Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
The US Tanker Deal Again  
User currently offlineRacko From Germany, joined Nov 2001, 4887 posts, RR: 19
Posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 3530 times:

It's becoming clearer and clearer that Darleen Druyun, an Air Force negotiator in the tanker deal who later joined Boeing, was not fighting on the side of the US tax payer, but rather on Boeing's side.

Read this article in the Seattle times:


Some extracts:


In a June 2002 e-mail, Bob Gower, Boeing's vice president for tankers, wrote, "Meeting today on price was very good. Darleen spent most of the time bringing the (U.S. Air Force) price up to our number. We did not finalize the price because the USAF went to caucus on how to present the figures for the business case. It was a good day!"

Earlier the same day, an e-mail from Andrew Ellis, Boeing's vice president of Washington operations, described an effort by Druyun to keep the big liability that the government would face if it terminated the tanker contract early off the president's budget.

"She may be running her own covert operation on this one," Ellis wrote, "so we probably don't want to discuss openly."

The e-mail, congressional watchdogs say, shows that Druyun was on Boeing's team rather than fighting for U.S. taxpayers."


Just days later in April 2002, another Ellis e-mail that went out would prove pivotal in the tanker deal's tangled course.

"Darleen told us several times to keep in mind that EADS' proposed price on green A330 was $5 million to $17 million cheaper than green 767," the e-mail said.

European Aeronautic Defence & Space is the European parent of Airbus, Boeing's major rival in the commercial aviation business. "Green" refers to a basic aircraft model before it has been modified for refueling purposes.

EADS wasn't invited to bid on the tanker contract but volunteered that it could supply less expensive tankers that would save taxpayers billions of dollars.

It was that e-mail that prompted the Pentagon's inspector general to open an investigation of the tanker deal in September. Transferring proprietary price information from one bidder to another is not allowed under government procurement regulations."

1 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineSaintsman From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2002, 2065 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 3526 times:

This may or may not be connected but the decission by the UK government to announce the FSTA winner has been put back a month.

If Boeing knew the price that EADs had bid then it is reasonable to assume that it would be fed to the BAES/Boeing team submitting the FSTA bid. Although there is more than just the cost of supplying aircraft for FSTA, it must give them some advantage.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic The US Tanker Deal Again
No username? Sign up now!

Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Airbus Fantasy - the US Tanker deal posted Wed Jan 12 2005 20:44:24 by Dayflyer
Eads Confident On Share Of US Air Tanker Deal posted Mon Sep 18 2006 12:12:54 by Columba
Boeing Plans To Double US Air Force Tanker Deal posted Fri Oct 3 2003 14:31:52 by Kl911
Becoming A Pilot For The US Navy posted Sat Nov 25 2006 18:16:30 by Turpentyine
Joining The US Airforce posted Sun Nov 12 2006 22:14:53 by Turpentyine
How Long Would The US Have Been Giving Away F4U's posted Sun Oct 8 2006 08:47:57 by L-188
Eads US Helicopter Deal Suspended posted Fri Jul 21 2006 12:14:03 by RichardPrice
X-48B; The Next Tanker, C, B Or What? posted Tue May 30 2006 08:46:42 by TedTAce
How Could The US Navy Pass On The Natf posted Sat Mar 11 2006 01:45:16 by 747400sp
Should The US Buy Some A-400Ms? posted Wed Dec 28 2005 18:16:17 by KC135TopBoom

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format