Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Orion 13 Might Be First Manned Return To Moon  
User currently offlineAerospaceFan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (7 years 9 months 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 3805 times:

What is it with NASA and the number 13?

We all know that Apollo 13 was a near-disaster for the space program in which the lives of three astronauts were placed in peril by a catastrophic vehicular failure in Earth orbit.

According to a recent report, this fact has not deterred NASA from assigning the role of returning man to the Moon to the 13th mission of Orion. Moreover, it is scheduled to take place -- yes -- thirteen years from now.

See:

http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/content/?cid=4859

13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinePtrjong From Netherlands, joined Mar 2005, 3905 posts, RR: 19
Reply 1, posted (7 years 9 months 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 3781 times:

Quoting AerospaceFan (Thread starter):
Moreover, it is scheduled to take place -- yes -- thirteen years from now.

Shocking find.  Wink

Why are so many people, especially in America it seems, into numerology?  Confused

Peter



The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)
User currently offlineRAPCON From Puerto Rico, joined Jul 2006, 671 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (7 years 9 months 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 3755 times:

Quoting Ptrjong (Reply 1):
Why are so many people, especially in America it seems, into numerology?

Dude, you must be psychic! Check out this article from today's Washington Post:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...le/2006/10/26/AR2006102601597.html



MODS CAN'T STOP ME....THEY CAN ONLY HOPE TO CONTAIN ME!!!
User currently offlineAerospaceFan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (7 years 9 months 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 3699 times:

It's just weird, that's all.

Also, thirteen is considered unlucky sometimes because of the association of Judas with that number.

Please see, e.g.,

http://www.ibri.org/Papers/Judas/GospelofJudas.html


User currently offlinePtrjong From Netherlands, joined Mar 2005, 3905 posts, RR: 19
Reply 4, posted (7 years 9 months 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 3668 times:

Oh, I know, Aerospacefan. 13 is considered unlucky not just in America, and 4 for that matter is considered unlucky in China. It's said that the Chinese military aircraft designations (J-5, H-5, Q-5, Z-5) all start at 5 because of this.

It's just that to come up with the fact that Orion 13 is scheduled 13 years from now seems so far-fetched to me. You'll always find a 13 when you look hard enough.

Peter Smile



The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)
User currently offlineThorny From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (7 years 9 months 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 3626 times:

Quoting AerospaceFan (Thread starter):
According to a recent report, this fact has not deterred NASA from assigning the role of returning man to the Moon to the 13th mission of Orion. Moreover, it is scheduled to take place -- yes -- thirteen years from now.

Chances of this schedule and flight program looking anything like the end product = zero.  Smile

Note the two years plus gap between Orion 11 and Orion 12. Congress will not accept that. They will not allow NASA to pay a huge workforce to sit around for two years doing nothing, not when there is a perfectly good spacecraft design waiting to be used... watch for Orion 12-15 (or so) to be converted to extended Space Station operations.

Also, I think the chances of the cargo variant ever seeing the light of day are close to zero as well. If any of the commercial projects are successful, and odds are good that at least one will be, NASA's request to build and launch its own far more expensive cargo ship will be politically untenable. In that case, most of those unmanned Orion missions will disappear from the schedule, making the first lunar Orion fight something like Orion 6.


User currently offlineDavid L From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 9523 posts, RR: 42
Reply 6, posted (7 years 9 months 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 3610 times:

Quoting Thorny (Reply 5):
Chances of this schedule and flight program looking anything like the end product = zero.

That was my first thought.  Smile

Quoting AerospaceFan (Thread starter):
Moreover, it is scheduled to take place -- yes -- thirteen years from now.

But next year it'll be scheduled to take place in twelve years. Anything that's scheduled thirteen or more years in advance will inevitably be scheduled to take place in thirteen years time at some point.


User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 19
Reply 7, posted (7 years 9 months 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 3543 times:

it won't happen anyway. The US don't have the guts to launch large scale space programs like that. Lots of paper balloons go up, but nothing will ever come of it.
The risk of being sued over someone stubbing his toe or spilling his coffee is just too great.



I wish I were flying
User currently offlineThorny From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (7 years 9 months 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 3501 times:

Quoting Jwenting (Reply 7):
it won't happen anyway. The US don't have the guts to launch large scale space programs like that. Lots of paper balloons go up, but nothing will ever come of it.

You may be right, we'll have to see. At least the US is trying.... no one else is even doing this much. Europe is too fragmented politically to ever attempt something of this scale (same GDP as America, yet less than 1/4 the spending on civil space), so at best they will be junior partners with the US, Russia, or China if anyone ever does go back to the moon. The Russians talk the talk but never walk the walk. The list of ambitious "this is what we're going to do in space" boasts is nearly as long as America's, with much less to show for it. Russia is now talking about building a new Space Station of its own, nevermind that they never finished their half of the current Space Station and can't seem to scare up the funding for their new Kliper spacecraft (talk about paper balloons...) At the rate China is launching manned spacecraft (two flights in the period of time America flew the entire Project Gemini) they might get to the moon around 2050, maybe.

Anyway, America sends up humans in a spacecraft that has no escape systems for large portions of its flight, and we've lost 14 great men and women in the effort. Americans climb on rockets that look like they were built in someone's garage and win X-Prizes with them. Americans go out in space to build space stations with nothing but rubbery spacesuits between them and instant death. And America is the only nation to ever send humans on expeditions beyond the confines of low Earth orbit. To say we don't have the guts is, quite simply, ridiculous.


User currently offlineConnies4ever From Canada, joined Feb 2006, 4066 posts, RR: 13
Reply 9, posted (7 years 9 months 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 3492 times:

Quoting Thorny (Reply 8):
Quoting Jwenting (Reply 7):
it won't happen anyway. The US don't have the guts to launch large scale space programs like that. Lots of paper balloons go up, but nothing will ever come of it.



Quoting Thorny (Reply 8):
Anyway, America sends up humans in a spacecraft that has no escape systems for large portions of its flight, and we've lost 14 great men and women in the effort. Americans climb on rockets that look like they were built in someone's garage and win X-Prizes with them. Americans go out in space to build space stations with nothing but rubbery spacesuits between them and instant death. And America is the only nation to ever send humans on expeditions beyond the confines of low Earth orbit. To say we don't have the guts is, quite simply, ridiculous.

Agree with your comments, Thorny. No one doubts the bravery of Americans as individuals. Perhaps what Jwenting was trying to say, however clumsily, is that the political entities and government agencies themselves either can't or won't sustain a vision for the future, but pay more attention to the election cycle.

Particularly if the US goes into a deep recession (not impossible, esp. given the housing meltdown) they may not be able to pay for the Constellation program.



Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
User currently offlineCloudy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (7 years 9 months 11 hours ago) and read 3421 times:

Quoting Jwenting (Reply 7):
it won't happen anyway. The US don't have the guts to launch large scale space programs like that. Lots of paper balloons go up, but nothing will ever come of it.
The risk of being sued over someone stubbing his toe or spilling his coffee is just too great.

The only thing that would cause us to have an ambitious government space program is competition. The only way we are going back to the moon is if someone else threatens to do it first, or do something that looks more spectacular. Otherwise, the public will see it as a waste of money. They want a manned space program better than anyone elses, but are not willing to spend beyond that.

The legal system does indeed hold back a lot of innovation in America, but there are several legal protections for manned space -

- Sovereign immunity. This essentially means you cannot sue the government. There are a lot of exceptions to this, but it still serves to protect the government and many of its contractors in the event of a space accident. This is why the families of soldiers who die in war or training accidents cannot sue, for example. The reason for sovereign immunity is that it protects the seperation of powers. We can't have the courts, for example, be determining when and with who we go to war - and that is what they would have to do to award damages to the family of a soldier killed in a war we shouldn't have gotten into.

Sovereign immunity is a little weaker with regard to the space program's civilian workforce and to people and property on the ground. However, with the proper precautions, this type of damage or casualty is very rare. In the case of workers - standard workman's comp usually applies.

- It is much harder to sue for damages if you are engaged in what the law calls an "inherently dangerous activity". That is how skydiving and base jumping operations survive. You can still sue if your parachute fails, but there is a much higher standard of proof to meet. I have no doubt that any commercial manned space activity would be considered "inherently dangerous" for some time to come.

- Sometimes congress grants certain industries immunity from civil lawsuits, or makes it much harder to sue, in order to encourage growth in the given industry.

The bigger threats to private manned space flight, IMHO, are regulatory overkill and anti-competitive actions by NASA and/or its contractors. Make no mistake about it - NASA as an organization does not want a commercial manned space program of any kind. They support it only when its goals are limited or it just won't happen for a long time. If someone seriously wants to sell rides to orbit, make no mistake about it, NASA/Lockmart/Boeing will do anything they can to stop them.


User currently offlineLehpron From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 7028 posts, RR: 21
Reply 11, posted (7 years 8 months 4 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 3312 times:

Quoting AerospaceFan (Thread starter):
returning man to the Moon to the 13th mission of Orion

I would have preferred 12 design revisions to present.

Quoting Ptrjong (Reply 1):
Why are so many people, especially in America it seems, into numerology?

I want to say paranoid, but then some of us believe it is possible there are no coincidences.



The meaning of life is curiosity; we were put on this planet to explore opportunities.
User currently offlineBlazingCessna From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 113 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (7 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 3241 times:

I just looked at NASA's Constellation website, and there is nothing baout the launch schedule there, other than first manned launch no later than 2014 and lunar landing no later than 2020.

http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2006/aug/HQ_06305_Orion_contract.html



Flown on:722, 731, 732, 742, 752, 763, DC8, DC9, DC10, A300, A319, A320, A330, PIC on C172, PA28R, D55, A36, DC3
User currently offlineThorny From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (7 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 3230 times:

Quoting BlazingCessna (Reply 12):
I just looked at NASA's Constellation website

NASA web sites are usually the last places with such information, because they only have information once the top brass has given it its blessing, which means the politicians have to get their oily hands on it first. For advance news, the inside story and unofficial planning dates, etc. you need to try the external web sites like NASA Watch or NASASpaceNews.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Orion 13 Might Be First Manned Return To Moon
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
First 4 Eurofighters Delivered To Fighter Squadron posted Wed Jul 26 2006 23:50:47 by TheSonntag
First EH101 Delivered To Jap Marit. Self Def Force posted Fri Mar 3 2006 15:48:38 by 777
A Return To Planet Neptune? posted Sun Dec 18 2005 00:03:28 by GDB
Discovery's Return To FL posted Thu Aug 11 2005 14:41:32 by IAH777
Space Shuttle Return To Flight May 15. Too Early? posted Tue Mar 1 2005 20:44:38 by UAopsMGR
Orion Cockpit To Be Based On 787 posted Sat Oct 7 2006 04:43:32 by N328KF
"Orion" Said To Be Name Of NASA's CEV Program posted Fri Jul 21 2006 10:42:36 by AerospaceFan
First To Fly The PC-21 - Singapore Air Force posted Fri Nov 3 2006 18:05:15 by Airimages
Was CV-64 Suppost To Be CV-63. posted Thu Oct 19 2006 01:31:19 by 747400sp
CVN-77, USS Bush, To Be Christened 10/7/06 posted Thu Oct 5 2006 07:07:21 by BladeLWS

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format