MiG31 From United States of America, joined Aug 2008, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (13 years 5 months 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 1621 times:
Hey MiG-21 is not ugly - it look just like any fighter of its time. If you think it is ugly then in you probably wouldn't like any similar fighter of that time...
Also I think that however, you people put it F-16 is rather ugly looking. I mean there are many beautiful pictures of it but if you just come up to it, especially from the front it just doesn't look proportional. There's this intake thingy, which makes it look like a vacum cleaner (like JSF) and the glass (what do u call it?) cabin, cockpit glass I mean is blown up like a bubble.
I also think that Su-37 is beautiful an so is Berkut.
And certainly MIG-31!!! It looks GREAT when in air
Flyhigh@tom From United Arab Emirates, joined Sep 2001, 401 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (13 years 5 months 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 1589 times:
Climbout, what on earth is that fat thing?(Beriev Bartini VVA 14)
Did that thing actually fly, does not look like a flying machine at all to me!!! well even if it is ugly it does facinate me a lot, anybody on more info about that?
Best looking fighters: The Su27, MiG29, F14, F15 (in the descending order)
Climbout From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (13 years 5 months 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 1565 times:
That plane was discussed in detail on this forum a while back. Check out the topic entitled "Who Knows More about this airplane"(I would post the link, but I don't know how), and you will see what people are saying about it.
MiG-29-Sniper From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (13 years 5 months 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 1535 times:
nicest out look: Zhuravlik!!!!!; MiG-29; MiG-31; Su-32/34 - oh, gee, my favorite!; Su-33/37. and, crap there many of 'em!
not as killing: Su-47; F-4/5/14/117/18/16/15/22/21/... do i need to continue?
absolutely ugly: gibt es nichts!