Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Japan's Military Chief Says F-35 Is "best Fighter"  
User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 26150 posts, RR: 50
Posted (1 year 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 5608 times:

Shigeru Iwasaki, chief of the Japanese Self-Defence Forces said on Wednesday that Lockheed Martin's F-35 fighters were the best choice for the nation's future operational needs as Tokyo wrestles with tensions with China and increasingly belligerent North Korea.

Iwasaki, a veteran fighter pilot who used to fly F-15s, "believe the F-35 is the best fighter, when we think about Japan's future national security."

Japan, one of the closest U.S. allies in Asia, has remained steadfast in its plans to buy 42 F-35s, with the first four planes scheduled for delivery by March 2017.

Story:
http://ca.news.yahoo.com/japans-mili...s-f-35-best-fighter-125455472.html

=


From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinePowerslide From Canada, joined Oct 2010, 571 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (1 year 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 5599 times:

Of course he would say that, he needs to say positive things to keep advancing in his military career, because if you aren't a "team player" in the military, you don't go far. He is obviously paid by Lockheed.

 


User currently offlineconnies4ever From Canada, joined Feb 2006, 4066 posts, RR: 13
Reply 2, posted (1 year 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 5542 times:

Quoting Powerslide (Reply 1):
Of course he would say that, he needs to say positive things to keep advancing in his military career, because if you aren't a "team player" in the military, you don't go far. He is obviously paid by Lockheed.

Thanks ! Imitation is, after all, the sincerest form of flattery. 



Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
User currently offlinewingman From Seychelles, joined May 1999, 2341 posts, RR: 5
Reply 3, posted (1 year 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 5469 times:

I should start a thread where two Americans argue all day long about the Canucks and the Senators.

User currently offlineAcheron From Spain, joined Sep 2005, 1723 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (1 year 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 5441 times:

Quoting Powerslide (Reply 1):
He is obviously paid by Lockheed.

Because Lockheed bribing politicians is totally unheard of.  


User currently offlineMax Q From United States of America, joined May 2001, 4781 posts, RR: 19
Reply 5, posted (1 year 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 5389 times:

Sounds like he ate some bad sushi..


The best contribution to safety is a competent Pilot.
User currently offlineThePointblank From Canada, joined Jan 2009, 1858 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (1 year 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 5369 times:

I will note that Japan is a potential contender for the F-35B as well; the Japanese have in recent years built a number of STOVL capable ships, such as the 22DDH, and the Hyūga-class helicopter 'destroyer'. Somehow, I don't think the Japanese fully intended to build a flat tops the size of an Iwo Jima class amphib, and intend on operating only 11 helicopters on it.

Ditto the Koreans; the STOVL capabilities for the Koreans would enhance their land-based basing options in case of a hot war with the North, and the Koreans have a pair of flatop amphibs and are building two more as well that are capable of handling a STOVL fighter...


User currently offlinekanban From United States of America, joined Jan 2008, 3864 posts, RR: 27
Reply 7, posted (1 year 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 5362 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Talk is cheap.. let's see them sign a contract and transfer some cash before counting the chickens. (same with Singapore.)

User currently offlineThePointblank From Canada, joined Jan 2009, 1858 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (1 year 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 5348 times:

Quoting kanban (Reply 7):
Talk is cheap.. let's see them sign a contract and transfer some cash before counting the chickens. (same with Singapore.)

Ahem:

http://www.defense.gov//contracts/contract.aspx?contractid=5004

Quote:
Lockheed Martin Corp., Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Co., Fort Worth, Texas, is being awarded a $40,200,000 fixed-price-incentive (firm-target), advance-acquisition contract to provide long lead-time parts, materials and components required for the delivery of four Low Rate Initial Production Lot VIII F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter Conventional Takeoff and Landing aircraft for the government of Japan. Work will be performed in Fort Worth, Texas, and is expected to be completed in February 2014. Foreign Military Sales contract funds in the amount of $40,200,000 are being obligated on this award, none of which will expire at the end of the current fiscal year. This contract was not competitively procured pursuant to the FAR 6.302-4. The Naval Air Systems Command, Patuxent River, Md., is the contracting authority (N00019-13-C-0014).


User currently offlinekanban From United States of America, joined Jan 2008, 3864 posts, RR: 27
Reply 9, posted (1 year 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 5281 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

That is not a contract with the Japanese Government, that's a long lead procurement that can be reallocated if the Japanese contract isn't forthcoming.. You have a contract with the US government to buy components..that is all.

User currently offlineThePointblank From Canada, joined Jan 2009, 1858 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (1 year 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 5272 times:

Quoting kanban (Reply 9):
That is not a contract with the Japanese Government, that's a long lead procurement that can be reallocated if the Japanese contract isn't forthcoming.. You have a contract with the US government to buy components..that is all.

Incorrect.

There are essentially two ways a foreign military can buy American military hardware; the Foreign Military Sales program, or direct commercial sales.

Direct commercial sales is exactly what it is and is the method that you are thinking of. It means that the foreign government has a direct contract with the vendor to supply the weapons system and support. The vendor is therefore to provide the foreign government the weapons system, support, tooling, and manuals to operate the weapons system. The foreign government then has to develop the training programs and infrastructure upgrades themselves. The US government does not have any direct relationship between the foreign government, and the vendor beyond Congress approval and the export license.

Foreign Military Sales is a whole different animal. The foreign government in this scenario buys the military hardware directly through the US government. The US government, through Defense Security Cooperation Agency serves as an intermediary, usually handling procurement, logistics and delivery and often providing product support, training, and infrastructure construction (such as hangars, runways, utilities, etc.). The US government then gets a cut from the sale, otherwise known as FMS fees.

The Japanese F-35 purchase is through the Foreign Military Sales program. The Japanese government does not have direct commercial contact with Lockheed Martin. Also, FMS sales and contracts are announced separately from DOD sales and contracts.

Also, if you are wondering, the Israeli purchase of F-35's is also through the Foreign Military Sales program as well. Therefore, you will never see a contract between Lockheed Martin and Israel regarding Israel's purchase of F-35's.

This document explains the Foreign Military Sales program in more detail than what I have gone into here:
http://www.dsca.mil/PressReleases/fmsadvantagev2.pdf

But back on topic, the contract I listed above is the initial contract for the Japanese F-35's.


User currently offlinemham001 From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 3726 posts, RR: 3
Reply 11, posted (1 year 8 months 4 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 5141 times:

Quoting Powerslide (Reply 1):
He is obviously paid by Lockheed.

Accusing the man of taking bribes is a heavy accusation. What are your sources for that? And, exactly which fighter do you know to be better?


User currently offlinewingman From Seychelles, joined May 1999, 2341 posts, RR: 5
Reply 12, posted (1 year 8 months 4 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 5114 times:

In case you haven't been following the epic exchanges between our Canadian brothers, I believe the bribery "accusation" is just some tongue in cheek horseplay between the two.

User currently offlinekanban From United States of America, joined Jan 2008, 3864 posts, RR: 27
Reply 13, posted (1 year 8 months 4 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 5088 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting ThePointblank (Reply 10):
The Japanese government does not have direct commercial contact with Lockheed Martin.

Young man, I have been involved in FMS procurement many times.. I have also been involved in long lead forecasting and procurement ,and there is still a contract between the US government and the receiving government. That has not happened. That contract is required to transfer ownership even under FMS.

What you posted as a contract isn't anything more than an advance material procurement authority. However believe what you want..


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Japan's Military Chief Says F-35 Is "best Fighter"
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Who Is The Best Fighter Pilot Ever? posted Fri Aug 17 2001 22:00:35 by Fireblade
Which Boeing Model Is Best For New Air Force 1? posted Mon Mar 23 2009 18:13:34 by Nitepilot79
Lockheed Says F-35 Could Fly Pilotless posted Wed Aug 16 2006 14:44:55 by RAPCON
What Is The F-35? Is It The JSF? posted Thu Apr 15 2004 18:14:33 by AndrewUber
Polikarpov I-16: Best Fighter Of The 30's? posted Sat Jan 24 2004 06:10:13 by RayChuang
What Is A "fighter"? posted Fri Dec 27 2002 02:49:59 by Cadet985
F-35 (X-35) Joint Strike Fighter posted Thu Apr 25 2002 00:17:03 by USAFJR
Best Fighter Pilot Competition posted Fri Mar 8 2002 10:05:27 by VonRichtofen
Worlds Best Fighter Aircraft posted Tue Feb 19 2002 11:08:55 by Tommy the cat
U.S. Military Grounds F-35 Fighter Jets posted Fri Feb 22 2013 12:31:59 by PlayLoud

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format