Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Buff Picture OTD Question  
User currently offlineTedTAce From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 23 hours ago) and read 2763 times:

I was looking @ http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1137263/M/

And I noticed a few things.

The most obvious being the jack stands at the outer ends of the wings. This one is a duh (metal fatigue).

More obscure (to me) is why the flaps down position is better for long term storage (guessing Hydaulic power holds them up).

And Un-imagineable to me are the inboard aileron positions. It seems like they are articulated in opposing manner much the way I would expect if such a deflection were to occur in flight, but the question comes down to this: is there a mechanical linkage that even while powered off (as obviously is the case) that keeps the ailerons opposite? Why does it have such a system? Wouldn't it be easier (less weight/money) to have hydraulic controls set opposite? Or would that just make it a FRED?

6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineUH60FtRucker From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 23 hours ago) and read 2756 times:

Ted, I really can't provide answers to your questions... but just commenting on that picture, check out that B model in the center, with it's distinctive high tail. With a bird that old, I wonder what the chances are that this particular aircraft was flying over the north pole during the Cuban Missile Crisis?

If you ever get the chance to talk to some of the older B-52 pilots - especially pre-Vietnam, they've got some amazing stories. This picture rocks simply because of the history, and sense of awe, that it conjures up.

-UH60


User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29832 posts, RR: 58
Reply 2, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 22 hours ago) and read 2752 times:

Quoting TedTAce (Thread starter):
The most obvious being the jack stands at the outer ends of the wings. This one is a duh (metal fatigue).

More then likely the outrigger wheels have been removed as spares for the remaining fleet.

Quoting TedTAce (Thread starter):
More obscure (to me) is why the flaps down position is better for long term storage (guessing Hydaulic power holds them up).

They probably bleed down.

Quoting TedTAce (Thread starter):
And Un-imagineable to me are the inboard aileron positions. It seems like they are articulated in opposing manner much the way I would expect if such a deflection were to occur in flight, but the question comes down to this: is there a mechanical linkage that even while powered off (as obviously is the case) that keeps the ailerons opposite? Why does it have such a system? Wouldn't it be easier (less weight/money) to have hydraulic controls set opposite? Or would that just make it a FRED?

This aircraft is from a time where boosted flight controls where still a new concept. I have no doubt there are still cables tying them together.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offline474218 From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 6340 posts, RR: 9
Reply 3, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 13 hours ago) and read 2677 times:

The B-52's flaps cannot be extended without hydraulic power, so they extend the flaps when the plane is parked (waiting to be dismantled for parts) so the attaching hardware is accessible.

User currently offlineVenus6971 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 1444 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 13 hours ago) and read 2671 times:

Plus at the time that was a D-Model in the center. All the D models are gone except a few that survived as static displays. Most hard to get parts have been striped and the fuselages turned into beer cans and razor blades.


I would help you but it is not in the contract
User currently offlineSlamClick From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 10062 posts, RR: 68
Reply 5, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 11 hours ago) and read 2624 times:

Quoting TedTAce (Thread starter):
inboard aileron positions. It seems like they are articulated in opposing manner

Don't know a great deal about the B-52 but it is not uncommon for boosted ailerons to be cable-bussed together in such a manner that one will never deflect without getting the appropriate throw from the opposite one. Would not be at all surprised if that were the case here.

The B-52 no doubt incorporated some provisions, like inboard ailerons, that arose from the "aeroelasticity" issues experienced by the B-47.

Aren't they cool though?



Happiness is not seeing another trite Ste. Maarten photo all week long.
User currently offlineJakeOrion From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 1255 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 11 hours ago) and read 2612 times:

Isn't the hydraulic fluid pumped out of the aircraft before the axe? Another reason why they might bleed down, maybe...


Every problem has a simple solution; finding the simple solution is the difficult problem.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Buff Picture OTD Question
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Night Trap Picture - And A Question. posted Mon Apr 18 2005 17:54:23 by SlamClick
SR-71 Picture -- Question posted Wed Sep 7 2005 19:37:27 by GoBoeing
A Question About This Picture... posted Mon Mar 22 2004 07:49:15 by HaveBlue
F-15 Engine Question? posted Thu Nov 16 2006 08:08:08 by Venus6971
U.S.A.F Squadron/Wing Question posted Tue Nov 7 2006 23:03:55 by Tiger119
Fighter Jet Fly-by Question posted Mon Nov 6 2006 05:37:12 by Chi-town
'Stupid' Carrier Ops Question: Soaking The Jets. posted Sun Oct 22 2006 23:21:53 by TedTAce
Great Picture Of An Unpainted F-22A posted Thu Oct 19 2006 19:57:59 by Egronenthal
Your Favorite Rocket Launch Picture? posted Tue Oct 17 2006 22:17:27 by Lehpron
Old Jet RAF Aeroplanes Question posted Wed Oct 11 2006 00:17:54 by Gary2880

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format