Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Sydney Camm--the British Design Genius.  
User currently offlineRayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 8018 posts, RR: 5
Posted (10 years 8 months 3 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 2514 times:

I think here in the USA, we always read that Clarence "Kelly" Johnson and Jack Northrup are aeronautical design geniuses with innovative ideas.

Yet, I think Americans have forgotten an equally influential design genius: Sir Sydney Camm (1893-1966), the Chief Designer at Hawker Aircraft and Hawker Siddeley Aerospace (with merged into the BAE Systems company).

Camm's resumé of great designs is nothing short of legendary: the Hart family of biplanes, the legendary Hurricane fighter, the Typhoon, Tempest and Fury piston-engined fighters that were near the zenith of piston-engined fighter design, the Sea Hawk fighter that pioneered jet operations on Royal Navy carriers, the outstanding Hunter jet fighter that defined the limits of subsonic jet fighters, the revolutionary P.1127 Kestrel that pioneered V/STOL military aircraft, and initial design work near the end of his life on what would become the Tornado multi-role fighter.

Camm's legacy lives on: the Hawker Siddeley company he worked for designed the wings for the original Airbus A300B airliner (indeed, Hawker Siddeley worked on the A300B wing design and production as a private venture when the British government originally pulled out of the Airbus consortium). It is this group--now part of BAE Systems--that designed and built the wings for all subsequent Airbus airliners, including the upcoming A380, the world's largest airliner.

Comments?

4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineGDB From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 13229 posts, RR: 77
Reply 1, posted (10 years 8 months 3 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 2229 times:

He was one of the greats certainly.
While the Spitfire was the better fighter in most respects, the earlier Hurricane design was far easier to produce, and that was crucial in 1940.
Typhoon may have been a poor high level fighter , but it was a fantastic ground attack aircraft, performing much of the vital strikes against German forces and supply lines, the 4 x 20mm cannon and bombs/rockets were devastating.
Had policy after 1945 not been so muddled and wrong headed, his teams would have produced even greater aircraft, for example a planned supersonic Hunter would have been a best seller, but the RAF were not interested.
Sea Hawk (and land based versions) should have been the original P1081 swept wing version that was actually flown.
But the Hawker legacy is impressive anyway.


User currently offlineBroke From United States of America, joined Apr 2002, 1322 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (10 years 8 months 3 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 2179 times:

If you are a student of aircraft design, especially military aircraft, there are names of individuals who advanced the art, whom you should be aware of.
Sydney Camm (Hurricane) and Reginald Mitchell (Spitfire) are two British designers that fall into this classification.
Sydney Camm's work was mainly evolutionary in that each design began with the lessons learned from the previous designs over a long line of airplanes.
Reginald Mitchell's was more revolutionary in that much of the Spitfire's heritage was derived from the RAF's High Speed Flight, the Schneider Trophy Races, and the S-6 airplanes.
Each man made a huge mark on aviation.
If I remember correctly, there is a gallery in the RAF Museum at Hendon that is dedicated to Sydney Camm, and it is a well deserved memorial.
No matter what the airplane is, there is no sweeter sound than a Merlin.


User currently offlineRayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 8018 posts, RR: 5
Reply 3, posted (10 years 8 months 3 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 1769 times:

One major legacy of Sydney Camm was the fact he recognized what more powerful piston engines could do for fighter planes. The Hawker Tornado was probably the first fighter developed around a piston engine in the 2,000 bhp range--the original Vulture-powered version had a nearly 400 mph top speed. Only the desperate needs for more Hurricane production during the Battle of Britain prevented the Tornado from reaching operational service. One Tornado prototype was built around an early version of the Bristol Centaurus radial engine, and it was among the first piston-engined powered fighter prototypes to exceed 400 mph in level flight.

But I think Camm's more modern legacy are the Hunter fighter and the Harrier V/STOL ground-attack fighter. The Hunter was probably the ultimate in subsonic fighters, a superb plane that was well-liked by everyone that flew the plane. The Harrier came out of the ground-breaking research done on the P.1127 Kestrel, the first truly useful V/STOL airplane ever made.


User currently offlineTwinPioneer From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2004, 52 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (10 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 1797 times:

Camm & Mitchell. Geniuses IMHO. What a pity that this Country that produced so many fantastic A/C is now reduced to buying/sharing/helping to build other A/C. Great names that are now just history. Sopwith, A.V. Roe, Blackburn and Fairey etc..... Very very sad  Embarrassment

Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Sydney Camm--the British Design Genius.
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Agusta A109 In The British Army posted Mon Jul 5 2004 15:23:35 by JasperEMA
Did The British Like The F-4? posted Fri Feb 27 2004 08:22:03 by Ramprat74
Sydney Camm--the British Design Genius. posted Wed Feb 4 2004 04:18:25 by RayChuang
Did The British Govt. Betray Their People? posted Fri Jan 23 2004 13:33:40 by Greaser
Why Not A Dedicated Tanker Design For The Usaf? posted Tue Jan 3 2006 04:20:46 by Dandy_don
British Aerospace And The Nimrod posted Thu Feb 5 2004 19:10:49 by SpeedbirdHeavy
Becoming A Pilot For The US Navy posted Sat Nov 25 2006 18:16:30 by Turpentyine
Can The MIG-29 Fly Backwards? posted Thu Nov 16 2006 19:07:54 by DIJKKIJK
Joining The US Airforce posted Sun Nov 12 2006 22:14:53 by Turpentyine
Is The U.S.C.G. Considered "Military" posted Sun Nov 12 2006 19:19:37 by UH60FtRucker

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format