Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
What Is The Greatess Aircraft Carrier Ever Built.  
User currently offline747400sp From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3301 posts, RR: 2
Posted (10 years 2 months 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 7608 times:

I know this is a aviation web site, but I fell aircraft carriers the back bone of the Navy air power. I thought it be interesting to hear people opino on what they fell is the greatess carrier ever built. I would have to say the USS Niimitz, USS Enterprise (the current one) and the USS Farrenstal because they was very inervative super carrier.

37 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineFlagshipAZ From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 3419 posts, RR: 14
Reply 1, posted (10 years 2 months 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 7560 times:

IMHO it was the first carrier to bear the name "Enterprise". CV-6 was the most decorated ship of the US Navy in WWII.
It was felt by many she should have been preserved as an memorial to all Navy veterans of WWII, and when she was scrapped in 1959...many sailors again considered this to be nothing short of a criminal act & a federal offense. Even Admiral Bull Halsey got into the fight to save her...and some closest to him says that when the Big E was gone, Halsey's spirit chose to die at the same time.
I'll be back later on this thread with Enterprise's war record. Regards.



"Beer is living proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy." --Ben Franklin
User currently offline2912n From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 2013 posts, RR: 8
Reply 2, posted (10 years 2 months 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 7546 times:

Much will depend on your criteria...

Langley in many ways set the standards for fleet carriers.

British carriers which first really developed the concepts. (And the later inventions of the steam cat and fresnel landing system that allowed big deck carriers to operate.)

As noted above, the Big E and her sisters that opened WWII and were thrust into the lead role of the Navy.

The Essex class carriers that bore the brunt of fighting during WWII and with later modifications led the Navy into the Jet and nuclear ages.

USS Midway and her sisters (Oriskany and FDR) that were the first true big decks.

Then the Forrestal class...The nuke Enterprise...and then the true Super Carrier, the Nimitz class. Each has far too much to address here...

And then there are the small carriers developed by the UK that could be better suited to the littoral warfare of the future....


User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29699 posts, RR: 59
Reply 3, posted (10 years 2 months 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 7529 times:

I remember reading that 6 portholes from CV-6 where installed on CVN-65.

I would suggest the Midway.

How many other carriers have seen service in 4 wars?

World War II
Korea
Vietnam
Kuwait.

You can do far worse then a 50 year service record.


But it is a purely perceptive arguement.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineTsv From Australia, joined Nov 1999, 1641 posts, RR: 5
Reply 4, posted (10 years 2 months 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 7514 times:

"USS Midway and her sisters (Oriskany and FDR) that were the first true big decks."

Oriskany was an Essex class carrier (of the third group and the last to be completed). The other sister to Midway and FDR was the Coral Sea.

"I would suggest the Midway.

How many other carriers have seen service in 4 wars?

World War II
Korea
Vietnam
Kuwait."

When/where did Midway see service in WWII?

Laid down October 27, 1943
Launched March 20, 1945
Commissioned September 10, 1945
Trials and training continued until end October, 1947

Also I can't find any record of her serving in Korea for that matter - just Atlantic and The Med deployments.



"I told you I was ill ..." Spike Milligan
User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29699 posts, RR: 59
Reply 5, posted (10 years 2 months 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 7507 times:

Opps, your right, Midway, just missed the war.

Still, it is an impressive service record.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineTsv From Australia, joined Nov 1999, 1641 posts, RR: 5
Reply 6, posted (10 years 2 months 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 7506 times:

The cold up there must be affecting your memory (but certainly not your posting ability!).


"I told you I was ill ..." Spike Milligan
User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29699 posts, RR: 59
Reply 7, posted (10 years 2 months 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 7504 times:

Actualy it is unseasonably warm

Right at 0C



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offline2912n From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 2013 posts, RR: 8
Reply 8, posted (10 years 2 months 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 7478 times:

Ohhhh, I screwed up with Midway's sister ships.. My bad...  Sad (I hate when I do that!)

Actually Midway came into service just after WWII ended and did not see action in Korea. Midway and her sisters were kept in the Atlantic during the Korean conflict because they could handle the a/c with nuclear weapons. The Korean war was left to the older carriers to handle...

Midway did not see her first action until Vietnam.

(In that vein, the USS Midway will be open as a museum in San Diego late in May or early June of this year. Well worth a visit if you are in this part of the country.)


User currently offline747400sp From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3301 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (10 years 2 months 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 7459 times:

I heard that the USS Midway was originally designed as a battleship and looking at it satistic from 1945 to 1992 I see it beam has been wided from 113 t0 121 fleet. They problely did this so it could handle it new flight deck. Now that I live in San Diego I see the Midway almost everyday and it bigger than I thought it would be, but Nimitz class will take it's glory in a second.

User currently offlineGarnetpalmetto From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 5327 posts, RR: 53
Reply 10, posted (10 years 2 months 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 7456 times:

Some notes. Midway was never designed as a battleship. She always was meant to be a carrier. The only fleet carriers (not including light carriers) that were converted from other purposes were the Langley, which was originally a collier named Jupiter, and the Lexington-class ships which were redesigned from battlecruisers to aircraft carriers following the Washington Naval Treaty. From Ranger (CV-4) onwards, all carriers have been designed from the ground-up as carriers.


As for which was the greatest carrier, I'll toss in another vote for CV-6. When your opposition claims to have sunk her by name many times throughout the war, you know there's some sense of greatness there. When your ship has fought in nearly ever battle of the Pacific War and became one of only two of the Seven Sisters to survive the war (I'm not counting Ranger because she was assigned to LANTFLT throughout most of the war and only joined the Pacific War in '44 as a training carrier), you know it's greatness. When a ship comes out as the most heavily decorates ship of the war, if you don't call that greatness you're crazy.

As much as I'm a fan of the current Navy, I feel relucant to call any of the post World War-II carriers great. I realize some would be fast to jump on the current Enterprise and her 40 years of service, I ask what has she done in those 40 years, 10 of which have been spent in the yard on various RCOHs, modernizations, and reconstructions? She was not the first nuclear powered vessel (that honor goes to the USS Nautilus), nor was she the first nuclear powered surface ship (USS Long Beach beat her into service by two months). While she is a great ship that carries a great name, she was not the greatest, and I feel like her predecessor best deserves that title.




South Carolina - too small to be its own country, too big to be a mental asylum.
User currently offlineFlagshipAZ From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 3419 posts, RR: 14
Reply 11, posted (10 years 2 months 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 7443 times:

As promised, I want to share Enterprise's (CV-6) war record with anyone who may be interested. Enterprise earned the Presidential Unit Citation, the Navy Unit Commendation & 20 battle stars. She was on frontline status 578 days of the Pacific War...and had a homewardbound pennant 578 feet long when she stood down for the last time (one foot for everyday at sea). Enterprise & her crew (air & ship based) sank 71 enemy ships, and destroyed 911 aircrafts. But please do not forget all the men who gave their lives defending their ship & fighting this terrible war. I do not have an exact count of men who perished, but they cannot be forgotten. Rest in peace guys. Best regards.


"Beer is living proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy." --Ben Franklin
User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29699 posts, RR: 59
Reply 12, posted (10 years 2 months 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 7438 times:

The only Battleship connection that I can think of was the uncompleted United States and then the Forestal.

In both those ships running gear from the uncompleted 5th Iowa class Battleship Kentucky was used to save costs. When the United States was Canceled, it gave up parts for the Forestal that replaced it in the builders yards.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineMaiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 50
Reply 13, posted (10 years 2 months 5 days ago) and read 7430 times:

Why, the USS Nimitz, of course... NOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!





[Edited 2004-02-16 01:15:41]

User currently offlineGarnetpalmetto From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 5327 posts, RR: 53
Reply 14, posted (10 years 2 months 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 7417 times:

L-188, are you sure about that factoid? Having checked DANFS I can find no mention of that, additionally consider that United States was only under construction for 5 days before she was cancelled (laid down the 4/19/49 cancelled 4/23/49). Kentucky, the sixth Iowa-class Battleship wasn't cancelled until 1/22/50, so to do as you suggest, the machinery from a non-cancelled ship would be cannabalized during a construction phase.

While machinery parts from the last two Iowas, Illinois and Kentucky were utilized in other vessels, those other vessels weren't carriers, but the Sacramento-class AOEs.



South Carolina - too small to be its own country, too big to be a mental asylum.
User currently offlineDeltaMD11 From United States of America, joined Dec 2002, 1701 posts, RR: 35
Reply 15, posted (10 years 2 months 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 7415 times:

This is another one of my loves...naval vessels. While we're on the subject of BB's here for a second, if any of you guys happen to be in my neck of the woods, take some time to stop in Camden, NJ and have a look at the USS New Jersey (BB-62). She was the most-decorated battleship of WWII and amazingly she only ever had one combat fatality. Spruance's door placard is still in place...God I love that. Speaking of the Illinois and Kentucky...there are some rare pictures and things on display at the USS New Jersey museum dealing with them.


Too often we ... enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought. - John Fitzgerald Kennedy
User currently offline747400sp From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3301 posts, RR: 2
Reply 16, posted (10 years 2 months 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 7404 times:

The Kentucky Machinery is in the first two Sacramento class AOE. I read that the Kentucky nearly became a nuclear battleship in the late 50s. The Navy wanted battleship in the USS Enterprise, USS Long Beach and USS Bainbridge battle group but it never happened.

User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16693 posts, RR: 51
Reply 17, posted (10 years 2 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 7397 times:

"USS Long Beach "

There's a ship I wished they preserved, saw on a recent episode of (I forget, Marine Gunnery Sargent..) where they went to the Bremerton shipyard where the Long Beach was moored minus it's unique tower.



Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29699 posts, RR: 59
Reply 18, posted (10 years 2 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 7393 times:

You know, maybe I should keep my mouth shut, because it is appearing like my naval knowledge is less then it should be.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offline2912n From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 2013 posts, RR: 8
Reply 19, posted (10 years 2 months 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 7384 times:

Garnet--

Actually I think Midway was from a BB hull. I have to check with the folks over at the Midway museum. They were having a discussion about it while I was shooting photos for them and it seems that she was from a BB hull. When I find out I will post.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Tony Zeljeznjak



User currently offlineGarnetpalmetto From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 5327 posts, RR: 53
Reply 20, posted (10 years 2 months 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 7384 times:

Did some fast checking, 2912n, and this is what I got from a Midway sailors website. http://www.midwaysailor.com/midway/history.html

The Midway class hull arrangement was modeled on the canceled Montana class battleships and were a new, much larger design intended to correct certain problems in the Essex class design.

So while they didn't use the actual hull of the Montanas, as they were never built, the Midways utilized elements of the basic hull design.



South Carolina - too small to be its own country, too big to be a mental asylum.
User currently offline2912n From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 2013 posts, RR: 8
Reply 21, posted (10 years 2 months 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 7357 times:

I understand the engines etc are all essentially identical to the Iowa class BB's. They took all of that design and machinery that was intended for a Montana BB and stuck it in the Midway hull as a time saving measure.

Because the hull is a BB design the armor is in place. Some of the hatch covers leading from the hangar deck down are of a heavy armor design that are not found on later ships.

Interesting to walk around on the ship and see where the old gun tubs were. Midway carried a huge number of defensive AA guns when she was completed. These were taken off over the years to save weight/trade weight for the angled deck etc...The ship itself is a model for the progression from straight deck to angle deck.



User currently offlineTsv From Australia, joined Nov 1999, 1641 posts, RR: 5
Reply 22, posted (10 years 2 months 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 7350 times:

"The ship itself is a model for the progression from straight deck to angle deck."

The Poms and some purists will dispute that as HMS Victorious was arguably the best example of a moderisation from straight to angle deck. Bigger is not necessarily better.



"I told you I was ill ..." Spike Milligan
User currently offlineLMP737 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (10 years 2 months 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 7345 times:

Speaking of aircraft carrier the USS Oriskany is going to be "converted" into an artificial reef this year. Which probably means it's going to be used a s a target vessel. Wonder how much ordinance will be expended to accomplish this.

User currently offlineFlagshipAZ From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 3419 posts, RR: 14
Reply 24, posted (10 years 2 months 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 7342 times:

DeltaMD11.....I really do hate to disappoint you, but it was the North Carolina (BB-55) that was the most decorated battlewagon of WWII. She has 15 battle stars. However the New Jersey (BB-62) has seen service in three very different conflicts. New Jersey earned 9 WWII battle stars, 4 Korean War battle stars, and the Navy Unit Citation for Vietnam. Regards.


"Beer is living proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy." --Ben Franklin
25 Broke : Years ago, I read a book on the original Enterprise (CV-6) called "And Then There Was One". There was a period during the Pacific portion of WW II, wh
26 Tsv : "You know, maybe I should keep my mouth shut, because it is appearing like my naval knowledge is less then it should be." What and miss out on being t
27 747400sp : L-188 I am glad you did put in a respose to this post. These post are for fun, so please do not keep your shut. PS I have had the wrong information be
28 Bobs89irocz : USS Enterprise (CV-65) shes my favorite.....
29 2912n : It is a sad fact that the British carrier fleet gets little recognition...Even in the UK the war in the Far East is largely forgotten. The Imperial Wa
30 L-188 : Well I try. Well an arguement could be made that the Ark Royal was responsible for the single most significant contribution by a carrier to a single b
31 2912n : And with Swordfish no less. Now those were men with huevos!
32 Tsv : "Well an arguement could be made that the Ark Royal was responsible for the single most significant contribution by a carrier to a single battle actio
33 Arrow : "The attack on Taranto by HMS Illustrious (as the first major use of carrier air power?) surely deserves special mention." Especially since the Japane
34 Da man : The answer to the original question is the USS Lexington (CV-16/CVA-16/CVS-16/CVT-16/AVT-16) Service in WWII, Cuban Missile Crisis, training naval avi
35 L-188 : I still think that retiring the lexington wasn't the brightest idea. Make them train on a smaller deck, then the big ones will seem huge. As far as To
36 Post contains images Banco : L-188, I think the attack on Taranto more or less is a footnote in history anyway. However, you could argue that it was a pivotal moment even so. Both
37 GDB : It was more bad luck, 'Force Z', the ill fated Singapore force, had a carrier, but on the way it ran agground, hindsight suggests they should waited f
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic What Is The Greatess Aircraft Carrier Ever Built.
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
What Is The Best Aircraft Carrier Ever? posted Fri May 11 2001 16:21:41 by Braniff747
What Is The Loudest Jet To Get Lunch Off A Carrier posted Wed Jul 26 2006 20:58:56 by 747400sp
What Is The Best Fighter The US Ever Had. posted Sun Mar 6 2005 05:56:03 by 747400sp
What Is The Most Powerfull Anti Aircraft Gun? posted Sat May 17 2003 21:44:00 by Keesje
What Is The Latest On Rutan's Space Ship 2? posted Thu Sep 21 2006 02:08:36 by CTR
What Is The Deadliest Russian Fighter? posted Thu Jul 27 2006 06:10:51 by ThirtyEcho
What Is The A400M Airlifter? posted Thu Jul 20 2006 16:57:38 by Mlglaw
What Is The Power Output Of A Super Nova? posted Thu Jan 12 2006 22:50:48 by Lehpron
What Is The Story On The C-32B? posted Mon Jan 10 2005 20:32:23 by FlyMeToTheMoon
Huey? What Is The Exact Reg? posted Tue Dec 14 2004 02:58:08 by Anair80

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format