Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
C-130 Lands On A Carrier Deck  
User currently offlineSonic67 From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 292 posts, RR: 0
Posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days ago) and read 14743 times:


Was the C-130 actually considered as a possible carrier plane by the Navy?

It seems a little to large to be stored on board on a AC carrier but I was surprised to see actually being able to land on the AC carrier Forrestal.


http://www.theaviationzone.com/factsheets/c130_forrestal.asp#videos

15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSpacepope From Vatican City, joined Dec 1999, 2935 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days ago) and read 14674 times:

They landed U-2s on carriers too. More of showing that ti could be done than any real plan to intoduce them into carrier service.


The last of the famous international playboys
User currently offlineSonic67 From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 292 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days ago) and read 14661 times:


I also heard that Lockheed also tried to modify a C-130 to land and take off from a soccer field using rockets to rescue the hostages in Iran. I heard the first test was successful but the second time they tried the wing ripped off and the AC and crew where lost.


User currently offlineGarnetpalmetto From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 5399 posts, RR: 53
Reply 3, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days ago) and read 14658 times:

Sonic - the idea wasn't to base C-130s onboard carriers, but rather to evaluate whether or not it would be effective as the COD.


South Carolina - too small to be its own country, too big to be a mental asylum.
User currently offlineSonic67 From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 292 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days ago) and read 14650 times:


What does COD stand for?



User currently offlineHaveBlue From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 2112 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 14628 times:

Sonic,

I have video of the C-130 landing tests you are talking about. Are you familiar with JATO rockets? This C-130 had JATO bottles on the side and near top of the forward fuselage pointing FORWARD... the idea was to decelerate in short order. On the video I have and what you're talking about they hit the cans too early, while the plane was still in the air, and it effectively dropped out of the air (guessing 20' or so, haven't watched it in a while) and when it did the starboard wing came off and a fuel fire immediately started. I'm not certain, but I don't think any of the crew died. They did scrap the idea after that though.

And COD stands for Carrier Onboard Delivery, or what brings mail, cargo and crew on board while the Carrier is underway. The COD aircraft used for the last few decades has been the Grumman C-2 Greyhound, an empty cargo version of its sister, the E-2 Hawkeye.

And yes the U-2 took off from a carrier and the 130 took off and landed, unassisted, but neither was put into practice.

Still cool though.



Here Here for Severe Clear!
User currently offlineSATL382G From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 14624 times:

Seems entirely possible to me that both the U2 and C130 carrier tests were public test flights to provide cover for and/or support later covert operations.

Given the nature of carrier operations it could've happened and the only folks that would know are the flight crew and the guys in the island.


User currently offlineSonic67 From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 292 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 14613 times:

HaveBlue

Yes I'm familiar with JATO it was used since the 2nd WW. I should have known that. If you have chance can you post the video of the C-130.

Thanks

 Big thumbs up


User currently offlineHaveBlue From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 2112 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 14574 times:

Sonic,

I didn't mean the question to be sarcastic, just rather typing how I was thinking, and not knowing if you had any idea what JATO was. I tried to upload the video to my homesite, but as I really have only ever uploaded pictures, it didn't work and I'll have to find a way around it. However, upon watching the video again after posting it does seem to have fired at about 20-30 feet and to clarify the wing didn't depart until the very hard landing, at which point the C-130 did a 90 degree turn to the right and caught fire, and according to the commentator 'the ship was lost' so I'm assuming from his lack of saying so that the crew was okay. It certainly looked survivable, though embarrissing.




Here Here for Severe Clear!
User currently offline2H4 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 8955 posts, RR: 60
Reply 9, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 14569 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
DATABASE EDITOR

Found it!


http://people.attens.com/bierma/Misc/C-130_Mishap.mpg


The airplane is a C-130, highly modified with rocket engines, yes rocket engines. This plane was modified in 1980 when the Iranians took over the American Embassy in Tehran. The plane was designed to land and take-off in the length of a soccer field,(~ 600 ft.) which was conveniently located across from the Embassy. The modification was done in record time 3-1/2 months. This was the final flight test, after which, the plane was to leave for Iran with 50 special missions troops.

However, as you can see, this crash ended the mission. The flight test director on the program gave us the scoop. If you watch the landing closely, you can see that the retro rockets on the top of the fuselage fire first, then approximately 3 seconds later, the bottom rockets are fired. Initial flight tests revealed that the bottom rockets were only to be fired when the plane was on the ground. They had so much stopping power, that if they were fired in the air, the plane would stop forward motion, and "drop" to the ground, as happened here.

The sequence was to be as follows: the pilot would fire the upper rockets @ 20' agl (above ground level) and then the navigator would fire the lower rockets when the plane touched down. A problem arose with determining when the plane actually touched the ground. The upper rockets caused so much noise, and vibration, that the crew lost the ability to sense when the airplane actually touched the ground. Thus, through trial and error, the navigator discovered that if he counted to 3 after upper rockets were fired, the plane would be on the ground. So that was the plan: pilot fires upper rockets @ 20' agl, navigator counts to 3, and fires lower rockets. Seems simple enough.

However, on this flight, with all the top military brass watching, the pilot thought he would make the landing as spectacular as possible, and without telling anyone, he fired the upper rockets @ 40' agl. Unaware of pilot's change of plan, the navigator counted to 3 after the pilot fired the upper rockets, and fired the lower rockets. Problem was they were still 20' in the air, and as you can see from the video, they literally dropped out of the sky, causing the plane to crack-up. Lesson learned: Flight test plans must be followed to the letter.

This one guy's deviation from the flight plan may have changed history. Had the landing been successful, the mission would have proceeded, and if it would have been successful, and the hostages rescued, Jimmy Carter may have won re-election. While the benefits of another term with Carter could be debated, there's no doubt things would have been different from the Reagan Era.


Source: http://www.slowroll.com/Misc/c130.shtml



2H4



Intentionally Left Blank
User currently offlineKAUST From United States of America, joined Jun 2009, 99 posts, RR: 25
Reply 10, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 14563 times:

Wow...imagine the huge THUMP for the sailors below deck when the C-130 made it's imprint upon the flight deck.

I have heard that most seasoned carrier crews can tell the plane by the sound they make, if not, I bet they could sure tell the mighty Herk!  Big thumbs up  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

KAUST



"Houston, this is Apollo 8. We are now in Lunar orbit."
User currently offlineHaveBlue From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 2112 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 14552 times:

Yep, that's the video I have 2H4. And nice to hear the detailed description of what happened, all I had ever seen was the video but the details are interesting.


Here Here for Severe Clear!
User currently offlineSlamClick From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 10062 posts, RR: 68
Reply 12, posted (9 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 14416 times:

Spectacular video. Looks like a completely survivable crash though. I'll bet that is somewhat exciting, having the rockets fire and engulf the flight deck in fire!

I have seen a number of Herk wings fail during hard landings. Seems like an unfortunate design feature. One that comes to mind was on one of the drop zones at Fort Bragg. Maybe they need to invest some research in making the fuel system crashworthy in the zone where the wings seem to break.

Then of course there was the air tanker crash near Coleville California that effectively shut down aerial fire fighting in the US. And it did not even touch the ground. (until after...)



Happiness is not seeing another trite Ste. Maarten photo all week long.
User currently offlineSprout5199 From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 1853 posts, RR: 2
Reply 13, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 13909 times:

I met the pilot that landed the C-130 on the USS Forrestal (CV-59). His name is Rear Adm. James H. Flatley III(ret). However I did not know it at the time.I was his driver. He was there at the change of command of my ship the USS Flatley (FFG-21), named for his father. Also IIRC he has the most traps of any naval aviator.

Dan in Jupiter

[Edited 2005-02-28 00:00:08]

User currently offlineSonic67 From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 292 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 21 hours ago) and read 13847 times:

2H4:

Thank you for that. That was impressive to say the least.

I had read about it in an aviation magazine but it seeing corrected a lot of misconceptions that I had.


User currently offlineJGPH1A From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (9 years 7 months 1 week 11 hours ago) and read 13819 times:

I recall seeing pictures of a Fokker F.28 doing approaches to a US Navy carrier, way back when. I think it was in conjunction with selecting a new COD aircraft to replace the Greyhound (which it would seem never happened).

Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic C-130 Lands On A Carrier Deck
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
RA5 Vigliante Drop Live Nuke On Carrier Deck? posted Thu Jun 29 2006 08:29:04 by Bjornstrom
C-5 & C-130 @ ORD On 7/5/06 posted Thu Jul 6 2006 01:00:08 by Airfinair
Video Of A Blackhawk Rollover On A Carrier posted Wed Jan 11 2006 22:32:16 by KPDX
Have Any Of You Watched Flight Ops On A Carrier posted Thu Aug 11 2005 18:25:47 by 747400sp
Huygens Lands On Titan Tommorrow posted Thu Jan 13 2005 19:04:45 by SATL382G
C-130 Herculese Landing On Aircraft Carrier posted Fri Jun 28 2002 04:06:24 by Squigee
Carrier Landings On Autopilot posted Wed Jan 4 2006 00:58:25 by Exarmywarrant
Top Cool Things About Living On AC Carrier posted Mon Mar 10 2003 01:36:52 by Jhooper
U.S. Jet Crashes On Aircraft Carrier posted Thu Jan 10 2002 06:06:29 by NBC News1
Space A Travel On Uscg Aircraft posted Wed Nov 15 2006 23:40:00 by Reedyreed

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format