Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Focke-Wulf 190 Restored In Norway  
User currently offlineMortyman From Norway, joined Aug 2006, 3991 posts, RR: 1
Posted (1 year 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 5965 times:

A Focke-Wulf 190 of Nazi Germany has just been restored at the Bodø Iar Museum in Norway.

- Luftwaffe produced 20 000 such aircraft during World War II. Focke-Wulf 190 was Germany's main fighter, and succeeded Messersmidt, says Anders Utgård, who heads the Air Force Museum in Bodø.

Together with colleagues in the vaulantery association, he has worked on the plane that during the war was used in air attacks against Britain, the bombing of Soviet troops on the Eastern Front and in North Africa.

The new Fw 190 fighters were faster in both diving and climbing than RAF Spitfire Vb, and much better armed.

Fw 190 was in the latter part of World War II used on most fronts and in a variety of roles, even as torpedo aircraft the Black Sea.

On board the plane, there were also a bomb of 500 pounds.

- Focke Wulf was a pretty advanced aircraft of its time. It included two 20 millimeter machine guns and a huge BMV engine at over 1600 horsepower.

The plane that is now restored went down in Finnmark, in Northern Norway in 1943, and was found in the mid-1980s. For nearly 30 years, the Museum of Flight has worked to restore it.

- This is a rare jewel. There are only a handful left of Focke-Wulf 190 worldwide

Translated excerpt from Norwegian article. Check out video:

http://www.nrk.no/nyheter/distrikt/nordland/1.10887790

[Edited 2013-01-27 02:35:09]

14 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinebreiz From France, joined Mar 2005, 1917 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (1 year 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 5816 times:

Takk for linken.
If you allow me, the Fw-190 was not the main fighter of the Luftwaffe, the Bf-109 was (some 34,000 were produced).
The Bf-109 is even regarded as the most produced fighter aircraft in history, period.


User currently offlinecmb56 From United States of America, joined Dec 2009, 231 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (1 year 8 months 4 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 5531 times:

The FW was a more flexible aircraft, more multi-role capability than the 109. By the end of the war the 109 had been stretched about as far as it could go. a newer Me design should have gone into production 42-43. The DB-605 engine was every bit as good as the Merlin, it needed a better airframe than the 109. The FW-D model or "Dora" was considered one of the highest performance fighters of the war. Like most of the late war designs it was too little too late to stop the avalanche of material and machines from the US and Russia. The FW was in line with many of the German war designs, fine weapons that they couldn't build enough of or provide trained men to operate.

User currently offlineLMP737 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (1 year 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 5437 times:

Quoting cmb56 (Reply 2):
The FW was in line with many of the German war designs, fine weapons that they couldn't build enough of or provide trained men to operate

They were able to produce plenty of them. In the end it was a lack of qualified pilots that did them in. No rotation home to a training command for a Luftwaffe pilot. You flew until the war ended or were blown out of sky.


User currently offlineptrjong From Netherlands, joined Mar 2005, 3959 posts, RR: 18
Reply 4, posted (1 year 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 5430 times:

Actualy the Fw 190 was the last new German aicraft to be built in really large numbers. The German gamble was a short war, and the main types of the first campaigns - Bf 109, Bf 110, He 111, Ju 87 - were all kept in production for too long. According to one of my books as much as 14,000 Bf 109s were built in 1944 - I guess there was a shift towards fighters - and so it seems that the Bf 109 was numerically more important even at the end of the war.


The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)
User currently offlinecmb56 From United States of America, joined Dec 2009, 231 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (1 year 8 months 3 weeks 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 5128 times:

Agreed the Me-109 was the most produced fighter of the war.
The IL-2 was probably the most produced combat aircraft overall.
In general terms Germany wasted resourses on high quality weapons like the Tiger and Panther tanks the Me-262 jet fighter and V2 rocket. Great weapons that ended up overwhelmed in numbers by lesser quality but massive numbers of American or Russian designs. Me-262s could not be caught while they were at altitude but they had to land. Hard to do when the P-51s or Tempests are orbiting your own airfield. Shortage of pilots played its part as well. At the end of the war there were hundreds of brand new fighters sitting around but no one left alive to fly them. My father spent 3 years overseas in a combat zone, the greater tragedy to me is nothing was learned by anyone. Look at our world today.


User currently offlineprebennorholm From Denmark, joined Mar 2000, 6484 posts, RR: 54
Reply 6, posted (1 year 8 months 3 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 5002 times:

Quoting cmb56 (Reply 5):
At the end of the war there were hundreds of brand new fighters sitting around but no one left alive to fly them.

Right! Here in Denmark at VE-Day there were endless rows of rail-cars parked with new Fw-190s which only needed to have wings and propeller mounted. But few qualified pilots and almost no fuel.

They were driven over by Royal Army tanks and sold locally as scrap.

They were said to be of very poor quality since they were hastily built by mostly slave workers.



Always keep your number of landings equal to your number of take-offs, Preben Norholm
User currently offlinecelestar From Singapore, joined Jul 2001, 404 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (1 year 8 months 3 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 4762 times:

Quoting Mortyman (Thread starter):

My understanding of FW190 was its performance at high attitude was significantly reduced, it does excel at mid to low attitude envelope of engagement. The DORA version was a better all rounder, even at high attitude, is this a correct understanding?

The designation of BF 109 vs Me 109, I recall reading a book that before the war begins, the designation was BF109, notably the BF-109B and BF109C model or even the famous E model.
Starting with F and the later G model, the designation has always been ME instead of BF. Again, is this a correct statement?


User currently offlineptrjong From Netherlands, joined Mar 2005, 3959 posts, RR: 18
Reply 8, posted (1 year 8 months 3 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 4753 times:

Quoting celestar (Reply 7):
My understanding of FW190 was its performance at high attitude was significantly reduced, it does excel at mid to low attitude envelope of engagement. The DORA version was a better all rounder, even at high attitude, is this a correct understanding?

Yes, thanks to getting another engine. By the way it's the Fw 190D and Dora is simply from the German spelling alphabet.

Quoting celestar (Reply 7):
The designation of BF 109 vs Me 109, I recall reading a book that before the war begins, the designation was BF109, notably the BF-109B and BF109C model or even the famous E model.
Starting with F and the later G model, the designation has always been ME instead of BF. Again, is this a correct statement?

No, the 109's designation always remained Bf 109 (lower case f space), for Bayerische Flugzeugwerke (Bavarian Aircraft Works), Willy Messerschmitt's company. Later Messerschmitt types including the Me 163, 210 and 262 got Me.



The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)
User currently offlineolle From Sweden, joined Feb 2007, 305 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (1 year 8 months 1 week 13 hours ago) and read 3974 times:

The last versions on ME 109 got a new tail in plastic without the support that the older versions had and could reach 720 kilometers per hour the same as Spitfire XIV and the last versions of Mustang.

The later version of FW 190 "longnose" was in another leage together with Hawker Tempest, and had higher speeds. Pierre Closterman (One of the big aces of wwII) described it this way and he had chance to test them after VE.

The ME 262 all together 10 years more advanced and could perhaps be prepared to Meteor. If Hitler would had accepted it in 1943 the allied forces would probebly not got free skies over Germany in 1944 and german war production of new submarines could have ended the idea about Normandie in 1944.

The allied even stopped intending kill Hitler because they considered his misstakes helped them more compared to get rid of him and fight a germany without him  


User currently offlinerwessel From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 2368 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (1 year 8 months 1 week ago) and read 3893 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting olle (Reply 9):
The ME 262 all together 10 years more advanced and could perhaps be prepared to Meteor. If Hitler would had accepted it in 1943 the allied forces would probebly not got free skies over Germany in 1944 and german war production of new submarines could have ended the idea about Normandie in 1944.

Very, very debatable. The engines simple were not there until mid-44. And that had nothing to do with Hitler's orders to make the Me-262 into a fighter-bomber.


User currently offlinecelestar From Singapore, joined Jul 2001, 404 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (1 year 8 months 1 week ago) and read 3890 times:

Thanks for the clarification on Me vs Bf on 109 question.
I was not aware of the plastic tail model on Bf 109 which achieves such a high speed. Is it the K model or ?
Is technology on plastic that advanced during WW II? I am really interested to hear more.
The FW190D model is an interesting plane, with its long nose (bigger engine perhaps) and I think, still the same wing span like the other FW190 model. So, the non-D version suffers poor performance at high attitude is attributable to the BMW engine power it had? I hope I understant this correctly!
In addition to the comments about introducing Me 262 earlier, I can't agree more but it is true that Hilter helps Germany to loose the war and maybe that is a good outcome as lesser people got killed in air combat action. One last comment, German Air Force should adopt more FW than Bf 109 as inherently, the Bf109 undercarriage is so prone to accidental damage during landing, whereas the FW190 has a much wider tolerance on its undercarriage design, which brought to be an interesting thoughts, did US Army lost a lot of Wildcat during landing? Wildcat has a rotund shape but its undercarriage is always an 'interesting' design...
Hellcat is a great plane but it is kind of too common looking, functional excellent but looks wise, too common....


User currently offlinecmb56 From United States of America, joined Dec 2009, 231 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (1 year 8 months 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 3829 times:

The term plastic with regard to WWII aircraft is not what we think of as plastic today. The RAF Mosqito was technically a plastic aircraft. A composite of balsa, plywood, and resins. So the Germans began to have parts of their aircraft made from wood composites also. The last models of the 109 did have performance to match the Mustang but the pilots who could use that were gone. When the 109 was loaded up with guns to shoot down bombers it's performance suffered very badly. The landing gear on the 109 comes from it's pre-war roots. The airframe was designed to be as small as possible and accept the larges engine available. The gear being bolted to the fuselage instead of the wing helped keep the size and weight small. When the later big engine DB-605 was installed the airframe was overmatched by the horsepower. The 109F model was generally considered to be the best version. Light, fast, manueverable, lightly armed.

The FW-190D model had an inline V12 made by Junkers to replace the BMW radial. Very big change and also the source of the name long nose Dora. The fuselage was extended to counter the weight of the engine by inserting a plug between the tail and main fuselage. The D model was one of the best performing piston engine fighters of the war. Like many German weapons it was too late and in too few numbers to turn the tide.


User currently offlinecelestar From Singapore, joined Jul 2001, 404 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (1 year 8 months 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 3682 times:

Thanks for clarifying the 'plastic' subject.
Interesting to hear the Bf 109F was considered the best model, I always read that it is the lightest armed and not very effective, I guess it depends on the role. Would have think the G model, without the two heavy underwing gun, would be the best all-rounder.


User currently offlineolle From Sweden, joined Feb 2007, 305 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (1 year 8 months 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 3611 times:

The pilots, as I understand it did not get enough of fuel in the schools to learn the basics. They spent more time getting idealic thought that was going to compensate...

This resulted in that the Luftwaffe used gasoline of low quality and they gave a lot of smoke even so much that allied aircrews considered them damaged because of the smoke.

The main problem was that the german population got stucked with a group of criminals as government who first started a war instead of handling internal economical problems in 1939 and that when the war was obviusly lost in 1944 did more take care of them self then the german people.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Focke-Wulf 190 Restored In Norway
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Spitfire Crash In Norway posted Sun Aug 22 2010 08:46:32 by speedygonzales
American Hercules Skids Of Taxiway In Norway posted Wed Feb 24 2010 11:09:49 by Mortyman
Bold Avenger - Nato Air Training In Norway posted Fri Sep 14 2007 21:51:20 by Mortyman
Report - Rafale Out Of The Running In Norway posted Thu Aug 31 2006 22:46:33 by Lumberton
Memphis Belle To Be Restored In Dayton OH posted Sun Oct 9 2005 05:56:24 by DAYflyer
Eurofighter Out In Denmark & Norway? posted Fri Dec 21 2007 04:57:34 by Lumberton
Tu 22 " Backfire " 22M In Attack Mode Near Norway posted Wed Oct 10 2007 21:40:21 by Mortyman
In Pictures: The European Southern Observatory posted Wed Jan 23 2013 14:51:41 by NoUFO
French Gazelle Shot Down In Mali posted Sat Jan 12 2013 07:48:50 by chuchoteur
Boeing Bad Parts Caused F-15’s Breakup In 2007 posted Fri Jan 11 2013 07:56:25 by Revelation

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format