Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Another KC-767 Question  
User currently offlineSpacepope From Vatican City, joined Dec 1999, 2951 posts, RR: 1
Posted (10 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 2335 times:

While we already know that probe and drouge refuelling will be possible using the wingtip tanks, will there be a centerline feed as well like on the KC-10, or will it have to be installed before flight like on the KC-135?

T.J.


The last of the famous international playboys
3 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineGarnetpalmetto From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 5404 posts, RR: 53
Reply 1, posted (10 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 2250 times:

It's to my understanding that it will only have a centerline feed. http://www.afa.org/magazine/Aug2003/0803tankers.asp states that

"Example: Though USAF wanted plumbing in the wings for wingtip probe-and-drogue refueling, to lower cost, it dropped the requirement. The aircraft will have both a boom-type refueling system and a probe-and-drogue, both on the centerline."



South Carolina - too small to be its own country, too big to be a mental asylum.
User currently offlineLga1011 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 67 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (10 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 2144 times:

I wonder if the USAF should have ordered the the 767-300 instead of the 200, what do you think?

User currently offlineLY744 From Canada, joined Feb 2001, 5536 posts, RR: 10
Reply 3, posted (10 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 2262 times:

It's not like you could fit more fuel in a -300, and the additional cargo capacity (volume, rather) would not make much of a difference either. Basically, you would have an airplane carrying a bunch of extra weight around for decades, not good for the fuel budget.  Smile -200ER seems perfect for military (tanker and otherwise) applications, especially seeing as it's the 767 with the greatest range.


LY744.




Pacifism only works if EVERYBODY practices it
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Another KC-767 Question
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Buffet Problems For Italian KC-767 posted Mon May 22 2006 09:56:35 by Scbriml
KC-767 posted Sat Apr 8 2006 17:46:40 by AirbusA346
KC-767 Vs KC-30? Try KC-787 Vs. KC-50 posted Wed Dec 14 2005 02:38:41 by AirRyan
New Hampshire ANG KC-135 Question posted Mon Oct 10 2005 04:44:01 by ChrisNH
Who Selected P&W For Usaf KC-767? posted Wed Jul 27 2005 23:54:26 by AirRyan
First KC-767 Tanker Rolls Out posted Fri Feb 25 2005 11:39:57 by 777ER
Another Air Force One Question posted Fri Aug 6 2004 19:23:39 by T1210s
Another Nicknaming Question posted Mon Dec 8 2003 09:36:52 by Garnetpalmetto
A Question About This KC-135 Stratotanker? posted Sat Mar 22 2003 19:19:14 by Mr Spaceman
Trivia Question : KC-114A posted Sun May 12 2002 18:58:58 by Southflite

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format