Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Serbians Tricked Nato With Decoys: Is This True?  
User currently offlineCURLYHEADBOY From Italy, joined Feb 2005, 940 posts, RR: 2
Posted (9 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 3799 times:

If this has already been discussed please delete this thread, I tried a search but didn't get anything about it... I'm a newbie here, be patient  Smile

I read an interesting article in an aviation magazine regarding the use of fake planes, tanks and vehicles by the Serbians during the Kosovo airstrikes.
In summary: There was a unit called M 18 whose task was building decoys. They built 30 false L-18 (Mig-29) aircrafts out of junk wood, wrapped in aluminum foils to make it radar-reflecting, put simple petrol burners in the back to reproduce engine heat and simple mechanical and electronic devices to create engine noise. Over 90% of these cheap decoys were hit by NATO bombs. There are some pictures and I can tell you the work is outstanding, they look real in every particular, Aphid and Alamo AA missiles included!  Wow!
Colonel David Hackworth, commentator for "defending America" wrote:"After all the bombs, missiles and roaring reports by NATO on the damage inflicted to the Serbian Army [...] 11 Mig-29 appeared in a Kosovo base the day after peace was signed."

That's shocking news to me, I heard something about light poles used in Vietnam to resemble SAMs but never knew about this story...

Do you guys have some more on this or want to add any comment?

Marco.


If God had wanted men to fly he would have given them more money...
12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineNoUFO From Germany, joined Apr 2001, 7966 posts, RR: 12
Reply 1, posted (9 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 3764 times:

Yes, I have heard of that, too. If I remember correctly, it was said they even lit coal fires inside fake tanks to simulate infrared signatures.


I support the right to arm bears
User currently offlineMD11Engineer From Germany, joined Oct 2003, 14139 posts, RR: 63
Reply 2, posted (9 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 3743 times:

This is nothing new. Back during WW2, a complete fake army of several divisions of American and British equipment was staged in fields in Kent in Britain to convince the Germans that the invasion would take place around Calais. They used inflatable tanks and trucks made of rubber, which got moved every day by a small British unit to look realistic on German aerial reconaissance pictures.On June 6, 1944, a few British planes flew a carefull pattern over the British Channel, dropping chaff (pieces of aluminium foil) to fool the German sea observation radar stations into believing that a fleet of ships were on the way to Calais.
The Russians were also experts in camouflaging their equipment and setting up fake positions to attrct the attention of the Germans.
On Iwo Jima, the Japanese carved and painted a rock to look like a Japanese tank (I´ve got a picture of it). Numerous US Marine tank crews reported having knocked out this "tank". I´ve also got pictures of fake Japanese AAA guns made up of tree trunks.

The Germans camouflaged huge parts of central Hamburg with tarpaulins and nets, to make built up areas look like rivers and lakes, while the built floating islandson the Elbe river and the Alster lake to look like housing from the air.

Jan


User currently offlineSATL382G From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (9 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 3734 times:

Yes, but in WWII they didn't have EP-3s, UAV, U2s, Satellite recon, etc....

User currently offlineContact_tower From Norway, joined Sep 2001, 536 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (9 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 3668 times:

Well, NATO did spend lots of expensive PGMs on plywood planes and tanks during Allied Force, so it obviously works. (At least in theatres of war where weather prevents UAVs having 100% access to the battlefield at all times, like Kosovo where weather prevented most optical surveilance in long periods.)

Large plywood armies are a thing of the past, but decoys still have a place in the mix, if just to adjust the odds in favour of the defender slightly.


User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29832 posts, RR: 58
Reply 5, posted (9 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 3645 times:

Wouldn't surpise me if it where true.

And it wouldn't bother me if it where.

The Flying Tigers did that to Japanese bombers before WWII.

Decoying has been around for a long tme.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlinePPGMD From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 2453 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (9 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 3639 times:

True they may have saved the air frames, but because they had to spend their time hidden they weren't useful in attacking US forces.


At worst, you screw up and die.
User currently offlineCURLYHEADBOY From Italy, joined Feb 2005, 940 posts, RR: 2
Reply 7, posted (9 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 3639 times:

Well, actually is not the fact that these decoys were built and used that amazes me, I know this is nothing new, but the amount of success they obtained.
If I have to believe this particular article, I'm impressed by the fact that of the over 300 tanks NATO claimed to have destroyed, only 3 T55 were actually found to have been hit for real, all the others were dummies built out of old cars (Yugo 45, Zastava 128 and VW Golf), modified with wood boxes and heater tubes as a cannon. Also, the only MIGs actually destroyed were those downed in air-to-air engagements by the NATO F-15s and F-16s, all the others were fake. Of course this changes nothing about the political achievements of the campaign, but makes a lot of difference in terms of success of the airstrikes against airbases and ground forces.
I thought that the Serbian Air Force was completely annihilated, but this seems not to be true.



If God had wanted men to fly he would have given them more money...
User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29832 posts, RR: 58
Reply 8, posted (9 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 3602 times:

Well, actually is not the fact that these decoys were built and used that amazes me, I know this is nothing new, but the amount of success they obtained.

Actually don't be so surprised.

There is a rule of thumb that if you have the wartime resources available..

When it doubt, Blow it up.


OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29832 posts, RR: 58
Reply 9, posted (9 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 3602 times:

Well, actually is not the fact that these decoys were built and used that amazes me, I know this is nothing new, but the amount of success they obtained.

Actually don't be so surprised.

There is a rule of thumb that if you have the wartime resources available..

When in doubt, Blow it up.


OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineScbriml From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2003, 12875 posts, RR: 46
Reply 10, posted (9 years 10 months 2 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 3567 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

So, if you're in doubt, you blow it up twice?  Big grin


Time flies like an arrow, but fruit flies like a banana! #44cHAMpion
User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29832 posts, RR: 58
Reply 11, posted (9 years 10 months 2 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 3514 times:

Yeah, the first shot might miss  Laugh out loud


OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineBully707 From Germany, joined Jan 2005, 1038 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (9 years 10 months 1 week 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 3517 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Oh yes...!!

During the campaign, before and after every mission we received a looong "intel" briefing by our military intelligence group...

Based on the information handed out to them from various sources they gave those briefings.Deception is always used to confuse the enemy...!!!

The Serbians may have tricked NATO forces all along ( and fooled us since 1992 )...but we controlled the interception and destruction of 4 Serbian MiG29 ( 2 on March 24, enroute to Nis from Batajnica and 2 on March 26, headed to shoot us down, from Batajnica until destroyed over the Bosnian border ).

I do not want to experience something similar again...it sure is a crappy feeling when you are trying to evade the attack of a supersonic MiG29 with your E-3 and you can see everything on your radar scope and pds system...

Bully




"That's the good thing about the 707...it can do anything, but read!" Joe Patroni, Airport '70
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Serbians Tricked Nato With Decoys: Is This True?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Is This AN AA 747 Carrying A Space Shuttle? posted Wed Oct 18 2006 02:25:45 by Fll2993
What Is This Space Project From The 60's posted Sun Jan 1 2006 12:12:33 by Aak777
Shuttle + Duct Tape (is This For Real?) posted Sun Sep 11 2005 11:10:42 by Jimpop
What Plane Is This? posted Sun Sep 4 2005 00:49:54 by Scbriml
What Kind Of Plane Is This? posted Mon Jan 17 2005 19:29:44 by Clickhappy
What Kind Of Aircraft Is This? posted Wed Sep 22 2004 03:54:26 by FrontierCPT
IAF Scored Over Uasf Is It True. posted Thu Jun 24 2004 18:11:45 by HAWK21M
What Aircraft Is This? posted Thu May 27 2004 21:38:08 by Derico
F4U Corsair - What Model Is This One? posted Sat Oct 18 2003 20:37:43 by Mr Spaceman
What Type Of C-130 Is This? posted Mon Aug 4 2003 00:35:49 by Cadet985

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format