Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Mag-Lev For The Military  
User currently offlineTIMC From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 133 posts, RR: 0
Posted (8 years 9 months 4 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 2782 times:

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Conten...cles/000/000/006/766oumbi.asp?pg=1

This is quite interesting. When I first saw it, I thought it might be about levitating equipment on Submarines to reduce noise output for stealthiness.

Still, its a novel application of maglev, the main use I always assumed for it was transport and high speed rail.

Its kind of like a new definition of the protect the egg problem...

1 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinePPVRA From Brazil, joined Nov 2004, 8976 posts, RR: 39
Reply 1, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 2640 times:

So, in the example in the last paragraphs, they plan in levitating the SEATS? LOL!

Quote:
The successor to the Mark V is the Sea Fighter (formerly the X-Craft), a 262-foot, 1,000-ton, aluminum catamaran that travels up to 50 knots on the high seas. This led Cohen to "look at decoupling the human from the impact of the craft using this magnetic levitation, and that was sort of the genesis of the seats that you see today."

Cats are way smoother than monohulls. Regular cushioned seats should do fine.

>that Sea King looks like over-kill to me. Also, not very manuverable and more limited in regards to shallow waters compared to the Mark V<

But anyways, as far as reducing vibration (motors).. I guess that's a good idea, just not sure how feasible that would be.

Cheers



"If goods do not cross borders, soldiers will" - Frederic Bastiat
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Mag-Lev For The Military
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why No Military Name For The JT8-D? posted Wed Aug 2 2006 01:37:35 by 747400sp
Becoming A Pilot For The US Navy posted Sat Nov 25 2006 18:16:30 by Turpentyine
Looking For The Red Flag Accident Video posted Fri Oct 20 2006 21:35:14 by RichardPrice
Replacement For The Superhornet posted Fri Sep 29 2006 17:50:02 by 747400sp
Winglets For The E-6 Mercury posted Sat Sep 16 2006 20:57:56 by 747400sp
Could The 2707 Have Been Useful To The Military? posted Thu Aug 31 2006 01:14:46 by 747400sp
Why Not A B-736 For The Army's Sigint? posted Tue Aug 29 2006 01:57:52 by DEVILFISH
Looking For Some Military Planes Unit Price posted Wed Jul 19 2006 22:53:34 by Chrisdigo
Aurora - New Fuel For The Fire posted Wed Jun 14 2006 23:58:28 by RichardPrice
Super SeaSprites For The RAN, Is It The End? posted Mon May 15 2006 09:59:38 by Ozair

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format