Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
F-20  
User currently offlineCheckerboard From Hong Kong, joined Jul 2001, 33 posts, RR: 0
Posted (12 years 6 months 1 week 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 1232 times:

Could anyone tell me what's wrong about F-20 Tigershark? Why no one bought it?
Thanks in advance

9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineUSAir1489 From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 363 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (12 years 6 months 1 week 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 1158 times:

I believe Air & Space Magazine ran a huge article about the aircraft and why it wasn't successful. I forget when the article was published.

Steve



Zinger Aviation Delta Oscar Tango Charlie Oscar Mike
User currently offlineCannibalZ3 From United States of America, joined May 2001, 392 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (12 years 6 months 1 week 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 1145 times:

The Air & Space article pretty much says (if I remember correctly) that the F-20 failed because it was built for foreign customers that used the F-5 but couldn't buy F-16 replacements for them, because there was a restriction on them. About the time the F-20 came out, which by all accounts I know of was an excellent airplane, the ban on F-16s was lifted, so everyone bought them instead. Hope this helps.
-Zach


User currently offlineGDB From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 13048 posts, RR: 78
Reply 3, posted (12 years 6 months 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 1102 times:

The US not buying any did not help, not that they required it.
Never underestimate the 'penis envy' factor in some purchases of fighter aircraft in some parts of the world.


User currently offlineFireblade From Portugal, joined Feb 2006, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (12 years 6 months 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 1099 times:

'penis envy factor in some purchases of fighter aircraft in some part of the world'
What do you mean GDB?
Please explain it.


User currently offlineGDB From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 13048 posts, RR: 78
Reply 5, posted (12 years 6 months 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 1087 times:

How best to explain? You are some second or third level air force, with a limited budget, you want a new fighter. (If any of your potential enemies have supersonic fighters, you could maybe use one, if not, a good armed trainer like the Hawk 100/200).
But no....you want a big manly top of the range F-16, like the big boys have.
Or maybe you do need a cheapish fighter, the F-20 is made for you, at this time in the 1980's it's weapon options are as good as most F-16's.
But no....the USAF and NATO has F-16's, so you've gotta have 'em. Never mind the F-20 will be easier and cheaper to maintain, important factors in combat.
Imagine these guys like South Park's Eric Cartman, 'I wanna F-16 dammit!'
Clear now?


User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 19
Reply 6, posted (12 years 6 months 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 1075 times:

Wrong aircraft at the wrong time.
It was designed to replace the F-5 as the aircraft for the US to provide in their program to arm poor allies, but by the time it was ready for production those countries the program was dead and the countries chose the more sexy F-16 (which has better specs) to replace it.



I wish I were flying
User currently offlineBoeing nut From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 1049 times:

This is one of the "greatest aircraft that never flew".

To bad politics got on the way of this aircraft being a reality. I remember one of it's strong points was that it could go from cold start to 10,000 ft. in less than a minute. Not many, if any, aircraft could do that.


User currently offlineFireblade From Portugal, joined Feb 2006, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 1045 times:

Thanks GDB i got it now



Slobodan


User currently offlineGregoire From France, joined Sep 2007, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 1036 times:

About penis envy we could also add that it is easy to maintain an aircraft in a big service that one that have not been bought the customer having the choice betwen the F16 and the F20 will have wonder why did the us have not bought the F20 and do we have to pay for the development cost then the F16 was a better plane than the F20 you may like it or not the F16 was a direct competitor of the F20 (as was the Mirage 2000) and the F16 was Better and used in the US so bye bye F20. a similar story happens with the super mirage 4000 that was a heavy fighter for export a great plane never find a customer because not in use in its own country

Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic F-20
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
F-20 Tigershark posted Thu Apr 6 2006 03:15:23 by Checksixx
What Killed The F-20 Tigershark? posted Sun Feb 26 2006 08:05:09 by DEVILFISH
Challenger Disaster 20 Years Ago Today posted Sat Jan 28 2006 09:10:12 by Andz
A-20 Havoc Help Needed posted Fri Jul 29 2005 22:33:14 by ATCT
UK's RAF About To Order 20 A330 Tankers posted Tue Mar 1 2005 18:03:38 by Horus
No One Remembered? July 20, 1969 posted Tue Jul 20 2004 18:16:53 by Alpha 1
New York Time Article Usaf 20 Bill 767 Deal.. posted Wed Sep 3 2003 10:54:44 by Keesje
F-20 posted Thu Oct 18 2001 14:29:19 by Checkerboard

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format