Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Fighter Escort Pre 9-11 And On That Day  
User currently offlineB744F From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 0 posts, RR: 0
Posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 4529 times:

This was brought to my attention and I was wondering what the military experts think of this. What was the fighter escort response time like pre 9-11, and specifically, on that horrible day? I have always wondered why there were no escorts in time when they are supposed to be ready 24/7 to go up within 2-3 minutes. Can someone knowledgable in this please tell me what happened?

I hope this is the right forum... Thanks

43 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineLt-AWACS From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 4515 times:

They were available, just at fewer bases. Before Sept 11, IIRC only 7 bases had jets on alert, mainly along the coasts. Now it is something like 20-25. The Vipers out of Ellington Field in Houston launched very quickly, and ended up escorting AF1. Interesting too, since that was GWBs old unit.


Ciao, and Hook 'em Horns,
Capt-AWACS, Uncle Sam's AWAX, The best shine for your jet


User currently offlineB744F From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 4511 times:

Thank you for the info, but that does not answer my question  Smile

User currently offlineSATL382G From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 4502 times:

Quoting B744F (Reply 2):
Thank you for the info, but that does not answer my question

Actually he answered your question pretty well. With fighters sitting alert at only a handful of bases it was difficult to provide complete coverage. You have to remember that pre 9-11 the air defense threat was considered to be away from our borders not within them. So there would be time to launch the alert fighters and start getting additional fighters ready. Unfortunately the threat came from within.....


User currently offlineAGM114L From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 4492 times:

Quoting B744F (Reply 2):
Thank you for the info, but that does not answer my question

I don't think anyone who knew such details would be posting them on an open forum.


User currently offlineCitation501SP From United States of America, joined May 2000, 209 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 4477 times:

During the Cold War ADC had interceptor squadrons all over the USA, its kinda like SAC bases once you know what to look for at airports the "alert sheds" are everywhere. Back then the fighters where on a hair trigger. I remember several times during open houses at Griffiss AFB the F-106s were scrambed. Once it was part of the F-106 display, siren to wheels up was about 2 minutes. Most of the other times they were either training or an actual scramble.

However getting the aircraft in the air quickly is one thing, being directed to the intercept is a completely different one, and depending on distance and headings can take a considrable amount of time.



Smoke and Thunder! Stage 2 FOREVER!!!
User currently offlineLt-AWACS From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 4469 times:

B744F what exactly do you want to know then?

And of course as noted above, we won't get into in classified discussion here Big grin Up to Sept 11th NORAD had 7 bases with jets on alert. Take SEAD for example. the Southeast Air Defence sector of the US. They had Ellington Field ANGB, in Houston with Vipers on alert. They had vipers from Minnesota rotating on alert at Tyndall AFB in Panama City, and they had Eagles on alert at Homestead. All three launched within the 5 minute window on Sept 11- once the order was given.
Ditto the NEADS Eagles out of Otis ANGB in Mass.

Now post Sept 11 we have over 20 bases with jets on alert. Search ABC20/20 IIRC they did a good show about it, including the chain to NORAD and AWACS.

So to answer your question, the fighters that were on alert Sept 11th did launch within the 5 minute window-once the order got to them-which is a whole other thread/discussion.

Ciao, and Hook 'em Horns,
Capt-AWACS, Watching you from 30,000 feet


User currently offlineMissedApproach From Canada, joined Oct 2004, 713 posts, RR: 2
Reply 7, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 4463 times:

Quoting Citation501SP (Reply 5):

Exactly. Prior to Sept 11 alert fighters were geared toward intercepting unidentified aircraft entering sovereign airspace, ie, the occasional Tu-142. Nobody ever thought we would have to intercept civilian airliners within our own airspace.



Can you hear me now?
User currently offlineWoodreau From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 1049 posts, RR: 7
Reply 8, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 4461 times:

The Sept 11th Commission Report, has a relatively good summary of the military/FAA interaction and response to the initial attacks, and probably will have the information you are looking for. You might still be able to get a copy on Amazon.com. The coordination between the two agencies was less than optimal. Even after the planes crashed into their targets, NORAD still believed the hijacked planes were in the air and were sending fighters on a wild goose chase.


Bonus animus sit, ab experientia. Quod salvatum fuerit de malis usu venit judicium.
User currently offlineDuce50boom From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 4448 times:

Just to piggyback on what AWACS and others said, there was no direct link between the FAA and NORAD before september 11th. In a nutshell, NORAD took care of the airspace outside the US, FAA took care of airspace inside the US. So the left hand didn't know what the right hand was doing. My memory is sketchy, but IIRC the FAA didn't even notify NORAD of the hijackings until just before the first AC hit the tower. After that they were scrambled. But given that the fighters were near Boston and just getting airborne in DC they weren't close enough, nor did they have the time or positive control, to intercept the other flight into NYC and/or the AA flight to DC. You also have to remember that before sept 11 intercepting aircraft were not allowed to go supersonic over the US. So scratch the speed advantage of a fighter. And again, IIRC, the DC F-16s were not armed or were armed with only 20mm. All in all, we were caught with our pants down in a situation that wasn't looked at by planners as realistic--after all, this was the pre september 11th mindset.

Quoting AGM114L (Reply 4):
Quoting B744F (Reply 2):
Thank you for the info, but that does not answer my question

I don't think anyone who knew such details would be posting them on an open forum

Agreed. "Where are your troops, and may I count them?"


User currently offlineLt-AWACS From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 4443 times:

Quoting Duce50boom (Reply 9):
My memory is sketchy, but IIRC the FAA didn't even notify NORAD of the hijackings until just before the first AC hit the tower. After that they were scrambled. But given that the fighters were near Boston and just getting airborne in DC they weren't close enough, nor did they have the time or positive control, to intercept the other flight into NYC and/or the AA flight to DC. You also have to remember that before sept 11 intercepting aircraft were not allowed to go supersonic over the US.

This is all correct.

Quoting Duce50boom (Reply 9):
And again, IIRC, the DC F-16s were not armed or were armed with only 20mm.

Most had AIM-7s, which normally are not on US Vipers, but the ADF model could carry 7s-- just in case they had to be "snipped" after "Fox1"

As "Dos gringos" would say, "Fox 1, when you've got nothing left, Fox 2, it's that heater in your chest, Fox3, the only friend you'll ever need". Will anyone get that???

Ciao, and Hook 'em Horns,
Capt-AWACS, NATO-Not After Ten O'clock


User currently offlineB744F From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 4439 times:

Quoting Duce50boom (Reply 9):
there was no direct link between the FAA and NORAD before september 11th

I find this extremely hard to believe. NORAD was informed on that morning by the FAA, as was the NMCC.

And why weren't fighters stationed in Andrews called to intercept?

one more thing that I don't understand,

http://www.ntsb.gov/Publictn/2000/AAB0001.htm

Payne Stewarts airplane had lost contact, fighters were scrambled and within 20 minutes it was up to FL420 to intercept.

It just doesn't make sense how the reaction to 9-11 was so lacking.

[Edited 2005-08-03 07:54:08]

User currently offlineLt-AWACS From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 4436 times:

Quoting B744F (Reply 11):
I find this extremely hard to believe. NORAD was informed on that morning.

And why weren't fighters stationed in Andrews called to intercept?

You might find it hard to believe but it is true. By the time NORAD was got the words on the correct hijacks, it was too late. All of which is publicly available. Since then our (AWACS/NORAD/CONR) procedures have changed and the FAA has a liaison. Several news programs have done shows on the pre/post chain that was in place.

The Andrews fighters were launched, and were sent out over the Atlantic past New Jersey.

Payne Stewart's jet was a different "type" incident, and was on a straight and level path that had continuous radar tracking. We even had an E-3 nearly divert for it, that is how long the time was.

Ciao, and Hook 'em Horns,
Capt-AWACS, Hermano bebe, que la vida es breve


User currently offlineB744F From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 4435 times:

Why over the Atlantic? And the first WTC was struck before 9, the Pentagon after 9:30, NORAD was notified at 8:40 of a hijacking, why would they not scramble jets to protect important targets and intercept the other airplanes that were found to be hijacked as well? I'm just confused at how blind the response was, and how nobody was fired because of this.

User currently offlineB744F From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 4433 times:

And according to NORAD, fighters were scrambled at 8:46 to flight 175 but somehow did not get there in time? 9:03 was when the plane hit, how slow did they go? They scrambled planes from Otis, farther away than McGuire as well. Another mistake. How many mistakes were made that day???

User currently offlineWoodreau From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 1049 posts, RR: 7
Reply 15, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 4410 times:

You have the benefit of hindsight and Monday morning quarterbacking about all this...

When things are happening in real-time like on Sept 11, you don't have all the information you need to make decisions. You make the best decision you can based on incomplete information and usually conflicting and wrong information. You have to decide what information is valid and what isn't, and you can't wait until you have all the information. That's just the way things are. It's a sucky situation, and you do the best you can. And just because you finally make a decision and order a response, responses to an order don't happen instantaneously. It takes time to respond to an order.

Everything you are asking about is explained in the commission report on pages 14-46.



Bonus animus sit, ab experientia. Quod salvatum fuerit de malis usu venit judicium.
User currently offlineDL021 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 11447 posts, RR: 75
Reply 16, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 4395 times:

Guys.....keep in mind that B744F is looking for opportunity to criticize and attempting to accumulate his version of "proof" for whatever conspiracy theories he read about on whichever website he scanned prior to posting here.

Prior to 9-11 the assumption was that aerial threats would come from overseas, not from within. Therefore the interceptor bases were ready, but not necessarily to shoot down airliners.

Payne Stewart's plane (and it's kind of asinine to compare an in-flight emergency on a business jet to a hijacking on an airliner) was not intercepted by an interceptor per-se, with the intention of shooting it down, but by an F-16 that was sent up to catch the thing and see what the problem was. There was so much time that the E-3 that diverted started in the Gulf of Mexico.



Is my Pan Am ticket to the moon still good?
User currently offlineDuce50boom From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 17, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day ago) and read 4376 times:

Quoting Lt-AWACS (Reply 10):
Most had AIM-7s, which normally are not on US Vipers, but the ADF model could carry 7s-- just in case they had to be "snipped" after "Fox1"

As "Dos gringos" would say, "Fox 1, when you've got nothing left, Fox 2, it's that heater in your chest, Fox3, the only friend you'll ever need". Will anyone get that???

And if you drive a viper than you gotta drink it fast, cause this ain't a time to loiter and we ain't got the gas!

Great choice AWACS. Old question for you. Payne Stewart's intercept. Were alert birds launched or were F-16s diverted from another mission to intercept? I remember the HUD footage on the news, but can't remember which aircraft got to it, ADF or some dude on a training flight


User currently offlineB744F From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 4347 times:

Quoting DL021 (Reply 16):
(and it's kind of asinine to compare an in-flight emergency on a business jet to a hijacking on an airliner)

Umm the controllers had no idea it was an inflight emergency, they simply lost contact as the airplane stopped communications. The ATC followed procedures and informed the military who had fighters jets up to intercept. The amount of guessing and plain incorrectness of most of the answers is quite disturbing.

Quoting DL021 (Reply 16):
Guys.....keep in mind that B744F is looking for opportunity to criticize and attempting to accumulate his version of "proof" for whatever conspiracy theories he read about on whichever website he scanned prior to posting here.

No I've always wondered exactly why what should have been done, never was, but only on that day, other events were handled correctly.


User currently offlineWoodreau From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 1049 posts, RR: 7
Reply 19, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 4338 times:

Okay, I'll write this on the assumption that you aren't trying to be imflammatory. I think I found the website you were looking at and I'll attempt to clear up some things.

I don't have any inside info about the Air Force or NORAD or anything. I'm just going off my experience as a staff planner and the way things are theoretically supposed to work.

Quoting B744F (Reply 13):
the first WTC was struck before 9, the Pentagon after 9:30, NORAD was notified at 8:40 of a hijacking, why would they not scramble jets to protect important targets and intercept the other airplanes that were found to be hijacked as well?

As stated in posts above, there were only 14 interceptors at 7 bases throughout the entire United States available to NORAD to intercept anything - hijacked aircraft, attack from outside the US. And from what I can gather, NORAD launched everything it had initially - the interceptors from Otis and Langley.

NORAD is an operational command. It is responsible for the air sovereignty of the United States, Canada, and Alaska. It is responsible for planning, scheduling, and employing the resources (interceptors, tankers, AWACs, ships, ground forces, etc) it is given to accomplish its mission. It exercises its responsibility through three subordinate units: Alaska NORAD Region (ANR), Canadian NORAD Region (CANR), and Continental US NORAD Region (CONR). Inside the Untied States, CONR has three subordinate units, Western Air Defense Sector (WADS), Northeast ADS (NEADS), and Southeast ADS (SEADS). These Air Defense Sectors are the people that "scramble" the interceptors. Washington and New York are covered by NEADS.

Since NORAD is an operational command, it can only employ the resources it has. It just can't arbitrarily call up an airbase and say launch your fighters. It doesn't own any interceptors or airbases. The interceptors and airbases belong to the Air National Guard and Air Combat Command.

Based on the expected threat, NORAD is given assets from the ANG and ACC (and other force providers as well, like the Army FORSCOM for the Stinger batteries that are in the DC area)

On Sept 11, with the expected threat known at the time, NORAD believed for the CONR region, that 14 interceptors were all that were needed. And that's all it had.

NORAD can always ask for more and additional forces will be assigned to NORAD when the situation warrants.

After the hijackings and crashes - NORAD probably asked for everything from everybody, and it got everything it asked for that day - from the Navy it got a flotilla of AEGIS cruisers and destroyers, from the Air Force and ANG, it got more interceptors, more tankers, and AWACS support.

When a interceptor unit is not tasked to provide a ground alert for NORAD, it's doing routine business - training missions, maintenance, etc. It just can't provide fighters to fly CAPs right away. It takes time to bring live ordinance from the bunkers and arm the fighters, to find (in the case of ANG units) and brief the pilots, etc.

An example, I'll assume you're a college student. Every day you go to class, you have a schedule - classes in the morning and in the afternoon. Then you get a call on your cell phone in one of your morning classes, your best friend dropped in unannounced and is at the airport, and wants you to go pick him up now, pronto, stat. Well you still have more classes that day, and you have an exam in the next class. You can't get to the airport until lunch. You'll try to pick him up as soon as possible. If your friend told you about dropping in the day before, you could have made arrangements to pick him up when he arrived at the airport.

Same thing for NORAD. The units that were activated to provide additional interceptors and support after the hijackings and crashes did provide the requested units as quickly as possible, even though they weren't on tether to provide forces that day.

So by the time the events were over, NORAD had overwhelming military assets available to combat the next hijacking, once it became aware of the nature of the new unexpected threat. But to expect everything within the first two hours of the initial crash into the WTC is unrealistic.

Quoting B744F (Reply 14):
And according to NORAD, fighters were scrambled at 8:46 to flight 175 but somehow did not get there in time? 9:03 was when the plane hit, how slow did they go?

The website I found that I think you are looking at mentioned that the fighters were only flying at 24-25% of their max speed and if they were flying at max speed, the interceptors could have prevented the second WTC crash, and the Pentagon crash.

This assumes many things that is clear now, but wasn't clear on Sept 11. (You have to love that "fog of war." It will get you every time.)

Flying at max speed is a nice capability, but that 2 hour loiter capability dwindles very quickly to zero the faster an interceptor flies. So an F-15 which has a ferry range of over 2-3,000 miles and a combat radius of 500-600 miles (I'm guessing these numbers), probably has a combat on-station time of less than 15 minutes if it's flying on afterburner at max speed. Now you've got a fighter that might be in position to intercept, but no fuel to find, locate, and maneuver into position to identify and intercept the hijacked aircraft.

That's the problem I have with the assertions of the website I found.

When you own interceptors and set them in CAP stations, your primary worry about interceptors nagging you in the back of your mind after you're done worrying about the radar picture, and tactical situation on your display, is how much fuel do they have left? At least that's what my worry was when I had fighters from the aircraft carrier available to me. I'd always bug my AIC to bug the fighters, "Say [fuel] state."

Anyways, I apologize for the long post. I hope this answers some of your questions.



Bonus animus sit, ab experientia. Quod salvatum fuerit de malis usu venit judicium.
User currently offlineB744F From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 4304 times:

I wasn't looking at any website, so not sure what you were talking about. And no fighters were scrambled from Langley. I am also not a college student.

But thank you for the information, I guess the only way to know for sure was to be there that day, I just don't understand how nobody was punished for the mistakes made.


User currently offlineSATL382G From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 21, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 4289 times:

Quoting B744F (Reply 20):
I just don't understand how nobody was punished for the mistakes made.

Would be helpful to know where you're getting your information and why you believe mistakes were made. My information is substantially different from yours is why I ask.....

For example: the following info is from page 32 of the 9/11 commission report

08:38 Boston Center notifies NEADS of hijacking
08:46 NEADS scrambles Otis fighters in search of AA11
(you say in reply 14 that these fighters are looking for UA175)
08:46:40 AA11 crashes into the North Tower
08:53 Otis fighter jets airborne
09:03:11 UA175 crashes into the South Tower
09:21 Boston Center advises NEADS that AA11 is heading for Washington
09:24 NEADS scrambles Langley fighter jets in search of AA11

I'm stopping at 09:24 because I'm making the assumption that there were no additional fighters on alert available to scramble after that time.

Now, why do you believe mistakes were made?


User currently offlineLt-AWACS From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 22, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 4278 times:

Quoting B744F (Reply 18):
Umm the controllers had no idea it was an inflight emergency, they simply lost contact as the airplane stopped communications. The ATC followed procedures and informed the military who had fighters jets up to intercept. The amount of guessing and plain incorrectness of most of the answers is quite disturbing.

Nothing I have said is incorrect. I was there on Sept 11th, Flying over the East Coast, and got an Air Medal for it-so that part is no longer a secret.

Quoting B744F (Reply 18):
No I've always wondered exactly why what should have been done, never was, but only on that day, other events were handled correctly.

actually as noted above, procedures were followed, and take-off response time was basically as fragged- your original question I thought.

Quoting B744F (Reply 13):
Why over the Atlantic? And the first WTC was struck before 9, the Pentagon after 9:30, NORAD was notified at 8:40 of a hijacking, why would they not scramble jets to protect important targets and intercept the other airplanes that were found to be hijacked as well? I'm just confused at how blind the response was, and how nobody was fired because of this.

Just because a plane said "hijack" did not mean it would be intercepted-under the old rules. The FAA did not active rules under 7610.4 until after the first tower was hit. Why would jets "autmoatically" have been scrambled from multiple bases to attack targets we did not yet know were under attack. After it was apparent what was happening, targets were protected. The response was not blind, just geared toward another type of expected attack. Who would you fire, basically people followed procedures, other than the FAA not having the correct comm with NORAD up front. As for the jets going out to the Atlantic, those vipers were given a launch order, but not told of targets. Under the old rules they would expect a launch for Russian bombers over the Atlantic. THat is where they headed, as that is what they were trained to do.

Quoting B744F (Reply 14):
And according to NORAD, fighters were scrambled at 8:46 to flight 175 but somehow did not get there in time? 9:03 was when the plane hit, how slow did they go? They scrambled planes from Otis, farther away than McGuire as well. Another mistake. How many mistakes were made that day???

Fighters were scrambled, but not directed at 11 until later, and even then 17 minutes would most likely not have been enough time, even for a BVR-beyond visual range shot, which would most likely not happen. Think about 8 miles a minute.

As I said above, only 7 bases had planes on alert. Otis was it for NYC. Very few mistakes were made that day. The process was broken, not really the execution.

Duce, IIRC the Stewart jets were gaurd, but I don't remember from where. I think the F-15s at St Louis, took over for ADF Vipers from down at Tyndall IIRC. I would have to go back and research some logs for actual model numbers.


Ciao, and Hook 'em Horns,
Capt-AWACS, Philly, where they boo Santa Clause


User currently offlineANCFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 4277 times:

Quoting DL021 (Reply 16):
Guys.....keep in mind that B744F is looking for opportunity to criticize and attempting to accumulate his version of "proof" for whatever conspiracy theories he read about on whichever website he scanned prior to posting here.

 yes 

Quoting SATL382G (Reply 21):
Would be helpful to know where you're getting your information

LewRockwell.com perhaps . . . ConspiracyTheorists101.org . . . HistoryRevisionRUs.net . . .

Quoting SATL382G (Reply 21):
why do you believe mistakes were made

Please refer to DL021s comments in reply #16.


User currently offlineDL021 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 11447 posts, RR: 75
Reply 24, posted (9 years 2 months 3 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 4277 times:

Because it suits his desire to call into question and cast aspersions at every military decision made in the history of mankind. It's a pattern that he evidently has decided to bring here.

He gets most of his information from googling and scanning, not reading in depth, websites and news articles. He draws his conclusions from the mothership which is currently trying to hide from the Discovery.

B744, The atmosphere and threatcon prior to 9-11 was rather different, and had nothing happened and we sent up a fighter to meet every aircraft then you would be complaining about harrassment. If we kept hundreds of interceptors on alert, as in the bad old days, you'd be looking to complain about the money that could be going to build schools or peace gardens.

Let us know when you get to the point that you are trying to make, since everyone has taken the time to provide you with valid and accurate information.



Is my Pan Am ticket to the moon still good?
25 Duce50boom : No worries AWACS, it's not important. Just wondering about it. Thank you though
26 Halls120 : As several of the posters have noted - in exhausting detail - NORAD made no mistakes that required any punishment be meted out.
27 BHMBAGLOCK : Are you saying that the AF could have saved the day by scrambling C-141 or KC-10? Please go back to watching your regularly scheduled programming on
28 B744F : The problem is, all your comments, and everyone elses, have gone against everything the offical spokespeople and high up command has said. First peop
29 Lt-AWACS : No one above said that. Please show me where that is written. No one claimed that FAA and NORAD can't talk now, but the system on 9/11 was different,
30 AFHokie : One question to B744F: Have you read the 9/11 commission?
31 SATL382G : This troll thinks he's in Non-Av... The first line above is flat out wrong and completely unsupported..
32 B744F : Here you go: Thats ridiculous, they have the most advanced radar tracing system in the world, yet they were sending them on a wild goose chase? And t
33 SATL382G : Dude, what fact have you offered here that you have also offered some support for? NONE.... Troll: Someone who is trolling for an argument. You are c
34 B744F : I am not stiring any pot, I am responding to insults thrown at me for asking simple questions but not finding adequate responses.
35 STT757 : McGuire AFB hosts KC-135s, C-32s, KC-10s etc.. No fighters. The closest Inceptors to NYC are the NJ-ANG 177th FW F-16s based out of Atlantic City NJ,
36 Lt-AWACS : The FAA and NORAD are two different agencies, you act as if they are one. Not true. There was no direct link as Duce noted, the FAA had to request NO
37 Post contains images TedTAce : You are being insutled because for normal people, the EXCELLENT information provided by my fellow members exceeds any nominal standard response for t
38 Woodreau : If you only knew the limitations of radar. Radar is not the magic see everything know everything gadget. I've never been inside NORAD's command cente
39 B744F : Nonsense, anytime an airplane turns off its transponder, goes off course, and refuses to listen to instructions by the ATC, fighters should, and alwa
40 Duce50boom : And in an instant B744F has gone from a curious-as-to-how-the-military-could-screw-the-pooch skeptic to jumping off a cliff with no parachute......
41 STT757 : Then why has no one taken credit, the President, Vice President, and everyone on down acknowledges that the order to shoot down was given. Why would
42 TedTAce : IT ALL CLEAR NOW!!! B744f is MD90!!! That's the reason he will NOT cite his source because it's that LEWwhateverser site!!
43 VirginFlyer : Right, this has clearly gone beyond the scope of the original question, and is descending into *yet another* non-av bickerfest. I think the original q
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Video Of Ares I And V On Moon Mission.... posted Sun Jul 2 2006 21:52:36 by Boeing Nut
Some Info On That Wet-Leased Lauda B736 (USN) posted Sun Jan 30 2005 19:30:53 by Flynavy
AirForce 747 Doing Touch And Goes All Day In TUL posted Fri Mar 21 2003 20:27:06 by TechRep
Boeing And Eads Working Together On E-3 posted Wed Nov 30 2005 21:52:10 by N328KF
Fighter Jet Pressurization And Oxygen Mask posted Wed Nov 9 2005 09:41:55 by BrownBat
2 F-16's And A MiG-21 For Sale On EBay... posted Mon Sep 19 2005 18:13:55 by USAFHummer
Question On "Dump And Burn"? posted Sun May 29 2005 15:10:01 by CaptainT38
Latest On C-5 Rerp And AMP posted Thu Mar 31 2005 01:23:36 by Galaxy5
Russian And Ukrainian Naval Aviation On Display posted Sun Aug 15 2004 00:34:42 by GDB
THe A-10...on TV And In NY This Weekend posted Tue Jul 6 2004 19:11:18 by Mirrodie