AGM100 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 5407 posts, RR: 16 Posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 2545 times:
In other sources as well a A-NET I have noticed the US Navy USMC appears to be changing from the low viz schemes. I saw a shot on CBS news the other night of a carrier in the gulf, the F-14's were painted up in squadron colors and looked great. Which do you like ? I love this shot of the 18 thanks Mr. Fulber!
BCAInfoSys From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 2495 times:
Just a clarification.. the USMC may be located under the Department of the Navy, but they're NOT part of the Navy! There is a very big distinction. You're sure to piss off any Marine if you label them as being part of the Navy... just an FYI.
DfwRevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 977 posts, RR: 51
Reply 6, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 2324 times:
I agree on the low viz , never did understand that. Maybe someone can expalin the logic of low viz.
Even if you're radar picks a target up say 10 miles out, it is much harder to spot a grey dot against the horizon than it is a bright red or orange dot. Grey also reflects less light making it harder to see.