Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
BUK-M1-2  
User currently offlineBattleborgcube From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (12 years 12 months 10 hours ago) and read 2783 times:

How effective is compared with new western SAM?
And how much it cost?

2 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineFireblade From Portugal, joined Feb 2006, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (12 years 12 months 10 hours ago) and read 2759 times:

http://www.milparade.com/1998/29/066.htm
See the table downthere
http://www.rusarm.ru/products/ad/bukm1.htm
About the money i don't know but s-300 cost about 6ooomillions so BUK will cost ?


User currently offlineLY744 From Canada, joined Feb 2001, 5536 posts, RR: 10
Reply 2, posted (12 years 12 months 9 hours ago) and read 2764 times:

The SA-11/17 is deffinetely one of the best (if not the best) systems of its class (not that it has too many competitors). It comes from a very succesful family of medium-range/altitude SAMs. The first member being the good old SA-6. The SA-6 (NATO: Gainful, Russia: Kub/Kvadtrat) entered service in the late 60's and has been setting the standard for medium-range, low to medium altitude, highly mobile, semi-active homing SAMs in the world for many years. It has proven its abilities in the Middle East in the early 70's. But the war of 1982 ("Lebanon War") has proven that the classic Russian SAM defense doctrine (SA-2/SA-3/SA-6) can be beaten. By that time, though, the SA-11 (NATO: Gadfly, Russia: Buk-1M) has entered service with the Soviet armed forces. Unlike the SA-6, an SA-11 launcher can carry up to 4 missiles (3 for SA-6). Significant imporvements in the SA-11 included much imporved performances against cruise missiles, the ability to track and shoot at 6 targets at the same time (vs. 1 in the SA-6), being even more mobile, being able to resist electronic warfare better, and the ability to guide the missiles mannually. Countries that operate the SA-11 include Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, Finland, Syria, Iran, Serbia, and India.
The SA-17 / SA-N-12 (NATO: Grizzly, Russia: BUK M1-2/Yezh [Naval] China: HQ-16) is a further development of the SA-17, in fact, the SA-11 can be upgraded to become the SA-17. The HQ-16 is a Russian-Chinese project that is apparently based on the SA-17, but has been improved to fit Chinese requirements.
A typical SA-11/17 battery would include a command post, a target acquisition radar, up to 6 mobile launchers (each equipped with guidance radar), and a similar number of missile transporters/loaders (can be used to launch missiles, but do not have own guidance radar).

LY744.



Pacifism only works if EVERYBODY practices it
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic BUK-M1-2
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format