Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Boeing To Begin Ground Testing X48B  
User currently offlineDEVILFISH From Philippines, joined Jan 2006, 4837 posts, RR: 1
Posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 12010 times:

A press release from Boeing says the company is about to start ground testing of the X48B Blended Wing Body built to their specifications by Cranfield Aerospace, Ltd. of the UK in preparation for flight testing early next year.

In contrast to previous threads' earlier focus on large capacity airlifter applications, would NASA's concern for edge-of-the-envelope flight dynamics and the USAF's interest in the project as a future military aircraft now center on weapons delivery or as an unmanned aerial vehicle for ISR?

http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2006/q4/061027b_nr.html

Quote:
The X-48B's three turbojet engines will allow the 500-pound, composite-skinned, 21-foot wingspan prototype to fly up to 120 knots and 10,000 feet in altitude during flight testing.


OTOH, I think a single-engine version would make one super-cool personal Aerial Recreation Vehicle.  thumbsup 


"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Garfield
6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineN328KF From United States of America, joined May 2004, 6485 posts, RR: 3
Reply 1, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 11924 times:

Regardless of what they think over at CivAv, BWB units have "Air Force" written all over it. This (in different sizes) would be a superb replacement for various cargolifters and tankers.


When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.' T.Roosevelt
User currently offlineTedTAce From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 11901 times:

I love how this project is comming along. I don't care it they are mil(freight/Strategic) or civil or both. I want to see the real full scale things flying as soon as reasonably possible!!

User currently offlineLehpron From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 7028 posts, RR: 21
Reply 3, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 11730 times:

I first thought this was Boeing's hypersonic platform (X-50B i think) testing ahead of schedule (by 2 yrs!)

I'm glad they are pursuing these studies, just wish they could apply this "faith in technology and potential market" to others. It seems to me misguided to place faith something as long as we try and believ it will work, but other ideas will not (or ever work) work because we neither believe or are willing to try.

Quoting DEVILFISH (Thread starter):
OTOH, I think a single-engine version would make one super-cool personal Aerial Recreation Vehicle.

And the difference between this and an ultralight is...?

Quoting N328KF (Reply 1):
Regardless of what they think over at CivAv,

Their thoughts are driven by emotion, not logic. Big grin

I agree with any and all thoughts so far presented.

Quoting DEVILFISH (Thread starter):
The X-48B's three turbojet engines will allow the 500-pound, composite-skinned, 21-foot wingspan prototype to fly up to 120 knots and 10,000 feet in altitude during flight testing.

They used real turbojets in their model? Wow, I know while they are expensive and Boeing can afford three, would a more accurate turbofan have had any low-speed impact whatsoever?



The meaning of life is curiosity; we were put on this planet to explore opportunities.
User currently offlineDEVILFISH From Philippines, joined Jan 2006, 4837 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 11645 times:

Quoting Lehpron (Reply 3):
And the difference between this and an ultralight is...?

It's the X-48B minus two engines and "ultraexpensive"? Don't know if that would get off the ground though.  Smile

Quoting Lehpron (Reply 3):
Wow, I know while they are expensive and Boeing can afford three, would a more accurate turbofan have had any low-speed impact whatsoever?

I haven't the slightest idea - but I'd venture to guess that envisioned full-size and payload would require high thrust ratings, so they put in three to distribute the stresses and scale down more accurately.



"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Garfield
User currently offlineLehpron From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 7028 posts, RR: 21
Reply 5, posted (7 years 10 months 3 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 11605 times:

Quoting DEVILFISH (Reply 4):
haven't the slightest idea - but I'd venture to guess that envisioned full-size and payload would require high thrust ratings, so they put in three to distribute the stresses and scale down more accurately.

I wasn't talking about a fullsize engine. I meant, same thrust but with a bypass (a.k.a model turbofan) should do better than a turbojet. They even said something about

Quote:
validating engines

.



The meaning of life is curiosity; we were put on this planet to explore opportunities.
User currently offlineDEVILFISH From Philippines, joined Jan 2006, 4837 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 11395 times:

Here's another, but definitely intended for the civilian market.....

http://www.flightglobal.com/Articles...e%2c+energy-efficient+blended.html



"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Garfield
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Boeing To Begin Ground Testing X48B
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Boeing To Shut Down C-17 Line.... posted Fri Aug 18 2006 18:09:49 by AirRyan
Manned Space Flight To Begin Monday! posted Fri Jun 18 2004 20:54:49 by RaginMav
Boeing Looks To Acquisitions To Boost UK Profile posted Tue Oct 3 2006 00:40:22 by Osiris30
Boeing Wants Taxpayers To Subsidize Its Govt Fines posted Fri Jul 7 2006 15:42:58 by Max999
Canada To Buy 4 Boeing C-17s posted Wed May 31 2006 00:31:33 by KrisYYZ
Boeing Pitches P-8 MMA To Indian Navy posted Thu Apr 13 2006 17:23:19 by N328KF
USN To Ground All Aircraft For One Day posted Sat Mar 4 2006 16:43:03 by AviationAddict
Seattle PI: Boeing May Move 767 Line To LGB posted Wed Feb 15 2006 08:05:18 by N328KF
WSJ: Congress Wants KC-777, Boeing Likely To Bid posted Mon Dec 5 2005 15:39:09 by N328KF
F-15C And Air To Ground posted Fri Dec 2 2005 18:23:37 by CX747

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format