Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Nasa Space Shuttle Takeoff Flightpath...  
User currently offlineDeltadude8 From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 569 posts, RR: 4
Posted (8 years 3 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 16585 times:

Was wondering if anyone knows what the targeted flightpath of the shuttle's takeoff will be...

years ago i was able to go outside and watch and saw a tiny blip (the shuttle)

If anyone knows what path it will take after departure from Cape...please post

27 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineBMIFlyer From UK - England, joined Feb 2004, 8810 posts, RR: 58
Reply 1, posted (8 years 3 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 16586 times:

Erm, straight up, I think  Wink




Lee



Sometimes You Can't Make It On Your Own
User currently offlineCV580Freak From Bahrain, joined Jul 2005, 1033 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (8 years 3 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 16568 times:

Quoting BMIFlyer (Reply 1):

Superb , let's hope so  Smile



One day you are the pigeon, the next the statue ...
User currently offlineDeltadude8 From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 569 posts, RR: 4
Reply 3, posted (8 years 3 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 16580 times:

well it goes up but at an angle...its not a straight up angle of attack

User currently onlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 30571 posts, RR: 84
Reply 4, posted (8 years 3 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 16547 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

It should arc eastward towards Spain, I imagine, since Marone [sic] is the first abort return site after KSC.

[Edited 2006-07-04 20:44:36]

User currently offlineThorny From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (8 years 3 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 16483 times:

Quoting Stitch (Reply 4):
It should arc eastward towards Spain, I imagine, since Marone [sic] is the first abort return site after KSC.

Sorry... northeast paralleling the east coast of the United States.


User currently offlineChecksixx From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 1078 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (8 years 3 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 16379 times:

Quoting Thorny (Reply 5):
Sorry... northeast paralleling the east coast of the United States.

Wow! That information is nowhere near correct...check your facts. I don't remember the last time Moron, Spain was located up the East Coast of the United States!

-Check


User currently offlineBobster2 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (8 years 3 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 16378 times:

This chart gives the exact latitude and longitude coordinates for the first 520 seconds, at one second intervals:

http://www.cbsnews.com/network/news/space/121ascentdata.gif


User currently offlineBobster2 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (8 years 3 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 16372 times:

Quoting Checksixx (Reply 6):
I don't remember the last time Moron, Spain was located up the East Coast of the United States!

The Earth is a sphere, it's not flat like the map shows.  Smile


User currently offlineStealthZ From Australia, joined Feb 2005, 5678 posts, RR: 45
Reply 9, posted (8 years 3 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 16353 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

At 520 sec Discovery would be approx 259 mi South East of Nantucket.


If your camera sends text messages, that could explain why your photos are rubbish!
User currently offlineBobster2 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (8 years 3 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 16332 times:

I drew a straight line from the launch site to the location at 520 seconds. It doesn't represent the actual flight path. But it shows that the Shuttle does go roughly parallel to the North American coast, and you can see how it gets to Spain.

Big version: Width: 600 Height: 400 File size: 63kb


User currently offlineJBirdAV8r From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 4488 posts, RR: 21
Reply 11, posted (8 years 3 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 16304 times:

Quoting Deltadude8 (Reply 3):
well it goes up but at an angle...its not a straight up angle of attack

No, it sure isn't...(never heard of a "straight up" AOA anyway  Wink)

Angle of Attack isn't the right term you're looking for here. That would be the angle between the chord line of an airplane's wing and the relative wind.

For a further geeky discussion, I'm not sure if the AoA of the Shuttle stack at liftoff is based on the actual angle of attack of the wings of the Orbiter or if it isn't some other line of reference on the stack.

For most of the Orbiter's flight through the atmosphere, the "angle of attack" in the conventional sense would be pretty close to zero (maybe plus or minus ten degrees)

To answer the original poster's question:

To reach the orbit of the International Space Station, the vehicle launches toward a 51.6 degree inclination (meaning that the Orbiter will "peak" at crossing 51.6 degrees north and 51.6 degrees south of the Equator). This takes the Shuttle on a northeasterly trajectory. I believe most Shuttle launches prior to the ISS were done with the vehicle heading roughly due east, for about a 39 degree inclination (about the same distance above the Equator as KSC). This is a pretty simplistic explanation since I have a really rudimentary understanding of orbital dynamics, but I think it covers the bases.



I got my head checked--by a jumbo jet
User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 962 posts, RR: 51
Reply 12, posted (8 years 3 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 16276 times:

Quoting JBirdAV8r (Reply 11):
I believe most Shuttle launches prior to the ISS were done with the vehicle heading roughly due east, for about a 39 degree inclination (about the same distance above the Equator as KSC)

Depends on the mission, of course. The due east launch trajectory was common for the non-station missions that involved space science missions and the like.

The inclination for such a launch is about 28.5 degrees.


User currently offlineJBirdAV8r From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 4488 posts, RR: 21
Reply 13, posted (8 years 3 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 16265 times:

Quoting DfwRevolution (Reply 12):
Depends on the mission, of course. The due east launch trajectory was common for the non-station missions that involved space science missions and the like.

1. sorry, replace 39 with 28.5 (thou shalt not post when tired)

2. My point was that the remaining Shuttle flights will (barring a possible Hubble repair mission) launch to the 51.6 degree inclination to rendezvous with space station. For that matter, just about all Shuttle launches for the past few years have been dedicated to the ISS, with STS-107 and all the recent Columbia missions being the exception, launching to whatever inclination was appropriate for the mission.

Another geeky thought...I think Columbia was due to have the external airlock/docking adapter installed and make its first mission to the ISS not long after STS-107. IIRC its first mission to the ISS was to have Barbara Morgan (of TISP fame) on board. Don't know if it would've done much of the construction work as it was significantly heavier than the other Orbiters.

[Edited 2006-07-05 08:53:14]


I got my head checked--by a jumbo jet
User currently offlineThorny From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (8 years 3 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 16197 times:

Quoting Checksixx (Reply 6):
Wow! That information is nowhere near correct...check your facts. I don't remember the last time Moron, Spain was located up the East Coast of the United States!

Ahem. It is wise to look before you leap...

See Bobster's groundtrack image, which is faily accurate. High-inclination launches like the Station missions (51.6 degrees inclination to the equator) go up along the east coast. The first abort landing option is Return to Launch Site (turn around and go back to Cape Canaveral), the second is East Coast Abort Landing, which I think is aimed for Westover ARB, Massachusetts.

http://www-pao.ksc.nasa.gov/nasafact/tal.htm


User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 962 posts, RR: 51
Reply 15, posted (8 years 3 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 16191 times:

Thorny, what is the difference between the following commands I heard on the launch transcript:

"Discovery, 1E OPS-3 Zaragoza." T+0:5:35

versus

"Discovery, 1E TAL Zaragoza." T+0:6:12

I realize it has to do with the engine-out abort capabilities, but what is the difference between an OPS-3 scenario versus a TAL abort?


User currently offlineThorny From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (8 years 3 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 16189 times:

Quoting JBirdAV8r (Reply 13):
Another geeky thought...I think Columbia was due to have the external airlock/docking adapter installed and make its first mission to the ISS not long after STS-107. IIRC its first mission to the ISS was to have Barbara Morgan (of TISP fame) on board. Don't know if it would've done much of the construction work as it was significantly heavier than the other Orbiters.

There were also a lot of rumors about NASA retiring Columbia, since she didn't appear on the Shuttle manifest except for one Station resupply mission and one more Hubble mission. That's why so many of the "how will they finish the station now with only three Orbiters left" question is not taken seriously.

Barbara Morgan (now a full-fledged astronaut) is scheduled to fly on STS-118 next summer.


User currently offlineJBirdAV8r From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 4488 posts, RR: 21
Reply 17, posted (8 years 3 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 16145 times:

Quoting DfwRevolution (Reply 15):
"Discovery, 1E OPS-3 Zaragoza." T+0:5:35

versus

"Discovery, 1E TAL Zaragoza." T+0:6:12

I realize it has to do with the engine-out abort capabilities, but what is the difference between an OPS-3 scenario versus a TAL abort?

I'm no Thorny but I'll take a stab at what I know.

OPS 3 is the PASS software mode for entry. I think even when a TAL abort is selected (single engine TAL, select Zaragoza) OPS 3 is selected after single-engine MECO. Before that I think a TAL TRAJ page is shown on a display and the orbiter flies a trajectory for TAL. Perhaps this OPS 3 call means to mode directly into OPS 3 and forgo switching to TAL?



I got my head checked--by a jumbo jet
User currently offlineChecksixx From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 1078 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (8 years 3 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 16097 times:

Quoting Thorny (Reply 14):
Ahem. It is wise to look before you leap...

See Bobster's groundtrack image, which is faily accurate. High-inclination launches like the Station missions (51.6 degrees inclination to the equator) go up along the east coast. The first abort landing option is Return to Launch Site (turn around and go back to Cape Canaveral), the second is East Coast Abort Landing, which I think is aimed for Westover ARB, Massachusetts.

Ahem...maybe you should heed your own advice...as someone pointed out to me (for some unknown reason) the Earth is not flat. The groundtrack image is NOT accurate as it does not take into account a 3rd dimension. The shuttle did NOT parallel the east coast no matter how you look at it...unless you think the world is flat. There was not any East Coast Abort Landing briefed only the Return to Launch Site the Trans-Oceanic Abort Sites in Spain and ATO.


User currently offlineNosedive From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (8 years 3 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 16084 times:

Ok, here's a great circle image of the shuttle's path and the direct parth from KTTS to LEMO, the shuttle landing facility in FL and the Morón airbase in Spain.


Red dots on the shuttle's path indiciate 200, 300, 400, and 520 second intervals from launch.

Funny thing is, the shuttle was blazing a path for LHR!

I wonder if the Bermuda II would allow for shuttle landings... what about the landing fees and slots!?  duck 
I'd post the think, but great circle is being a punk ass...


User currently offlineJBirdAV8r From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 4488 posts, RR: 21
Reply 20, posted (8 years 3 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 16084 times:

Quoting Checksixx (Reply 18):
There was not any East Coast Abort Landing briefed only the Return to Launch Site the Trans-Oceanic Abort Sites in Spain and ATO.

ECALs are contingency abort only--meaning there's little more than a snowball's chance down under that that may happen. ECAL wouldn't happen in a "normal" abort mode like RTLS or TAL. ATO doesn't resort in a landing, at least as part of the abort. Any decision on a contingency abort would be made in a matter of seconds and the Orbiter could head anywhere from Myrtle Beach to Nova Scotia. ECAL's aren't generally briefed much, I believe, because it's hard to target toward a specific one and consistently monitor its weather (after all, weather wouldn't really be much of a concern at that point).

Quoting Checksixx (Reply 18):
Ahem...maybe you should heed your own advice...as someone pointed out to me (for some unknown reason) the Earth is not flat. The groundtrack image is NOT accurate as it does not take into account a 3rd dimension. The shuttle did NOT parallel the east coast no matter how you look at it...unless you think the world is flat.

I don't think you understand how orbit works. I'm not saying you CAN'T, I'm just saying that often times it goes beyond the realm of common sense. The Earth isn't perfectly round, either--it's pear-shaped, and this creates its own problems.

http://liftoff.msfc.nasa.gov/academy/rocket_sci/orbmech/incline.html

This is an old link and doesn't illustrate a launch to the ISS, but it may help you understand a bit better.



I got my head checked--by a jumbo jet
User currently offlineChecksixx From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 1078 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (8 years 3 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 16048 times:

Quoting JBirdAV8r (Reply 20):
I don't think you understand how orbit works. I'm not saying you CAN'T, I'm just saying that often times it goes beyond the realm of common sense. The Earth isn't perfectly round, either--it's pear-shaped, and this creates its own problems.

Dude, are you serious?? I have a very clear understanding. Maybe you should read my post.


User currently offlineThorny From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 22, posted (8 years 3 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 16038 times:

Quoting Checksixx (Reply 18):
Ahem...maybe you should heed your own advice...as someone pointed out to me (for some unknown reason) the Earth is not flat. The groundtrack image is NOT accurate as it does not take into account a 3rd dimension. The shuttle did NOT parallel the east coast no matter how you look at it...unless you think the world is flat.

No, the Earth is not flat. You might want to look at some of the plots of the Great Circle routes airliners follow. The Shuttle adheres to that principal.

Yes, the Shuttle paralleled the East Coast of the United States. The Shuttle, like the Space Station is in an orbit inclined 51.6 degrees to the equator, that means the most northerly point in its orbit is 51.6 degrees North Latitude, about the latitude of Juneau, Alaska. The most southerly point in the orbit is 51.6 South, or about Johannesberg, South Africa. The two points are 180 degrees apart.

To get into that orbit from Cape Canaveral, the Shuttle headed northeast, with the SRBs coming down off the coast of Jacksonville, Florida. Discovery passed only about 200 miles east of Cape Hatteras on the way up. Main Engine Cutoff was off the coast of Cape Cod or so. (Night launches have been seen as far north as Nova Scotia.)

The natural flight path then carried them over Central Europe, heading southeast. To get to Moron or Istres, they would have needed to use a lot of their 1,000 mile crossrange capability. That's what the delta wing and its crossrange is most useful for.


User currently offlineSABE From Argentina, joined Jun 2005, 156 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (8 years 3 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 16023 times:

Quoting Thorny (Reply 22):
The most southerly point in the orbit is 51.6 South, or about Johannesberg, South Africa.

Johannesburg is only at 26 degrees southern latitude. Maybe you were thinking about Cape Horn (South America) rather than Cape Hope (South Africa)?

http://gc.kls2.com/airport/JNB
http://gc.kls2.com/airport/USH

Quoting Thorny (Reply 22):
The two points are 180 degrees apart.

Actually, the difference in latitude between the northernmost and southernmost points of the orbit is only 103.2 degrees. What you meant to say was that the orbit of the Space Station (or Shuttle in this case) describes a plane that is tilted to the Equator by 51.6 degrees. The plane is, of course, flat, and therefore there is an angle of 180 degrees from one of its sides to the other. The link provided by JBirdAV8r shows this nicely.



TUS-DFW-EZE... can't wait to visit home again!
User currently offlineThorny From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 24, posted (8 years 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 16004 times:

Quoting SABE (Reply 23):
Johannesburg is only at 26 degrees southern latitude. Maybe you were thinking about Cape Horn (South America) rather than Cape Hope (South Africa)?

D'oh! Yep. Johannesburg is about the southern limit for a 28.5 degree orbit like the Shuttle used to fly all the time. Got South Africa and South America mixed up.

Quoting SABE (Reply 23):
The plane is, of course, flat, and therefore there is an angle of 180 degrees from one of its sides to the other.

Didn't I say that? The most northerly and most southerly points in the orbit are 180 degrees apart.


25 Post contains images JBirdAV8r : Absolutely! Chill out. I think that you think you do. I did, in fact. I read this: and this: and drew my conclusion. I think you're confused. The gro
26 Bobster2 : Cape Canaveral is actually in a pretty bad location for launches to the ISS. That's why you see the odd flightpath to the northeast. The ISS orbit was
27 Thorny : SkyLab was in nearly the same orbit... 50 degrees. Oh, to have the throw-weight of a Saturn V today... Space Station Freedom was going to be at 28.5
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Nasa Space Shuttle Takeoff Flightpath...
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Space Shuttle Takeoff Sequence As Seen By Me. posted Tue May 18 2010 17:23:48 by eksath
Will Nasa Ever Build A New Space Shuttle? posted Fri Jul 8 2011 23:19:22 by United Airline
Speed Limits On 747 Space Shuttle Carrier posted Thu Apr 19 2012 17:29:18 by Max Q
Space Shuttle Discovery Landing At Dulles In April posted Fri Mar 2 2012 16:36:31 by rjm777ual
Inside Space Shuttle Atlantis Article. posted Thu Jan 12 2012 13:39:59 by eksath
Space Shuttle Orbiter Hydraulic System posted Fri Sep 9 2011 21:58:32 by Wingscrubber
STS-135: Final Space Shuttle Touchdown 'The End' posted Thu Jul 21 2011 03:22:52 by ZKNCL
ISS/Space Shuttle Wake Up Times posted Sat Jul 16 2011 22:09:12 by flymia
Space Shuttle Engine Power Questions posted Fri Jun 24 2011 20:58:18 by Thrust
Book Excerpt: Space Shuttle Owner's Wrkshp Manual posted Tue Apr 12 2011 07:57:03 by j_hallgren

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format