Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Panetta Announces New Medal For Drone Pilots  
User currently offlinedragon-wings From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 3997 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 7412 times:

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta announced Wednesday that for the first time the Pentagon is creating a medal that can be awarded to troops who have a direct impact on combat operations, but do it from afar.

The new blue, red and white-ribboned Distinguished Warfare Medal will be awarded to individuals for "extraordinary achievement" related to a military operation that occurred after Sept. 11, 2001. But unlike other combat medals, it does not require the recipient risk his or her life to get it.

The medal will be considered a bit higher in ranking than the Bronze Star, but is lower than the Silver Star, defense officials said.

What does everyone think about this? I don't like this idea. I think military awards should be kept for people who put their lives at risk in the combat zone.

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013...es-medal-for-drone-pilots#comments


Don't give up don't ever give up - Jim Valvano
33 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineMaverick623 From United States of America, joined Nov 2006, 5747 posts, RR: 6
Reply 1, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 7396 times:

Quoting dragon-wings (Thread starter):
I don't like this idea. I think military awards should be kept for people who put their lives at risk in the combat zone.

Hate to break it to you, but most awards and medals are awarded for non-combat actions. The third-highest award is a non-combat award, right behind the Medal of Honor and the various Crosses, and above the Silver Star.



"PHX is Phoenix, PDX is the other city" -777Way
User currently offlinen229nw From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 1972 posts, RR: 31
Reply 2, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 7341 times:

In a nutshell, I don't like it at all and find it patently disturbing because it is further "approval" for an illegal act of war. The drone attacks need to be stopped, not glorified.


It's people like you what cause unrest!
User currently offlineMaverick623 From United States of America, joined Nov 2006, 5747 posts, RR: 6
Reply 3, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 7340 times:

Quoting n229nw (Reply 2):
I don't like it at all and find it patently disturbing because it is further "approval" for an illegal act of war.

How is the use of UAVs illegal?



"PHX is Phoenix, PDX is the other city" -777Way
User currently offlineOzair From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 881 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 7306 times:

I suppose this will be available to categories such as Intel and logistics as well. No reason these guys have less of an impact on the front line than your average grunt.

User currently offlinerfields5421 From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 7607 posts, RR: 32
Reply 5, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 7295 times:

The REMF medal might be popular, and it won't be only for drone pilots. There are a lot of specialties where the impact of a good job is successful combat ops, and a poor job cost people's lives.

However, one thing I suspect is the medal may be the kiss of death for selection to higher rank. Combat action medals have always had a strong impact on the promotion boards.

I can just see a group of USMC officers with silver stars sitting reviewing records for promption - and what they will think of anyone who got this medal.

Will USAF selection boards consider those with this medal 'equal' to those with the DFC? I really doubt it.


User currently offlineflyingturtle From Switzerland, joined Oct 2011, 2581 posts, RR: 14
Reply 6, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 7217 times:

Quoting Maverick623 (Reply 3):
How is the use of UAVs illegal?

Ehhh... you're joking?

Using the UCAVs is neither war, neither judicial or police work. It's something in between, and that is where the problem comes from.

- Use of Pakistani airspace to kill Pakistanis and foreign nationals, thus violating the judicial system of Pakistan.
- No due process, no public court. Mr. Obama and Mr. Bush can decide who's next to die.

If you deem UAV "combat" as warfare, would you think any other form of warfare (e.g. deploying some Army Ranger Battalions to Pakistan) is acceptable to the Pakistanis?


As a side note, there is this quote from the magnificent film "Patton".

Correspondent: General, we're told of wonder weapons the Germans were working on: Long-range rockets, push-button bombing weapons that don't need soldiers. What's your take on that?
Patton: Wonder weapons? My God, I don't see the wonder in them. Killing without heroics. Nothing is glorified, nothing is reaffirmed. No heroes, no cowards, no troops. No generals. Only those that are left alive and those that are left... dead.



David



Keeping calm is terrorism against those who want to live in fear.
User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12181 posts, RR: 51
Reply 7, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 2 days ago) and read 7164 times:

Quoting rfields5421 (Reply 5):
Will USAF selection boards consider those with this medal 'equal' to those with the DFC? I really doubt it.

I hope you are right. The DFC requires some level that puts the awardee at some level of risk. Drone crews don't face that risk.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disting...ished_Flying_Cross_(United_States)

Even the Air Medal should rank abve this DWC.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_Medal

Both the Air Medal and the Bronze Star can be awarded for Valor.


User currently offlinerfields5421 From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 7607 posts, RR: 32
Reply 8, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 7128 times:

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 7):
Both the Air Medal and the Bronze Star can be awarded for Valor.

A lot of lower ranked troops will be awarded an Army (Navy or AF) Commendation medal for valor in combat. All the services have a device to attach to the ribbon indicating the medal was awarded for valor.

Mine is worth 10% extra retirement pay.


User currently offlineFlyingSicilian From Italy, joined Mar 2009, 1402 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 7108 times:

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 7):
Both the Air Medal and the Bronze Star can be awarded for Valor.

Unless something has changed (which it might have) the US Air Force does not have a V device for Air Medals. IIRC it did decades ago but got rid of it, much like the AF got rid of warrent officers.



“Without seeing Sicily it is impossible to understand Italy.Sicily is the key of everything.”-Goethe "Journey to Italy"
User currently offlineptrjong From Netherlands, joined Mar 2005, 4006 posts, RR: 18
Reply 10, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 7084 times:

Quoting flyingturtle (Reply 6):

I'm with you, I don't like the use of drones. Not from an aviation enthousiast's point of view and more importantly, because the use of robotic 'coward' weapons makes warfare far too easy for one side, and probably fosters terrorism on the other side more than anyhing else.

However, the fact that the drone war in Pakistan is shady is not something that is particular to drones.

Peter



The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)
User currently offlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 31437 posts, RR: 85
Reply 11, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 7042 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

So if attacking with a drone is "cowardly" or an "illegal act", what is using a cruise missile? Or an air-to-air missile? Air-to-surface missile? Surface-to-air-missile? Torpedo? Artillery shell? Rocket? Bullet?

Maybe we should just go back to beating each other over the head with clubs?

And while General Patton himself never actually said this line (it was created for the film Patton), it is one of the reasons we have stand-off weapons: "I want you to remember that no bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor, dumb bastard die for his country."

[Edited 2013-02-14 10:33:40]

User currently offlineflyingturtle From Switzerland, joined Oct 2011, 2581 posts, RR: 14
Reply 12, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 7020 times:

Quoting Stitch (Reply 11):
So if attacking with a drone is "cowardly" or an "illegal act", what is using a cruise missile? Or an air-to-air missile? Air-to-surface missile? Surface-to-air-missile? Torpedo? Artillery shell? Rocket? Bullet?

A "pilot" sitting in a cubicle at Nellis AFB has crossed the line IMHO.

Some cruise missiles still have to be fired by some magnificent men in their flying boxes. If the drone goes haywire, the pilot won't be dead. SAM personnel are subject to AGM-88 and other air-to-surface missiles. Being a submariner is still more dangerous than operating a joystick and staring at screens in the office. With artillery it's the same. The drone pilot does not even have to be near the ordnance to do his job.

In WWII, there was fallout about Lloyd Fredendall and the bunker he had built some 70+ miles away from the front line. The opinion was that even generals were expendable and had to take personal risks. In today's Germany, we had a controversy about army cooks getting the same risk premium as their colleagues on patrol duty. After all, Afghanistan is a dangerous place.

Quoting Stitch (Reply 11):
ever won a war

Using drones isn't even war. It is state-sponsored killing. Did the U.S. ever declare war on Pakistan in order to use their drones there? Or did the Pakistani government ask the U.S. for these UCAV strikes? Nope.

Quoting Stitch (Reply 11):
Maybe we should just go back to beating each other over the head with clubs?

No need for that. It just shouldn't be driving to the office, piloting drones, kill some terrorists and civilians, and go back home to kiss the wife and play with the children.


David

[Edited 2013-02-14 11:44:10]


Keeping calm is terrorism against those who want to live in fear.
User currently offlineSSTeve From United States of America, joined Dec 2011, 738 posts, RR: 2
Reply 13, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 7004 times:

Quoting flyingturtle (Reply 6):
Patton: Wonder weapons? My God, I don't see the wonder in them. Killing without heroics. Nothing is glorified, nothing is reaffirmed. No heroes, no cowards, no troops. No generals. Only those that are left alive and those that are left... dead.

If you're looking for romantic historical analogies for the modern realities of "war" on terrorists, just liken it to the way pirates were treated by the sovereign navies of the world. Attack and summary execution, indefinite detainment, etc. There were rules for the way you would civilly treat flag-flying enemies, and then there was what you could do to pirates-- anything.


User currently offlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 31437 posts, RR: 85
Reply 14, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 7002 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting flyingturtle (Reply 12):
Using drones isn't even war. It is state-sponsored killing. Did the U.S. ever declare war on Pakistan in order to use their drones there? Or did the Pakistani government ask the U.S. for these UCAV strikes? Nope.

So if an F-117 had flown into Pakistani airspace and the pilot in the cockpit had dropped a JDAM on the target, that would be okay?


User currently offlineSCAT15F From United States of America, joined Feb 2007, 402 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 6980 times:

It's the targeting policy that's illegal.

Still, I am totally against this medal, and I am totally against using drones.

Just what we need. Further dehumanization of war. Clearly, nobody in the military is thinking about where this trend toward UAV's is going to end, because as we have seen with technological development "limiting" any new technology is tantamount to treason.

An episode of the original Star Trek dealt with the inevitable conclusion of this madness. War had evolved into computer simulations and those "killed" were sent to vaporization chambers to be killed for real.

Freaking idiots.


User currently offlineOzair From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 881 posts, RR: 2
Reply 16, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 6970 times:

Quoting flyingturtle (Reply 12):
A "pilot" sitting in a cubicle at Nellis AFB has crossed the line IMHO.

Why is a drone pilot in Nellis any less of a target than the Taliban senior figure sitting in a hut in North Waziristan? AQ already crossed the line by deliberately targeting non-combatants in their home nation. Now the US targets senior leadership figures in their home countries, deliberately avoiding the targeting of non-combatants. I am sure if you spoke to the pilot he would agree that he is a valid target, just harder to get to. It is AQ's fault they attacked a nation that had better internal security and advanced weapons than themselves.

And a UCAV is more than just the pilot, there are the ground crew servicing the aircraft in theater who are under direct threat each day.

Quoting flyingturtle (Reply 12):
Using drones isn't even war. It is state-sponsored killing. Did the U.S. ever declare war on Pakistan in order to use their drones there? Or did the Pakistani government ask the U.S. for these UCAV strikes? Nope.

Do you actually have any evidence to support that claim? Despite the political rhetoric coming out of Pakistan I would be very very surprised if Pakistan is not fully supportive of the drone attacks. If they really cared about drones invading their airspace they would shot them out of the sky until the US stopped sending them. The drones solve a problem for them as the tribal regions are as much an issue for Pakistan as they are for the US.

Quoting flyingturtle (Reply 12):
No need for that. It just shouldn't be driving to the office, piloting drones, kill some terrorists and civilians, and go back home to kiss the wife and play with the children.

Perhaps we should confine him to base, make him eat ration packs and shower in unsanitary conditions just like the ground crew servicing the aircraft in Afghanistan?

Quoting SCAT15F (Reply 15):
Clearly, nobody in the military is thinking about where this trend toward UAV's is going to end, because as we have seen with technological development "limiting" any new technology is tantamount to treason.

No, they are doing what they are supposed to be doing, concentrating on winning. The military does not set national policy, the government does. If you have an issue with the policy take it up with the government.

Quoting SCAT15F (Reply 15):
Still, I am totally against this medal

Shame really as there are plenty of active service personnel in rear areas who are just as important to the war effort and keeping front-line troops alive as the front-line guys themselves. Why not reward these people for their abilities, talents, ingenuity and determination.


User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12181 posts, RR: 51
Reply 17, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 6938 times:

Quoting flyingturtle (Reply 12):
Using drones isn't even war. It is state-sponsored killing.

Hmmm, isn't war itself "state sponsored killing"?

Quoting flyingturtle (Reply 12):
Did the U.S. ever declare war on Pakistan in order to use their drones there? Or did the Pakistani government ask the U.S. for these UCAV strikes? Nope.

We don't need to declair war everywhere a terrorist is hiding. If a terrorist was hiding in your living room and we wanted to take him out, we wouldn't be asking you for permission to do it. It would just happen. It is easier to explain later why we killed that terriorist than to ask for permission before hand.


User currently offlineBMI727 From United States of America, joined Feb 2009, 15841 posts, RR: 27
Reply 18, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 6912 times:

Quoting SCAT15F (Reply 15):
Just what we need. Further dehumanization of war. Clearly, nobody in the military is thinking about where this trend toward UAV's is going to end, because as we have seen with technological development "limiting" any new technology is tantamount to treason.

War does need dehumanization.

There is no nobility in a fair fight. The best war to fight is the one where no Americans are in danger. If we could set it up for the President to zap terrorists while wearing sweatpants and sitting on his sofa I'd do it in a heartbeat.



Why do Aerospace Engineering students have to turn things in on time?
User currently offlinechecksixx From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 1141 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 6866 times:

Quoting ptrjong (Reply 10):
I'm with you, I don't like the use of drones. Not from an aviation enthousiast's point of view and more importantly, because the use of robotic 'coward' weapons makes warfare far too easy for one side, and probably fosters terrorism on the other side more than anyhing else.

Too easy for one side?? We don't want it to be fair!! Are you serious??

Quoting flyingturtle (Reply 12):
The drone pilot does not even have to be near the ordnance to do his job.

So part of your problem with this is simply the mere fact that they are not 'near' enough to it??

Quoting flyingturtle (Reply 12):
Using drones isn't even war. It is state-sponsored killing. Did the U.S. ever declare war on Pakistan in order to use their drones there? Or did the Pakistani government ask the U.S. for these UCAV strikes? Nope.

Wrong partner...the US told them that they would pursue terrorism suspects within Pakistan due to the nations lack of doing so themselves. Also...FYI...a 'civilian' engaging in acts with terrorism subjects becomes a legal combatant at that point...per Geneva Convention and Rules of War.

Quoting flyingturtle (Reply 12):
It just shouldn't be driving to the office, piloting drones, kill some terrorists and civilians, and go back home to kiss the wife and play with the children.

So you would rather they die at the end of their work day????

Quoting SCAT15F (Reply 15):
Still, I am totally against this medal, and I am totally against using drones.

Just what we need. Further dehumanization of war. Clearly, nobody in the military is thinking about where this trend toward UAV's is going to end, because as we have seen with technological development "limiting" any new technology is tantamount to treason.

So you'd rather someone be there and in jeopardy of losing their life also then...wow...

Quoting Ozair (Reply 16):
Shame really as there are plenty of active service personnel in rear areas who are just as important to the war effort and keeping front-line troops alive as the front-line guys themselves. Why not reward these people for their abilities, talents, ingenuity and determination.

   Absolutely!!!! Rewarding them and showing them they play a crucial roll keeps them going...its something that is highly pushed right now. I have an award (not medal) with valor...does that make it any less than the pilot with a medal with valor? Nope...not at all.


Whats really funny in this thread is that with exception to one, many of the posters in objection to UAV's and UNfair warfare (LoL), appear to be from countries that either tried to remain neutral or simply surrendered without a fight to the German's in WWII. I find that very interesting. Glad they're not in any way running our military!!!!


User currently offlineSCAT15F From United States of America, joined Feb 2007, 402 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 6861 times:

Quoting checksixx (Reply 19):
So you'd rather someone be there and in jeopardy of losing their life also then...wow...

Absolutely. It is the only honorable thing to do, (yes, I'm talking about honor in combat) particularly when you are killing hundreds of civilians and targeting any adult male of military age who happens to be anywhere near known "terrorists" without any attempt whatsoever to determine just cause.

One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.

The CIA has committed more terrorist acts and killed more innocent people than all the "terrorists" from Iraq, Afganistan, and Pakistan combined.


User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29840 posts, RR: 58
Reply 21, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 6858 times:

Quoting rfields5421 (Reply 5):
The REMF medal might be popular, and it won't be only for drone pilots. There are a lot of specialties where the impact of a good job is successful combat ops, and a poor job cost people's lives.

I was surprised to hear this, I was under the impression the drone drivers where getting their own set of wings.




OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineBMI727 From United States of America, joined Feb 2009, 15841 posts, RR: 27
Reply 22, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 6850 times:

Quoting SCAT15F (Reply 20):
It is the only honorable thing to do,

Honor in combat doesn't get the job done. Like Al Davis said, "Just win, baby." Like they said in the movie Patton: "I want you to remember that no bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor, dumb bastard die for his country."

That's right, Al Davis and Patton in the same post. There should be a medal for that.



Why do Aerospace Engineering students have to turn things in on time?
User currently offlineptrjong From Netherlands, joined Mar 2005, 4006 posts, RR: 18
Reply 23, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 6839 times:

Quoting checksixx (Reply 19):

Too easy for one side?? We don't want it to be fair!! Are you serious??

The decision to wage war needs to be a tough one. Yes, I'm serious and I also understand well if people in the military don't immediately agree.



The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)
User currently offlinechecksixx From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 1141 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 6827 times:

Quoting SCAT15F (Reply 20):
Quoting checksixx (Reply 19):
So you'd rather someone be there and in jeopardy of losing their life also then...wow...

Absolutely. It is the only honorable thing to do, (yes, I'm talking about honor in combat) particularly when you are killing hundreds of civilians and targeting any adult male of military age who happens to be anywhere near known "terrorists" without any attempt whatsoever to determine just cause.

One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.

The CIA has committed more terrorist acts and killed more innocent people than all the "terrorists" from Iraq, Afganistan, and Pakistan combined.

Ahhh...you're one of those. Thank God you don't make those decisions!!

Quoting ptrjong (Reply 23):
Quoting checksixx (Reply 19):

Too easy for one side?? We don't want it to be fair!! Are you serious??

The decision to wage war needs to be a tough one. Yes, I'm serious and I also understand well if people in the military don't immediately agree.

There wouldn't be any modern military that would agree with you actually...LoL


User currently offlineptrjong From Netherlands, joined Mar 2005, 4006 posts, RR: 18
Reply 25, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 6871 times:

Well, war is too important to be left to the military.


The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)
User currently offlinenomadd22 From United States of America, joined Feb 2008, 1903 posts, RR: 0
Reply 26, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 6862 times:

I never thought much of all those guys who had half their chests covered with ribbons, most of which were for doing their jobs. One national Defense ribbon was enough for me.
Sniping from the sidelines might be all some people can do, but the world would be in pretty bad shape if we let the Srebrenica school of warfare prevail. Pacifism is a luxury paid for by people willing to do what it takes.



Andy Goetsch
User currently offlineThePointblank From Canada, joined Jan 2009, 1859 posts, RR: 0
Reply 27, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 6868 times:

Quoting BMI727 (Reply 22):
Honor in combat doesn't get the job done. Like Al Davis said, "Just win, baby." Like they said in the movie Patton: "I want you to remember that no bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor, dumb bastard die for his country."

That's right, Al Davis and Patton in the same post. There should be a medal for that.

Indeed.

This is not a video game or a sport, it's war. It's dirty, it's dangerous, and people will get killed, one way or another. There are no rules to warfare except get the other guy killed before he kills you. The only time honor / sportsman like conduct matters is when it comes to a game, WAR IS NOT A GAME! In war, there is no honor, there is only those who are going to die, and those who live. I want our side to win with as little damage to us as possible. I want our side to over run the enemy with as much utter over powering and overwhelming force as possible like in Desert Storm where we ripped Saddam's military to the ground in one of the fastest wars in recent history.

I dont' care if we're called cheaters, or dishonourable, as long as our troops come home safely and the enemy goes down in flames quickly and easily, I'm happy. I support the use of any technical / intelligence / tactical / strategical advantage to be had in warfare.


User currently offlinerfields5421 From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 7607 posts, RR: 32
Reply 28, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 6849 times:

Quoting checksixx (Reply 19):
Rewarding them and showing them they play a crucial roll keeps them going...its something that is highly pushed right now.

There are existing awards / medals to recognize such service.

Adding a new award and calling it 'equilavent to the DFC' dilutes the recognition of their contributions in my opinion.


User currently offlineSCAT15F From United States of America, joined Feb 2007, 402 posts, RR: 0
Reply 29, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 6821 times:

Quoting checksixx (Reply 24):
Ahhh...you're one of those. Thank God you don't make those decisions!!

If by one of "those", you mean someone who doesn't let that hyperactive brand of U.S. patriotism which inevitably leads to arrogance and willful ignorance blind him to the truth, then yes, I am definitely one of those.


“There is a hard core of people in the United States who will not be moved, whatever facts you present, from their conviction that this nation means only to do good, and almost always does good, in the world, that it is the beacon of liberty and freedom."

Howard Zinn
Bombardier, USAAF 490th Bombardment group, WWII.
Historian, author, playwright, activist.

I take it you are one of "those"


User currently offlineBMI727 From United States of America, joined Feb 2009, 15841 posts, RR: 27
Reply 30, posted (1 year 10 months 2 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 6799 times:

Quoting SCAT15F (Reply 29):
I take it you are one of "those"

Whether what the country does is good or bad, it's better if at the end of it the Americans are all still alive.

Fighting wars is not a sport and playing fair is not important. Winning is what's important and if any American walks into a "fair" fight, then somebody probably screwed up somewhere.



Why do Aerospace Engineering students have to turn things in on time?
User currently offlinechecksixx From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 1141 posts, RR: 0
Reply 31, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 6555 times:

Quoting rfields5421 (Reply 28):
There are existing awards / medals to recognize such service.

Never said there wasn't.

Quoting SCAT15F (Reply 29):
If by one of "those", you mean someone who doesn't let that hyperactive brand of U.S. patriotism which inevitably leads to arrogance and willful ignorance blind him to the truth, then yes, I am definitely one of those.


“There is a hard core of people in the United States who will not be moved, whatever facts you present, from their conviction that this nation means only to do good, and almost always does good, in the world, that it is the beacon of liberty and freedom."

Howard Zinn
Bombardier, USAAF 490th Bombardment group, WWII.
Historian, author, playwright, activist.

I take it you are one of "those"

Nope...I quoted YOUR own words. You quoted someone else. Don't put any words in my mouth just to make your previous comments look any less ridiculous...thanks  


User currently offlineSCAT15F From United States of America, joined Feb 2007, 402 posts, RR: 0
Reply 32, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 6532 times:

Quoting checksixx (Reply 31):
Don't put any words in my mouth just to make your previous comments look any less ridiculous

Well, everything I quoted happens to be simple fact -regardless of what you want to believe- so why would I need to try and make them look less "ridiculous?"

The current drone targeting policy which I described is a matter of public record.

The history of most of what the CIA has done, and the number of people that organization has killed is a matter of public record. I've spent the last 7 years in both undergrad and grad school researching just that.

It's really not that complicated.


User currently offlineFlyingSicilian From Italy, joined Mar 2009, 1402 posts, RR: 0
Reply 33, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 6492 times:

Quoting rfields5421 (Reply 28):
There are existing awards / medals to recognize such service.

Adding a new award and calling it 'equilavent to the DFC' dilutes the recognition of their contributions in my opinion.



Very true.

There are too many medals in use with USAF now, another feel good medal is absurd. Besides the Global War on Terrorism Medal was supposed to do what this one purports to do.



“Without seeing Sicily it is impossible to understand Italy.Sicily is the key of everything.”-Goethe "Journey to Italy"
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Panetta Announces New Medal For Drone Pilots
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
New Restrictions For F-22 posted Tue May 15 2012 14:29:18 by moose135
New Capsule For Nasa posted Tue May 24 2011 22:13:23 by Cadet985
Looking For Test Pilots/astronauts posted Mon Apr 11 2011 19:08:40 by Venus6971
New Justification For F-22? posted Sat Aug 7 2010 15:40:05 by nutsaboutplanes
USAF: Fighter -v- Drone Pilots posted Sun Feb 28 2010 18:43:07 by Ken777
Pre-Tests For Military Pilots posted Thu Oct 15 2009 10:53:29 by B727LVR
Congress Wants 3 New C-37s For Themselves posted Wed Aug 5 2009 17:43:19 by KC135TopBoom
New Career For Buzz Aldrin? posted Fri Jun 26 2009 01:09:36 by Scooter01
New Life For The Buffalo? posted Tue Jun 9 2009 03:31:48 by Connies4ever
New Helicopters For US Army Delivered posted Thu Jul 26 2007 06:44:39 by Zeke

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format