Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
MC-130 Question  
User currently offlineJetjack74 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 7421 posts, RR: 50
Posted (9 years 3 months 19 hours ago) and read 2023 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

My experiance with the C-130 was the Navy, in which our roles were few compared to the Air Force which has the widest range of roles. My question is that most Special Ops MC-130's are painted in the night-gray scheme, but a few remain in the 1980's jungle cammoflage paint with grey radome. All of the Air Force and ANG C-130's have long since been painted in the standard low-vis grey, have these MC-130 remained this way for some reason or have they just lagged behind the rest?

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © M Radzi Desa



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © M Radzi Desa


Also, AF S Ops hasn't used the Fulton Recovery system in ages, is this still trained in usage?

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Mike -Rotor- Nowak



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Sascha Haberkorn




Made from jets!
5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAFHokie From United States of America, joined May 2004, 224 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (9 years 3 months 7 hours ago) and read 1986 times:

In regards to why they're still green instead of grey, only thing I can think is that they just haven't hit that point where it's time to repaint them.

I can't say for certain that they don't train for it, but I don't think they do. I think they have even removed the whiskers for the fulton system.


User currently offlineSATL382G From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (9 years 3 months 5 hours ago) and read 1970 times:

I haven't seen a SpecOps 130 with the Fulton arms installed for probably 10 years. Certainly none here at Moody now.

Surprising how many C-130 aficionados don't even know that the Fulton capability ever existed. I tell them. They say "NO WAY!!". I tell them to watch "The Green Berets". They come back shaking their heads.  Smile


User currently offlineDL021 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 11447 posts, RR: 75
Reply 3, posted (9 years 3 months 4 hours ago) and read 1962 times:

The Fulton system was discontinued from use back in the early 90's as there was not enough call for it.

It was originally designed when helo's did not have the legs they do today, and it is rather unsafe....albeit one hell of a ride.

I have not seen an AF Herc equipped with one since at least 95 or 96. Moody would have them if anyone outside of Hurlburt has them.


All that said, I'd not be surprised to see some systems sitting in a contingency warehouse somewhere in FL just in case. The system does offer a unique means of egressing at high speed from behind enemy lines. Problem is that the recovery aircraft is vulnerable at all times behind lines, and the position is given away the second the balloon goes up.

here's an interesting website on the subject....went looking after I answered.
http://www.cia.gov/csi/studies/95unclass/Leary.html

[Edited 2005-08-29 19:34:50]


Is my Pan Am ticket to the moon still good?
User currently offlineSATL382G From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (9 years 3 months 3 hours ago) and read 1954 times:

Quoting DL021 (Reply 3):
All that said, I'd not be surprised to see some systems sitting in a contingency warehouse somewhere in FL just in case.

I agree. The structural attach points on the aircraft were just faired over. V-22 will make it a moot point I think.

Fulton was good to get one guy out. Would have been to tough to get a squad out, one at a time, without attracting attention. Would have been a cool way to extract downed aircrew too if they could have found a way to pack the necessary gear in the ejection seat. One pass and the downed airman is home drinking beer.... provided they didn't drag him thru the trees at 130 knots.

From your link....
"Lifted off the ground, the pig began to spin as it flew through the air at 125 mph. It arrived on board undamaged but in a disoriented state. Once it recovered, it attacked the crew. "

Who says CIA doesn't have sense of humor.....


User currently offlineDL021 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 11447 posts, RR: 75
Reply 5, posted (9 years 3 months 3 hours ago) and read 1961 times:

Not much funnier than a drunken and disoriented pig!  Big grin


Is my Pan Am ticket to the moon still good?
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic MC-130 Question
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
LC-130 Question posted Sat Nov 27 2004 04:37:34 by Kiwi dave
F-15 Engine Question? posted Thu Nov 16 2006 08:08:08 by Venus6971
Embraer Mulling C-130 Size Airlifter? posted Mon Nov 13 2006 19:32:57 by DEVILFISH
Buff Picture OTD Question posted Mon Nov 13 2006 06:37:12 by TedTAce
CDN Forces C-130 Replacement posted Sat Nov 11 2006 07:47:25 by Kearney
U.S.A.F AC-130 posted Fri Nov 10 2006 17:13:32 by KC135TopBoom
U.S.A.F Squadron/Wing Question posted Tue Nov 7 2006 23:03:55 by Tiger119
Fighter Jet Fly-by Question posted Mon Nov 6 2006 05:37:12 by Chi-town
'Stupid' Carrier Ops Question: Soaking The Jets. posted Sun Oct 22 2006 23:21:53 by TedTAce
Old Jet RAF Aeroplanes Question posted Wed Oct 11 2006 00:17:54 by Gary2880

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format