Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Usaf Cancels All Demo Flights Inc. Thunderbirds  
User currently offlinechuchoteur From France, joined Sep 2006, 764 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 6929 times:

http://www.csindy.com/IndyBlog/archi...ds-fly-the-coop-due-to-budget-cuts


"Effective today, active-duty, Reserve and Guard units will cease all aviation support to the public. This includes the cancellation of support to all air shows, tradeshows, flyovers (including funerals and military graduations), orientation flights, heritage flights, F-22 demonstration flights and open houses, unless the event includes only local static assets.

Additionally, the Air Force will cancel the Thunderbirds’ entire 2013 season beginning April 1."

41 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineNASCARAirforce From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 3178 posts, RR: 4
Reply 1, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 6785 times:

Non necessary flying for Military Aircraft

That Means El Presidente needs to keep Air Force One grounded unless its official business only too - no golf outings with Tiger Woods, countless Hawaii vacations, trips for speeches he can make from the White House, Jimmy Kimmel appearances for his wife etc.


User currently offlineMadameConcorde From San Marino, joined Feb 2007, 10897 posts, RR: 37
Reply 2, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 6603 times:

Quoting NASCARAirforce (Reply 1):
That Means El Presidente needs to keep Air Force One grounded unless its official business only too - no golf outings with Tiger Woods, countless Hawaii vacations, trips for speeches he can make from the White House, Jimmy Kimmel appearances for his wife etc.

He will agree to cutting off spending unless it is for his own (public or private) travel.

 

Twitter:
Tim Robinson ‏@RAeSTimR
1st hits from #sequestration - USAF axes all aviation support to public events, air shows, cancels Thunderbirds 2013 season.

Tim Robinson ‏@RAeSTimR
USAF to also reduce flying hours by as much as 18% - 2/3 of active duty AF units to curtail home station training. #defence

    Wow!

              



There was a better way to fly it was called Concorde
User currently offlinestealthz From Australia, joined Feb 2005, 5696 posts, RR: 44
Reply 3, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 6596 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting MadameConcorde (Reply 2):
USAF to also reduce flying hours by as much as 18% - 2/3 of active duty AF units to curtail home station training.

From what I can determine the actual USAF budget cut is something around 4% yet they cut their "core business" by 18% .. I would tend to think the bloated fat tail of the fighting machine are not taking their share of the cuts. Tends to be the way.. the ones fudging the spreadsheets are rarely the ones that feel the pain.



If your camera sends text messages, that could explain why your photos are rubbish!
User currently offlinechecksixx From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 1095 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 6572 times:

Wrong...each service has significant cuts. There is no magic 'share' of cuts.

User currently offlineOroka From Canada, joined Dec 2006, 913 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 6522 times:

Quoting stealthz (Reply 3):
From what I can determine the actual USAF budget cut is something around 4% yet they cut their "core business" by 18% .. I would tend to think the bloated fat tail of the fighting machine are not taking their share of the cuts.

Flying time is something they can cut down, things like closing an airfield or emergency services can not be cut. Some non essential areas will have to take a larger share of the cuts.


User currently offlineRevelation From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 12559 posts, RR: 25
Reply 6, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 6453 times:

Quoting chuchoteur (Thread starter):
Additionally, the Air Force will cancel the Thunderbirds’ entire 2013 season beginning April 1

Are we supposed to be sad?

It seems to be one of the wiser things to cut when funds are tight.

You don't expect LM and PW to agree to take 10% less on their F-22s and F-35s, do you?

[ note - these are rhetorical questions, not directed at the poster ]

Quoting stealthz (Reply 3):
I would tend to think the bloated fat tail of the fighting machine are not taking their share of the cuts. Tends to be the way.. the ones fudging the spreadsheets are rarely the ones that feel the pain.

I agree with the point you are making, but will point out the action would be different if this was a permanent 10%cut across the board vs one of indeterminate duration.

The bottom line is we are paying the Congress to make decisions and compromises and they are refusing to do so.



Inspiration, move me brightly!
User currently offlineAesma From France, joined Nov 2009, 6656 posts, RR: 11
Reply 7, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 6313 times:

Quoting NASCARAirforce (Reply 1):
That Means El Presidente needs to keep Air Force One grounded unless its official business only too - no golf outings with Tiger Woods, countless Hawaii vacations, trips for speeches he can make from the White House, Jimmy Kimmel appearances for his wife etc.

Well I thought AF1 was a security measure ? Can the president really take a regular flight after all ? Then scrap the VC-25 fleet.



New Technology is the name we give to stuff that doesn't work yet. Douglas Adams
User currently offlinePowerslide From Canada, joined Oct 2010, 569 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 6278 times:

This include the Blue Angels too or are they under the Navy budgets?

User currently offlinerfields5421 From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 7607 posts, RR: 31
Reply 9, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 6246 times:

Quoting Powerslide (Reply 8):
This include the Blue Angels too or are they under the Navy budgets?

The Navy is implementing the required budget cuts according to their own priorities - but yes, effective April 1 - the Blue Angels season will end. The Navy imposed a similar ban as the Air Force in an order announced a week or so ago.


User currently offlineNASCARAirforce From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 3178 posts, RR: 4
Reply 10, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 6230 times:

Quoting Aesma (Reply 7):
Well I thought AF1 was a security measure ? Can the president really take a regular flight after all ? Then scrap the VC-25 fleet.

Air Force One is a security measure. However when you are cutting non essential flying for Thunderbirds, Blue Angels, military demos at airshows and canceling base airshows - how can you justify flying from Washington DC down to West Palm Beach to have a golf game with Tiger Woods - which is non essential flying of Marine One from WH to Andrews, C-17s to carry equipment as well as the VC-25 so the president can have fun at tax payer expense?

Thousands of people are losing jobs because of this while the president plays golf - this is like Nero playing the fiddle as Rome burns. During these cuts Air Force One should only be used for absolutely necessary flights such as important world leader meetings, disaster response, national crisis response. If the president wants to take a vacation during this sequester - he can go up to Camp David. He too should not be taking 3 week vacations in Hawaii, trips to Vegas for a brief speech on Immigration reform that could have been done from the oval office, flights on the VC-32 for his wife to appear on Jimmy Kimmel etc. General Motors and Chrysler took heat for showing up in their Gulfstreams when they were asking for federal bailouts. How is this any different? Obama campaigning around the country about cutting spending while he is buring a few million $ flying around in Air Force One, secret service and nice hotels?

Airshows at military bases are an economic generator. There are a lot of civilian vendors that show up at these events that sell food, shirts, other items as well as the civilian contractors that help set up these airshows - such as the tents, portapotties etc that were depending on these shows that are now losing money and have to lay off workers - this is why I am so against all the wasted flying by our government officials that are hypocrites

Its not just Obama. Congress is just as much at fault. Frogface Mitch McConnell bails out early during the meeting over this so he can catch a flight - he should have missed that flight because Americans are depending on this. Several other congress people didn't even show up March 1 for the meetings. Congress, Senators, President and Presidential cabinet need to also feel the pain that the average American citizens are by taking salary reductions - at least $20K cut per salary across the board.


User currently offlineBO__einG From Canada, joined Apr 2000, 2771 posts, RR: 18
Reply 11, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 6190 times:

Wholly agree,

As far as I know, Congress is broken, chaotic and dysfunctional..
You have to do whats important but don't showboat hypocrisy by doing the opposite of what is promised.
Greed consumes all and it is very prevalent on Capitol Hill. Reminds me of those political comic strips of pigs in suits eating tax payer money..

I feel for the airshow community that demo teams and performance teams will be no more. We will have to rely on non-profit organizations and restoration society to take up the slack by bringing in more warbirds and civilian stuff.

The shit has really hit the fan since yesterday's release..



Chance favors the prepared mind.
User currently offlineNASCARAirforce From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 3178 posts, RR: 4
Reply 12, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 6185 times:

Quoting BO__einG (Reply 11):
I feel for the airshow community that demo teams and performance teams will be no more. We will have to rely on non-profit organizations and restoration society to take up the slack by bringing in more warbirds and civilian stuff.

It won't be too long before our government in the name of "trying to protect us" takes warbirds away from us. They are already through rules and restrictions are making it harder for people to own flyable jet warbirds. I would be cool with seeing a formation of P-51s or Fifi the B-29 fly over a Stadium before a sporting event - but since they are privately owned aircraft they will not be able to fly over stadiums during large events like Superbowl, Daytona 500 because of TFRs. The next thing they will say is that these warbirds could be used as a weapon


User currently offlinecjg225 From United States of America, joined Feb 2013, 832 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 6157 times:

Well, not entirely unexpected, but I think it's not the greatest of ideas, as I said in another thread.

We are in such deep trouble... it's actually kind of funny.



Restoring Penn State's transportation heritage...
User currently offlinestealthz From Australia, joined Feb 2005, 5696 posts, RR: 44
Reply 14, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 5960 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting checksixx (Reply 4):
each service has significant cuts

Don't get me wrong, I was not implying the other services were not suffering as well.(but I will bet it is the sharp end of their spears bearing the brunt as well)
The bloated tail is the huge, and increasing, numbers of people in all levels of govt & military( and in most countries.. certainly mine) who do little but produce "paperwork" largely to justify their own positions.. often at the expense of the organisations basic mission.

Quoting NASCARAirforce (Reply 10):
Air Force One is a security measure.

And one that is largely not required, the security and commander in chief mystique that has grown around the President is a self serving cult that feeds on it's own importance rather than any real need.

The president could be kept safe(and in control) without much of the AF1 "industry" that is more about look how important we are rather than any desire of an individual president to utilise resources. This is especially so on international trips where whole cities (even countries) are hugely inconvenienced because a whole bunch of security folks have to feed their empires. In fact history shows US presidents are safer abroard than when at home!
What I am saying, criticising the president because a trip to make a speech or have a vacation utilises huge resources of multiple agencies is misplaced.. direct it at the empire builders that created that myth.



If your camera sends text messages, that could explain why your photos are rubbish!
User currently offlineflyingturtle From Switzerland, joined Oct 2011, 2404 posts, RR: 13
Reply 15, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 5930 times:

Quoting stealthz (Reply 14):
The president could be kept safe(and in control) without much of the AF1 "industry" that is more about look how important we are rather than any desire of an individual president to utilise resources.

I also think so. All that security stuff mostly serves to improve the public perception of the president's cojones - "with all that security, he must have darn dangerous life!" - without actually being in danger the most time. It's like putting tigers and lions and crocodile behind massive iron bars in zoos, while we we now put the animals behind a moat and a vertical wall. The security stuff isn't that visible anymore.

Why do we have a vice president if he can take over while Obama is outside the country? No need for the communication suites.


David



Keeping calm is terrorism against those who want to live in fear.
User currently offlinechecksixx From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 1095 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 5819 times:

Quoting rfields5421 (Reply 9):
The Navy imposed a similar ban as the Air Force in an order announced a week or so ago.

There is no 'ban' that you speak of.

Quoting NASCARAirforce (Reply 12):
I would be cool with seeing a formation of P-51s or Fifi the B-29 fly over a Stadium before a sporting event - but since they are privately owned aircraft they will not be able to fly over stadiums during large events like Superbowl, Daytona 500 because of TFRs.

Wrong..it's entirely possible.


User currently offlineNASCARAirforce From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 3178 posts, RR: 4
Reply 17, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 5677 times:

Quoting checksixx (Reply 16):
Wrong..it's entirely possible.

Roush was able to fly his P-51 over the Michigan 400 after he recovered from his crash at OSH. I am sure certain pilots - such as ex military like Dale Snodgrass would be allowed to fly an F-86 over a race or football game, but it is difficult to give private owners permission when you have airspace closed to private aircraft at such big events.


User currently offlineFlighty From United States of America, joined Apr 2007, 8541 posts, RR: 2
Reply 18, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 5634 times:

The govt strategy is to poke at the 3% of spending people really do like. The national parks, the Thunderbirds, Blue Angels, immigration enforcement. Their mission is to save the other 97% of spending that people don't care about.

Illusionists are being brought in and told to craft an image that the government may be running low on funding -- sputter! cough! It is truly deprived! Instead of being perched on a high funding peak, as is the reality.

[Edited 2013-03-03 16:02:54]

User currently offlineAesma From France, joined Nov 2009, 6656 posts, RR: 11
Reply 19, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 5618 times:

I'm not really trying to defend Obama on this, I'm just thinking what would GOPers have said if the same thing had happened under W. He was putting cycles on the VC-25s like crazy.

Aside from that I think the first thing that should be cut is politicians' salaries, at all levels. I mean, cut entirely, they're all wealthy so they can bear it for some time while figuring out their mess.

As an aside, the French president now has an A330 thanks to "Sarko the American", a great admirer of the Bush family, but he still gets to the airport by car, driving through Paris and then the freeway. For some reason he doesn't take an helicopter, it may have been deemed more dangerous than an inconspicuous car, since helos can't overfly Paris otherwise.



New Technology is the name we give to stuff that doesn't work yet. Douglas Adams
User currently offlineptrjong From Netherlands, joined Mar 2005, 3944 posts, RR: 18
Reply 20, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 5587 times:

Quoting Aesma (Reply 20):
m not really trying to defend Obama on this, I'm just thinking what would GOPers have said if the same thing had happened under W.

I was thinking the same.

One can hardly blame the president for doing some private travel, and the fact is, the man can't take a commercial flight or even hire a plane, even if he wanted to.

A few years ago, there was the VH-71 Kestrel fiasco. In a long thread about that, there was amazement about the unit price of the helicopter, but the American folks participating in that thread generally didn't question the need to buy twenty-eight large and much modified helicopters of a type new to the US armed forces, solely for White House transportation needs...I guess the replies would have been different today.

Peter 



The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)
User currently offlinerfields5421 From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 7607 posts, RR: 31
Reply 21, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 5403 times:

From ALNAV 014/13 issued 022300Z MAR 13

Quote:
2. NAVY PLANS TO:
A. SHUT DOWN CARRIER AIR WING TWO (CVW-2) AT Macedonian Airlines (Greece)">IN APRIL. THIS WILL INITIATE THE
PREPARATIONS TO GRADUALLY STAND-DOWN FLYING AT Macedonian Airlines (Greece)">IN AT LEAST THREE ADDITIONAL AIR
WINGS WITH TWO MORE AIR WINGS BEING REDUCED TO MINIMUM SAFE FLYING LEVELS BY THE
END OF THE YEAR;

........

3. WE WILL ALSO IMMEDIATELY:
.......

C. CANCEL MARCH INTRODUCTORY FLIGHT SCREENING FOR FUTURE PILOTS/NFOS;

D. ANNOUNCE INTENT TO CANCEL BLUE ANGELS SHOWS SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 2013 [FOUR
SHOWS: MACDILL AFB (TAMPA, FL), NAS CORPUS CHRISTI TX, VIDALIA GA, MCAS BEAUFORT
SC];


User currently offlinestealthz From Australia, joined Feb 2005, 5696 posts, RR: 44
Reply 22, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 5399 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting rfields5421 (Reply 21):
D. ANNOUNCE INTENT TO CANCEL BLUE ANGELS SHOWS SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 2013 [FOUR
SHOWS: MACDILL AFB (TAMPA, FL), NAS CORPUS CHRISTI TX, VIDALIA GA, MCAS BEAUFORT
SC];

Does this one month stand down imply these cutbacks by the USN and USAF(and cuts in other agencies and services) will be a short term expediency just until this "sequester" thing drops of the front page?



If your camera sends text messages, that could explain why your photos are rubbish!
User currently offlineFlyingSicilian From Italy, joined Mar 2009, 1332 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 5304 times:

Quoting checksixx (Reply 16):
Wrong..it's entirely possible.

It is possible with a lot of time, effort, coordination, paperwork, planing, and money, then one must presume the powers-that-be approve the paperwork in time, which with sequestration would seem more and more unlikely. I've worked some of this coordiation for airshows before and whole forests are cut down to deal with the mounds of buracracy involved.


It is possibly to win the powerball jackpot too, but highly unlikely. A few will, but most won't. Same with getting warbirds over sporting events.

On a cool note though I did see an Me-262 flying over the NASA area in Houston a few days ago, what's up with that?



“Without seeing Sicily it is impossible to understand Italy.Sicily is the key of everything.”-Goethe "Journey to Italy"
User currently offlineRevelation From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 12559 posts, RR: 25
Reply 24, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 5273 times:

Quoting stealthz (Reply 22):
Does this one month stand down imply these cutbacks by the USN and USAF(and cuts in other agencies and services) will be a short term expediency just until this "sequester" thing drops of the front page?

I'm thinking we'll see the rest of the season cancelled.

There's no movement on raising sequester, which will mean it's here till at least end of fiscal year in Sept.

If there's no movement then, it'll continue year by year up to 10 years.



Inspiration, move me brightly!
User currently offlineNASCARAirforce From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 3178 posts, RR: 4
Reply 25, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 5202 times:

Quoting Aesma (Reply 19):
I'm not really trying to defend Obama on this, I'm just thinking what would GOPers have said if the same thing had happened under W. He was putting cycles on the VC-25s like crazy

Well we know how both sides like to point the finger at each other, but when their guy does it - they seem to ignore it. That being said and that I am against both parties - you are right too about Bush, seems like he was taking a trip to Crawford every other weekend. However, there are a couple factors involved.

There wasn't a stand off during budget times because Bush had Congress and Senate on his side from 2001, until end of 2006.

Next - however the 2 wars were a major contributor to the national debt, we were only half as deep in the hole back then and our dollar was worth more. Unfortunately for Obama, he managed to do in one term what Bush took 2 terms to do - add $6 trillion to the debt.

Quoting Aesma (Reply 19):
Aside from that I think the first thing that should be cut is politicians' salaries, at all levels. I mean, cut entirely, they're all wealthy so they can bear it for some time while figuring out their mess.

Great idea - but who is going to enforce that? I also thought that the president and VP should take $40K cut, while congress and senate take $20K cut as well as cabinet officials taking a certain percentage cut too. However they are the ones wearing the pants and do you think they are going to vote for a cut? This is getting on the non av territory but the same thing happens when a major company like an airline goes into bankruptcy - they expect the workers to take a 25% cut but you never see the CEOs (who mostly likely made the bad decisions to get them there in the first place) take the cut. Just like with the US government - bad presidential decisions of the past like Solyndra, 2 wars etc got us into this mess that us citizens had no choice in but we suffer while they don't feel any of the pain of their decisions. Life isn't fair.

Quoting stealthz (Reply 22):

Does this one month stand down imply these cutbacks by the USN and USAF(and cuts in other agencies and services) will be a short term expediency just until this "sequester" thing drops of the front page?

Some of the cuts like ATC and other things could be last minute rescued or minimalized by April 1 before they really go into effect. However, most of these cuts will last the fiscal year, which ends in September.

Quoting FlyingSicilian (Reply 23):
On a cool note though I did see an Me-262 flying over the NASA area in Houston a few days ago, what's up with that?

Collings foundation I believe owns a Me-262 replica. I know it is supposed to be at the Thunder Over Michigan airshow this year - at least we can see one jet flying.


User currently offlinerfields5421 From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 7607 posts, RR: 31
Reply 26, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 5165 times:

Quoting stealthz (Reply 22):
Does this one month stand down imply these cutbacks by the USN and USAF(and cuts in other agencies and services) will be a short term expediency just until this "sequester" thing drops of the front page?

My guess - and this is just a wild guess -

1) If this continues, the sequestration cuts will be very public and implemented to cause the most 'anger' possible by the public. Cancelling the airshows for the season might meet that goal.

2) Every agency is going to make their cuts as public as possible, hoping their agency will get an exemption.

3) The President and the Congress will come to some sort of agreement before the summer, and things will be restored to normal as quickly as possible.

The FAA cuts which slow down air travel will be the ones which really upset the public.


User currently offlinechecksixx From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 1095 posts, RR: 0
Reply 27, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 5212 times:

Quoting FlyingSicilian (Reply 23):
Quoting checksixx (Reply 16):
Wrong..it's entirely possible.

It is possible with a lot of time, effort, coordination, paperwork, planing, and money, then one must presume the powers-that-be approve the paperwork in time, which with sequestration would seem more and more unlikely. I've worked some of this coordiation for airshows before and whole forests are cut down to deal with the mounds of buracracy involved.


It is possibly to win the powerball jackpot too, but highly unlikely. A few will, but most won't. Same with getting warbirds over sporting events.

On a cool note though I did see an Me-262 flying over the NASA area in Houston a few days ago, what's up with that?

I laughed when I read this...would you care to tell us why in the world a privately owned aircraft would be affected by sequestration??!?? We all await anxiously!

Quoting rfields5421 (Reply 26):
The President and the Congress will come to some sort of agreement before the summer, and things will be restored to normal as quickly as possible.

The President and most of Congress either pushed for it in the first place and/or just let it happen. I don't see a fix anytime soon when they could have fixed it prior. The bottom line is most of the Congress needs to go...these representatives (I say that loosely) are not in it for the people anymore.


User currently offlineFlyingSicilian From Italy, joined Mar 2009, 1332 posts, RR: 0
Reply 28, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 5199 times:

Quoting checksixx (Reply 27):
I laughed when I read this...would you care to tell us why in the world a privately owned aircraft would be affected by sequestration??!?? We all await anxiously!

Sure, I'll type slowly for you since you missed it even though it was in the original post.

Said flyovers still require coordination and approval with various federal agencies depending on the venue/event.
Those agencies are cutting the staff that process such paperwork. Having done such paperwork, both for the USAF and civilian groups, it is not something that just happens overnight...
it really is not that complicated.

As for the DoD security aparatus that exists for major events, like the AEW coverage, tanker support, and CAPs for events like the superbowl, only time will tell if such budgets get cut.



“Without seeing Sicily it is impossible to understand Italy.Sicily is the key of everything.”-Goethe "Journey to Italy"
User currently offlineStudeDave From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 486 posts, RR: 0
Reply 29, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 5177 times:

Quoting NASCARAirforce (Reply 12):
would be cool with seeing a formation of P-51s or Fifi the B-29 fly over a Stadium before a sporting event

Missed the race at PIR Sunday, did ya? The CAF's B-17 did the flyover.



StudeDave



Classic planes, Classic trains, and Studebakers~~ what else is there???
User currently offlinechecksixx From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 1095 posts, RR: 0
Reply 30, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 5112 times:

Quoting FlyingSicilian (Reply 28):
Sure, I'll type slowly for you since you missed it even though it was in the original post.

Said flyovers still require coordination and approval with various federal agencies depending on the venue/event.
Those agencies are cutting the staff that process such paperwork. Having done such paperwork, both for the USAF and civilian groups, it is not something that just happens overnight...
it really is not that complicated.

LoL...what does typing slow have to do with it!!?? Your last sentence here is the important part for you...it really is not that complicated. Bottom line is that with the proper coordination it can happen no problem. Who on earth said all the stops have to be pulled out by the federal government to coordinate with a private venue holder for a flyover??? Naaa...get the FAA approval well in advance and there is no major issue here. Sorry.


User currently offlinebikerthai From United States of America, joined Apr 2010, 2131 posts, RR: 4
Reply 31, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 5024 times:

Quoting checksixx (Reply 30):
FAA approval well in advance and there is no major issue here

LOL, I though the FAA is part of the Federal Government. Let see, for Sea Fair (in Seattle) to have a fly over in August, how far in advance would a new flying team need to apply for permission to perform? Would six months be sufficient? Don't know enough to say. Specially because the FAA is busy working the 787 issue to get it resolved before summer.

NO OVERTIME FOR YOU!!!!!   

bt



Intelligent seeks knowledge. Enlightened seeks wisdom.
User currently onlineTK787 From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 4435 posts, RR: 12
Reply 32, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 5008 times:

I wonder if some other parties would jump in, like private investors; to send in flying teams to fill the gap. Maybe fly bys sponsored by Canada, UAE, Emirates or Chavez? Maybe even lend some private jets to government use?? Maybe take over the Blue Angels and call them JPMorgan and Chase Angels   ?
This is what less government should look like, right?


User currently offlineflyingturtle From Switzerland, joined Oct 2011, 2404 posts, RR: 13
Reply 33, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 4938 times:

Quoting TK787 (Reply 32):
and call them JPMorgan and Chase Angels

Here, the Breitling team (sponsored by the same-called watchmaker) offered to loan aircraft and its pilots to substitute for the military Patrouille Suisse...


Some info here: Patrouille Suisse: The End? (by flyingturtle Feb 13 2013 in Military Aviation & Space Flight)


David



Keeping calm is terrorism against those who want to live in fear.
User currently offlineFlyingSicilian From Italy, joined Mar 2009, 1332 posts, RR: 0
Reply 34, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 4931 times:

Quoting checksixx (Reply 30):
LoL...what does typing slow have to do with it!!?? Your last sentence here is the important part for you...it really is not that complicated. Bottom line is that with the proper coordination it can happen no problem. Who on earth said all the stops have to be pulled out by the federal government to coordinate with a private venue holder for a flyover??? Naaa...get the FAA approval well in advance and there is no major issue here. Sorry.



So now you ignore most of a post, and latch on to something you deem relevant for your ill-informed point. Got it.

And who said it was just FAA approval? As noted above TFRs can and are in place for said events and TFR coordination can involve the FAA and DoT, DoD, often DHS, and local authorities. It is not something done on a post it note.

I appreciate you have no experience nor expertise in said matters, and you are just posting to try and pontificate as if you do, but in reality something that is already complicated, gets much more-so by a cut in staff.

Airshows will still happen, no one said otherwise. Flyovers at major public events will be curtailed, even by civilian aircraft. I spoke with someone planning a large airshow next October and they bumping up everything by months to try and prepare. Those with shows/events in early summer could be hosed sadly.

I am more curious to see what happens to the normal security aparatus for large national venues re:DoD. One would hope sanity will prevail.



“Without seeing Sicily it is impossible to understand Italy.Sicily is the key of everything.”-Goethe "Journey to Italy"
User currently offlineAesma From France, joined Nov 2009, 6656 posts, RR: 11
Reply 35, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 4925 times:

I just realized the Breitling team is the former patrouille Adecco (these red Pilatus PC-7 made an impression on me as a kid, they were in numerous TV ads), technically still French.


New Technology is the name we give to stuff that doesn't work yet. Douglas Adams
User currently offlinebikerthai From United States of America, joined Apr 2010, 2131 posts, RR: 4
Reply 36, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 4840 times:

Quoting TK787 (Reply 32):
JPMorgan and Chase Angels ?

Right idea, wrong banker . . .

Try Charles Schwab Angels   

bt



Intelligent seeks knowledge. Enlightened seeks wisdom.
User currently offlinechecksixx From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 1095 posts, RR: 0
Reply 37, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 4668 times:

Quoting bikerthai (Reply 31):
how far in advance would a new flying team need to apply for permission to perform? Would six months be sufficient?

How should I know??...that's why I said well in advance.

Quoting FlyingSicilian (Reply 34):
So now you ignore most of a post, and latch on to something you deem relevant for your ill-informed point. Got it.

Didn't ignore anything important....just the irrelevant parts.

Quoting FlyingSicilian (Reply 34):
I appreciate you have no experience nor expertise in said matters, and you are just posting to try and pontificate as if you do, but in reality something that is already complicated, gets much more-so by a cut in staff.

Never claimed to know it all...just that its not ANYWHERE near as complicated as you make it sound. So the system is slowed down...that's why I said "well in advance". Try reading the post. Did you get extra points with your big word in there? LoL


User currently offlineFlyingSicilian From Italy, joined Mar 2009, 1332 posts, RR: 0
Reply 38, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 3 days ago) and read 4655 times:

Quoting checksixx (Reply 37):
Didn't ignore anything important....just the irrelevant parts.

No you actually did, but if you keep saying it enough I guess you might think it is true. Keep ignoring, we all notice.
Everything was relevant, you just don't have a cogent reply.

Quoting checksixx (Reply 37):
Never claimed to know it all...just that its not ANYWHERE near as complicated as you make it sound. So the system is slowed down...that's why I said "well in advance". Try reading the post. Did you get extra points with your big word in there? LoL

Extra points, big words? What are you 13? Give us a break. I suggest you take your own advice and try reading the posts.

It actually is as complicated as I make it out. I know, I've done it before, and still deal with those who do, including right now in real time. You claim to know something about it (re:your ANYWHERE quote), so share with us what it is you do know about said coordination and how far in "advance" you think things need to happen, and with what agencies it must happen.
It is an easy question; share with us.

BTW The "system" is more than slowed down when entire activities are being cancelled through the fiscal year.



“Without seeing Sicily it is impossible to understand Italy.Sicily is the key of everything.”-Goethe "Journey to Italy"
User currently offlinechecksixx From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 1095 posts, RR: 0
Reply 39, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 4640 times:

Quoting FlyingSicilian (Reply 28):
it really is not that complicated.
Quoting FlyingSicilian (Reply 38):
It actually is as complicated as I make it out.

LoL...which is it?

Quoting FlyingSicilian (Reply 38):
Everything was relevant, you just don't have a cogent reply.

I love it!!! Why use convincing when you can use cogent...you are truly a necromancer with words! (lol...Thesaurus are great to have).

Quoting FlyingSicilian (Reply 38):
including right now in real time.

LoL...vs you taking your time traveling DeLorean back to 1985 to deal with them! Come on man...you trying to prove it to me now?? Never questioned your experience there slick.

Quoting FlyingSicilian (Reply 38):
You claim to know something about it

Nope, never have slick...

Quoting FlyingSicilian (Reply 38):
and how far in "advance" you think things need to happen

Already answered...again...you should read the posts first.

Quoting FlyingSicilian (Reply 38):
BTW The "system" is more than slowed down when entire activities are being cancelled through the fiscal year.

So the activities that would normally consume a lot of their time are being cancelled, yet still somehow slowing these agencies down?? Doesn't make any sense. I would think that loss of personnel would slow down their office instead. Just my opinion, but it seems to make a lot more sense.


User currently offlinetrex8 From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 4768 posts, RR: 14
Reply 40, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 4560 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Blue Angels demos are cancelled for April. No word on what happens after that. My son is at Annapolis, they got notice from sec navy office. The graduating class missed out on the Blue Angel flypast/show a year ago due to scheduling issues, hope this year doesn't.

OT but apparently almost 20%+ of the aviators in the class of 2010 have been Riffed already, this was going on over a year ago, passing scores for continuing in the training pipeline were increased to over 90% or they could leave with no further obligation. Anyone with a foreign language was kept ( possible lateral transfer to Surface warfare - intelligence?).


User currently offlineSA7700 From South Africa, joined Dec 2003, 3431 posts, RR: 25
Reply 41, posted (1 year 6 months 2 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 4315 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR

This thread will now be locked as some members continue to steer it into an off-topic debate, making personal attacks towards other members. Any posts added after the thread lock will be removed for housekeeping purposes only.

Thank you for your co-operation in this matter.


Regards,

SA7700



When you are doing stuff that nobody has done before, there is no manual – Kevin McCloud (Grand Designs)
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Usaf Cancels C-5 Re-Engine, More C-17s Coming? posted Fri Feb 15 2008 12:31:24 by USAF336TFS
All Shuttle Flights To Be Grounded Again posted Thu Jul 28 2005 02:15:28 by ConcordeBoy
Awesome USAF Thunderbirds Video - Question posted Wed Apr 26 2006 05:42:21 by AM
Usaf Thunderbirds In CLE? posted Mon Sep 5 2005 17:51:27 by MasseyBrown
Usaf Longhaul Flights Crew Catering? posted Mon Mar 10 2003 07:48:55 by Astrojet
Question About Usaf Thunderbirds posted Thu Sep 12 2002 10:42:12 by Wing
Smoking On Military Flights posted Wed Feb 27 2013 19:53:31 by lax777lr
Usaf F16 Down In The Adriatic posted Mon Jan 28 2013 13:46:28 by chuchoteur
F35B Flights Suspended posted Fri Jan 18 2013 13:17:23 by chuchoteur
A-7 Usaf Vs. Navy Load Outs posted Sun Dec 16 2012 19:04:37 by L-188