Jwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 18
Reply 3, posted (10 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 2639 times:
and why wouldn't they?
In the UK they're seriously considering outsourcing all pilot training up to type conversion and gunnery training to a commercial company.
Pilots would be trained by them all the way from primary trainers into the Hawk (or whatever is going to replace it maybe).
A little maintenance work on some VIP transports and crew trainers seems insignificant in comparison...
Flynavy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days ago) and read 2512 times:
As the C-40 is a relatively new aircraft in the military's inventory, the knowledge and experience with the airframe is limited, compared to that of the C-9 fleet. I'll be flying transcon on a C-9 or a C-40 this weekend, and I'll see what information I can gather, as to the depth of the maintenance that the USN/USAF outsource to DL.