sell on without someone noticing.

I'm not so sure about that. You can get some pretty heavy stuff on the black market and you have to wonder what the Chinese, Russians, et. al. might pay to get their hands on something like that to tear it apart.



Why do Aerospace Engineering students have to turn things in on time?
User currently offlineNewark727 From United States of America, joined Dec 2009, 1340 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 4374 times:

Quoting BMI727 (Reply 2):
I'm not so sure about that. You can get some pretty heavy stuff on the black market and you have to wonder what the Chinese, Russians, et. al. might pay to get their hands on something like that to tear it apart.

I suppose that might be true, I guess it depends on who the thieves actually were and what sort of channels they have access to. I always figured that if the Chinese and Russians were trying to do something like this of their own volition they would try something a bit more elegant like some kind of front-company set up but there are I guess plenty of possibilities.


User currently offlinefridgmus From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 1442 posts, RR: 11
Reply 4, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 4147 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Not to mention that members of the Israeli Defense Forces are very, very poorly paid. An inside job sounds very believable to me. Hope they find the missing engines.

F



The Lockheed Super Constellation, the REAL Queen of the Skies!
User currently offlineAirRyan From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 2532 posts, RR: 5
Reply 5, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 4075 times:

Sadly it won't be the first time Israel let's Western technology reach China. You do realize the greatest setback right now on the new Chinese fighter jets are the engines? Coincidence? I don't think so.

User currently offlinejohns624 From United States of America, joined Jul 2008, 911 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 4052 times:

Quoting BMI727 (Reply 2):
You can get some pretty heavy stuff on the black market and you have to wonder what the Chinese, Russians, et. al. might pay to get their hands on something like that to tear it apart.
Quoting AirRyan (Reply 5):
You do realize the greatest setback right now on the new Chinese fighter jets are the engines? Coincidence? I don't think so.

You do realize that Venezuela and Pakistan both fly the F16? I'm sure that Russia and China could get any information or parts that they needed from them. Besides, the F16 isn't exactly cutting edge technology.


User currently offlineBMI727 From United States of America, joined Feb 2009, 15727 posts, RR: 26
Reply 7, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 4004 times:

Quoting johns624 (Reply 6):
You do realize that Venezuela and Pakistan both fly the F16? I'm sure that Russia and China could get any information or parts that they needed from them.

Maybe or maybe not. Depending on what exactly the engines were, they may have been better versions than either of those two have. (All of the Venezuelan F-16s are Block 15s, but Pakistan's are newer) Plus those countries might simply have not wanted to provide the info.

Quoting johns624 (Reply 6):
Besides, the F16 isn't exactly cutting edge technology.

It has been continually updated over the years, and some of the engine technology from newer engines (like the F119 and F135) was rolled back. You could be entirely right that what was stolen was nothing special, but maybe not.



Why do Aerospace Engineering students have to turn things in on time?
User currently offlineOroka From Canada, joined Dec 2006, 911 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 3966 times:

Quoting AirRyan (Reply 5):
You do realize the greatest setback right now on the new Chinese fighter jets are the engines?

Wouldnt it be awesome to have a copy of an American engine, in a copy of an American funded jet design based on the F-16?


User currently offlineNewark727 From United States of America, joined Dec 2009, 1340 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (1 year 8 months 2 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 3891 times:

Quoting Oroka (Reply 8):
Wouldnt it be awesome to have a copy of an American engine, in a copy of an American funded jet design based on the F-16?

I can't help but imagine the result as being something like a protracted game of aeronautic Telephone.


User currently onlineDevilfish From Philippines, joined Jan 2006, 4794 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (1 year 8 months 1 week 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 3652 times:

Quoting Newark727 (Reply 1):
On the other hand, a jet engine seems like one of those things that, upon stealing, is pretty darn hard to sell on without someone noticing.

Especially when it's "several" as the reports says.

Quoting BMI727 (Reply 2):
Yes, but that may not be what they were after.

More "exotic" metal and materials come to mind.

Quoting Newark727 (Reply 3):
I suppose that might be true, I guess it depends on who the thieves actually were and what sort of channels they have access to.

No conclusive evidence was given, but this alludes to a modern day version of Ali Baba and his cohorts  ...

http://www.f-16.net/news_article4667.html

Quote:
"This leads investigators to believe that the thieves went in and out through the gates. This would have to be done with a large vehicle, since the engines weigh over 1.5 tons and are more than 15 feet long.

No suspects have been arrested yet but the most likely possibility is that the engines were stolen by Arab metal thieves, weapons dealers or terror-related agents.
"

For balance, the editorial noted that some sources later said that only engine parts were stolen.

http://www.f-16.net/gallery_item46690.html


Quoting AirRyan (Reply 5):
You do realize the greatest setback right now on the new Chinese fighter jets are the engines?
Quoting BMI727 (Reply 7):
some of the engine technology from newer engines (like the F119 and F135) was rolled back. You could be entirely right that what was stolen was nothing special, but maybe not.
.
If indeed 'several' engines were lost, could there be 'sneak previews' of F100-PW220 powered stealth fighters across the eastern skies?      


Not unexpectedly, some are quick to take umbrage at the mere mention of 'reverse engineering'   

http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/th...hina-upset-at-being-called-ou.html

Quote:
"Perhaps most significantly 'the J-15 is powered by home-made Taihang (WS-10) turbofan engine, which is more powerful than the Su-33's engine,' the People's Daily says.

That last part is actually quite a significant development, if it is true. China has not had an easy time of building jet engines. Most of its previous efforts have fallen flat with engines exploding in mid-air and the like. If the Chinese have learned to build their own engines, that could mean that they will not be dependent upon Russian hardware for much longer. However, building reverse engineered engines is one thing, coming up with and building your own design is quite another."


Quoting Oroka (Reply 8):
Wouldnt it be awesome to have a copy of an American engine, in a copy of an American funded jet design based on the F-16?

Something like this?  
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Guiqi2006
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Peter Terlouw




"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Garfield
User currently offlineOroka From Canada, joined Dec 2006, 911 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (1 year 8 months 1 week 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 3619 times:

Quoting Devilfish (Reply 10):
Something like this?

lol, yup, that would be the one. Nice to see the cycle possibly coming to a close. American funded Lavi copy with copys of F-16 engines in it. Going to be a decent jet. Thanks Israel!


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Viper Engine Larceny
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
RR Merlin Engine - Exhaust Developments posted Mon Sep 10 2012 11:28:36 by moo
XH558 Vulcan Engine Failure posted Tue May 29 2012 08:45:19 by dc10bhx
Single Engine Fighter @ Knip (NAS JAX) posted Tue Jan 17 2012 15:25:49 by gators312
GE And Rolls-Royce Give Up On F136 JSF Engine posted Fri Dec 2 2011 07:57:16 by aviationweek
US Navy To Buy 74 UK Harriers + Engine Spares posted Sun Nov 13 2011 18:37:45 by STT757
Man Loses Life Being Sucked Into Hercules Engine! posted Sun Aug 7 2011 21:51:32 by notaxonrotax
Space Shuttle Engine Power Questions posted Fri Jun 24 2011 20:58:18 by Thrust
Usaf E-8 Re-engine Program posted Fri May 20 2011 09:10:06 by B727LVR
U.S. Not Happy With F-35 Engine Cost Overruns posted Thu Apr 14 2011 17:55:57 by AirRyan
Could A Twin Engine BAe 146 Made A COD? posted Thu Feb 24 2011 16:41:31 by 747400sp

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format