Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Next Generation Awacs  
User currently offlineBjornstrom From Australia, joined Jun 2005, 331 posts, RR: 1
Posted (10 years 10 months 3 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 5364 times:

I read the Boeing presentation on AWACS here:

Found this information: "In November 1997, Boeing received a contract worth approximately $450 million to develop and test the next mission systems upgrade for the NATO E-3 fleet. Under the Mid-Term engineering, manufacturing and development (EMD) contract, which runs through 2001, Boeing -- supported by subcontractors from participating NATO nations -- will integrate major system-related enhancements to computers, displays, communications, navigation and target identification. Retrofit of the entire fleet will be implemented during a follow-on contract."

Do you guys know details about the upgrade? Will there be a next-gen AWACS using a upgraded body, the 707-320B seems a bit old. Maybe a 777-300LR? Whats the pricetag of a current gen AWACS?

Eurobonus Gold | BMI Gold | http://my.flightmemory.com/bjornstrom/
7 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineBjornstrom From Australia, joined Jun 2005, 331 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (10 years 10 months 3 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 5363 times:

I kept on reading and found the 767 AWACS. Seems a bit odd that they use a old airframe when they have the 777's?


Eurobonus Gold | BMI Gold | http://my.flightmemory.com/bjornstrom/
User currently offlineColumba From Germany, joined Dec 2004, 7207 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (10 years 10 months 3 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 5361 times:

No 777 it is too big. I only see two alternatives 767 or even 737 BBJ 2. Guess with new electronics you don´t need such a large airplane. I think Australia is doing fine with its wedgetails and the Airforce/Navy have already aquired some 737s.

It will forever be a McDonnell Douglas MD 80 , Boeing MD 80 sounds so wrong
User currently offlineWoodreau From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 1181 posts, RR: 7
Reply 3, posted (10 years 10 months 3 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 5342 times:

I don't think there was any change in the airframe or engines or anything like that.

The changes were in the electronics, display consoles, communication equipment, so all the changes were internal. It sounds like a typical upgrade to a military weapon system - replace the vacuum tubes with solid state electronics  Smile


Bonus animus sit, ab experientia. Quod salvatum fuerit de malis usu venit judicium.
User currently offlineBully707 From Germany, joined Jan 2005, 1047 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (10 years 10 months 3 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 5306 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hi there!!!

The Mod-Block Upgrade incorporated a new computer and upgrades for the radar....

The Mid-Life upgrade consists of new consoles and all the other stuff mentioned in the Boeing article...  Wink

For the last 3 years NATO is contemplating a change in engines...and the engines only!!!
The two competitors are proposing the future upgrade to either CFM56 (like the E-3D/F and the Saudi E-3s) or
the conversion to JT8 engines ( like on the N707RE ).

During an airshow in the Netherlands in 2003 I spoke to a representative of Boeing, and he mentioned that they would prefer a change to CFM...  Wink

A completely new AWACS was also proposed, but NATO would rather like to have a combined E-3/E-8....

The current fleet of 17 NATO E-3As was planned for a operational life until 2025....but they were aging fast during the 7 years of the Yugoslavian crisis...

But I hope they will remain operational for a looong time....!!!!!  Wink  Wink  Wink



"That's the good thing about the 707...it can do anything, but read!" Joe Patroni, Airport '70
User currently offlineAeroWeanie From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 1612 posts, RR: 51
Reply 5, posted (10 years 10 months 3 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 5241 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

The E-3 (AWACS) and the E-8 (JSTARS) are supposed to be replaced by the E-10A, built on a 767-400ER airframe. One airframe has been ordered, but the USAF has now announced that it will only be a testbed. The real testbed for the E-10A is the 707 Paul Revere (N404PA).

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Fabrice Nelson

User currently offlineLt-AWACS From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (10 years 10 months 3 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 5175 times:

Actually the E-3 is now spiral 3 of the E-10 and will not happen anytime soon. JStars and RJ are the first two for the E-10. The NATO upgrade was just to get all to the US Block 30/35 RSIP standard.

THe Four JASDF E-767s have the same mission system as the current E-3C with the AN/APY-2. It was to expensive for Boeing to restart the 707 for just 4 models, and no one else was buying. Expect the 737 Wedgetail to be a Boeing gap filler for at least 10-12 years of new AWACS/AEW development (though the US will not buy any).

Currently in the USAF we are working on the E-3G, which will be the new designator for the E-3B/C block 30/35 upgrade to block 40 standard. ~2010.

Ciao, and Hook 'em Horns,
Capt-AWACS, Veni, Vidi, Bibi

User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12346 posts, RR: 51
Reply 7, posted (10 years 10 months 2 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 5093 times:

Quoting Lt-AWACS (Reply 6):
Expect the 737 Wedgetail to be a Boeing gap filler for at least 10-12 years of new AWACS/AEW development (though the US will not buy any).

I agree. I think the NexGen AWACS will be a smaller platform. Right now, the Wedgetail seems to be the platform of the future. But, that could change. But, in the US, the RAAF Wedgetail uses a common airframe as the USN P-8A and C-40A, and the USAF C/VC-40B/C (B-737-700/800/BBJ/BBJ2).

Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Next Generation Awacs
No username? Sign up now!

Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)

Similar topics:More similar topics...
European Fighter Aircraft Next Generation Approach posted Sat May 28 2005 15:13:53 by Keesje
Next Steps With NAS Oceana posted Wed Nov 8 2006 05:59:00 by DeltaGuy
Updated: USAF's Next Tanker posted Fri Sep 29 2006 04:05:32 by AislepathLight
L-188 Or P-3 Awacs posted Fri Sep 15 2006 01:37:07 by 747400sp
Enomoto Pulled Ansari Goes On Next Soyuz posted Mon Aug 28 2006 08:15:03 by Centrair
Next Usaf Tanker posted Sun Jul 30 2006 09:07:28 by AislepathLight
Next Generation Bomber posted Thu Jul 6 2006 06:48:37 by Baron95
Next Mission For Shuttle Endeavour? posted Sat Jul 1 2006 19:26:28 by JetBlueGuy2006
Saab 2000 Awacs posted Thu Jun 22 2006 13:38:01 by Alessandro
Next AFB To Get C-17s? posted Wed Jun 14 2006 04:23:14 by Dacman

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format