Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Fixed Wing Aircraft In The US Army?  
User currently offlineLastordu From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 367 posts, RR: 0
Posted (8 years 10 months 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 32767 times:

I know that this might be a dumb question, but what fixed wing air craft dose the US Army have and/or use? I looked on here but everthing was helicopters.


Thanks,
Nick


"Remember, Remember the 5th of November" from V for Vendetta
32 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineHaveBlue From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 2108 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (8 years 10 months 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 32767 times:

The Army is not allowed to have fixed wing combat aircraft, that was decided long ago in an Air Force vs Army debate. They had the O-1, O-2 and OV-10 observation planes which could carry targeting smoke rockets and such, but they are not allowed to have combative aircraft. But logistical and combat aircraft fall under the domain of Air Force command.

I had an Air Force recruiter argue with me in High School in the 80's that the Army had A-10's at one point, but he was wrong. It was a bitter fight in Washington but the Air Force won that one.



Here Here for Severe Clear!
User currently offlineJoness0154 From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 667 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (8 years 10 months 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 32767 times:

UC-35's
C-12's
C-23's

All still in service



I don't have an attitude problem. You have a perception problem
User currently offlineSlamClick From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 10062 posts, RR: 68
Reply 3, posted (8 years 10 months 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 32767 times:

Quoting HaveBlue (Reply 1):
O-1, O-2 and OV-10

I flew the O-1, but never saw so much as a picture of the other two in Army markings. I would not rule them out, but they were not part of the Army "inventory" of fixed wing.

During my time in Army Aviation, which was the Vietnam era, we had:

Singles
O-1 Bird Dog
T-41B - A Cessna 172 with an IO-360 and a constant-speed prop.
U-6A - DeHavilland of Canada Beaver
U-1A - DeHavilland of Canada Otter
U-10A - Helio Courier

Twins
T-42A - A Beech Baron instrument / multi trainer
U-8D & G - Beech Twin Bonanza
U-8F - Beech Queen Air
U-21A - An unpressurized King Air or a PT-6A powered Queen Air 88. Not sure which.
OV-1 Mohawk - Grumman, triple-tail, side-by-side ejection seats.
CV-2 Caribou - - DeHavilland of Canada

By the time I was on active duty a few others had been dropped from the inventory:

Aero Commander
Cessna 195
Navion

Some other aircraft of which they had maybe only one or maybe as many as a half dozen or so on special projects:

YO-3A - Schweizer glider with a very quiet engine and prop
P-51 Cavalier Mustang as a chase plane at Test Board
C-45
T-28B
C-47 - several around the world
C-54 - at Lakehurst and maybe a couple other places
P-2V Neptune - All at the "First RR" at Cam Rahn Bay, RVN.
F-3D Skynight - straight-wing Douglas twin jet

They also had other aircraft "demonstrated" and this sometimes meant that they were painted at least temporarily in US Army markings. This included:

Helio Stallion
Shorts Skyvan
OV-10

[Edited 2005-11-22 18:12:22]


Happiness is not seeing another trite Ste. Maarten photo all week long.
User currently offlinePropatriamori From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 132 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (8 years 10 months 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 32767 times:

Army Aviation operates ELINT platform modified DHC-7 (RC-7B) aircraft as part of Military Intelligence units. The aircraft are painted in "civilian-like" paint schemes with small "U.S. Army" titles on the tail. I know several are stationed at Biggs AAF (adjacent to Ft. Bliss, TX) as part of an M.I. unit there. I have also seen these aircraft deployed to Korea, and from what I hear make somewhat "unadvertised" depoyments to various locations.

User currently offlineSidishus From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 519 posts, RR: 4
Reply 5, posted (8 years 10 months 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 32767 times:

Quoting HaveBlue (Reply 1):
The Army is not allowed to have fixed wing combat aircraft

The GR/CS, not to mention the increasingly doubtful ACS, and even the AR(L) aircraft are as much "COMBAT" aircraft as any A-10, F-15 , etc.
Treating SIGINT/ELINT aircraft as spectators to the fight is an obsolete notion that belongs in the quaint past of the last century.
Indeed, with the advent of NETWAR, AESA, and the drive for an ever shorter sensor to shooter loop, it's well time to question the need for specialized manned ELINT/SIGINT aircraft to exist at all.

[Edited 2005-11-22 20:39:19]


the truth: first it is ridiculed second it is violently opposed finally it is accepted as self-evident
User currently offlineDL021 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 11447 posts, RR: 75
Reply 6, posted (8 years 10 months 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 32767 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Don't forget the BTC-47 and the AN-2 Colts the Army has down at Hurlburt.


Is my Pan Am ticket to the moon still good?
User currently offlineSlamClick From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 10062 posts, RR: 68
Reply 7, posted (8 years 10 months 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 32767 times:

Quoting Sidishus (Reply 5):
Treating SIGINT/ELINT aircraft as spectators to the fight is an obsolete notion that belongs in the quaint past of the last century.

Some spectators have a better view of the proceedings than others!



Happiness is not seeing another trite Ste. Maarten photo all week long.
User currently offline2H4 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 8955 posts, RR: 60
Reply 8, posted (8 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 32767 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
DATABASE EDITOR




There was also the Cessna U-3:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Paul Goddard
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Gary Chambers






2H4





Intentionally Left Blank
User currently offlineSlamClick From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 10062 posts, RR: 68
Reply 9, posted (8 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 32767 times:

Quoting 2H4 (Reply 8):
There was also the Cessna U-3:

Those came over from the USAF just as I was leaving the Army. We got OH-58s and I went to ground school on that, but never flew one, then we were told we were going to get a U-3 "blue canoe" from the Air Guard. I was designated the IP for it, and did my summer camp writing the training program. 25 hours of ground school if I remember right. But I left the guard and never flew it. I'd guess they came into the inventory around 1973-74.



Happiness is not seeing another trite Ste. Maarten photo all week long.
User currently offlineF4wso From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 974 posts, RR: 11
Reply 10, posted (8 years 9 months 4 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 32767 times:

The Army doens't have many, but they do have some interesting fixed wing aircraft.

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Gary Chambers
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Gary Chambers



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Gary Chambers
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Gary Chambers



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Gary Chambers
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Gary Chambers



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Gary Chambers




Seeking an honest week's pay for an honest day's work
User currently offlineLurch From United States of America, joined Jul 2008, 0 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (8 years 9 months 4 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 32767 times:

The US Army operated the Boeing 767-200 prototype with a dorsal cupola. It was converted as the Airborne Optical Adjunct Laboratory although not many people remember it as a US Army aircraft

User currently offlineSlamClick From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 10062 posts, RR: 68
Reply 12, posted (8 years 9 months 4 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 32767 times:

Quoting Lurch (Reply 11):
The US Army operated the Boeing 767-200 prototype with a dorsal cupola. It was converted as the Airborne Optical Adjunct Laboratory although not many people remember it as a US Army aircraft

That would pretty much hold the record then. Do you know if it was actually flown by Army Aviator crews or if they contracted that out?



Happiness is not seeing another trite Ste. Maarten photo all week long.
User currently offlineSidishus From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 519 posts, RR: 4
Reply 13, posted (8 years 9 months 4 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 32767 times:

Quoting SlamClick (Reply 7):
Quoting Sidishus (Reply 5):
Treating SIGINT/ELINT aircraft as spectators to the fight is an obsolete notion that belongs in the quaint past of the last century.

Some spectators have a better view of the proceedings than others!

Trouble is, emerging military doctirne being advertised by some potential bad guys makes it a point to include such platforms in the fight.
The Cold War concepts of standing off the contested airspace, or south of a DMZ, or whatever won't work in this century's scraps



the truth: first it is ridiculed second it is violently opposed finally it is accepted as self-evident
User currently offlineEspike From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 3 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (8 years 9 months 4 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 32767 times:

Guys are showing a lot of obsolete aircraft on this forum. U-3s, T-42, C-47s? Not anymore.

The current fixed-wing aircraft in the Army are:

C-12 Huron (Beechcraft Raytheon B200 Super King Air)
RC-12 - military intelligence variant
UC-35 - (Cessna Citation Ultra)
Gulfstream GIV- Used by the Army Chief of Staff from Andrews AFB, and flown by Army Aviators.
RC-7s - Dash 7 - as previously stated, an MI platform used in Texas and Korea and parts unknown.
C-23 Sherpa - A box with wings that is currently out flying the Air Force in Iraq by delivering much needed personnel and equipment all over the Iraqi theater to tiny little airfields the C-130s won't go to.

The C-23 is going to be replaced very soon. The C-27J Spartan is the leading competitor. It's like a mini C-130, but it will be flown by Army Aviators, not Air Force. The Army should also be looking to replace the C-12 and UC-35 with a larger jet aircraft for the personnel/vip transport role. Hopefully, they will consider the GIV or G200. We need something that can cross the oceans.

Fly Safe!

Spike


User currently offlineLurch From United States of America, joined Jul 2008, 0 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (8 years 9 months 4 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 32767 times:

From memory the AOA project used some US Army and Boeing Crews to do the flying but all the Cabin personal were US Army people!

User currently offline2H4 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 8955 posts, RR: 60
Reply 16, posted (8 years 9 months 4 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 32767 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
DATABASE EDITOR




I remembered another:



The Pilatus UV-20 Chiricahua:








...And, winning the "What the hell?" award:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Alan McKnight




 eyepopping 




2H4





Intentionally Left Blank
User currently offlineErj-145mech From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 306 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 32767 times:

That last pic is a T-6B, basically a US built Pilatus PC-7.

The Army did have two O-2A's, 68-11150 and 151. They replaced two U-6 Beavers based in Berlin. The Army also has a T-34C based in North Carolina.


User currently offlineSlamClick From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 10062 posts, RR: 68
Reply 18, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 32767 times:

Quoting Erj-145mech (Reply 17):
The Army did have two O-2A's, 68-11150 and 151.

Interesting. Never saw them. Baugher has 150 now civil registered.

Quoting Espike (Reply 14):
Guys are showing a lot of obsolete aircraft on this forum. U-3s, T-42, C-47s? Not anymore.

Right! That is why I said:

Quoting SlamClick (Reply 3):
During my time in Army Aviation, which was the Vietnam era, we had:

I was waiting for someone familiar with today's inventory to pop up.

You have planes today that I would consider superior to most that we had back then, but we sure did have numbers and diversity all over you. Of course the same was true for Air Force and Navy thirty years ago - more aircraft and more types.



Happiness is not seeing another trite Ste. Maarten photo all week long.
User currently offlineErj-145mech From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 306 posts, RR: 1
Reply 19, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 32767 times:

Here ya go Slam, check it out:

http://www.warbirdsresourcegroup.org...egistry/o2registry/o2-6811150.html

I got checked out in the Bird Dog at the Ft Hood Aero Club, had two of them, later got a Beaver, but I had PCS'd by then.


User currently offlineShyFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 20, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 32767 times:

Quoting Erj-145mech (Reply 17):
That last pic is a T-6B, basically a US built Pilatus PC-7.

Actually, they are Pilatus PC-9s, upon which the Texan II was based. So the question remains, why did the US Army have Swiss built PC-9s?

According to Scramble, all three aircraft in that picture left the Army for Slovenia.

91-0071 (C/N: 180) To Slovenia as S5-DSL
91-0072 (C/N: 181) To Slovenia as S5-DPT
91-0073 (C/N: 182) To Slovenia as S5-DPI


User currently offlineErj-145mech From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 306 posts, RR: 1
Reply 21, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 32767 times:

Shyflyer, thanks for the correction, I knew what I meant, its just that my fingers forgot!! Thats my story, and I'm sticking to it.

User currently offline2H4 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 8955 posts, RR: 60
Reply 22, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 32767 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
DATABASE EDITOR




Quoting ShyFlyer (Reply 20):
Actually, they are Pilatus PC-9s, upon which the Texan II was based. So the question remains, why did the US Army have Swiss built PC-9s?



I was wondering the same thing. Given that the factory PC-9 logo is still visible, I'd venture a guess that the three were in the running for an aircraft requirement competition....much like the Northrop A-9 competed with the A-10 (and lost) for a ground attack requirement:











The question then becomes....what requirement was the PC-9 proposed to fulfill? And what other aircraft did it compete with, and lose to?

 confused 




2H4





Intentionally Left Blank
User currently offlineContact_tower From Norway, joined Sep 2001, 536 posts, RR: 1
Reply 23, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 32767 times:

Quote:
According to Scramble, all three aircraft in that picture left the Army for Slovenia.

Actually, they went back to Pilatus on a HB- reg before beeing sold to the Slovenians.


User currently offlineShyFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 24, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 32767 times:

Quoting Erj-145mech (Reply 21):
Thats my story, and I'm sticking to it.

 Silly

Quoting 2H4 (Reply 22):
I'd venture a guess that the three were in the running for an aircraft requirement competition...The question then becomes....what requirement was the PC-9 proposed to fulfill? And what other aircraft did it compete with, and lose to?

Kind of a wild guess but, JPATS maybe?


25 SlamClick : Unfortunately the photos are of a "warbird" civil aircraft in a pseudomilitary paint job. I'd sure like to see pictures of the actual livery. (this m
26 2H4 : Yeah, I was thinking that, too....but is the Army involved in JPATS? I sure hope this won't turn into an unsolved Airliners.net mystery. 2H4
27 SlamClick : Well, they certainly are capable of laying chemtrails. ("Shot! Over!")
28 DeltaGuy : You wouldn't believe how many O-2's are out there now doing civilian jobs. My roomate has a job flying them out of the Jacksonville area for whale wa
29 Erj-145mech : Its civillian now, and I have pics of it in flight over West Germany, in a book "Cessna Warbirds", but I don't know how to post those pics. It hasn't
30 Mechatnew : The PC-9s' were used at Fort Bragg ,NC as photo chase aircraft for the US Army Airborne test unit. They would fly in formation with C-130's, and C-141
31 2H4 : Wow, thanks for the info Mechatnew. Do you have any idea how long they were in service? 2H4
32 Post contains links Lurch : Apparently the 767 Prototype is still operational in the US Army but has changed its name and is Located in a remote location in the Pacific The Reaga
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Fixed Wing Aircraft In The US Army?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Small Planes In The US Presidential Flight posted Mon Jul 27 2009 07:54:27 by Deskflier
What Are Some Aviation Careers In The US Navy posted Fri Aug 3 2007 23:09:56 by LAXspotter
Rnzaf Registered In The US? posted Fri Apr 15 2005 16:56:38 by Cancidas
Agusta A109 In The British Army posted Mon Jul 5 2004 15:23:35 by JasperEMA
US Army Fixed-Wing Aviation posted Thu May 31 2007 05:14:49 by MeanGreen
Aircraft Used In The Assault On Osama Bin Laden posted Mon May 2 2011 10:12:44 by tugger
US Army Using UH-1Y In Afghanistan? posted Wed Feb 17 2010 13:39:55 by AirRyan
How Do The Old US Fighters Fit In The Iriaf? posted Sat Jul 25 2009 08:26:58 by LHCVG
Trainee Pilot Aircraft Selection In The Usaf posted Tue Jan 6 2009 18:39:48 by B787
US To India: We'll Throw In The Kitty Hawk posted Sun Feb 24 2008 19:27:34 by Atmx2000
Small Planes In The US Presidential Flight posted Mon Jul 27 2009 07:54:27 by Deskflier
What Are Some Aviation Careers In The US Navy posted Fri Aug 3 2007 23:09:56 by LAXspotter
Rnzaf Registered In The US? posted Fri Apr 15 2005 16:56:38 by Cancidas
Agusta A109 In The British Army posted Mon Jul 5 2004 15:23:35 by JasperEMA
US Army Fixed-Wing Aviation posted Thu May 31 2007 05:14:49 by MeanGreen
Aircraft Used In The Assault On Osama Bin Laden posted Mon May 2 2011 10:12:44 by tugger
US Army Using UH-1Y In Afghanistan? posted Wed Feb 17 2010 13:39:55 by AirRyan
How Do The Old US Fighters Fit In The Iriaf? posted Sat Jul 25 2009 08:26:58 by LHCVG
Trainee Pilot Aircraft Selection In The Usaf posted Tue Jan 6 2009 18:39:48 by B787
US To India: We'll Throw In The Kitty Hawk posted Sun Feb 24 2008 19:27:34 by Atmx2000

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format