Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Afghan Military Av  
User currently offlineSpacepope From Vatican City, joined Dec 1999, 2897 posts, RR: 1
Posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 2 days ago) and read 1776 times:

What is the status of the Afghani fleet?

In this photo, you can see 2 Mi-8/17, a Mi-24 gunship, as well as an AN-12/Y-8. The C-130 in the background is most likely not Afghani.

Does anyone have any updated numbers of types in service, and where these came from (I have seen numerous US Mi-8s in press photos from early fighting in 2001, as well as being used in liberia).


The last of the famous international playboys
14 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineGreaser From Bahamas, joined Jan 2004, 1101 posts, RR: 4
Reply 1, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 1719 times:

I would imagine the US/EU would start selling defense equipment pretty soon to them. Maybe some block 50/60 desert falcons (f-16s)

3 priorities:

1. Border & National Security: maybe 80-100 SAR/Enforcement helis like Super Pumas or HH-60s.
2.National Army: AH-1Zs, Ch-47s.
3.Air Force: Again, f-16s and maybe F-15s. Another possibility would be the Dassault...



Now you're really flying
User currently offlineDuce50boom From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 1694 times:

I don't think F-16s or F-15s would be in the Afghani AF anytime soon. It was hard enough selling them to Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, and they're both US friendly (sort of) and stable (sort of) countries. If the F-5 were still in production I'd say that'd be a shoo-in. Not really sure what it's equivalent would be today. Of course, if they can fork up the deneros, the EU countries might be willing to sell mirages or something similiar.

My guess is they'll stick with Russian or Chinese designs. Mig-21 comes to mind as a possibility


User currently offlineContact_tower From Norway, joined Sep 2001, 536 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 1532 times:

I think the F-16 or similar is to complex (and capable) to be an option for the Afghan forces. They are better off with a more rugged Russian design, at least in the short term. There are some surplus MIG29s available at the moment as well, and probably more to come.

For the same reason as above, the Mi-8 family (Mi-17, "hot and high" version at least) and Mi-24 are more suited for this part of the world, I don't think they will afford to keep a fleet of modern western airframes airborne.
Old US CH-47s in storage (if any???) might be a solution, if they have the high altitude capablilites of the modern ones.

[Edited 2004-06-15 15:36:18]

User currently offlineSpacepope From Vatican City, joined Dec 1999, 2897 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 1451 times:

During and after the Soviet occupation, they had quite a few MiG-21s and Su-22Ms. These along with AN-12/24/26s made up the bulk of their fixed wing forces. There was a MiG-21 flying for the Taliban as recently as the beginning of the US campaign there. As for rotary wing, They had Mi-8/17/24s in service too, so this re-equipment seems to just be replacing units. If you look at the nice newly painted helicopter in the picture, you can see it is not a new-build Mi-17 (still has old style rear loading doors).

I would be amazed to see the Afgans get any "western" rotorcraft. Even Pakistan, who is getting 40 AH-1 and 40 UH-1s this year, still has taken delivery of 13 Mi-17s this year as well.

Is China exporting the Y-8 as a cargo aircraft? The AN-12 went out of production in 1973, and they are becoming rarer by the day. I see a cargo fleet that may include C-130 E/H from surplus stocks, backed up by AN-26/32s

Note: that photo was supposedly from when the Chinese were retrieving the bodies of the 11 contractors killed in their sleep last week. They flew in on an IL-76, the AN-12 there does not seem to belong to them.



The last of the famous international playboys
User currently offlineContact_tower From Norway, joined Sep 2001, 536 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 1428 times:

It's pretty much just the CH47 that is really hot and high capable in the "western" world. The Mi-17 is a good choice, and it's fairy cheap as well.



User currently offlineGreaser From Bahamas, joined Jan 2004, 1101 posts, RR: 4
Reply 6, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 1422 times:

Oh well, i guess my hopes of a super modern Afghan Armee are dashed...but u cannot rule out ch-47s....exp. the older ones...


Now you're really flying
User currently offlineN328KF From United States of America, joined May 2004, 6483 posts, RR: 3
Reply 7, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 1416 times:

I thought the Super Stallion had similar hot/high/heavy capabilities as compared to the CH-47.


When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.' T.Roosevelt
User currently offlineContact_tower From Norway, joined Sep 2001, 536 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 1412 times:

My bad 28KF, you are right! (I must start taking more vitamins, becoming forgetful... Big grin )

User currently offlineSpacepope From Vatican City, joined Dec 1999, 2897 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 1408 times:

The problem is that the CH-46 hasn't been produced in how many decades? The Navy and Marines can't afford to get rid of any, plus the airframes are beat to hell and have no useful life left. It seems every tine their hours limit is about to be reached, they extend it.

For fixed wing, I wouldn't say that the US is above pulling some F-16A/Bs out of storage, as the F-16 is readlily available and has been used quite extensively by coalition forces. Used MiG-23s might also be a possibility (perhaps as Algeria takes delivery of more MiG-29s). For new aircraft, it's pretty much either MiG-29 or JF-17. SU-27 is unlikely, although we did see how it dominated MiG-29s in the Ethiopia/Eritrea war a few years ago.



The last of the famous international playboys
User currently offlineN328KF From United States of America, joined May 2004, 6483 posts, RR: 3
Reply 10, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 1385 times:

Spacepope:

CH-46 != CH-47. The latter is being supplied as new build.



When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.' T.Roosevelt
User currently offlineSpacepope From Vatican City, joined Dec 1999, 2897 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 1384 times:

N328KF: Sorry brainfart.

Next time use CH-53 instead of "Super Stallion", then I'll be sure to know what the hell we're talking about.

In all seriousness, a tandem/coaxial rotor helicopter, or a heavy lift helo is really the only viable option here. I think Kamov and Mil have the inside track.



The last of the famous international playboys
User currently offlineSpacepope From Vatican City, joined Dec 1999, 2897 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (10 years 4 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 1313 times:

Dug up another photo today, dated June 24, 2004.



In the background, it looks like an AN-32 is in service too.



The last of the famous international playboys
User currently offlineLY744 From Canada, joined Feb 2001, 5536 posts, RR: 10
Reply 13, posted (10 years 4 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 1311 times:

Couldn't the An-32 belong to a European ally? The type seems popular with Eastern European countries.


LY744.



Pacifism only works if EVERYBODY practices it
User currently offlineSpacepope From Vatican City, joined Dec 1999, 2897 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (10 years 4 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 1311 times:

Most europeans don't use the AN-32, as they don't need the extra performance for hot-and-high ops. the color scheme looks most like it is an Indian, or at least ex-indian machine. India is one of the largest users of the type. Before the war, there were plenty of AN-24 and AN26s around. Unfortunately that is the best photo I could find of this one.


The last of the famous international playboys
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Afghan Military Av
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Iranian Military Plane Crash posted Mon Nov 27 2006 13:40:18 by 7of9
Military Cargo A/C In CLE? posted Sat Nov 18 2006 21:14:43 by Dan2002
Is The U.S.C.G. Considered "Military" posted Sun Nov 12 2006 19:19:37 by UH60FtRucker
Military Flights Into BHX posted Thu Nov 9 2006 14:18:21 by DC10BHX
Fastest British Military Jet posted Thu Nov 2 2006 17:36:49 by N215AZ
Toilets On Military Planes? posted Mon Oct 16 2006 05:18:27 by LimaNiner
Unusual Military Designations posted Wed Oct 11 2006 21:52:50 by Broke
Military Presence At PDX? posted Wed Oct 11 2006 19:14:58 by IFEMaster
How Capable Is The North Korean Military? posted Mon Oct 9 2006 11:01:50 by CHRISBA777ER
Military Presence At ABE posted Sat Sep 30 2006 08:24:59 by ANITIX87

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format