Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Australia Selects A330-200 For Air Force Tanker  
User currently offlineKEESJE From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 3291 times:

“They will also have a significant strategic air lift capacity when not engaged in aerial refuelling tasks, including the ability to carry 293 passengers and a significant amount of cargo,” says Hill.

http://www.companynewsgroup.com/communique.asp?co_id=86401



4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSaintsman From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2002, 2065 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 3150 times:

This is interesting. There are no political influences in this decission ( buying from your home market etc). It would appear the Aussies have chosen the best of what was on offer.

User currently offlineGDB From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 13252 posts, RR: 77
Reply 2, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 3141 times:

It was always likely that the RAAF might follow the RAF lead in this, while to some the A330 represents 'too much aircraft' if you have funding for only limited numbers, as well as a secondary transport role, it makes sense.


User currently offlineRussophile From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 3128 times:

That's too bad. But as long as they don't get a single order from the US I suppose it's OK. Let Airbus sell 40-50 models around the world while Boeing takes the 400-500 from the US.

Cut the crap.

The RAAF has new BBJs -- plus they also help the American aerospace industry with numerous orders -- even when the American product is not as good as what is on offer. We are currently faced in this country with a real threat from Indonesia, which with new Sukhois (with more to come) will be superior to anything we currently have in our arsenal.

We buy the American products, because our PM is such a kiss arse to the Americans, and will order American products to appease Washington -- and I hope it won't happen that we have to put our arsenal up against Indonesia in the near future.

Here is an article which sheds a bit more light as to why the A330 was chosen

http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/04/16/1082055639856.html

The fact that QANTAS is involved speaks volumes. The 767 in QF probably doesn't have much of a future -- since they have the new A330s, these will be in the fleet for quite some time, and hence support in a decade's time will likely be easier to obtain within this country on the A330. If, and when, QF get's rid of the 767 in the future, any 767 tanker would have to be sent overseas for work.


User currently offlineRussophile From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (10 years 8 months 1 week 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 3139 times:

Also Wingman, I will add. The RAAF said specifically that the 767 tanker deal for Australia would be conditional on the USAF going ahead also. But since Boeing screwed up, the future of that program is now in doubt also. So instead of taking pot-shots at Airbus, blame Boeing for losing out. They did it to themselves.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Australia Selects A330-200 For Air Force Tanker
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
US President Selects A380 As New Air Force One... posted Tue May 3 2005 22:56:35 by AirOrange
Replacement For Air Force 1? posted Sun Aug 8 2004 23:37:02 by Futurestar68
Why 744 For U.S. Air Force posted Sun Feb 8 2004 03:12:19 by 3lions
Boeing Plans To Double US Air Force Tanker Deal posted Fri Oct 3 2003 14:31:52 by Kl911
Security Measures For Air Force One posted Thu Mar 20 2003 14:58:07 by Ryanb741
Singapore Air Force Tanker posted Wed Feb 6 2002 21:56:51 by 9A-CRO
A340-200 D-ASFB Ex-Brunei For Iran Air Force? posted Thu Dec 5 2002 13:30:55 by Alpha
New U.S. Air Force Bombers Planned For 2018, 2035 posted Fri Oct 13 2006 06:48:45 by AerospaceFan
Finnish Air Force Wants A330 posted Wed May 24 2006 13:27:58 by Ravel
US Air Force Clears F-22A Raptor For Combat posted Sat Jan 14 2006 19:14:35 by MidnightMike
Boeing Plans To Double US Air Force Tanker Deal posted Fri Oct 3 2003 14:31:52 by Kl911
Security Measures For Air Force One posted Thu Mar 20 2003 14:58:07 by Ryanb741
Singapore Air Force Tanker posted Wed Feb 6 2002 21:56:51 by 9A-CRO
A340-200 D-ASFB Ex-Brunei For Iran Air Force? posted Thu Dec 5 2002 13:30:55 by Alpha
Brazil Signs Air Force Deal For Mi-35 Helicopters posted Tue Dec 2 2008 09:30:29 by Keesje
Winglets For Every US Air Force C-32A? posted Mon Aug 20 2007 03:02:25 by Socal

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format