Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Shuttle Recovery  
User currently offlineTIMC From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 133 posts, RR: 0
Posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 1545 times:

When the shuttle lands on Monday, what happens next?

I mean, how does it get back to its base, can it fly like any other normal aircraft, eg, take-off and go to another airport? Or will it have to be towed somehow back to the start.

Also, where are all the other shuttles stored, and how do they get them to be upright to attach to the rocket boosters?

16 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTedTAce From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 1538 times:

Quoting TIMC (Thread starter):
I mean, how does it get back to its base, can it fly like any other normal aircraft, eg, take-off and go to another airport? Or will it have to be towed somehow back to the start.

TIMC, I HIGHLY suggest you go through the NASA sites and read up. This question SEEMS to indicate you have done no research whatsoever, and really don't care about the topic..

Try:
(Best link) http://www.nasa.gov/returntoflight/system/index.html

and
http://www.kennedyspacecenter.com/la...s/launchDetails.asp?calendarId=106
http://www.nasa.gov/centers/kennedy/home/index.html
http://www.nasa.gov/returntoflight/main/index.html

If after reading these you have more questions SATL and I will be more then happy to oblige.


User currently offlineAsstChiefMark From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 1524 times:

It gets towed a few hundred feet from the runway to the vehicle assembly building. There, it's prepared for the next mission and mounted on the SRB's and ET.

User currently offlineTIMC From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 133 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 1515 times:

Quoting TedTAce (Reply 1):
TIMC, I HIGHLY suggest you go through the NASA sites and read up. This question SEEMS to indicate you have done no research whatsoever, and really don't care about the topic..

Forgive me, but I've read most of the NASA page... what I'm asking is, once the shuttle touches down and stops on the runway, what happens from there?

I can't find anything about that on the page, if there is something and I've missed it then accept my apologies, but I can't really seem to find anything :S


User currently offlineTIMC From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 133 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 1509 times:

aha...

apparently, there is a shuttle mating/demating device:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Ben Wang



so I'm guessing the shuttle lands, is put into this, put onto the back of a shuttle carrier and flown back to Kennedy?


User currently offlineSATL382G From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 1505 times:

Quoting TIMC (Reply 4):
so I'm guessing the shuttle lands, is put into this, put onto the back of a shuttle carrier and flown back to Kennedy?

Tim,

If every thing goes according to plan it lands AT Kennedy Space Center. The 747 would only be used if it were to land at Edwards AFB, White Sands, or one of the transatlantic abort sites (Moron, Istres, etc).

Once it lands at the Shuttle Landing Facility (SLF) at Kennedy it is towed to the Orbiter Processing Facility (OPF) where it is prepared for the next flight. When it is ready to be "stacked" (placed on it's boosters) the orbiter is towed from the OPF to the Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB).

Once in the VAB it is fitted with a lift rig. Two traveling cranes are attached to the lift rig, one towards the nose of the orbiter and one towards the tail. Initially both cranes lift together, but once sufficient height is gained the rear crane stops lifting and the cranes move towards each other. Thus the orbiter is moved to a vertical position.



If you'd like a birds eye view of the site go to google maps and search on "x68". X68 is the 3letter code for the SLF, just like JFK is the 3letter code for Kennedy airport.

edit: Tim -- I should have made you find this yourself but.... here is the google satellite view of Launch Complex 39 at KSC. SLF on the left, OPF & VAB in the middle, and launch pads A & B on the right.

http://maps.google.com/maps?q=x68&ll...20&spn=0.172936,0.169928&t=k&hl=en

[Edited 2005-08-07 01:11:29]

User currently offlineGarnetpalmetto From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 5364 posts, RR: 53
Reply 6, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 1467 times:

Quoting TIMC (Thread starter):
can it fly like any other normal aircraft, eg, take-off and go to another airport?

To answer this part of your question, no. Once the external fuel tank is jettisoned, the orbiter lacks additional fuel for the Space Shuttle Main Engines (the three engines at the tail of the orbiter) and upon reentry the orbiter is basically the world's most expensive glider.



South Carolina - too small to be its own country, too big to be a mental asylum.
User currently offlineTedTAce From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 1463 times:

Quoting Garnetpalmetto (Reply 6):
the world's most expensive glider.

Don't forget the fastest too Big grin


User currently offlineSATL382G From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 1460 times:

Quoting TedTAce (Reply 7):
Don't forget the fastest too

... and highest  Smile


User currently offlineHaveBlue From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 2098 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 1448 times:

And heaviest...

It's in the Guiness Book of World Records for heaviest glider, though the other descriptions above apply as well.



Here Here for Severe Clear!
User currently offlineJrw261 From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 35 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 1439 times:

Ide hardly call it even a glider. I dont think the thing is capable of even being towed in the air, part of the reason why its piggy backed when it needs transported. Its more commonly called a controllable falling brick.. Its amazing what they can do with fly-by-wire avionics.

User currently offlineTedTAce From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 1436 times:

Quoting Jrw261 (Reply 10):
Ide hardly call it even a glider.

From: http://www.webster.com/cgi-bin/dicti...?book=Dictionary&va=glider&x=0&y=0

Quoting webster (Reply 11):
Main Entry: glid·er
Pronunciation: 'glI-d&r
Function: noun
1 : one that glides : as a : an aircraft similar to an airplane but without an engine

Being able to be "towed in the air" is irrelevant..


User currently offlineBhmbaglock From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 2698 posts, RR: 5
Reply 12, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 1360 times:

Quoting HaveBlue (Reply 9):
And heaviest...

It's in the Guiness Book of World Records for heaviest glider, though the other descriptions above apply as well.

Shouldn't that record go to the A330 or does it have to be intentional?



Where are all of my respected members going?
User currently offlineSATL382G From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 1333 times:

FYI: I just heard that NASA has advised the ISS crew that the shuttle reentry may be visible from ISS.

Another unique for photo op for this mission...

regards


User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 962 posts, RR: 51
Reply 14, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 1327 times:

>> Shouldn't that record go to the A330 or does it have to be intentional?

Hmm... good point, I will definitly have to take that into consideration  Wink

>> FYI: I just heard that NASA has advised the ISS crew that the shuttle reentry may be visible from ISS.

Another unique for photo op for this mission...


That would be really cool !

Speaking of unique photo views, I must recommend the following link. In addition to the camera along the External Tank, each SRB was fitted with a camera that shows the SRB-seperation sequence and subsequent recovery in the Atlantic Ocean.

It's amazing how smooth the SRB seperation is, it didn't occur to me that aerodynamic loads would be so low at that point in flight:

http://www.nasa.gov/returntoflight/m...videos_search_agent_archive_1.html

I also heard the re-entry will not be visible from Texas due to the inclination of the orbital plane as it descends through the atmosphere. Cuba and Centeral America should have a spectacular view, but those of us in El Norte are left out to dry  Wink


User currently offlineHaveBlue From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 2098 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 1318 times:

Nice link DfwRevolution. The SRB seperation is amazing, and its cool the video continues on from then at the 2 minute mark til splashdown 4 1/2 minutes later. On the Left SRB the chutes are clearly visible and the splashdown is better, whereas on the Right SRB it seems it was upright? in the water.

The ET seperation was nice as well, and the Pitch Manuever by the Shuttle from the ISS is sweet.

Too bad they don't let you save the videos to your computer... any ideas why they have it so guarded?



Here Here for Severe Clear!
User currently onlineMir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 21525 posts, RR: 55
Reply 16, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 1322 times:

Quoting Jrw261 (Reply 10):
Ide hardly call it even a glider. I dont think the thing is capable of even being towed in the air, part of the reason why its piggy backed when it needs transported.

It's a delta wing, so it's low speed handling is going to suck. But if you could get it going fast enough, it's wings would certainly generate lift, and it could fly like any other plane. In theory, it could be towed as well, but since there's no plane out there that could pull that much at the necessary speeds, it gets piggybacked.

-Mir



7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Shuttle Recovery
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Is This AN AA 747 Carrying A Space Shuttle? posted Wed Oct 18 2006 02:25:45 by Fll2993
Status Of Space Shuttle Endeavour posted Sat Sep 23 2006 06:44:00 by RJ777
Shuttle Support Vehicles What Are They posted Thu Sep 21 2006 17:35:07 by Airfoilsguy
Soyuz Vs Shuttle? posted Wed Sep 20 2006 20:30:45 by Mt99
Object Shadows Shuttle; Landing Waved Off - Report posted Tue Sep 19 2006 17:47:36 by AerospaceFan
OFFICIAL: Shuttle Launch Scrubbed...Again posted Fri Sep 8 2006 17:30:37 by S12PPL
Shuttle Launch Imminent: Live Streaming Link Here posted Fri Sep 8 2006 15:33:05 by KFLLCFII
Space Shuttle Launch Delays posted Wed Aug 30 2006 03:01:02 by Thorny
Best Spot To Watch A Shuttle Launch? posted Thu Aug 17 2006 22:32:13 by Lnglive1011yyz
Shuttle Boosters..Where Do They Fall? posted Fri Jul 14 2006 03:03:02 by Wardialer

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format