Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Super SeaSprites For The RAN, Is It The End?  
User currently offlineOzair From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 850 posts, RR: 1
Posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 4888 times:

http://www.smh.com.au/news/NATIONAL/...-ALP/2006/05/15/1147545231093.html

After years of protracted development and failed attempts to certify the aircraft to fly in any reasonable condition safely it seems we are about the see the end of the great SeaSprite experiment.

Was it just a software mile too far, a bad investment in "old new" technology or as Kim Beasley would have us think simple mismanagement?

Is the NH90 the potential replacement?

8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineMigFan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 4860 times:

I do not know the particulars of all the problems, but purchasing a forty-year old aircraft as new has to have it's catches. Was the purchase decision political?

/M


User currently offlineZkpilot From New Zealand, joined Mar 2006, 4833 posts, RR: 9
Reply 2, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 4840 times:

There were brand new Super Seasprites available..not sure if Australia got those or not? New Zealand purchased Super Seasprites for the RNZN and they are working great! (They have different computers and software from the RAN models). Aparently the Australian govt is going to sue the manufacturers, hopefully they replace the computers and software to the same as the RNZN uses and then they won't have a problem!


56 types. 38 countries. 24 airlines.
User currently offlineDL021 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 11447 posts, RR: 75
Reply 3, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 4793 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

The Australians seem to have real difficulty in getting the software integrated and fully functional.

The airframe is terrific, and it's currently being used by the Kiwis, Poles, Egyptians and others. I'd say that systems integrations problems of the magnitude Australia has had indicate problems in their procurement process with either expectations or selection of providers. The 40 year old design of the airframe is not the problem....it's the brand new software.



Is my Pan Am ticket to the moon still good?
User currently offlineOzair From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 850 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 4744 times:

Quoting DL021 (Reply 3):
The 40 year old design of the airframe is not the problem....it's the brand new software.

Most certainly this is the issue. Whose fault is it though?

Is the RAN and DMO at blame for asking too much of the technology or did Kaman promise too much during the initial bid?

This program has been going on so long I have forgotten what the initial purchase requirements were and who were the competitors. I have wondered why they didn't purchase the SH-60 considering they already had a small fleet deployed on the FFGs. Does anyone know more of the background to this?


User currently offlineFultod From Australia, joined Mar 2005, 6 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 4729 times:

I think the RAN was going to buy some large patrol boats that we were also trying to sell to Malaysia. The patrol boats were too small to take a Seahawk. Malaysia cancelled and so did our Navy but we already had the Seasprites on order.

This article gives a good overview of the project-

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au...ory/0,20867,19145841-31477,00.html


User currently offlineOzair From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 850 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 4699 times:

Quoting Fultod (Reply 5):
This article gives a good overview of the project-

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au....html

Very interesting, thank you for the link.

So if as the article alludes to that the program is finished, what should we view as a replacement? The NH90 or the SH-60?


User currently offlineDL021 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 11447 posts, RR: 75
Reply 7, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 4664 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Ozair (Reply 4):
Is the RAN and DMO at blame for asking too much of the technology or did Kaman promise too much during the initial bid?

I don't think Kaman was the integrator on the software. They produced the airframes and made sure they flew. I'll look that up.

Quoting Ozair (Reply 4):
. I have wondered why they didn't purchase the SH-60 considering they already had a small fleet deployed on the FFGs. Does anyone know more of the background to this?

The FFGs had room for the Seahawks, but the new frigates built for Australia did not have as much room, and the SeaSprites were smaller allowing for lower cost and less space.



Is my Pan Am ticket to the moon still good?
User currently offlineFultod From Australia, joined Mar 2005, 6 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 4575 times:

There is an article in today's paper saying that Kaman expect the problems to be fixed in a couple of months-

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au...ory/0,20867,19164102-31477,00.html

It will be interesting to see if the Navy persist with the Seasprites.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Super SeaSprites For The RAN, Is It The End?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
What Is The Power Output Of A Super Nova? posted Thu Jan 12 2006 22:50:48 by Lehpron
Is The U.S.C.G. Considered "Military" posted Sun Nov 12 2006 19:19:37 by UH60FtRucker
How Capable Is The North Korean Military? posted Mon Oct 9 2006 11:01:50 by CHRISBA777ER
What Is The Latest On Rutan's Space Ship 2? posted Thu Sep 21 2006 02:08:36 by CTR
Why Is The Phantom A Twinseater? posted Thu Aug 10 2006 23:31:58 by TheSonntag
What Is The Deadliest Russian Fighter? posted Thu Jul 27 2006 06:10:51 by ThirtyEcho
What Is The Loudest Jet To Get Lunch Off A Carrier posted Wed Jul 26 2006 20:58:56 by 747400sp
What Is The A400M Airlifter? posted Thu Jul 20 2006 16:57:38 by Mlglaw
Where Is The Closest B-1b Base To Norfork VA posted Mon Feb 20 2006 02:17:01 by 747400sp
Is The F-22 Necessary, Why Not Newer F-15? posted Mon Aug 22 2005 06:15:08 by ERAUMcDlover

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format