Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
"New" VC-25 Vs E4-B  
User currently offlineBoeing Nut From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (8 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 8354 times:

Greetings all,

Reading "Air Force One" threads gets everyone wondering about other possible variants of this special aircraft. Not everyone is aware however of the support aircraft. Namely the E4-B.

Kind of hopping around here, but now that the 747-800 has been launched I think it's pretty much a given that it will be the next "Air Force One". A lot has been mentioned about the unused space above the main cabin that can/will be used for crew rest, galley storage and so on.

Now, with technology coming as far as it has with computers, specifically thier reduced size, couldn't the Air Force use this "unused" space as a war room section of the aircraft? All info could be transmitted down to the main conference room. This could possibly eliminate the need for the E4-B.
Just curious as to what some of you with the "in the know" think about this.

Regards

10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJarheadK5 From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 216 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (8 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 8343 times:

Quoting Boeing Nut (Thread starter):
now that the 747-800 has been launched I think it's pretty much a given that it will be the next "Air Force One".

With as little as the current AF1's are used (when compared to 747's in revenue service), and as well-kept as they are, I personally don't see a need for an airframe replacement for a looong time.
(I'm assuming there's more than one VC-25 - I can't remember right now...)



Cleared to Contact
User currently offlineBoeing Nut From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (8 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 8339 times:

Yea, there are two of them. SAM 28000 and 29000. I was just thinking along the lines if the military kept "downsizing".

Also, just day dreaming.  goodvibes 


User currently offlineKC135R From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 725 posts, RR: 4
Reply 3, posted (8 years 9 months 1 week 2 days ago) and read 8238 times:

The E-4 isn't just a support aircraft for the VC-25, its primary job is to serve as a flying command post for the military. It does support presidential missions and one is always nearby when AF1 is flying somewhere, but it does much more than that.

With everything on the E-4, I doubt you could combine the missions of the two aircraft even with the increased space on the 747-8.
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/systems/e-4b.htm

Besides, why replace the VC-25's already? They are relatively young (only been in service since 1990 and the VC-137's stayed around for nearly 30 years before being replaced.


User currently offlineBoeing Nut From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (8 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 8222 times:

Quoting KC135R (Reply 3):
Besides, why replace the VC-25's already?

I know, I know. I'm just flying ideas arround.


User currently offlineDw747400 From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 1258 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (8 years 9 months 1 week 22 hours ago) and read 8117 times:

Recent upgrades to the VC-25A give it C+C capbilities rivaling, if not surpassing, those of the E-4B. The E-4s still have important roles, but it is unlikely they will see the president aboard, even in a time of crisis.


CFI--Certfied Freakin Idiot
User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12134 posts, RR: 51
Reply 6, posted (8 years 9 months 1 week 15 hours ago) and read 8089 times:

The E-4Bs have already been in service with SAC, and now ACC for over 30 years now (they all started out in life as E-4As). They fly lots of hours each year. So they may, someday, be replaced by a B-747-800. Maybe within the next 10 years, or so. One problem is that there is only 4 E-4s in the USAF inventory. With one always on alert, one in some type of maintenance, and one used during crew training missions, that only leaves one spare airplane.

There is also one USAF ABL platform that is a B-747-400.


User currently offlineBoeing Nut From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (8 years 9 months 1 week 11 hours ago) and read 8078 times:

Do you guys think the current VC-25's would ever retrofit this unused overhead space utilized with new equipment? Seems like several desktop stations could be installed

Before replying, keep my signature in mind.  Silly


User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12134 posts, RR: 51
Reply 8, posted (8 years 9 months 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 7964 times:

Quoting Boeing Nut (Reply 7):
Do you guys think the current VC-25's would ever retrofit this unused overhead space utilized with new equipment? Seems like several desktop stations could be installed

Before replying, keep my signature in mind.

Actually, the upper deck on the VC-25 is already used. That is where the White House communications center is. This equipment gets updated regularly. The foreward and aft cargo lobes are also used, during 9/11 they were stuffed to the gills with food, water, and supplies when the plane landed at Barksdale AFB, LA.

IIRC, the raided the base Commissary.


User currently offlineBoeing Nut From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (8 years 9 months 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 7897 times:

Greetings TopBoom,

I am aware of the "hump" is already being utilized on the VC-25's. I am refering to the overhead space over the main cabin that is not used. (that we know of) On the newer 747 studies, this space over the main cabin will be used for various purposes. Crew rest, sleeping berths for passengers, etc.


User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12134 posts, RR: 51
Reply 10, posted (8 years 9 months 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 7885 times:

Quoting Boeing Nut (Reply 9):
I am refering to the overhead space over the main cabin that is not used. (that we know of)

Oh, that overhead space is already occupied by the swollen heads of all the political passengers who have ever flown on the VC-25As. They needed a B-747 sized airplane because those in the Bush 41, Clinton, and Bush 43 Administrations couuld not fit their heads into the B-707s (VC-137B/Cs).

LOL.

No, I don't know of any future use for this space, unless they decide to build a crew rest area. I believe that Boeing offers a kit for this for the B-747-200/300/400s.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic "New" VC-25 Vs E4-B
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Article: "New Dawn For Russian Bombers" posted Mon Jul 3 2006 21:25:52 by Lumberton
Has A VC-25 Been Air Refueled While AF1? posted Wed Apr 7 2004 16:42:20 by Stormin
VC-25 I.e. AF1 At Tinker Today posted Tue Dec 31 2002 00:21:07 by Lt-AWACS
Info On VS-30 "Diamondcutters" posted Wed May 4 2005 18:56:13 by Spartan13
F-14D Vs F/A-18E During "Iraqi Freedom" posted Thu Mar 27 2003 19:51:05 by CX747
Rotary Wing Pilots: "I've Always Wondered..." posted Tue Nov 21 2006 06:28:44 by MCIGuy
"Stars Of Sukhoi" Video (Su-27, 30, 33, 47) posted Tue Nov 21 2006 04:47:29 by BEG2IAH
Is The U.S.C.G. Considered "Military" posted Sun Nov 12 2006 19:19:37 by UH60FtRucker
Rare Broadcast "Dr. Strangelove" posted Sat Nov 11 2006 22:25:21 by RC135U
"Dog Fights" History Channel Tonight posted Sat Nov 4 2006 03:48:00 by Thomasphoto60

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format