Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Italian F-104s Intercept A Lybian Cargo.  
User currently offlineSteman From Germany, joined Aug 2000, 1403 posts, RR: 7
Posted (13 years 2 months 23 hours ago) and read 1632 times:

Hi guys,
have you heard of what happened last Saturday in Italy?
A Fokker F50 of a Lybian Company entered the Italian air space at 13:45 CET.
As the ATC found some discrepancies with the Reg. No. and the flight plane immediately an emergency action has been initiated by the Italian Air Defence Command.
Two F-104S (actually ASA-M) Starfighters from the 4th Stormo (wing) of the Italian Air Force, intercepted the plane at 13:55, only ten minutes after it entered the National airspace and 7 minutes after the alarm had been launched.
Two more fighters escorted the Fokker to let it exit from the Italian air space.
At the end the Fokker resulted a normal flight but probably there was an error in the transcription of the Reg.No in the flight plan.

This fact demonstratesa couple of things in my opinion: first, ENAV (Italian Civil Av. Auth.) and Air Force demonstrated a perfect coordination job, even more important after 9/11.
Second: the venerable F-104 showed once more what it can do while more modern fighters can't: being in the air 5 minutes after alarm, at high altitude and already in sight of the target. Yes, it hasn't BVR capability nor it is suited for a modern interoperability scenario but it still has something to say in the Air Defence role!

Long live the Starfighter

Ciao

Stefano


10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSoren-a From Denmark, joined Sep 2001, 235 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (13 years 2 months 22 hours ago) and read 1557 times:

Hi

This has happend a few times lately.

Here is a link to a BBC news feed about a Turkish MD-88 that was intercepted by Austrian fighters on Tuesday the 16th of October, after radio contact was lost:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/uk/scotland/newsid_1602000/1602077.stm

They also had another story the other day about a passanger plane being interceptet by French Air force fighters after radio contact was lost, but I cant find the artcile right now.

Regards
Søren Augustesen


User currently offlineSoren-a From Denmark, joined Sep 2001, 235 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (13 years 2 months 22 hours ago) and read 1547 times:

Hi

Found the second link on BBC:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/uk/newsid_1611000/1611935.stm

On the 26st French air force Mirage F.1s intercepted a Go airliner over france after radio contact was lost.

The article have a nice picture of a Mirage - unfortunatly it is of a -2000 and not a F.1.....

Regards
Søren Augustesen


User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 18
Reply 3, posted (13 years 2 months 17 hours ago) and read 1541 times:

Any current fighter can do this, if the procedures at base are good (and the range and course of the target are favourable).
The problem in the US at 9/11 was that due to the feeling of "nothing is going to hurt us" of the last decade reaction times of air defense units had slipped from seconds or minutes to tens of minutes. Fighters that would have been sitting on the runway with engines running 24/7 10 years ago were in their shelters with everything shut down while the pilots were having breakfast.
Reaction time was 25 minutes, not 5 or less as it used to be. The Italian air force is and always has been on guard for Lybian incursions. They are still on +5 on several bases, as should be the normal practice of all NATO air defense units IMO.



I wish I were flying
User currently offlineFlyHigh@Tom From United Arab Emirates, joined Sep 2001, 400 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (13 years 2 months 7 hours ago) and read 1521 times:

Fighter readiness was very much present during the cold war era. In the earstwhile Soviet Republic Readiness 1 will mean that the pilot will sit in the cockpit all night, readiness 2 will mean that the pilot will be dressed in the usual G equipment etc and ready to go, readiness 3 would mean that the pilot will be in the usual uniform only. They used to have atleast 1 man in the readiness 1 position.

I guess this is the case in most of the air forces...but as Jwenting said, after the cold war the USAF squads within the US became a bit too complacent (after all there was no war like situation in the country), who would dare to attack them in their country...sadly they were wrong.

Anyway Kudos to the Italian airforce  Big thumbs up

Cheers
Thomas.


User currently offlineGregoire From France, joined Sep 2007, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (13 years 2 months 6 hours ago) and read 1518 times:

Soren

I have read an article about it it was quite fun the journalist was talking of 2000 and the picture was one of mirage F1 what was funny is that after having etablished radio contact the airliner pilot have asked the mirage pilot to go and fly in the other side of the liner so all the passenger could have a good look at the mirage. (I do not know if the mirage did so)


User currently offlineTurin_airport From Italy, joined Oct 2001, 278 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (13 years 2 months 4 hours ago) and read 1513 times:

Any current fighter can do this, if the procedures at base are good (and the range and course of the target are favourable).

I'm not sure it's true. I recently red that one of the main reason why Italian Airforce dislikes the Tornado ADV (and will replace them with the F16) is because they need too much time to intercept an intruder starting from the ground, compared to the F104. I don't know if it's true, but I belive it.

Regards.

T_a


User currently offlineSteman From Germany, joined Aug 2000, 1403 posts, RR: 7
Reply 7, posted (13 years 2 months 3 hours ago) and read 1505 times:

It's true because modern fighters need a lot of time to startup all their avionics system. 15 minutes are required only to align the INS.
Moreover Tornado ADV don't have the same climb speed as Starfighters.

Anyway the ASA-M upgrade of the F-104 has the same NAV/COM system of the Tornado IDS and AMX fleet, including the GPS/INS system which requires more time than the previous one so I am wondering if they have made some changes to the procedures or if they have always some planes ready in 5' like in the Cold War peak operations.

Ciao

STefano


User currently offlineSoren-a From Denmark, joined Sep 2001, 235 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (13 years 2 months 3 hours ago) and read 1507 times:


I would not mind being on an airliner that was intercepted by Italian F-104 or Frence Mirages (as long as the reason was just a broken radio or something like that). Think about the photos you could get  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

Regards
Søren Augustesen


User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 18
Reply 9, posted (13 years 2 months 2 hours ago) and read 1508 times:

Turin, a Tornado could do it if it were sitting on the ramp with engines running (like the RAF used to have them in Scotland to intercept Bears in the GIUK gap), in other words on +1 alert. At present, +15 is the alert used most often, and apparently +5 in southern Italy.
Comparison: fighters in the Washington DC area took 25 minutes to get airborne on 11/09...



I wish I were flying
User currently offlineTurin_airport From Italy, joined Oct 2001, 278 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (13 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 1502 times:

Jwenting, I don't think that Italian Air Force ever used to have a/c on the ramp with engines running. They keep them in the shelters, ready to fly, with pilots in their rooms. Probably, in this given situation the F104 is quicker then many others figthers (for the reasons Steman posted). After all, I think they built it with these kind of missions in mind: its shape (more a rocket than a plane), its power and its speed are meant to reach a potential enemy as soon as possible (instead, its little wings are not so good in close combat).

Just my thoughts.

T_a


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Italian F-104s Intercept A Lybian Cargo.
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Rivals Muscle In On Lockheed's Cargo Plane posted Thu May 3 2007 22:42:04 by Srbmod
C-27J Just Delivered To Italian AF (pics) posted Fri Jan 12 2007 12:47:17 by 777
Indian Exo-atmospheric Missile Intercept Test posted Wed Nov 29 2006 08:51:33 by BarfBag
Huge Usaf Cargo Proptransports posted Fri Nov 24 2006 17:43:23 by Reedyreed
Military Cargo A/C In CLE? posted Sat Nov 18 2006 21:14:43 by Dan2002
U.S. Grants SpaceX Cargo Ship Prototype Contract posted Fri Oct 13 2006 17:03:33 by AerospaceFan
Fighter Planes Intercept Russian Bombers posted Sun Oct 1 2006 00:16:08 by Clickhappy
Libyan Air Cargo AN-124s posted Mon Sep 25 2006 21:45:17 by Cruisertk421
Buffet Problems For Italian KC-767 posted Mon May 22 2006 09:56:35 by Scbriml
AF1 Has An Entrance By Cargo?(Pic) posted Sat Mar 4 2006 21:59:13 by JrMafia90

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format