Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Global Hawk UAV As Intercontinental CM?  
User currently offlineAerospaceFan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 2702 times:

Could the Global Hawk unmanned aerial vehicle be converted into an intercontinental cruise missile?

Granted, it's slightly less speedy than the CGM-86, but with its intercontinental range (7,500 miles), it could be launched in the continental United States and strike high-value targets a quarter of the way around the world. It might even be equipped with a nuclear weapon, such as the W-80, perhaps at some cost to its range. (The U.S. could compensate for range limitations by basing such a missile in Guam, a U.S. territory, or another U.S. base.)

On the other hand, the Global Hawk is not designed to be a low-flying terrain-following missile; but could it be converted to serve that purpose? And, anyway, could it serve as a high-altitude CM against countries that can't shoot it down at altitude?

Just a few questions.

[Edited 2006-01-01 17:07:13]

11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDL021 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 11447 posts, RR: 75
Reply 1, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 2694 times:

It would be a waste of time and money to convert those airplanes into missiles.

THey are specialized reconnaissance assets and would not make very good missiles since they are not fast or maneuverable. Their primary defense is low visibility and high altitude.

We have plenty of delivery options for any type weapon we want to use in any conflict, and the Global Hawk is designed specifically for other purposes.



Is my Pan Am ticket to the moon still good?
User currently offlineAerospaceFan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 2693 times:

Quoting DL021 (Reply 1):
We have plenty of delivery options for any type weapon we want to use in any conflict, and the Global Hawk is designed specifically for other purposes.

I mean production of the converted design, not conversion of existing airframes.  Smile


User currently offlineDL021 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 11447 posts, RR: 75
Reply 3, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 2689 times:

Either way it would not be a successful cruise missile.....too slow and unwieldy.

Cruise missiles need to be fast and low to the ground able to move around terrain so they are not shot down.

Even 3rd world nations have ADA missiles.



Is my Pan Am ticket to the moon still good?
User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 19
Reply 4, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 2684 times:

It could indeed not be used as a cruise weapon itself.
I do see a possibly viable derivative that can serve as a launch platform for standoff weapons though, leaving the launching platform outside of SAM range and able to provide faster control data for midcourse corrections to the weapons it launches than can be provided from a control bunker thousands of miles away.



I wish I were flying
User currently offlineCloudy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 2517 times:

No, because it would be a ground-launched cruise missile. The US cannot have ground launch cruise missiles because the INF treaty prohibits them.

User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29802 posts, RR: 58
Reply 6, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 2516 times:

Quoting DL021 (Reply 3):
Either way it would not be a successful cruise missile.....too slow and unwieldy.

Same problem the V-1 had.

Quoting Cloudy (Reply 5):
The US cannot have ground launch cruise missiles because the INF treaty prohibits them.

That should only apply to nuclear warheads. I am pretty sure that non-nuclear ones aren't covered.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineAerospaceFan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 2512 times:

Quoting Cloudy (Reply 5):
No, because it would be a ground-launched cruise missile. The US cannot have ground launch cruise missiles because the INF treaty prohibits them.

That's an excellent observation on your part. I will have to look at the treaty. The question I would have is whether the INF would apply to intercontinental-ranged cruise missiles, rather than ones with intermediate or short range.


User currently offline11Bravo From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 1720 posts, RR: 10
Reply 8, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 2509 times:

Quoting L-188 (Reply 6):
That should only apply to nuclear warheads. I am pretty sure that non-nuclear ones aren't covered.

Actually INF applies to both nuclear and conventional ground-launched ballistic and cruise missiles with ranges of 500 to 5,500 kilometers (300-3,400 miles).

http://www.state.gov/www/global/arms/treaties/inf2.html

Quoting AerospaceFan (Reply 7):
The question I would have is whether the INF would apply to intercontinental-ranged cruise missiles, rather than ones with intermediate or short range.

As long as the missile in queston exceeds the range listed above, it isn't covered by INF although it may be regulated by the Treaty on Strategic Offensive Reductions (SORT) ratified in 2003.

Another interesting idea is to equip ICBMs with conventional warheads based on JDAM technology. This would create a highly accurate warhead that could be delivered to any point on the planet within 30 minutes.



WhaleJets Rule!
User currently offlineAtmx2000 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 4576 posts, RR: 37
Reply 9, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 2506 times:

Quoting 11Bravo (Reply 8):
Another interesting idea is to equip ICBMs with conventional warheads based on JDAM technology. This would create a highly accurate warhead that could be delivered to any point on the planet within 30 minutes.

Wouldn't they be traveling rather fast at release? Would the warhead guidable?


Also, wouldn't ICBM launches set warnings off and cause all sorts of problems?



ConcordeBoy is a twin supremacist!! He supports quadicide!!
User currently offlineAFHokie From United States of America, joined May 2004, 224 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 2465 times:

Quoting 11Bravo (Reply 8):
Another interesting idea is to equip ICBMs with conventional warheads based on JDAM technology. This would create a highly accurate warhead that could be delivered to any point on the planet within 30 minutes.



Quoting Atmx2000 (Reply 9):
Wouldn't they be traveling rather fast at release? Would the warhead guidable?


Also, wouldn't ICBM launches set warnings off and cause all sorts of problems?

The idea is feasible, but as said, you launch an ICBM, and the world is gonna think you just popped off a nuke at someone. Other countries out there that also have ICBM's aren't going to wait to see how big of a boom it makes before they start launching their own.

ICBM's will always be associated with nuclear warheads, and therefore, never be used for any other military application.


User currently offline11Bravo From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 1720 posts, RR: 10
Reply 11, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 2394 times:

Quoting AFHokie (Reply 10):
Other countries out there that also have ICBM's aren't going to wait to see how big of a boom it makes before they start launching their own.

Clearly there would be launch-on-warning issues, but that is not a problem only associated with ICBMs.

We test fire ICBMs and other sub-orbital systems from Vandenberg AFB on a regular basis.

There are many orbital launches from a multitude of sites all over the world that could easily be confused with an ICBM in boost phase.

We have used cruise missiles in combat on many occasions, sometimes launched from submarines, that flew on courses that might have been mistaken for an attack on Russia.

We have used the Army Tactical Missile System in combat, once again, fired on trajectories that could be initially mistaken for a nuclear missile launch on Russia.

I suspect that most, if not all, of these events were detected by Russian and/or Chinese missile-launch early warning systems. There are a number of redundant communication systems that are used by the nuclear super-powers to insure that mistakes are not made when these events occur. I'm optimistic that we could figure out how to do the same for a conventional-warhead ICBM.



WhaleJets Rule!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Global Hawk UAV As Intercontinental CM?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Iraq As UAV Proving Ground posted Thu Sep 14 2006 21:59:24 by BOE773
Bell X Hawk posted Thu Oct 26 2006 11:46:58 by HeliflyerPDC
Indonesia - UAV's From Israel? posted Sun Oct 22 2006 20:45:21 by 7474ever
How Many C-130s Have Served As Fat Albert? posted Sun Oct 8 2006 00:57:35 by Dl757md
Kitty Hawk Carrier Strike Group Guam posted Tue Sep 26 2006 15:36:20 by FlyMatt2Bermud
Hizbollah UAV Downed posted Tue Aug 8 2006 12:29:50 by Alessandro
Details Emerge On Lockheed Polecat UAV posted Wed Jul 19 2006 14:56:33 by RichardPrice
Eads Unveils UAV Tech Demonstrator 'Barracuda' posted Sat May 13 2006 23:08:50 by A319XFW
Stealth Fighters Might Select Hickam As Base posted Thu Mar 2 2006 01:06:32 by Squirrel83
Boeing May Use Antonov An-72 As Platform For FCA B posted Fri Jan 20 2006 20:48:53 by Atmx2000
Iran Shoots Down US UAV Over Nuclear Plan posted Wed Jul 20 2011 11:59:39 by bjornstrom
Prince Harry Back In Afghan War As Apache Pilot. posted Thu Jun 16 2011 03:01:01 by bjorn14
CT-155 Hawk Crash In Cold Lake, Alberta posted Fri Jun 10 2011 17:40:49 by ThePointblank
New RAF A330 Mrtt As VIP Aircraft? posted Fri Apr 29 2011 14:12:19 by Bthebest
C-32 As Air Force ONE To KSC posted Fri Apr 29 2011 12:18:23 by WF2BNN
UAV Air Show Performances? posted Mon Apr 4 2011 07:14:43 by titanmiller

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format