Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
SU508 Needs To Be Banned  
User currently offlineMikeN From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (12 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 1220 times:

This youngster doesn't seem to want to play by the rules. I think he needs to be banned or at least put on probation. See his posts for yourself....

http://www.airliners.net/discussions/military/read.main/3561/

8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineFireblade From Portugal, joined Feb 2006, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (12 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 1143 times:

I already read all of his posts about that topic and i posted my opinion. Su508 make a mistake but he make apologize .So if his only sin is that he thinks that ruaf rules and that russian armament is best MIke every man has a right to think whatever he wants [that's called democracy].BTW i suggest you to read duce50booms' and 767-332ER thoughts .How they sound to you?

User currently offlineFireblade From Portugal, joined Feb 2006, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (12 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 1142 times:

I apologize su508 really post something stupid i already suggest deletion.

User currently offlineMikeN From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (12 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 1131 times:

I think what Duce50boom said was in direct retaliation to SU508's very incencitive remarks. At least he didn't shout or use foul language.

I do realize that every man and woman has opinions and should be free to express them, however, there are ways of expressing opinions in a manner so that nobody is personally offended. I wouldn't consider myself "sensitive" by any means, but I was deeply offended by SU508's remarks concering the events on 11 September 2001. Also, instead of posting the trash he posted today, he should have e-mailed the individuals he had a problem with.


User currently offlineLY744 From Canada, joined Feb 2001, 5536 posts, RR: 10
Reply 4, posted (12 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 1119 times:

I'm in no way justifying what SU508 said, but I don't see anyone suggesting that Duce50Boom and/or 767-322ER should be banned. I was also deeply offended by their comments.
BTW, what exactly was SU508's latest reply (It got deleted before I could see it)?

LY744.



Pacifism only works if EVERYBODY practices it
User currently offlineMikeN From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (12 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 1119 times:

So, I guess it did. Good!


User currently offlineContact_tower From Norway, joined Sep 2001, 536 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (12 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 1117 times:

The best way to handle pricks like SU508 is to ignore them completely, they are not worth the bother!  Smile

(I allso think that many of last weeks posts have been placed to yank the chain of all US forum members Big grin )


User currently offlineSpectre From United Kingdom, joined exactly 13 years ago today! , 81 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (12 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 1084 times:

MikeN
I found SU508's remarks to be offensive, so I have stopped reading his posts for the time being. I feel that part of the problem with his posts could be in the translation and I hope that, as his English gets better, so will they. Another part of the problem, in my opinion, is other people rising to the bait. If you ignore that sort of comment, it tends to go away. I have been reading posts in other forums on this site and was amazed at many of the comments that were passed.
I am not in favour of censorship, in a forum like this, over one subject, especially one as delicate and sensative as the one concerned. I hope that SU508 will realise that he has upset a number of people and moderate his thoughts and keep his posts to aviation matters.

Regards
Dave


User currently offlineMiG31 From United States of America, joined Aug 2008, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (12 years 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 1065 times:

Why, what did he do?
SU508 is an abbriviation for Aeroflot flight from CY to Moscow.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic SU508 Needs To Be Banned
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Was CV-64 Suppost To Be CV-63. posted Thu Oct 19 2006 01:31:19 by 747400sp
Orion Cockpit To Be Based On 787 posted Sat Oct 7 2006 04:43:32 by N328KF
CVN-77, USS Bush, To Be Christened 10/7/06 posted Thu Oct 5 2006 07:07:21 by BladeLWS
Firefly T-3A Fleet To Be Destroyed. posted Tue Sep 12 2006 03:07:30 by BOE773
CEV Contractor To Be Announced 8/31 posted Mon Aug 28 2006 15:50:28 by DfwRevolution
"Orion" Said To Be Name Of NASA's CEV Program posted Fri Jul 21 2006 10:42:36 by AerospaceFan
C-17 To Be Unseated By New Airlift Design. posted Tue Jan 10 2006 14:18:02 by CX747
Memphis Belle To Be Restored In Dayton OH posted Sun Oct 9 2005 05:56:24 by DAYflyer
All Shuttle Flights To Be Grounded Again posted Thu Jul 28 2005 02:15:28 by ConcordeBoy
This Has Got To Be A Joke posted Sat Jun 18 2005 23:45:16 by Alberchico

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format