Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Singapore Chooses F-15  
User currently offlinePanAm_DC10 From Australia, joined Aug 2000, 4095 posts, RR: 90
Posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 3645 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
COMMUNITY MANAGER

Dassault have issued a press release stating that Singapore has chosen the F-15 over the Rafale. Singapore refused to respond but have just announced that they have entered final negotiations with Boeing.

How many airplanes were Singapore looking to procure?

Regards, PanAm_DC10


Ask the impossible to achieve the best possible
17 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineLumberton From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 4708 posts, RR: 20
Reply 1, posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 3554 times:

Reuters reports "about 20".


"When all is said and done, more will be said than done".
User currently offlineCX747 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4445 posts, RR: 5
Reply 2, posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 3499 times:

Yet another impressive win by the F-15! Is this the same version that was sold to South Korea ala F-15K?


"History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid." D. Eisenhower
User currently offlineCX747 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4445 posts, RR: 5
Reply 3, posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 3492 times:

Where will the South Korea's and Singapore's F-15 pilots be trained? Will an oepration like Luke AFB has be set up at Seymour Johnson with the USAF's F-15E training wing?


"History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid." D. Eisenhower
User currently offlineLumberton From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 4708 posts, RR: 20
Reply 4, posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 3428 times:

Have there been any "finalized" export orders for the Rafale? I know there was a thread here way back when discussing a possible sale of 96 (?) to Saudi Arabia. Has this sale been confirmed?

Reason I ask is the language in this Reuters article: "dashing hopes for the first export order for the Rafale"

http://yahoo.reuters.com/financeQuot...005-09-06_14-16-24_l0673948_newsml

[Edited 2005-09-07 00:40:27]


"When all is said and done, more will be said than done".
User currently offlineAirRyan From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 2532 posts, RR: 5
Reply 5, posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 3397 times:

I'd like to see the Rafale have success in Saudi Arabia and I wouldn't mind even a few squads of tandem seat Navalized variants so we in the USN don't have to put all of eggs in one basket in the Super Hornet.

Aboiut the F-15 sale, are these to be GE powered as like the ROKAF models? AESA radar? What a shame these countries are buying new and better variants of our own weapons and we're wasting our taxpayers dollars fighting for AIDS in Afirca and subsidies like Egypt.


User currently offlineLMP737 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 3393 times:

Quoting AirRyan (Reply 5):
I'd like to see the Rafale have success in Saudi Arabia and I wouldn't mind even a few squads of tandem seat Navalized variants so we in the USN don't have to put all of eggs in one basket in the Super Hornet.

Given the cost of adding another type aircraft to the fleet I doubt that would happen. Don't forget the money would have to come from somewhere and it's unlikely the Navy will give up funds for the "Super Hornet" or JSF. Then of course there's the politics.


User currently offlineAR1300 From Argentina, joined Feb 2005, 1740 posts, RR: 3
Reply 7, posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 3333 times:

Quoting AirRyan (Reply 5):
wasting our taxpayers dollars fighting for AIDS in Afirca

I wouldn't really call that one a waste.But whatever.  

Mike

[Edited 2005-09-07 04:55:14]


They don't call us Continental for nothing.
User currently offlineCX747 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4445 posts, RR: 5
Reply 8, posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 3331 times:

It would be nice to see some better equiped F-15Es given to the front line squadrons. The older F-15Es could then be rotated to Reserve or National Guard squadrons and increase the punch that they pack.


"History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid." D. Eisenhower
User currently offlineGreaser From Bahamas, joined Jan 2004, 1092 posts, RR: 4
Reply 9, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 3161 times:

and that's more bad news for the raphale...but rest assured the RSAF has got one of the best as their choice, the F-15 is by no means a long shot at taking down some bogies...i mean lotsa bogies.


Now you're really flying
User currently offlineDuce50boom From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 3139 times:

Quoting AirRyan (Reply 5):
we're wasting our taxpayers dollars fighting for AIDS in Afirca

Damn straight! We should be using our tax dollars fighting against AIDS. Not for it. LOL


User currently offlinePyrex From Portugal, joined Aug 2005, 3791 posts, RR: 28
Reply 11, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 3028 times:

Hi,

I understand that, in the case of South Korea, the Rafale actually won the fly-off but the F-15 was a political decision (not wanting to stir any pot, that's just the way military contracts go). Do you know if the same thing happened in Singapore?
It really is a shame, the Rafale is probably the most beautiful aircraft flying today and I am a really big fan of Dassault.

Miguel



Read this very carefully, I shall write this only once!
User currently offlineAirRyan From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 2532 posts, RR: 5
Reply 12, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 2984 times:

Quoting Duce50boom (Reply 10):
Quoting AirRyan (Reply 5):
we're wasting our taxpayers dollars fighting for AIDS in Afirca

Damn straight! We should be using our tax dollars fighting against AIDS. Not for it. LOL

The point I was trying to make was that i$40b in context to nearly $1 TRILLION in debt they have is nothing that will solve Afirca's problems - a crummy bandaid at best. $40 billion is a lot of money and can buy a whole lot of F-22's.

Quoting Pyrex (Reply 11):
Hi,

I understand that, in the case of South Korea, the Rafale actually won the fly-off but the F-15 was a political decision (not wanting to stir any pot, that's just the way military contracts go). Do you know if the same thing happened in Singapore?
It really is a shame, the Rafale is probably the most beautiful aircraft flying today and I am a really big fan of Dassault.

Miguel

That must have been from the French papers because as I understood it the F-15K was selected because it was using proven tech on a proven airframe and the ROKAF could not afford to gamble on uncertainty. The F-15K's will serve very well in the ROKAF.

http://www.milavia.net/home/f-15k.jpg


User currently offlinePyrex From Portugal, joined Aug 2005, 3791 posts, RR: 28
Reply 13, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 2886 times:

Quoting AirRyan (Reply 12):
That must have been from the French papers because as I understood it the F-15K was selected because it was using proven tech on a proven airframe and the ROKAF could not afford to gamble on uncertainty. The F-15K's will serve very well in the ROKAF.

If you consider multiple editions of Flight International magazine as French newspapers then yes, it was...



Read this very carefully, I shall write this only once!
User currently offlineLMP737 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 2867 times:

You have to wonder what the future holds for Boeing's St. Louis facility. Unless there are other fighter competitions where the F-15 will be included once the last F-15's for the ROKAF and Singapore roll off the line that will be it. In addition once the last F/A-18E/F is delivered to the USN manned fighter aircraft production in St. Louis will be no more. Maybe the future for the St. Louis facility is in UCAV's.

Quoting AirRyan (Reply 5):
What a shame these countries are buying new and better variants of our own weapons and we're wasting our taxpayers dollars fighting for AIDS in Afirca and subsidies like Egypt.

I for one do not view it as a "waste". If the money we spend on fighting AIDS slows the spread or comes up with a cure then it's money well spent.


User currently offlineCX747 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4445 posts, RR: 5
Reply 15, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 2837 times:

Who says there won't be another fighter produced after the F/A-18 E/F? No one really knows what the future holds. Maybe St. Louis will produce an actual A-10 replacement! Crazier things have happened.


"History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid." D. Eisenhower
User currently offlineLMP737 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 2830 times:

Quoting CX747 (Reply 15):
Who says there won't be another fighter produced after the F/A-18 E/F? No one really knows what the future holds. Maybe St. Louis will produce an actual A-10 replacement! Crazier things have happened.

Given the current state of the budget I doubt the DOD is going to spend the money to develop a replacement for a specialized aircraft such as the A-10. Especially for one that would have a limited production run.


User currently offlineFlyf15 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 17, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 2828 times:

I'm totally not up to date on these sorts of things. Were the T-45 and AV-8B built in STL? And also, are they still being produced at all?

Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Singapore Chooses F-15
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
F-15 Engine Question? posted Thu Nov 16 2006 08:08:08 by Venus6971
First To Fly The PC-21 - Singapore Air Force posted Fri Nov 3 2006 18:05:15 by Airimages
131 FW F-15 Celebrates The World Series posted Wed Nov 1 2006 19:02:41 by F4wso
F-15 Re-engine For Supercruise posted Sat Sep 2 2006 23:20:31 by EBJ1248650
Early F-15 Colors posted Mon Aug 7 2006 23:44:54 by EBJ1248650
F-14 Vs F-15 Which Sound Better? posted Sun Jul 2 2006 17:34:09 by 747400sp
How Long Does It Take F-15’s To Reach Mach 1? posted Fri May 26 2006 19:15:47 by Lenbrazil
F-15 Stabilator Shape posted Tue Mar 14 2006 11:46:20 by Slinker
How Does The F-15 Stack Up Agains New Aircraft? posted Fri Mar 3 2006 20:48:38 by CX747
Why The Usaf Cancel The YC-14 & YC-15 posted Tue Feb 21 2006 00:19:19 by 747400sp

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format