Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why Ultra-long Range Bomber Flights?  
User currently offlineMozart From Luxembourg, joined Aug 2003, 2408 posts, RR: 21
Posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 3683 times:

Hi, I haven't got a clue about military aviation whatsoever, and this is my first post here.

I have a question: why on earth are B52s sent from Louisiana to Iraq, drop a few bombs and then fly back?? What's the point for those ultra-long flights? Couldn't they be based somewhere closer? There are plenty of bases in Europe or there's Diego Garcia, let alone Qatar which is closer. So why send them in from Louisiana?

5 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineN328KF From United States of America, joined May 2004, 6618 posts, RR: 3
Reply 1, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 3642 times:


If they only need them for a few missions, it's a lot easier to just fly them non-stop (with aerial tanking) than it is to move their entire support system.

Anyhow, the main outlying bases for the B-52 that are pre-prepped are Diego Garcia and Guam, but also, sometimes the pilots want to be home after they're done.  Big grin

When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.' T.Roosevelt
User currently offlineIntruderPC From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 82 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 3432 times:

Diego GArcia is roughly 3200 miles from the middle of Irag, Guam 6600 miles, and BArksdale AFB is over 8000 miles. I would think that they could take one set of support equipment to Diego Garcia and then rotate squadrons like every 2 months or so. That way I think they would save a major, major amount on fuel. If you take into account the refueling flights and all of the other support they are putting some REAL BIG BIG BUCKS into just a 2 or 3 plane mission. Logistics and fuel are awesomely expensive!!

[Edited 2004-12-15 02:57:27]

[Edited 2004-12-15 02:58:03]

A-6's and Navy Air forever!!!
User currently offlinePhilsquares From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 3419 times:

Very simply put.................

Force projection. Which is the ability to use force anytime and anyplace. It sends a very strong message.

User currently offlineGrom365 From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 27 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 3376 times:

The B-52s that flew from Barksdale AFB carried CALCMs, which are unique weapons in the inventory. They made the long trip for many of the same reasons B-2s make the trip from MO - because you don't have to worry about non-US personnel, friendly or otherwise, taking pictures or snooping around.

Plus, I think there are treaty restrictions on the placement of nuclear capable cruise missiles outside national borders.

User currently offlineVzlet From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 854 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 3390 times:

Was there a series of missions from Barksdale, or are you referring only to the strikes on the opening night of Desert Storm? Those were carried out by seven B-52Gs firing a total of 35 cruise missiles. I'm not at all sure, but there may have been issues (in 1990/91, before later modifications) with the "H" model employing conventional versions of the AGM-86. Adding to N328KF's point, any deployment would likely also have to have included support for the missiles, so it may just have been simpler to launch from and recover at home. ("Simpler" being a relative term. It can't be fun spending 35 hours in any plane, much less a combat aircraft!)


"That's so stupid! If they're so secret, why are they out where everyone can see them?" - my kid
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Why Ultra-long Range Bomber Flights?
No username? Sign up now!

Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)

Similar topics:More similar topics...
New Long Range Bomber Announced posted Thu Aug 3 2006 01:32:53 by AislepathLight
Why So Long For A KC-135R To Get Into The Air? posted Sun Sep 10 2006 02:01:28 by 747400sp
Do Long Range Heavy Bombers Have An Fighter Excort posted Tue Dec 20 2005 18:23:02 by 747400sp
Awacs With Long-range AAMs posted Thu Sep 2 2004 16:14:28 by N328KF
Why No USN Heritage Flights? posted Tue Jul 18 2006 20:41:06 by 747400sp
Why Not Keep The F-14 As A Full Time Bomber? posted Fri Mar 7 2003 06:20:01 by CX747
Military Flights Into BHX posted Thu Nov 9 2006 14:18:21 by DC10BHX
Space Policy Pushes Manned Flights, Nuclear Power posted Tue Oct 17 2006 21:51:27 by AerospaceFan
How Long Would The US Have Been Giving Away F4U's posted Sun Oct 8 2006 08:47:57 by L-188
Final F-14 Flights. posted Thu Sep 28 2006 04:56:57 by Silver1SWA

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format