Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Anti-Drone Laser On USS Ponce  
User currently offlinerwessel From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 2353 posts, RR: 2
Posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 4542 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

USS Ponce is deploying to the Arabian Gulf next year, carrying a 100KW Laser Weapon System (LaWS) for anti-drone and anti-small boat use. This would mark the first operational deployment of this sort of directed energy weapon.

The link contains a video. Anyone know what drone is being targeted in the test is?

http://www.newscientist.com/article/...ser-gun-to-sail-on-us-warship.html

19 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29800 posts, RR: 58
Reply 1, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 4393 times:

I want to know how this thing isn't effectively countered by a mirror


OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineBladeLWS From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 403 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 4377 times:

Depends on how good the mirror is, if an aircraft or weapon were to be fitted with mirrors to defeat a laser is would need to be 100% perfect. Meaning no gaps, scratches, or openings for the laser to penetrate.

In other words mirrors don't work for this kind of thing.  


User currently offlinetugger From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 5611 posts, RR: 8
Reply 3, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 4371 times:

Quoting L-188 (Reply 1):
I want to know how this thing isn't effectively countered by a mirror
Quoting BladeLWS (Reply 2):
In other words mirrors don't work for this kind of thing.

However inclement weather is another thing.

This a step forward in the technology, this is not yet a "weapons system" but it is getting closer to a time when it can and possibly will be. And if it is developed and effective then it could very much be a counter the "mass missile" threat to the modern navy. Still though, there is a loooong way to go.

Tugg



I don’t know that I am unafraid to be myself, but it is hard to be somebody else. -W. Shatner
User currently offlinerwessel From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 2353 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 4356 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting L-188 (Reply 1):
I want to know how this thing isn't effectively countered by a mirror

Mirrors are far from 100% effective, and even a mirror reflecting 90%* of the beam will still be absorbing the other 10KW, and only a tiny bit of dirt on the best optics will absorb enough energy at these power levels to trash the surface almost instantly. Besides, LaWS is IR, and good IR mirrors are hard to begin with. And you can't mirror everything.

But yes, you could help the target survive with appropriate surface treatments, but I can't image you'd buy yourself even a single order of magnitude.


*Yes, you can get mirrors more efficient than that, well over 99% for relatively wideband visible light reflectivity, but nothing you could really do as a surface coating on an aircraft, and again, that's not IR.


User currently offlineoly720man From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 6741 posts, RR: 11
Reply 5, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 4067 times:

Quoting rwessel (Thread starter):
Anyone know what drone is being targeted in the test is?

Looks like a BQM-147a Dragon/Exdrone

http://www.unmanned.co.uk/autonomous...cle-uav-specifications-data-sheet/



wheat and dairy can screw up your brain
User currently offlinewingman From Seychelles, joined May 1999, 2267 posts, RR: 5
Reply 6, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 3999 times:

I don't get it, there's no green beam and no peeuw peeuw sound. We waste all this money on weapons and the stuff never works right. I want to see green laser light and shit exploding on contact with surround sound.

User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12150 posts, RR: 51
Reply 7, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 3997 times:

The system is mounted on the USS Dewey, DDG-105, not the USS Ponce, AFSB(I)-15 as the story implies. USS Ponce will get this system installed in Oct. 2013 before she deploys to the ME in 2014. USS Dewey has been refitted as the test ship for the LaWS system and has given up her helio pad and hanger to mount the system.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Pon...aging_Base.2C_Interim_.28AFSB-I.29

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Dewey_(DDG-105)

The problem I see with the LaWS as currently configured is the amount of deck space the system takes away from other needed functions, like heilo ops, as well as the amount of electrical power this system needs to function at max capacity.


User currently offlinebikerthai From United States of America, joined Apr 2010, 2131 posts, RR: 4
Reply 8, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 3941 times:

Quoting L-188 (Reply 1):

I want to know how this thing isn't effectively countered by a mirror

Like the other said. You can reduce the efectiveness of the laser with mirrors. But you also add a ton of weight onto your airframe.

An easier solution is to polish aluminum to a reflective quality. Unfortunately keeping it polished would be a maintenance problem as the aluminum will oxidize and loose it's luster.

A polish gold plated surface coating may help   

bt



Intelligent seeks knowledge. Enlightened seeks wisdom.
User currently offlineThePointblank From Canada, joined Jan 2009, 1721 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 3923 times:

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 7):
The problem I see with the LaWS as currently configured is the amount of deck space the system takes away from other needed functions, like heilo ops, as well as the amount of electrical power this system needs to function at max capacity.

Once we actually design ships to mount LaWS as standard instead of an afterthought, we can get around the deck space requirement. For electrical power, USN ships that have nuclear propulsion or Integrated Electrical Propulsion will have the necessary power reserves to power such a weapon; for example, the Ford class carriers and the Zumwalt class destroyers.

Quoting rwessel (Thread starter):
Anyone know what drone is being targeted in the test is?

According to what I've been told, the BQM-147A Dragon.


User currently offlinemorrisond From Canada, joined Jan 2010, 243 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 3920 times:

Quoting ThePointblank (Reply 9):
A polish gold plated surface coating may help

The Air force would never go for that - It would reduce the average cost per pound of the Modern Combat Jet.....


User currently offlinebikerthai From United States of America, joined Apr 2010, 2131 posts, RR: 4
Reply 11, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 3725 times:

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 7):
as well as the amount of electrical power this system needs to function at max capacity.

Remindes me of all those Star Trek shows where they divert energy from life support   

Don't know how much energy the system uses, but I can see the ship going to half speed while the generator charge up for the laser.


bt



Intelligent seeks knowledge. Enlightened seeks wisdom.
User currently offlinerwessel From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 2353 posts, RR: 2
Reply 12, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 3640 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting ThePointblank (Reply 9):
For electrical power, USN ships that have nuclear propulsion or Integrated Electrical Propulsion will have the necessary power reserves to power such a weapon; for example, the Ford class carriers and the Zumwalt class destroyers

Nuclear power isn't much of an issue one way or the other. The nuclear carriers don't have significantly different amounts of total horsepower installed than their non-nuc predecessors did. What matter is how much generating capacity is hung on the back end of that (or on the back-end of whatever propulsion system the ship is using).

Quoting bikerthai (Reply 11):
Don't know how much energy the system uses, but I can see the ship going to half speed while the generator charge up for the laser.

It's a 100KW laser. Even assuming 10% total efficiency (unlikely to be that low in this scale of application), that only needs 1MW input, and assuming a 90% efficient generator (again, low for that size), you'd need about 1500hp off the engines while the laser was firing (assuming you were powering it directly, and not off a capacitor bank that would be charged more slowly - given the modest size, I don't see the percentage in the latter, but...). For reference, an Austin-class LPD has about 24000shp installed, although given that this is still a test bed, who knows what's been done to the Ponce herself (I could easily see a dedicated generator for the application, just to keep things nicely self-contained).


User currently offlinekanban From United States of America, joined Jan 2008, 3564 posts, RR: 27
Reply 13, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 3635 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting bikerthai (Reply 8):
A polish gold plated surface coating may help  

how about simple chrome plating..granted EPA would make us go to China for the processing


User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29800 posts, RR: 58
Reply 14, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 3620 times:

Quoting bikerthai (Reply 8):
But you also add a ton of weight onto your airframe.
Quoting kanban (Reply 13):
how about simple chrome plating..granted EPA would make us go to China for the processing

I think you might be overthinking this a bit.

Frankly I think you just need to make sure Biff Tanner puts both coast of Turtle Wax on your Mustang.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Dan Vincent - New England Airports

Quoting bikerthai (Reply 8):
An easier solution is to polish aluminum to a reflective quality. Unfortunately keeping it polished would be a maintenance problem as the aluminum will oxidize and loose it's luster

We are thinking the same there. The point of these lasers at this point is to put enough energy into a target that A:The structure heats to failure, B: Enough energy ends up heating something in the target up to it's auto-ignition temp.

That takes energy and time, Polishing will reflect the energy and manuvering will make it harder for the laser to maintain a single point on the target.

Quoting rwessel (Reply 4):
Mirrors are far from 100% effective, and even a mirror reflecting 90%* of the beam will still be absorbing the other 10KW, and only a tiny bit of dirt on the best optics will absorb enough energy at these power levels to trash the surface almost instantly. Besides, LaWS is IR, and good IR mirrors are hard to begin with. And you can't mirror everything.

The mirror doesn't need to be 100% effective, it just needs to reflect enough energy that the laser can't practically put enough energy on the target when it is in range.

Quoting wingman (Reply 6):
We waste all this money on weapons and the stuff never works right. I want to see green laser light and shit exploding on contact with surround sound.

Agreed, where is the KABOOM! THERE SHOULD BE AN EARTH SHATTERING KABOOM!

Signed: Marvin the Martian



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlinetravelavnut From Netherlands, joined May 2010, 1614 posts, RR: 7
Reply 15, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 22 hours ago) and read 3565 times:

Quoting wingman (Reply 6):
I don't get it, there's no green beam and no peeuw peeuw sound. We waste all this money on weapons and the stuff never works right. I want to see green laser light and shit exploding on contact with surround sound.
Quoting morrisond (Reply 10):
The Air force would never go for that - It would reduce the average cost per pound of the Modern Combat Jet.....

         Thanks guys!!!

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 7):
The problem I see with the LaWS as currently configured is the amount of deck space the system takes away from other needed functions, like heilo ops, as well as the amount of electrical power this system needs to function at max capacity.

Besides not needing any ammo, what are the benefits of such a weapon?



Live From Amsterdam!
User currently offlinenomadd22 From United States of America, joined Feb 2008, 1867 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 21 hours ago) and read 3554 times:

Good luck making a reflective layer that doesn't turn the aircraft into the best radar reflector in the world. Even better if the system uses a low power laser for aiming and ranging.


Andy Goetsch
User currently offlinekanban From United States of America, joined Jan 2008, 3564 posts, RR: 27
Reply 17, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 17 hours ago) and read 3504 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting travelavnut (Reply 15):
Besides not needing any ammo, what are the benefits of such a weapon?

keeping the Admiral's coffee warm from a mile away?


User currently offlinebikerthai From United States of America, joined Apr 2010, 2131 posts, RR: 4
Reply 18, posted (1 year 5 months 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 3342 times:

Quoting nomadd22 (Reply 16):
Good luck making a reflective layer that doesn't turn the aircraft into the best radar reflector in the world.

And there's the rub . . . those are the questions that keep us Engineers well employed.

But one major point in stealth is to reflect the radar in the different direction than where the radar is comming from. This same principle would apply to the laser reflective material.

The one benefit of aluminum (and gold) is that the material is a good heat conductor as well as a good heat sink. Quickly getting the heat away from the laser site would buy you some additional time.

 
Quoting kanban (Reply 17):
keeping the Admiral's coffee warm from a mile away?

With a phase array radar, you can do the same, and keep the Admiral warm at the same time.

bt

[Edited 2013-04-19 07:06:22]

[Edited 2013-04-19 07:07:02]


Intelligent seeks knowledge. Enlightened seeks wisdom.
User currently offlinebikerthai From United States of America, joined Apr 2010, 2131 posts, RR: 4
Reply 19, posted (1 year 5 months 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 3334 times:

Quoting L-188 (Reply 14):

Agreed, where is the KABOOM! THERE SHOULD BE AN EARTH SHATTERING KABOOM!

Nah,

I remember Babalon 5. Just seeing a ship sliced in two is satisfying enough. I don't need to hear or see the KABOOM.

bt



Intelligent seeks knowledge. Enlightened seeks wisdom.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Anti-Drone Laser On USS Ponce
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
French Navy Rafales To Deploy On USS Roosevelt posted Sat Dec 15 2007 15:32:46 by RC135U
Anti-missile Defences On RAF BAe 146s posted Fri Dec 31 2004 16:16:39 by Kukkudrill
Rafale M On Board USS Enterprise posted Tue Jul 24 2007 18:20:13 by LMP737
Report: Singapore In Final Stages On F-35 posted Thu Mar 14 2013 05:46:09 by ThePointblank
New GAO Report On F-35: Outlook Improving posted Wed Mar 13 2013 12:20:06 by ThePointblank
Smoking On Military Flights posted Wed Feb 27 2013 19:53:31 by lax777lr
SpaceX CRS-2 Launches On February 28th posted Tue Feb 26 2013 15:49:24 by zanl188
German Air Force A343 Visible On FR24? posted Fri Feb 15 2013 11:05:00 by PHX787
Panetta Announces New Medal For Drone Pilots posted Wed Feb 13 2013 16:12:55 by dragon-wings
Some Drone Pilots Can Earn $200k/yr posted Sat Feb 2 2013 12:08:20 by planemaker

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format