Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Texas NG Units Mobilized  
User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12146 posts, RR: 51
Posted (8 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 1487 times:

Units of the TX ArNG are being mobilized for deployment to Iraq. The 136 ID (with Bradleys, and M-1A1/2 MBT) and 149 Av Btn (flying CH-47s, AH-64s, and UH-60s) are going to Ft. Hood for 6 months of training and desert equipment issue. In August they deploy to replace the Regular US Army 82 AB.

Godspeed, my friends. May everyone return home safely and unhurt.

14 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCX747 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4454 posts, RR: 5
Reply 1, posted (8 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 1474 times:

Godspeed and good luck.


"History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid." D. Eisenhower
User currently offlineDL021 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 11447 posts, RR: 75
Reply 2, posted (8 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 1389 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

There is the possibility that their deployment will be curtailed based on troop level adjustments in theater.

Regardless, I too wish them Godspeed on their mission.



Is my Pan Am ticket to the moon still good?
User currently offlineLongbowPilot From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 577 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 1293 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I would not recommend posting such troop and unit deployments on a public forum, specifically unit designations, dates, and equipment types. They are listening, watching, and researching as we are. Those operational turn over times could give the opposing force ideas.

It is nice you are wanting to tell everyone, but think of who else will get this info. Respect the troops and the familes of them and do not post such items.

I ask this because I am a deployed soldier.


User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12146 posts, RR: 51
Reply 4, posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 1284 times:

Quoting LongbowPilot (Reply 3):
I would not recommend posting such troop and unit deployments on a public forum, specifically unit designations, dates, and equipment types. They are listening, watching, and researching as we are. Those operational turn over times could give the opposing force ideas.

It is nice you are wanting to tell everyone, but think of who else will get this info. Respect the troops and the familes of them and do not post such items.

I ask this because I am a deployed soldier.

You are correct, I shouldn't have listed the units. I could have been generic.


User currently offlineLongbowPilot From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 577 posts, RR: 3
Reply 5, posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 1272 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I too am proud to announce when i'm going to battle, so I'm sorry to seem like I am jumping you.

User currently offlineLt-AWACS From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 1209 times:

Good point,

but the fact it was posted in the Houston Chronicle, Dallas Morning News, Austin American Statesman and other papers makes the "Secret" a bit mute.

Ciao, and Hook 'em Horns,
Capt-AWACS, Am I the only happy person because oil is at $65 a barrel


User currently offlineSCEagle From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 136 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1184 times:

Quoting Lt-AWACS (Reply 6):
but the fact it was posted in the Houston Chronicle, Dallas Morning News, Austin American Statesman and other papers makes the "Secret" a bit mute.

True. Excellent point. However, we don't need to make it easier by increasing the visibility of such announcements.

Attention Enemy: Just in case you missed it (or don't subscribe to Texas newspaper), here's the latest deployment news...


User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29799 posts, RR: 58
Reply 8, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1179 times:

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Thread starter):
I would not recommend posting such troop and unit deployments on a public forum, specifically unit designations, dates, and equipment types.



Quoting SCEagle (Reply 7):
Quoting Lt-AWACS (Reply 6):
but the fact it was posted in the Houston Chronicle, Dallas Morning News, Austin American Statesman and other papers makes the "Secret" a bit mute.

True. Excellent point. However, we don't need to make it easier by increasing the visibility of such announcements.

Got to concur with everbody else here. Ops-sec has been pretty lousy over the past couple of years. We don't need to make it that much easier for the ^*$##heads to find out what they are facing.

That being said

Quoting CX747 (Reply 1):
Godspeed and good luck

Absolutely.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineLt-AWACS From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 1156 times:

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/iraq_orbat.htm
We should shut these folks down then...

Trust me, I am all about opsec. I live it and work it (as do most of you) at levels we never post here, and that is the point of "real" opsec. Real classified info and opsec will be kept that way. Dirka Dirka doesn't care if he is facing a Texas Guard unit or Active US force from Korea. It is a well trained grunt with a gun that bothers him. I hate to sound flippant here, but if something should be kept secret then at least make it FOUO or higher. Ditto the CIA and there leaks.

From the DoD
http://www.defenselink.mil/releases/2005/nr20051223-12208.html


Ciao, and Hook 'em Horns,
Capt-AWACS, Texas-It's bigger than France


User currently offlineLongbowPilot From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 577 posts, RR: 3
Reply 10, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 1108 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Oh man, c'mon. Think about it bro, the information is out there, but putting it out there is just spreading it around. Kinda not helping, but could give somoene a heads up that did not know it was coming... Just one more variable that doesn't need to be added.

User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29799 posts, RR: 58
Reply 11, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 1098 times:

Quoting Lt-AWACS (Reply 9):
I am all about opsec. I live it and work it (as do most of you) at levels we never post here, and that is the point of "real" opsec. Real classified info and opsec will be kept that way.

I still really bothered me that we kept seeing announcements of "Offensives" on the evening new that where supposed to kick off in the next couple of days.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineLt-AWACS From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 1051 times:

THe kind of stuff you are talking about L188 is at much higher levels than stuff that would be posted on this board, and more than likely is calculated.
I agree 110% it bothers me, but it is out there.
I was not offended when my deployment to Iraq was posted there are much more important things to worry about then vague troop rotations. Like armour and fuel and upgrades etc.

Ciao, and Hook 'em Horns,
Capt-AWACS, Why I like NATO-Not after ten o'clocl


User currently offlineJohnM From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 347 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 1035 times:

L-188
The press stuff you see really doesn't relate to real world ops in the OIF world. I got back in November, and the stuff we did wasn't put out before we did it, and most times not even when the op was over. Opsec was good in my small part of Iraq. Everybody knows Opsec is life and death over there. I think the news releases are just to keep everybody at home reminded that we are still out there doing our thing.

John


User currently offlineLt-AWACS From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 1033 times:

The local news was at our departure for Iraq with "Live" coverage and then again on the return. Ditto during the air war a few years ago, but as JohnM said, the details are not out (minus Geraldo's little sand picture) there-- which is why I see this first post as vague and harmless.

Better the American public keep the war in mind JohnM, I agree.

Ciao, and Hook 'em Horns,
Capt-AWACS, Texas-It's bigger than France


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Texas NG Units Mobilized
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Mil Mi 8 Helicopter In Killeen/Fort Hood, Texas? posted Sat Jul 1 2006 01:21:10 by KPDX
US Registered IL-78 Based In North Texas posted Mon Jun 12 2006 16:16:07 by Cruisertk421
Marine Corp Air Units In Afghanistan? posted Fri Apr 9 2004 04:29:58 by CX747
Tracing Soviet WW II Units posted Mon Sep 8 2003 16:34:30 by Pacificjourney
AirFest At Lackland AFB, Texas On Sat. posted Tue Oct 29 2002 01:37:43 by Clipper471

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format