Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
HMX-1 Receives First MV-22B Aircraft  
User currently offlinerheite From United States of America, joined Apr 2009, 10 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 5449 times:

HMX-1 held it's public un-veiling today for it's first MV-22B. They are currently going through the process of phasing out the CH-46E with the MV-22B Block III variant.

Here are a few shots from today:


The Mighty Battle Phrog, soon to be even extinct from HMX-1







-R.K. Heite Sr
13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently onlineThePointblank From Canada, joined Jan 2009, 1669 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (1 year 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 5339 times:

The V-22 is going to serve well with HMX-1. They are also working on ship compatibility trials as a replacement for C-2 Greyhound in the carrier COD mission. More at the link below:
http://www.thebaynet.com/news/index.cfm/fa/viewstory/story_ID/31958

Quote:
Operational Testing the V-22 for the COD mission

5/2/2013

By Mike Wilson

Two V-22s from VMX-22 completed the first phase of Carrier onboard delivery (COD) operations with USS Harry S. Truman April 22, 2013.

According to published reports, the first phase began April 19th with the Marines loading and unloading the Ospreys to determine whether the MV-22s can be considered a replacement for aging C-2 Greyhounds. The evaluation included transferring passengers and cargo.

The next phase scheduled to begin in June will have the V-22s back aboard a carrier for six days. The Operational Test Marines will assess the Ospreys COD capabilities during fast-paced cyclic operations. Navy officials consider this phase critical because the Osprey cannot interrupt carrier operations.
http://www.thebaynet.com//images/news/full/2E9CAEC267618C92D4EA5ADC94867349.jpg


User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16810 posts, RR: 51
Reply 2, posted (1 year 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 5195 times:

The V-22 makes a perfect replacement for the C-2 as it can not only land on a carrier but also pretty much any Navy ship.


Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineDevilfish From Philippines, joined Jan 2006, 4775 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (1 year 2 months 2 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 4997 times:

All the above while ushering in a fresh competition for Marine One.....

http://www.defense-aerospace.com/art...elicopter-replacement-program.html

(Source: US Naval Air Systems Command; issued May 3, 2013)

Quote:
"PATUXENT RIVER, Md. --- Today the Navy issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) in the Presidential Helicopter Replacement Program (VXX). Proposals are due in 90 days with a goal to award a fixed-price incentive engineering and manufacturing development (EMD) contract, with production options, by mid-calendar year 2014.

'Our acquisition approach includes a full and open competition to select a prime contractor that can best integrate mature subsystems into an air vehicle currently in production for an affordable solution that meets mission requirements,' said Captain Dean Peters, the program manager charged with development of the replacement aircraft.

'We’re seeking a technically viable, cost-effective vertical lift aircraft to replace the current fleet as these reach the end of their useful service life. The Department of the Navy is committed to deliver a safe and reliable new Presidential Helicopter fleet, while maintaining the In-Service Fleet until that replacement is fielded.'

During the EMD phase, the selected contractor will provide six test aircraft, four of which will become operational aircraft. During the production phase, the RFP calls for 17 operational aircraft (four in low-rate initial production (LRIP) 1, five in LRIP 2 and eight in full-rate production), for a fleet total of 21 aircraft."



Proposals due in three months, EMD contract award target middle of next year...hmmn    ...



"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Garfield
User currently offlinetugger From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 5410 posts, RR: 8
Reply 4, posted (1 year 2 months 2 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 4977 times:

Quoting rheite (Thread starter):
MV-22B Block III

That is a sexy beast! I like it!

Quoting Devilfish (Reply 3):
All the above while ushering in a fresh competition for Marine One.....

The 22 pictured in the OP is not for Presidential transport, the helicopters designated for that duty (VIP transport) have the whitetop livery (Though they of course could be used to that if needed/desired, I am just noting that is not the intent based on the livery we see)

With that said I do wonder why it would not be a good Presidential helicopter? I think it would look terrific in the whitetop livery and be quite the way for the President to arrive/depart.

Tugg



I don’t know that I am unafraid to be myself, but it is hard to be somebody else. -W. Shatner
User currently offlineConfuscius From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 3829 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (1 year 2 months 2 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 4959 times:

Quoting tugger (Reply 4):
With that said I do wonder why it would not be a good Presidential helicopter?

Looking at the twin rotors, perhaps a larger footprint on White House lawn and the president has to walk a little farther.  



Ain't I a stinker?
User currently offlineBladeLWS From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 403 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (1 year 2 months 2 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 4946 times:

Quoting Confuscius (Reply 5):
Looking at the twin rotors, perhaps a larger footprint on White House lawn and the president has to walk a little farther.

and possibly knocking down a tree or the press corps at the same time, lots of down wash from those rotors.


User currently offlineDiamondFlyer From United States of America, joined Oct 2008, 1503 posts, RR: 3
Reply 7, posted (1 year 2 months 2 weeks 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 4903 times:

Quoting Confuscius (Reply 5):
Looking at the twin rotors, perhaps a larger footprint on White House lawn

Is the LZ at the White House even big enough for a V-22?

-DiamondFlyer


User currently offlineStudeDave From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 484 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (1 year 2 months 2 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 4854 times:

Quoting STT757 (Reply 2):
The V-22 makes a perfect replacement for the C-2 as it can not only land on a carrier but also pretty much any Navy ship.

Well- seeing as I have served on many 'smallboys' I'd have to disagree.
Cruisers, Destroyers, and Frigates are hardly big enough for H-60s (or H-3s) so there's no way in hell that one of those monstrosities are gonna be landing on any of those decks anytime soon~ least not in one piece!!!




StudeDave



Classic planes, Classic trains, and Studebakers~~ what else is there???
User currently offlineNewark727 From United States of America, joined Dec 2009, 1332 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (1 year 2 months 2 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 4845 times:

Would a V-22 configured for presidential transport become a VV-22?   

User currently offlinelegs From Australia, joined Jun 2006, 235 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (1 year 2 months 2 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 4812 times:

Quoting DiamondFlyer (Reply 7):
even big enough for a V-22?

It's a big jump up in weight too, I wonder what the lawn is rated at?


User currently offlinedragon6172 From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 1202 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (1 year 2 months 2 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 4599 times:

The V-22 has a rather significant rotorwash and has a large foot print. A couple of the reasons it won't be used to land on the White House lawn. Same reason you never saw HMX land their H-53s at the White House.


Phrogs Phorever
User currently offlinebikerthai From United States of America, joined Apr 2010, 2061 posts, RR: 4
Reply 12, posted (1 year 2 months 1 week 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 4474 times:

From Boeing Press release:

"The "greenside" Ospreys do not carry the president, but will be tasked with presidential support missions, carrying support staff and members of the media who travel with the president. "

So if it's carry staff and press, where does it land? Does staff and press transport usually land at the White House also? Or do they have to go some where near by?

On the grand scheme of thing, it may not cost that much more to make the helipad larger to take the V-22. Heck, that many be the most cost effective sub contract of the whole procurement.

Also, how long does it take for the V-22 rotors to wind down? You would assume it would be faster than a helicopter rotor.
Perhaps braking mechanism can be employed to quickly stop the rotor . . .

bt



Intelligent seeks knowledge. Enlightened seeks wisdom.
User currently offlineDevilfish From Philippines, joined Jan 2006, 4775 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (1 year 2 months 1 week 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 4381 times:

Sans the RFP stipulation for "existing, in-service platform" and given that it may take a long while anyway owing to the budget situation...this could be a good candidate for both requirements.....

http://www.aviationweek.com/media/im.../Defense/Helos/JMR-AVXAircraft.jpg

May be less problematic than the tilt-rotor...and will usher the HMX fleet into the next generation of faster helos. Smaller footprint and looks more "presidential" to boot. Just not sure if the rotor and prop wash would be gentler on the Rose Garden.   



"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Garfield
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic HMX-1 Receives First MV-22B Aircraft
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Jordan Receives First F-16AMs From Belgium posted Sun Sep 14 2008 14:05:19 by RJAF
433rd WS Receives First F-22A posted Thu Mar 6 2008 09:58:17 by EBJ1248650
Russia Receives First Su-34 posted Fri Jan 5 2007 12:56:41 by A342
US Army Receives First UH-72A Lakota posted Tue Dec 12 2006 21:08:40 by UH60FtRucker
Venezuela Receives Its First Chinese Jets posted Sun Mar 14 2010 13:31:14 by alberchico
First Carrier Borne Stealth Aircraft.... posted Wed Jun 30 2004 23:25:52 by PPGMD
Fate Of Last Nasa Shuttle Carrier Aircraft Decided posted Fri May 3 2013 07:27:08 by eksath
Australia To Acquire 12 F/A-18G Growler Aircraft posted Thu May 2 2013 18:15:17 by legs
Virgin Galactic SS2 First Test Flight Success posted Mon Apr 29 2013 08:56:39 by oly720man
Antares First Launch Successful posted Mon Apr 22 2013 07:08:41 by jollo

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format