Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Mirage 2000 - A Good Aircraft  
User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31712 posts, RR: 56
Posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 4124 times:

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/922855.cms
A Mirage 2000 crashes & doubts are raised about a very reliable Jet.This happens only in India.Remember the A320s.
regds
MEL


Think of the brighter side!
9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineIndianFlyboy From India, joined Sep 2003, 294 posts, RR: 6
Reply 1, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 3995 times:

Well I am waiting for the moment when the media labels the Mirage 2000's as flying coffins part II now.

4 mirage crashes , this one is set as pilot error (still under investigation) , the one which crashed on take off was a bird hit if I am not wrong , the one on its way back from RSA had a undercarriage failure , dont know about the fourth.
I am yet to see, with the exception of the undercarriage failure which one can be attributed directly to the safety of the aircraft.

Throughout its service with the IAF , the mirage has been exceptional in its performance , these sorts of reports just insult a beautiful aircraft.

The statement on the news item "The news also spelt trouble, for MiG-21s - notorious for frequent crashes and ominously named 'flying coffins' - are old, have trouble with spare parts, while Mirages are considered the safest fighters not just in the IAF but around the world. " , is again incorrect.

Just a blanket statement covering all the MiG 21's , when it is the Type 77 or the FL's which have the maximum problems.

Just our wonderful media at play....

Regards



User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31712 posts, RR: 56
Reply 2, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 3953 times:

I think the solution would be multiple Engined Aircraft. Smile
regds
MEL

[Edited 2004-11-16 14:13:05]


Think of the brighter side!
User currently offlineSpacepope From Vatican City, joined Dec 1999, 2992 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 3898 times:

The IAF really has to take a look at what they're doing with their Mirage 2000s. 4 crashes in 3 months is absurd, especially as they only crashed 3 in the previous decade. Pretty soon the loss rates are going to approach that of the F-18 in USN service.

IAF jet losses this year, from the top of my head:
4 M2K
4 Jaguar
2 MiG 21
1 MiG 23
1 MiG 27



The last of the famous international playboys
User currently offlineSayem55 From Pakistan, joined Jul 2001, 324 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 3554 times:

Dude, it’s not the a/c... it’s the person in the cockpit!!! IAF have had phenomenal record of crashing GOOD a/c. MiG-21s were dubbed "flying coffins" when 97% of the accidents were pilots' fault.




StarFighter
User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31712 posts, RR: 56
Reply 5, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 3493 times:

I agree the Transition from Flying Sub to Supersonic is causing a problem.
regds
MEL



Think of the brighter side!
User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29840 posts, RR: 58
Reply 6, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 3491 times:

Didn't the IAF have issues when the aircraft requiring and extraordinary amount of good treatment compared to other types when introduced?

I think I remember hearing stories about having to construct air conditioned hangers especially for the aircraft because of their dislike of hot ground temps.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineDl021 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 11447 posts, RR: 75
Reply 7, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 9 hours ago) and read 3455 times:

The Mirage 2000 is an excellent aircraft, in the same class as the F-16 series, and the thought that it is to blame for these crashes is an attempt to divert blame.

IAF will continue to have these problems until they get serious about training. The delayed Hawk purchase (for political reasons) and the diversion of funding to nuclear subs and weapons has been the root of some serious issues for the Indians. You don't see this problem with the Taiwanese, French, or other operators of the Mirage, and you certainly did not see this with the MiG-21 with most operators.

The modern Hawks should be brought into service as quickly as possible and the leadership should apologize to the brave pilots that have been failed by the training system, especially in the area of LIFT to this point.

[Edited 2004-11-21 20:44:29]


Is my Pan Am ticket to the moon still good?
User currently offlineIndianFlyboy From India, joined Sep 2003, 294 posts, RR: 6
Reply 8, posted (10 years 1 month 6 days ago) and read 3347 times:

While the MiG 21's (earlier variants and MiG 23's) do have airworthiness issues , no sane flight engineer would clear an aircraft for flight if he had the slightest of doubts. If an engine flames out in flight , I seriously doubt the mech who certified it even knew that it would happen.
The big problem with MiG 21's are that they are extremely unforgiving aircrafts. They have exceptional high speed characteristics and wonderful agility but at low speeds it is similar to flying a truck without power steering. Same goes for the MiG 23 as well.While the problems do exist with the flight training ,IMHO attributing this particular incident to flight training would be incorrect. To get to a Mirage 2000 sqn , the pilot would already have been night operational on the MiG 21's , so it is not that the pilot was thrown from a Kiran directly to a Mirage and asked to fly nights.

MiG 21's on the other hand , engine flame out in flight or failure (due to any reasons , bird hit anything) would definitely have a very high possibility of a crash because of the way the aircraft handles. Again , in over 90% of the cases , I would not blame the pilots or the training for this. The reason for this being , if all pilots train on MiG 21-77's or MiG 21-FL's , do all of them crash ?
Attrition rates for the MiG 21-BIS or the MiG 21 Bisons are pretty much in line with all other aircrafts for any airforce in the world.
While the IAF tries everything in its capacity to train pilots for the handling of aircrafts like the MiG 21's , there are certain things which just cannot be taught on the ground and these come with experience , unfortunately sometimes the experience is learnt the hard way.
Getting the Hawks would definitely be a step closer to gaining valuable experience for pilots transistioning from the subsonic Kiran's and Iskra's to the likes of the MiG 21's , but would this eliminate all the crashes , no.

Dl021 , the IAF is very serious about training , the idiots who run the govt however fail to see the reasoning. The Hawk order has been pending since 86 and finally came only in 2003 . As far as the MiG 21 goes , like I said it is the Type 77's or FL-s which gives the problems , as and when these get replaced with the BIS , the attrition rates should come down.

Dude, it’s not the a/c... it’s the person in the cockpit!!! IAF have had phenomenal record of crashing GOOD a/c. MiG-21s were dubbed "flying coffins" when 97% of the accidents were pilots' fault.

Sayem, please justify your post with some links ....

Regards




User currently offlineDl021 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 11447 posts, RR: 75
Reply 9, posted (10 years 3 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 3205 times:

Iflyboy....Did not mean to impugn the entire IAF, just those in government responsible for the lack of training aircraft and for the decision making that leads to use of aircraft that are more difficult than average without the necessary provisions for the safety of the pilots.

Flameouts happen for a reason and the incident rate can be mitigated by better training on the more modern aircraft. This will obviously not eliminate all accidents but it will limit them.

DL021



Is my Pan Am ticket to the moon still good?
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Mirage 2000 - A Good Aircraft
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
IAF Zeroing On Mirage 2000 posted Sat Dec 3 2005 05:01:09 by Aseem
F-16 For Pakistan, Mirage 2000 For India... posted Tue Mar 29 2005 23:46:54 by Bsergonomics
Mirage 2000 Crash-lands At Mauritius' Airshow posted Tue Feb 1 2005 12:27:22 by AirOrange
USN F/A-18 E/F A Good Or Bad Aircraft? posted Mon Apr 3 2006 22:25:48 by Manzoori
Space A Travel On Uscg Aircraft posted Wed Nov 15 2006 23:40:00 by Reedyreed
Favorite Vietnam War Aircraft posted Tue Oct 24 2006 20:45:00 by PJFlysFast
Favorit WWII Aircraft? posted Wed Oct 18 2006 18:21:47 by Skyman
Eads Mako/HEAT Aircraft posted Wed Oct 11 2006 01:30:19 by Boeing4ever
Unusual Aircraft On Approach At Kdma posted Tue Oct 3 2006 19:35:39 by SABE
Aircraft With Highest Wing Store Weight Capacity posted Mon Sep 25 2006 15:57:44 by 2H4

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format