Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Revolutionary Aircraft Development Program (1945~)  
User currently offlineAislepathLight From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 562 posts, RR: 0
Posted (8 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 3044 times:

Since WWII, there have been some really remarkable developmental programs, such as the SR71, the F22s, and the KC135, that have changed the whole of military aviation. So which aircraft and its developments effected aircraft, the way their are built, and the features that they accommodated. For me there are two real competitors: the SR 71 and the KC135. The KC135 comes in a close second for me, as it has lasted so long, proven so useful to the USAF over its roughly 50 years of service, not to mention the 707 (but we are in Mil-Av). The SR71, takes the cake for me, as it was such an amazing development and product that it is still classified today, even though it was largely based on technology from the 1950s.

So what program do you think was the most revolutionary (in its contributions to aircraft tech, production tech, general concepts, etc)?


"We have slain a large dragon, but we now live in a jungle filled with a bewildering variety of poisonous snakes."
6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTaromA380 From Romania, joined Sep 2005, 334 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (8 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 2978 times:

X-1
X-15
XB-70
F-117


User currently offlineCURLYHEADBOY From Italy, joined Feb 2005, 940 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (8 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 2968 times:

I would put the B-52 aside the KC135, still flying today and proving effective...


If God had wanted men to fly he would have given them more money...
User currently offlineMigfan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (8 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 2968 times:

The SR-71 is up there as far as development of an top-shelf aircraft.

Others should include: B-2, F-117, The Space Shuttle (We all know it has carried military cargo), The Mig-25 (e-667), TSR.2

/M


User currently offlineTexfly101 From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 351 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (8 years 3 months 4 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 2931 times:

Well, the X-15 was not a developmental program, it was an experimental research program for the full life of the series. So to be specific, I would consider a developmental program to be one that concerned a service aircraft. So airplanes like the F-4, F-22, even the XB-70 qualify because the development of the aircraft was based on entering service, would be in this selection. That said, the A-12/SR 71 series definitely would be at the top one anyones list. As would the U-2, the Shuttle, the F-104, the F-16 etc. Usually, if they have a long life at Edwards, they are in some sort of development program. I just prefer the Blackbirds given their history and the time that they were developed. Something about slide rules, CRT's and the days when test pilots and flight engineeers rather than accountants ran flight research is probably the main reason.
Having said that, I will always consider the X-15 to be the program that holds the distinction of giving the most bang for the buck for time in the air. I won't even try to list the accomplishments as it is pages long. But I will say that without the X-15 and its advancements to our understanding of the regime of hypersonics, that anything related to the space programs and high speed flight would have struggled to be done. A truly extraordinary research program that might never see the equal.


User currently offlineRayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 8034 posts, RR: 5
Reply 5, posted (8 years 3 months 4 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 2882 times:

My answer: the Boeing B-47 Stratojet.

When it appeared in 1947, the B-47 with its pod-mounted jet engines, thin, swepback wings and highly aerodynamic design was considered extremely revolutionary in many ways. Indeed, many of the tenants of modern commercial airliner design came from the features pioneered on the B-47.

People forget that the B-47 by 1948 could fly at an astonishing 600 mph, which was just as fast as jet fighters of the day! A B-47 at cruising speed would have been difficult to intercept even by a MiG-15.


User currently offlineTexfly101 From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 351 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (8 years 3 months 4 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 2863 times:

Quoting RayChuang (Reply 5):
My answer: the Boeing B-47 Stratojet

ohhh, good choice. How could I have overlooked this one with all that its been in my life. My uncle was a test pilot on that program and still raves about how sweet an airplane it was. I lived next to McCoy when it was a SAC base with Strats on the line. Fabulous airplane, lovely in flight and on the ground. And you're so right with all that it proved out. For a WWII era airplane, it was so significantly ahead of its time. You're so spot on that it proved out swept wing, multi engine podded layout and suitability. As you say, its basic planform is still with us today, almost 60 years later, in both the military side and the commercial side. Its the main reason why the dash 8 ended up in its planform. Needless to say that the success of the 707 laid the basis for commercial jet aircraft...and that was paved by the B-47 Strat...that's definitely success as a developmental program...yeah, I change my vote to the B-47


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Revolutionary Aircraft Development Program (1945~)
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Test Aircraft In Development posted Wed Jul 19 2006 03:35:35 by Jalto27R
Space A Travel On Uscg Aircraft posted Wed Nov 15 2006 23:40:00 by Reedyreed
Favorite Vietnam War Aircraft posted Tue Oct 24 2006 20:45:00 by PJFlysFast
Favorit WWII Aircraft? posted Wed Oct 18 2006 18:21:47 by Skyman
Eads Mako/HEAT Aircraft posted Wed Oct 11 2006 01:30:19 by Boeing4ever
Unusual Aircraft On Approach At Kdma posted Tue Oct 3 2006 19:35:39 by SABE
Aircraft With Highest Wing Store Weight Capacity posted Mon Sep 25 2006 15:57:44 by 2H4
Argentine Army Aircraft Crashes Near Buenos Aires posted Wed Sep 13 2006 14:20:07 by Lanas
A-10 Service Life Extension Program posted Thu Aug 31 2006 14:41:51 by Lumberton
Very Cool Aircraft Vid Varazdin Airshow posted Sat Aug 26 2006 05:34:35 by Mig21UMD
Test Aircraft In Development posted Wed Jul 19 2006 03:35:35 by Jalto27R
Fake Chinese Parts On US Military Aircraft posted Tue May 22 2012 11:42:09 by chuchoteur
Swing Wing Aircraft Take Off / Landing? posted Sat Mar 24 2012 21:26:49 by Max Q
Aircraft Launch Time In A Carrier posted Tue Mar 13 2012 12:32:37 by rg828
F-35 Lrip Costs Per Aircraft - Over $200 Million posted Mon Mar 12 2012 14:53:01 by tommytoyz
Auction Of Zimbabwe Air Force Aircraft posted Sun Mar 4 2012 15:15:06 by bennett123
A4M And Mig-29 Replacement Aircraft. posted Sun Feb 26 2012 18:16:55 by L-188
N911NA Retires - 2nd Shuttle Carrier Aircraft posted Sun Feb 12 2012 05:03:56 by ZANL188
Name This Aircraft Cockpit posted Thu Jan 19 2012 08:20:35 by concorde007
Philippines Mull Aircraft Acquisition posted Wed Jan 4 2012 14:40:01 by Devilfish

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format