Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
F-22 In Heritage Formation?  
User currently offlineTedTAce From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (8 years 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 5565 times:

ok, yeah.... the pic is REALLY cool. http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1034261/L/


But what is this picture REALLY saying???

P-51: Running clean @ probably at LEAST 75% max cont
F-15: Running clean @ probably 20-50% Mil

F-22: Running At flaps 10(ish) degrees and gawd only knows probably flight idle.

I think it's hilarious that the 22 needs to use flaps for this formation. But then again, I'm sick like that.


The following similar threads were found:

F-22 Heritage Flight Pics by Vzlet 2005-01-25 13:12:47
F-22 by JetBlue26 2001-05-07 15:17:49
F-22 Stealth Fighter by Singa_air_rulz 2001-05-19 04:06:27
F-22 Raptour : Please Help by Gdarm 2001-09-01 13:58:11
V-22 Single Engine Ops by Ziggy 2001-09-01 17:55:30

(F-22 Heritage Flight Pics by Vzlet 2005-01-25 13:12:47 looked like a thread about fake pics to me.)

18 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineVzlet From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 829 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (8 years 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 5537 times:

Quoting TedTAce (Thread starter):
(F-22 Heritage Flight Pics by Vzlet 2005-01-25 13:12:47 looked like a thread about fake pics to me.)

Ted, I'm not sure if you're delivering a subtle compliment (i.e., that Erik Hildebrandt's photos are so good that most photographers would be unable to produce similar results), or actually casting suspicion on them as possible fakes. If you're unsure about the genuineness of these shots, you might check out some of his other work and clients.

-Mark



"That's so stupid! If they're so secret, why are they out where everyone can see them?" - my kid
User currently offlineDeltaDC9 From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 2844 posts, RR: 4
Reply 2, posted (8 years 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 5511 times:

This picture would be much cooler if there was a Phantom in there too. But is is cool, don't get me wrong.


Dont take life too seriously because you will never get out of it alive - Bugs Bunny
User currently offlineTedTAce From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (8 years 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 5431 times:

Quoting Vzlet (Reply 1):
actually casting suspicion on them as possible fakes

You tell me when those pictures were shot, who organized all those planes with the F-22, why the angles of the aircraft in some of those shots are so disparate for a 'formation shot' and I'll GLADY eat my words. Isin't it just a TOUCH suspicious that all those shots are backlit with suspicious looking backgrounds? Maybe he shot those A/C individually and 'put them together' in the dark room, fine, ok, whatever; but I'll be stunned to find objective information (or non backlit shots) on those 'flights'.

Thanks for hijacking the thread.. I wanted speculation on the f-22 performance and I'm guessing an apparent lack of a 'need' or 'ability' for consistant "low" speed handling.


User currently offlineDeltaDC9 From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 2844 posts, RR: 4
Reply 4, posted (8 years 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 5395 times:

Quoting TedTAce (Reply 3):
Thanks for hijacking the thread.. I wanted speculation on the f-22 performance and I'm guessing an apparent lack of a 'need' or 'ability' for consistant "low" speed handling.

If that really is a cut and paste, who's to say that the Raptor was'nt on approach or something while the other two planse were shot at speed?



Dont take life too seriously because you will never get out of it alive - Bugs Bunny
User currently offlineTedTAce From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (8 years 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 5380 times:

Quoting DeltaDC9 (Reply 4):
If that really is a cut and paste, who's to say that the Raptor was'nt on approach or something while the other two planse were shot at speed?

I guess you didn't look at the pics from the other thread... or read this one that clearly... or maybe I didn't keep my subjects seperate enough for you.

A)I was accusing the photographer in the other thread of C&P his 'alleged' photos.
B)I was not saying that the photo that launched this thread was C&P... I was remmarking on the fact that the 51 and the 15 were clean whereas apparently the 22 needs flaps to maintain this formation.


User currently offlineDeltaDC9 From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 2844 posts, RR: 4
Reply 6, posted (8 years 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 5373 times:

Quoting TedTAce (Reply 5):
I guess you didn't look at the pics from the other thread... or read this one that clearly... or maybe I didn't keep my subjects seperate enough for you.

A)I was accusing the photographer in the other thread of C&P his 'alleged' photos.
B)I was not saying that the photo that launched this thread was C&P... I was remmarking on the fact that the 51 and the 15 were clean whereas apparently the 22 needs flaps to maintain this formation.

Which leads me to believe its not real or the Raptor was going slower and the other two were flying by and it was captured at the moment they converged. Somethings up with that photo, cant put my finger on it.

Still, dont see any reason to be snippy.



Dont take life too seriously because you will never get out of it alive - Bugs Bunny
User currently offlineCorey07850 From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 2525 posts, RR: 5
Reply 7, posted (8 years 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 5350 times:

Quoting TedTAce (Reply 3):

You tell me when those pictures were shot, who organized all those planes with the F-22, why the angles of the aircraft in some of those shots are so disparate for a 'formation shot' and I'll GLADY eat my words. Isin't it just a TOUCH suspicious that all those shots are backlit with suspicious looking backgrounds? Maybe he shot those A/C individually and 'put them together' in the dark room, fine, ok, whatever; but I'll be stunned to find objective information (or non backlit shots) on those 'flights'.

The picture was taken at Sun-n-fun... Other than Airventure in Oshkosh it's probably the biggest airshow in the United States, so if the picture was fake I'm sure one of the 100,000 people that were in attendence would say something... There were two F-22's at the show, and yes the picture is real... Look at the pilots of the two jets... they are both looking at the p-51 to make sure they don't collide


User currently offlineThorny From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (8 years 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 5320 times:

Quoting DeltaDC9 (Reply 2):
This picture would be much cooler if there was a Phantom in there too. But is is cool, don't get me wrong.

And an F-86 to complete the lineage.


User currently offlineChecksixx From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 1071 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (8 years 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 5286 times:

The pics are real. I can gladly put you in touch with the F-22A Heritage Pilot if you need confirmation as he's the only F-22A Heritage Pilot.

-Check


User currently offlineMDorBust From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (8 years 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 5244 times:

Just a wild guess.

Could it be that the raptors onboard systems are automatically configuring the aircraft for the appropriate lift at airspeed, while the eagle driver and the p-51 would have to manually do so... thus more likely not to configure at all but just hand fly it?


User currently offlineYeahitsK From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (8 years 4 days ago) and read 5235 times:

Quoting Thorny (Reply 8):
Quoting DeltaDC9 (Reply 2):
This picture would be much cooler if there was a Phantom in there too. But is is cool, don't get me wrong.

And an F-86 to complete the lineage.

You guys give me a chuckle. "This is one of the coolest things I've ever seen with my own eyes, but...."

Can't blame you for dreaming.


User currently offlineCorey07850 From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 2525 posts, RR: 5
Reply 12, posted (8 years 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 5217 times:

Quoting Thorny (Reply 8):
Quoting DeltaDC9 (Reply 2):
This picture would be much cooler if there was a Phantom in there too. But is is cool, don't get me wrong.

And an F-86 to complete the lineage.

Well, you should've been at Sun-n-Fun last year


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Adam Wright



Quoting YeahitsK (Reply 11):
Can't blame you for dreaming.

No need to dream, see above...


User currently offlineTedTAce From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (8 years 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 5165 times:

Quoting MDorBust (Reply 10):
Just a wild guess.

Could it be that the raptors onboard systems are automatically configuring the aircraft for the appropriate lift at airspeed, while the eagle driver and the p-51 would have to manually do so... thus more likely not to configure at all but just hand fly it?

Thanks for an answer that actually makes some sense of what I was looking for in the first place.

Now to Checksixx: The sun and fun picture that started this thread, I 'd be stunned to find out that is a fake. It just amazes how an off handed remmark on a TECHNICALLY unrelated thread has so dominated this one. That being said; anything your buddy is allowed to say about the disparity in flap (and presumed throttle) settings for the picture @ sun 'n fun would be greatly appreciated. If he wants to confirm the pics from the OTHER thread are real, I suggest it be posted there as those pics were NEVER the intention of discussion for this thread.


User currently offlineVzlet From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 829 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (8 years 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 5056 times:

Quoting TedTAce (Reply 3):
You tell me when those pictures were shot

Going by the info on the originally referenced web page, I'd say October 20, 2004, and from Tyndall AFB.

Quoting TedTAce (Reply 3):
who organized all those planes with the F-22

I can't answer that definitively for you, but I would think that Hildebrandt likely had a primary role in it. This is part of the official description of his photo book entitled "Heritage Flight":
"Renowned for his ability to bring his readers "inside" some of the most inaccessible communities in aviation, photographer and writer Erik Hildebrandt has outdone even himself by cracking the code of silence of the United States Air Force.
With over 200 original color images made exclusivly for this title, Hildebrandt was afforded unprecedented access to the newly formed USAF Heritage Flight Program.
Over the course of a single season of air shows, Hildebrandt commanded dedicated photo missions from such outstanding air-to-air camera platforms as the C-130, B-25 and P-51 Mustang which resulted in a body of work unimaginable considering the constraints of time and the weather.
"

Quoting TedTAce (Reply 3):
why the angles of the aircraft in some of those shots are so disparate for a 'formation shot'

My take on it would be that some of those disparate angles are the result of performance differences (including those that you're interested in), some are the result of the entire formation maneuvering, and some are the result of station-keeping corrections by individual pilots.

Quoting TedTAce (Reply 3):
Thanks for hijacking the thread

Maybe the next item will help get things back on track:

Quoting TedTAce (Reply 3):
I wanted speculation on the f-22 performance

Here's contact information for LTC Shower, the F-22 display pilot:
Phone (757) 764-7391 / DSN 574-7391
E-mail michael.shower@langley.af.mil

Quoting TedTAce (Reply 3):
those shots are backlit with suspicious looking backgrounds

Ted, I think it's just the result of a dusk photo session.











-Mark



"That's so stupid! If they're so secret, why are they out where everyone can see them?" - my kid
User currently offlineChecksixx From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 1071 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (8 years 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 5039 times:

Quoting TedTAce (Reply 13):
Now to Checksixx: The sun and fun picture that started this thread, I 'd be stunned to find out that is a fake. It just amazes how an off handed remmark on a TECHNICALLY unrelated thread has so dominated this one.

"(F-22 Heritage Flight Pics by Vzlet 2005-01-25 13:12:47 looked like a thread about fake pics to me.)"

You typed it, not me....contact Lt. Col. Shower at Vzlet's info as he gladly answers most questions and also remarked to me that we will probably see a dedicated Raptor full demo in 2008.

-Check


User currently offlineTedTAce From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (8 years 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 4943 times:

Vzlet, and Checksixx, thanks for the info  Smile I can't wait to see a performance in 08. The tease at Pensacola last November was a bit much to bear especially as I had the worst cameras for the event in existance with me. Not that I think i'll have much better in 08, but to have enough time to get something for what I got will be nice.

I'll be e-mailing Mr. Shower in the next day or so after I come up with verbiage that isin't as ambigious as this thread was apparently started with.


User currently offlineVzlet From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 829 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (7 years 10 months 1 week 7 hours ago) and read 4421 times:

Quoting TedTAce (Thread starter):
F-22: Running At flaps 10(ish) degrees and gawd only knows probably flight idle.

I think it's hilarious that the 22 needs to use flaps for this formation.

Regarding TedTAce's original point/query:

I've only recently read that the F-22 uses "opposing" control deflections to perform the function of speed brakes and that this arangement works well enough to slow it more rapidly than an F-15 using its more conventional brake.

Having (finally!) seen an F-22 fly, it's apparent that the controls are in fact doing things that aren't typical on other planes. Here, the flaps are down and both ailerons are deflected up:
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Mark Carlisle



Not quite as unusual, on this pass the ailerons are drooped with the flaps:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Mark Carlisle




"That's so stupid! If they're so secret, why are they out where everyone can see them?" - my kid
User currently offlineSLCPilot From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 572 posts, RR: 3
Reply 18, posted (7 years 10 months 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 4339 times:

This kind of control surface tailoring has been around in the model sailplane world for at least ten years.

The split ailerons and flaps are called "crow". In some circumstances the flaps can be deflected 90 degrees down and the ailerons almost as much in the up direction. This makes the plane slow at an amazing rate or descend at a very steep angle without gaining speed.



"Cambering" involves deflecting the flaps and ailerons both down. This is used to add lift at slower speeds which allows for tighter thermaling turns.

In some advanced radios, elevators halves can be moved independantly of each other to aid in rolling "ailevators".

It's clear that the F-22 uses many of these same features, but probably in a way that's transparent to the pilot.

It's a little known fact that the B-2 has several stealth modes. Most pictures show the ruddervators partially open. In it's most stealthy mode, the control surfaces flick up or down, minimizing their time in an unstealthy position (deflected). The F-22 probably does the same.

Cheers!

SLCPilot



I don't like to be fueled by anger, I don't like to be fooled by lust...
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic F-22 In Heritage Formation?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Outstanding 360 View Of V-22 Pit In High Detail... posted Sun Jul 23 2006 07:50:37 by AirRyan
US Army Interest In V-22? posted Mon Feb 20 2006 18:05:43 by STT757
U-2 Crashes In Asia 06/22 posted Wed Jun 22 2005 13:54:51 by FlygMolinaFmly
Do Jets Normally Fly In Formation? posted Sun Mar 7 2004 07:36:33 by Corey07850
CV-22 Back In The Air At Edwards posted Thu Sep 12 2002 05:04:37 by Airforce1995
Golf In Space? posted Thu Nov 23 2006 02:18:23 by ZANL188
Air Force One 747 Out Of Service In Vietnam posted Mon Nov 20 2006 02:11:49 by Md94
Rumsfeld's Departure May Mean More F-22 - F-18E/F posted Wed Nov 15 2006 01:06:02 by MCIGuy
Westover ARB In Massachusetts posted Sun Nov 12 2006 01:35:02 by ChrisNH
Are There Any OV1 Mohawks In Service Anywhere? posted Sat Nov 11 2006 00:05:08 by Bisbee

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format