Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Rare Pictures Of A-12 Being Transported  
User currently offlineGeezer From United States of America, joined Aug 2010, 1479 posts, RR: 2
Posted (1 year 3 months 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 6893 times:

Anyone who is interested in the A-12 or the SR-71 should find this web site very interesting. Back in the late 1950s when Lockheed Aircraft was building the first A-12 aircraft at the famous "Skunk Works", they were faced with the huge problem of transporting a bunch of the first ones built, from the plant at Burbank, Ca. to the test center at Area 51 in Nevada.

This website explains the whole thing.........how they hauled them on specially built trailers which had a removable aluminum tubular framework placed over the airplanes, with heavy rubberized covers over the framework so no one could see what they were hauling. What hardly anyone realized at the time they were doing this, someone at Lockheed had arranged to have photographs taken all along the route; amazingly, these photographs were stored away and all but forgotten about until fairly recently.

They had the California Highway Patrol escorting them, they even had to widen a few road-cuts out with earth moving equipment, cut a few trees down, remove a few road signs, and numerous other problems which were encountered along the way.

Apparently, a bunch of "old guys" got together and formed the "Road Runners International", which is made up of retired Lockheed employees, at least one A-12 pilot, a former C.I.A. security guy. With the special "box" in place over the planes, the load was either 30 or 35 feet wide, and long enough that they had two guys with steering wheels who could steer the rear trailer wheels. At one point when they had to pull off to the side so everyone could eat, they got the back end of the trailer buried 2 feet deep in sand !


http://www.roadrunnersinternationale.com/transporting_the_a-12.html

Charley


Stupidity: Doing the same thing over and over and over again and expecting a different result; Albert Einstein
21 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSOBHI51 From Saudi Arabia, joined Jun 2003, 3416 posts, RR: 17
Reply 1, posted (1 year 3 months 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 6862 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Geezer (Thread starter):
http://www.roadrunnersinternationale.com/transporting_the_a-12.html

Great pictures.
Thanks



I am against any terrorist acts committed under the name of Islam
User currently offlineAeroWesty From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 20387 posts, RR: 62
Reply 2, posted (1 year 3 months 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 6808 times:

Amazing that they took these over the Grapevine. That would have been fairly harrowing driving down the northside with that load before it was interstate the whole way.


International Homo of Mystery
User currently offlineAesma From France, joined Nov 2009, 6528 posts, RR: 9
Reply 3, posted (1 year 3 months 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 6784 times:

WIDE LOAD

No kidding !



New Technology is the name we give to stuff that doesn't work yet. Douglas Adams
User currently offlineRevelation From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 12336 posts, RR: 25
Reply 4, posted (1 year 3 months 3 days ago) and read 6720 times:

Awesome link!

I was standing underneath the A-12 at San Diego Bilboa Park just a few weeks ago.

It's kind of amazing to see the number of rivets, hatches, etc in something that went Mach 2+.

Was just fascinating standing underneath it and thinking about where that plane had been and how fast it had gone.

Meanwhile, birds were crapping on it, sigh...



Inspiration, move me brightly!
User currently offlinecptkrell From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 3220 posts, RR: 12
Reply 5, posted (1 year 3 months 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 6687 times:

Great pictures and an interesting read, Charlie. Brings back a few memories of a college roomate at Art Center in L.A. who's brother was somehow envolved in the Blackbird program. He couldn't talk with any degree of specificity because of security, but his hint of "wait 'till you see this thing" certainly rang true. It still does even today IMHO. Thanks again...jack (p.s. kinda neat looking at the old cars, too)


all best; jack
User currently offlineNibog From Ireland, joined Apr 2009, 329 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (1 year 3 months 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 6676 times:

Excellent and very interesting piece of history reading,would love more like that.The black and white photographs are fantastic,loved the shot of the F101 and the Connie in the background!!!.

Many thanks for sharing.


User currently onlineflyingturtle From Switzerland, joined Oct 2011, 2303 posts, RR: 13
Reply 7, posted (1 year 3 months 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 6542 times:

Thank you very much for this find, Geezer!


These pictures look so outlandish. The slim A-12 and the cars form a certain contrast.


David



Keeping calm is terrorism against those who want to live in fear.
User currently offlineGeezer From United States of America, joined Aug 2010, 1479 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (1 year 3 months 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 6357 times:

I'm glad everyone is enjoying these pictures. When I first saw them, and saw how wide the load was, I was thinking the same things that many of you were. But now that you have looked at them, I have to tell you something you don't realize, just from looking at those pictures.........

Yes, transporting those big wide loads looks really "hairy", and it really is in some respects, but in some ways, it wasn't nearly as bad as it looks; I'll try to explain why.

Even though the load on that truck was 35 feet wide, it really wasn't terribly heavy; I don't know how much an actual A-12 A/C would weigh, but I know about 100 times as much about big trucks as I do about airplanes; I can tell just from looking at the photos that the old road tractor they had pulling that load, and the trailer they had modified to carry the airplane are not all that heavy, as compared to some of the modern day equipment that's used for transporting oversized loads. I doubt very much if the tractor and trailer together were more than maybe 40,000 to 45,000 pounds. I doubt if the airplane is more than maybe 50,000; the framework that had the cover on it was all light aluminum tubing, so it may have added a few more thousand pounds; all told, the whole thing probably didn't weigh more than 100,000 pounds. And I can guarantee you, they weren't going more than 20 or 25 mph; and down the "Grapevine" ? more like 10 mph;
And they had about 6 sets of "eyeballs" watching every inch of the whole load, all in radio comm. with each other; that right there makes a HUGE big difference.

From about 1971 to 1974, I worked for Doran Transfer & Rigging Company; Just about everything we hauled was either too heavy, too high, too wide, or too long; a few loads were ALL FOUR ! Before you can take oversize loads on public highways, you have to get an oversize permit from the state; and they want ALL the details.......how much it weighs, how wide it is, how long it is and how high it is; anything that can be taken apart and hauled in "pieces"......that's exactly what you have to do. A good example; we had to move a big stick crane from a power plant near Marietta, Ohio on the Ohio River, to another power plant up near Pittsburgh. The whole machine with about 150 of boom probably weighed between half a million to a million pounds; the ONLY way you can move that kind of weight is in a bunch of "pieces"; it took a crew of maybe 20 men about a week to take the thing apart; each crawler track was about four feet wide, by 25 or 30 ft long, and weighed around 30 tons each. That's two truck loads there; the heaviest part of any big crawler crane is always what's called the "center section"; it's one humongus big casting that the crawler tracks attach to, and the "machinery house" with the engine, all of the winches and gears, and the operators cab sits on top of it. All big stick booms are made in 20 to 30 long sections, and are anywhere from about 6 to 10 feet square; each boom section is a truck load.

The people in the state highway departments who issue oversize permits know all of this; and they tell you just how many axles and how many wheels you have to have under each load, depending on how much it weighs.

I don't recall the exact numbers any more, but that one crane move ended up requiring about 40 or 45 truck loads to move it.

The reason I was so fascinated by all of those pictures of moving that airplane was because I was thinking how EASY those guys had it ! They had.....the California Highway Patrol, Nevada S.P. both Highway Departments, about half the small town local cops en route, the Nation Guard, the U.S.Army..........and even the C.I.A. ! Oh....and the Department of Defense! You just can't get any more "official" than that ! By comparison, every time I ever hauled an oversize load, I had ever State Cop, and every D.O.T. guy, PLUS every state weigh station trying to dream up ways to give me a damned ticket, never mind the fact that the company had already paid a few thousand bucks for a permit.

In 1974 I had finally "had it" with all the associated BS involved with oversize stuff and got a job hauling cars; that gig lasted till I retired in 1997.

Charley



Stupidity: Doing the same thing over and over and over again and expecting a different result; Albert Einstein
User currently offlinemoose135 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 2296 posts, RR: 10
Reply 9, posted (1 year 3 months 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 6179 times:

Quoting Revelation (Reply 4):
I was standing underneath the A-12 at San Diego Bilboa Park just a few weeks ago.

It's kind of amazing to see the number of rivets, hatches, etc in something that went Mach 2+.

First time I saw an SR-71 up close (while in the USAF at RAF Mildenhall) I thought the same thing. Of course, when it's at 70,000+ feet, the air is pretty thin, so having a slick, smooth surface isn't quite so vital.



KC-135 - Passing gas and taking names!
User currently offlinerwessel From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 2311 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (1 year 3 months 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 6101 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Geezer (Reply 8):
Even though the load on that truck was 35 feet wide, it really wasn't terribly heavy; I don't know how much an actual A-12 A/C would weigh, but I know about 100 times as much about big trucks as I do about airplanes; I can tell just from looking at the photos that the old road tractor they had pulling that load, and the trailer they had modified to carry the airplane are not all that heavy,

Depending on what was installed, an SR-71 unfueled was somewhere between 56,000lbs and 67,000lbs. I'd assume the early test A-12s were likely towards the low end of the scale, and then you'd save a bunch of weight by removing the engines, the nose, draining the hydraulics, etc. You can see the engines and nose pod removed in the photos, also the outer wing panels and the vertical stabilizers.


User currently offlineneutrino From Singapore, joined May 2012, 605 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (1 year 3 months 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 5930 times:

Quoting Geezer (Reply 8):

Ok Geezer, this is going to be the third instance I am saying it. Must be kinda deja vu to you by now but here goes anyway; that's a loooong and interesting read!  

I was also very lucky to have seen (and touched) the second production A-12; at the Intrepid Museum back in maybe 1991 or 92. Fulfilled half of my topmost aerospace wet-dream of viewing in person the Blackbird and the Valkyrie; my two all-time favorite jet planes.



Potestatem obscuri lateris nescitis
User currently offlineHaveBlue From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 2098 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (1 year 3 months 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 5846 times:

Great pics Charlie, thanks for the link.

Quoting neutrino (Reply 11):
I was also very lucky to have seen (and touched) the second production A-12; at the Intrepid Museum back in maybe 1991 or 92. Fulfilled half of my topmost aerospace wet-dream of viewing in person the Blackbird and the Valkyrie; my two all-time favorite jet planes.

The Blackbird and Valkyrie are 2 of my 3 top aircraft, the Tomcat rounding out the 3rd. I've been lucky enough to see an A-12 at the Mobile, AL museum; the YF-12 and D-21 drone at WPAFB; the SR-71 at Eglin, Warner Robins, Smithsonian and WPAB; and the XB-70 of course at WPAFB. One of my biggest regrets is never getting to see a Blackbird fly though.. such a shame.

Quoting flyingturtle (Reply 7):
These pictures look so outlandish. The slim A-12 and the cars form a certain contrast.

Exactly! Over the years when I have espoused the futuristic virtues of the Blackbirds I've often pointed out how ordinary the cars looked at the same time that they were churning out this space age, sinister beauty. That contrast has hit me since I first started learning about the BBirds as a teenager.



Here Here for Severe Clear!
User currently offlinefridgmus From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 1442 posts, RR: 11
Reply 13, posted (1 year 3 months 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 5764 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Once again, Great Post Charlie!

I've been through a lot of the CA high desert, it looks nothing like the photo's on the web page! Times sure have changed, as we all know.

I love that aircraft! I wonder what, with today's technology, would the SR-71 be capable of?

Thanks again,

F



The Lockheed Super Constellation, the REAL Queen of the Skies!
User currently offlineGeezer From United States of America, joined Aug 2010, 1479 posts, RR: 2
Reply 14, posted (1 year 3 months 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 5733 times:

My thanks to everyone for taking the time to look ! I guess in all fairness I should tell you how I happened to find this website; My dear wife, Arlene went to a Catholic girls school and graduated from the Catholic High School for girls; her parish also had a High School for boys; "things" were completely different back then, especially for the girls and boys that attended these two schools. The ONLY boys any of the girls were allowed to "socialize" with, were the boys form Leo HS; (and then only for a few well chaperoned dances at the school; one boy from Leo "had his eye" on Arlene; she was "uninterested"; they were friends, that's it; so after Arlene graduated in 1960, it's the last she heard of this boy; until about 5 years ago; she had somehow got on "Facebook"; somehow, the "boy"........( who was now a retired executive from a big downtown Chicago company), found Arlene's name on Facebook; after much emailing back and forth, he happened to mention that he had a son who was a famous guitarist; to make a long story short, we had met his son 3 yrs before, and enjoyed his group so much, we had gone back to see them every fall at a festival in Brazil, Ind. (near where we live)

This man has sent Arlene at least 2, 3 or 4 emails every single day since they first bumped into each other on Facebook; it get's better.........both are big history buffs, particularly about anything having to do with Chicago; this fellow (Chuck), is also quite an airplane buff; so we get TONS of things about airplanes; and trains.........and all sorts of military stuff; I have no idea how he does it, but Chuck finds more interesting "stuff" on the internet than any other 10 people I know ! He recently sent me an email with a collection of vintage luxury cars from the 20's through the 40's; Just this week was a real,"prize", and I'm working right now on how best to either gets the pictures on Mil AV, or at least the link to it.

I'm sure most of you "younger fellows" have heard about General Jimmy Dolittle's famous B-25 raid on Tokyo in the early part of WW 2; (I remember it from hearing about it on the evening radio news); ( TV wasn't even "invented" then, I think it was either in 1942 or 1943; the survivors of the famous raid have held a reunion every year since WW 2 ended; they are now down to only 6 or 7 left; they just had the annual reunion at the USAF Museum in Dayton, to commemorate the 70th anniversary of the famous Toyko raid; the last one. there are some nice pictures of them at the reunion; also, every restored B-25 in the country flew into Dayton, did a 25 ship flyby........something none of us will probably ever see again. The photographer taking the photos knew what he was doing; I had heard about it a few months ago, and was hoping to go and take pictures of the B-25's but I was unable to get away.

For some strange reason, everyone seems to think I'm "ancient" just because they know I turned 80 in December (and got married on my birthday); wait till you see these boys from WW 2 ! They're all about 96 !

So when you see a new thread about the Dolittle Raid on Tokyo, be sure to take a look, and thanks to all of you !

Charley C

Quoting rwessel (Reply 10):
Depending on what was installed, an SR-71 unfueled was somewhere between 56,000lbs and 67,000lbs. I'd assume the early test A-12s were likely towards the low end of the scale, and then you'd save a bunch of weight by removing the engines, the nose, draining the hydraulics, etc. You can see the engines and nose pod removed in the photos, also the outer wing panels and the vertical stabilizers.


Thank you, rwessel; That's starting to sound like my guess was pretty close; I knew they had removed the vertical stabs, and I think also those huge engines; so that thing may not have gone over 50 K; I've hauled a fair number of 50 & 52 K coils on a regular tandem axle flat bed with a 3 axle tractor; ( and NO permit )

Note; next time you see a big convoy on the interstate moving some you think must be "real heavy"..........just start counting all of the axles; you can come pretty close that way.



Stupidity: Doing the same thing over and over and over again and expecting a different result; Albert Einstein
User currently offlinerwessel From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 2311 posts, RR: 2
Reply 15, posted (1 year 3 months 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 5700 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Geezer (Reply 14):
TV wasn't even "invented" then, I think it was either in 1942 or 1943;

Regular broadcasts of what would recognizably be "modern" TV began in NYC in 1938. The NTSC* standards were adopted in 1941, although this was mostly a refinement of what the existing TVs at the time could do, and many (most?) could be adapted. Various other schemes date back to 1908 or so, although those suffered from considerable limitations. WWII put a huge brake on TV deployment.


*Which, except for the addition of color, were basically what broadcast TV used until the recent conversion to digital (ATSC)


User currently offlineNibog From Ireland, joined Apr 2009, 329 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (1 year 3 months 17 hours ago) and read 5522 times:

Quoting Geezer (Reply 14):
So when you see a new thread about the Dolittle Raid on Tokyo, be sure to take a look, and thanks to all of you !

Geezer, i look forward to reading that and I enjoy all of your posts,so keep them coming sir!!!!!. The 25 ship flyby of the B-25 would be something else,both visually and the noise of that collective roar of the engines!!!.


User currently offlineGeezer From United States of America, joined Aug 2010, 1479 posts, RR: 2
Reply 17, posted (1 year 3 months 16 hours ago) and read 5495 times:

Quoting Nibog (Reply 16):
The 25 ship flyby of the B-25 would be something else,both visually and the noise of that collective roar of the engines!!!.

LOL! Well, I just now posted it, not 2 minutes before your reply popped up ! I found out while doing a bit more reading that I overstated the number of B-25s that gathered......apparently there were only 20; but it was still the biggest "get together" of B-25s since WW2. I'm kicking myself for not making more effort to have gone to Dayton to photograph them; (I'm only 175 miles away from there.)

I also found out that I had made a few mistakes in my post from trying to rely on my memory, which is usually fairly good. I discovered that the idea for launching the bombers off of an aircraft carrier was not Lt.Col. Doolittle's, but was actually the idea of a Navy ship Captain, (whose name I have now forgotten just since last night!) (Maybe I AM getting old.) Also that they had just 300 feet to get airborne ! In training for the raid, the absolute record was 287 feet. Of course, just like they do today, that's from a ship that is underway at full speed INTO the wind, so that helps a lot.

I think the most amazing thing of all about all of this is, that ANY of these old heros are still with us!



Quoting rwessel (Reply 15):
Regular broadcasts of what would recognizably be "modern" TV began in NYC in 1938. The NTSC* standards were adopted in 1941

Thank you again for the "facts" ! Everything you say is completely correct; however.......I can tell you this from memory; I graduated from high school in 1950; (I'm positive of that) During my three years of going to high school, ordinary people were just starting to get TV sets; not very many people had them then; and programming.......you wouldn't recognize it, from what you see on TV now. To even mention the word "pregnant" on TV was to invite a very big fine, and possibly have the whole program removed from the air. Also, almost all programs in 1950 were broadcast live, so every TV station was obliged to have a censor to instantly hit the "blip" button if anyone accidentally said "hell" or "damn". Things were MUCH different in 1950 from what they are now.



Stupidity: Doing the same thing over and over and over again and expecting a different result; Albert Einstein
User currently offlineRIXrat From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 786 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (1 year 3 months 9 hours ago) and read 5400 times:

Thanks, Charley, for another fine and informative report. My one and only encounter with an SR-71 was in the early 80s at an air show at Willow Grove NAS, outside PHL. The beast was sleek and beautiful, but to my horror, it was leaking fuel all over the place. I quickly pointed this out to the pilot who was stationed beside the plane. He kind of chuckled and proceeded to explain that once they are airborne and he puts the pedal to the metal, an enormous heat change happens and the plane's body expands, sealing all joints. He said it was designed that way. So, I said, how fast does does it have to go before it gets bonded? Above Mach 1, he replied, without divulging the aircraft's true performance limits.

User currently offlineRevelation From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 12336 posts, RR: 25
Reply 19, posted (1 year 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 5266 times:

Quoting Geezer (Reply 14):
For some strange reason, everyone seems to think I'm "ancient" just because they know I turned 80 in December (and got married on my birthday); wait till you see these boys from WW 2 ! They're all about 96 !

So when you see a new thread about the Dolittle Raid on Tokyo, be sure to take a look, and thanks to all of you !

Thanks for the posts! I know we butt heads (but aren't buttheads!) on non-av, but I appreciate your posts in both places.

Quoting rwessel (Reply 15):
*Which, except for the addition of color, were basically what broadcast TV used until the recent conversion to digital (ATSC)

As someone who left behind electrical engineering in the early 80s, I'm still amazed at how they were able to shoe-horn color into the original NTSC spec. Another thing that stood the test of time is the T1 spec (used to carry phone calls and now data in digital form) - it dates back to the early 60s! Chances are pretty good that your internet traffic is being represented in T1 format (or a decedent thereof) somewhere along its journey right now!



Inspiration, move me brightly!
User currently offlineCPH-R From Denmark, joined May 2001, 5977 posts, RR: 3
Reply 20, posted (1 year 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 5123 times:

The Nat Geo channel recently aired a documentary on the Oxcart project, which included interviews with some of those who were involved with it:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6Y7r3nisJg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sRjIChqaeWA

Sadly the rest of it isn't available.


User currently offlinekric777 From United States of America, joined Jun 2002, 279 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (1 year 2 months 3 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 4334 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Geez, I read that headline originally as "Rare pictures of An-12 Being Transported." I was expecting grainy black and white pictures from the Stalinist USSR of the first An-12 transports being towed around an airfield in Siberia!

Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Rare Pictures Of A-12 Being Transported
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
RAF BAe146 C3 - Rare Example Of Good Procurement? posted Fri Apr 19 2013 02:09:08 by Bthebest
Pictures Of Buran Flight Damage posted Thu Aug 21 2008 20:57:21 by SLCPilot
M-346 IPA: Pictures Of The First Flight posted Tue Jul 8 2008 01:33:00 by 777
Pictures Of F-14 And F-15 Together posted Sun Mar 30 2008 10:59:19 by HaveBlue
Pictures Of The Space Shuttle Reentry? posted Thu Jun 9 2005 11:16:13 by Keta
Pictures Of US Military Birds posted Wed Jan 19 2005 23:48:50 by Pilotntrng
Large Number Of Backfires Being Destroyed.. posted Thu Feb 6 2003 23:55:44 by Keesje
Pictures Of Last Mission posted Sat Mar 2 2002 15:53:34 by Galaxy5
Finally Some Pictures Of C-5 Upper Compts posted Sun Jun 3 2001 21:46:58 by Galaxy5
Video Of Syrian Copter Being Shot Down posted Tue Mar 5 2013 12:39:14 by TK787

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format