Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Best Air To Surface Missile  
User currently offlineSouthernCRJ From Argentina, joined Sep 2001, 180 posts, RR: 3
Posted (13 years 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 4821 times:


Which one has the longest range?
Which is the fastest?
Which has more precision?

Thanks in advance,
SouthernCRJ



43 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineLY744 From Canada, joined Feb 2001, 5536 posts, RR: 10
Reply 1, posted (13 years 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 4749 times:

Longest range? The AGM-86C perhaps
The fastest? Just guessing again, but it could be the AGM-88.
The most precise? In hitting what kind of targets? Anti-radar? Anti-armor? Other?

LY744.



Pacifism only works if EVERYBODY practices it
User currently offlineMiG-29-Sniper From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (13 years 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 4724 times:

-> Ch-31 - air ti ground (antiradar rocket) cared by MiG-29m/k, the Su family. used as antiradar, antiship, anti-anything what moves on the ground.
Dee


User currently offlineLY744 From Canada, joined Feb 2001, 5536 posts, RR: 10
Reply 3, posted (13 years 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 4715 times:

If would like to make a suggestion:

We have a fairly succesful "best AA missile" thread, that is probably because it is fairly easy to discuss the performances of AA missiles, as they are all made to destroy the same target. It is not the case with AG missiles. There are numerous AG missiles out there, with different ranges, sizes, warheads, and, most importantly, targets that they were designed to hit. I think that it would be a good idea to divide the question into several categories, for ex: Best anti-tank/armor (AGM-65 for example), anti-radar, anti-ship, cruise missiles, etc. If you have an extra category, go ahead and tell us so we can discuss that as well!

LY744.



Pacifism only works if EVERYBODY practices it
User currently offlineSouthernCRJ From Argentina, joined Sep 2001, 180 posts, RR: 3
Reply 4, posted (13 years 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 4703 times:

LY744:

Probably you're right, my topic isn't well formulated; so let's divide it into different categories like the ones you're proposing.

Regards


User currently offlineFireblade From Portugal, joined Feb 2006, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (13 years 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 4680 times:

We have a fairly succesful "best AA missile" thread

Yes we do untill we started with cannons,UZI,Hecklers,and SF pictures.  Smile/happy/getting dizzy
fly by wire


User currently offlineBlackened From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (13 years 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 4676 times:

I try to answer as good as I can and I can only tell you about U.S. missiles.

1. If you consider a cruise missile a missile the one with the longest range is the Boeing BGM-86C. Block IA should be available by now and has a range of 600nm+.

2. The AGM-88 is called HARM which means highspeed anti radiation missile. It is about 2280 km/h fast.

The Hellfire is also pretty fast, 900mph. The Maverick is only about 1100 km/h fast. AGM-86C, SLAM-ER and Harpoon are with jet engines so they're subsonic.


3. The BGM-86C Block IA has a 3rd generation GPS guidance with steep terminal dive so it should be quite precise.
Other missiles with GPS guidance like the SLAM-ER

and JASSM

might also be as precise.


User currently offlineSouthernCRJ From Argentina, joined Sep 2001, 180 posts, RR: 3
Reply 7, posted (13 years 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 4668 times:

How about the Taurus and the Apache (stealth missile?) ?

User currently offlineSchreiner From Netherlands, joined exactly 13 years ago today! , 960 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (13 years 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 4667 times:

Maverick, Slam, and offcourse the cruisemissile.


Soaring the internet...
User currently offlineLY744 From Canada, joined Feb 2001, 5536 posts, RR: 10
Reply 9, posted (13 years 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 4663 times:

AGM86C.

LY744.



Pacifism only works if EVERYBODY practices it
User currently offlineFireblade From Portugal, joined Feb 2006, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (13 years 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 4663 times:

I don't know much about this but what about houghes missile?

User currently offlineBlackened From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (13 years 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 4659 times:

Sure! I wrote it correctly once in the post. Maybe I was thinking of the Tomahawk too much. But when I look through the posts I think that most people wouldn't have noticed anyway.  Wink/being sarcastic

User currently offlineSJC>SFO From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (12 years 12 months 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 4647 times:

Fireblade,
Sorry bout the cannons and uzis... guess I kind of started those topics in there....


User currently offlineCobra27 From Slovenia, joined May 2001, 1020 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (12 years 12 months 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 4651 times:

Sorry I had no time to reply before but i found a missile:
XS-19 which would be carried with tu-160 blackjack and has a range of 4000 km. It would be the most advanced cruise missile (btw it would cost about 8 mil $ each) - BUT it was canceled


User currently offlineFightingfalcon From Switzerland, joined Feb 2001, 787 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (12 years 12 months 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 4638 times:

The HARM should be the fastest ('bout mach-4), I don't know about the precision of the missiles, but the newest missiles should all be as accurate that the difference doesn't matter. If you want to hit a tank, you just have to hit the turret, there's no need to hit a particular nail on it...

Martin



Imprezas rule!!
User currently offlineMiG-29-Sniper From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (12 years 12 months 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 4639 times:

quote: HARM which means highspeed anti radiation missile. It is about 2280 km/h fast.

that is not anywhere close to M-4. in fact, if you find me an international, not just US or NATO, facts stating that there was an object that flew beyond M-3.2, i'll give you a ruble! because i believe that there is simply no such thing that flyes that fast! (reasons - the engine will melt down; the rocket will hit so damn much it'll burn while flying; and so on)

D


User currently offlineLY744 From Canada, joined Feb 2001, 5536 posts, RR: 10
Reply 16, posted (12 years 12 months 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 4634 times:

MiG-29-Sniper:

"that is not anywhere close to M-4."

Actually, at a certain altitude it would be.  Smile

"if you find me an international, not just US or NATO, facts stating that there was an object that flew beyond M-3.2, i'll give you a ruble! because i believe that there is simply no such thing that flyes that fast!"

Isn't the SR-71 capable of Mach 3.5? What about ICBM warheads (or for that matter, manned space ships) re-entering the atmosphere? The speed of an SA-12b GIANT is 2.4km/sec. multiply that by 3600 (60 sec in a min, 60 min in an hour), and you get 7640km/h. At sea level, that would be somewhere around Mach 6-7.

You can keep the Ruble.

LY744.



Pacifism only works if EVERYBODY practices it
User currently offlineMiG-29-Sniper From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 17, posted (12 years 12 months 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 4631 times:

Q:Isn't the SR-71 capable of Mach 3.5?
A: no - 3520km/h is about 3.2

Q:manned space ships) re-entering the atmosphere?
A: nope - they dont enter it that fast, and even if they do the enginse are not the support. support is gravity.

Q:The speed of an SA-12b GIANT is 2.4km/sec.
A: doubt it... unless you're talking about the speed of sight...

Q:You can keep the Ruble.
A: why, thank you very little!


User currently offlineFireblade From Portugal, joined Feb 2006, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (12 years 12 months 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 4631 times:

Dima is wrong [isn't he always?]s-300v allows target speed of 3km per second that is hm 3*3600=10800km/h of the target because s-300v missile must be faster than it's target imagine it's speed.
Slobodan
Dmitry is wrong Dmitry is wrong hahahahahaha


User currently offlineLY744 From Canada, joined Feb 2001, 5536 posts, RR: 10
Reply 19, posted (12 years 12 months 2 days ago) and read 4628 times:

I would like to emphacize (once again) that the speed of sound varies according to altitude. I think the higher the altitude, the faster sound can travel (less air=less ressistance?), therefore, when you say that M3=3250km/h, you should state the altitude in which that is true (I'm sure it is true in some altitude, the questions is, would it be a couple km under the surface of the Earth?).

LY744.



Pacifism only works if EVERYBODY practices it
User currently offlineMiG-29-Sniper From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 20, posted (12 years 12 months 2 days ago) and read 4628 times:

Fire, guess what your next package will contain?!?!?!?!

Dee


User currently offlineLY744 From Canada, joined Feb 2001, 5536 posts, RR: 10
Reply 21, posted (12 years 12 months 2 days ago) and read 4628 times:

If any of you are thinking about sending white powdery substances to anyone anytime soon, I would advise against it, as you can go to jail for 5 years no matter what the substance really is, around here, anyway.  Innocent

LY744.




Pacifism only works if EVERYBODY practices it
User currently offlineFireblade From Portugal, joined Feb 2006, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (12 years 12 months 2 days ago) and read 4630 times:

Swiss chocolate and a postcard?
Am i right?
LIMA DU FUS


User currently offlineFireblade From Portugal, joined Feb 2006, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (12 years 12 months 2 days ago) and read 4627 times:

If any of you are thinking about sending white powdery substances to anyone anytime soon, I would advise against it, as you can go to jail for 5 years no matter what the substance really is, around here, anyway
Maybe in USA or Canada or any other normal country,but in Macedonia he could send me a Nuclear Bomb without fear of any kind of penalty.


User currently offlineMiG-29-Sniper From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 24, posted (12 years 12 months 2 days ago) and read 4623 times:

you'RE damn right!!! but those will come later after the 500g or c-4 with a string to the hatch!
Deem's (and who gives a shit about the white powder?)


25 Fireblade : You don't know my adress so forgath about it. LIMA DU FUS
26 MiG-29-Sniper : ..."how often we are surprized by underastimating other people's abilities..." -DimaN. out
27 Visage : But i do. Is it :"11th september 37 l/12 kicevo MAcedonia" Sophie
28 Post contains images LY744 : OK, I'll modify my earlier statement somewhere around here (mil av) to "Who needs chat rooms when Fireblade, MiG-29-Sniper, Visage and myself are on t
29 Visage : And for the last time LAME du feu
30 Fireblade : From his mailbox. Guess what was his password. Let me help you his favourite plane? Guess it from three times?
31 Visage : Also his a.net password is s10b0dan .understand name slobodan password s10b0dan Do you notice 1=l 0=o . Piece of cake Sophie
32 Fireblade : Are you some kind of a hacker?
33 Post contains images LY744 : Well, I know his password (unless he changed it by now) because he emailed it to me, but how on earth did you find out??? I'm impressed! OK, who am I
34 Post contains images Visage : No but one of my friends is. A good one. Sophie
35 Post contains images LY744 : OK then, forget about my suggestion! I don't want you to guess my password anymore! Well, don't post it around here, anyway. LY744.
36 Visage : Alex As i already said i'm not a hacker nor i'm interested about someone else privacy. I just wanted fireblade home adress to send him a piece of su-3
37 Fireblade : I feel stupid one more time i'm out of here. lame du fae or lezvie or what a hell
38 Visage : Why should he e-mail his password to you?
39 LY744 : I'm not sure if it's OK to post it here because Slobodan might consider it private, but I guess I can email it to you (unless Fire objects, of course)
40 MiG-29-Sniper : i never gave you my password, BritvaSRukojatkoy. i doubt i ever will, but somebody knows your home address, and that is already something..... hey Ale
41 Fireblade : Stop speaking Russian you trep-29-nishan. And stick to the thread. M 4 is unreachable hahaha
42 Post contains images LY744 : MiG-29-Sniper: Well, no one has to post one, the 3-4 threads we used yesterday could do. Besides, if we post a "party thread", it might get deleted as
43 Fireblade : You don't understand what happening in this forum. Not even a clue. Nobody going to delete that kind of thread i'm 80% sure[i shall not be a part of t
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Best Air To Surface Missile
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
The Best Air-to-air Missle posted Fri Aug 8 2003 03:04:55 by Charleslp
Mi-24 Air-to-Air Video posted Thu Apr 26 2007 03:20:39 by Vzlet
Air To Air Missiles posted Mon Dec 4 2006 11:40:57 by Ryan h
Best Spot To Watch A Shuttle Launch? posted Thu Aug 17 2006 22:32:13 by Lnglive1011yyz
Since The 80's Most Air To Air Kills...... posted Sun Jun 11 2006 05:14:38 by Socal
F-15C And Air To Ground posted Fri Dec 2 2005 18:23:37 by CX747
Best Places To Tour A Military Aircraft Graveyard? posted Wed Nov 2 2005 23:15:47 by JAM747
Air-To-Air Refueling Over ORD posted Fri Sep 17 2004 16:41:55 by Airfinair
F-15Cs In Air-To-Ground posted Mon Sep 13 2004 02:06:08 by Flyf15
Iraq AF Gets Air To Air Kill posted Mon Dec 23 2002 18:04:14 by Spacepope

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format