Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
How Much Did Mitsubishi Pay For The F-15 License?  
User currently offlineGarnetpalmetto From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 5426 posts, RR: 52
Posted (8 years 1 week 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 6596 times:

As I'm sure most of us know, the Japanese F-15s are built under license. In doing research for a paper I'm working on I've looked to see how much this license cost and have found nothing. Anybody have any ideas either of where to find the info or how much the license did cost?


South Carolina - too small to be its own country, too big to be a mental asylum.
4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineN328KF From United States of America, joined May 2004, 6491 posts, RR: 3
Reply 1, posted (8 years 1 week 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 6591 times:

Quoting Garnetpalmetto (Thread starter):
As I'm sure most of us know, the Japanese F-15s are built under license. In doing research for a paper I'm working on I've looked to see how much this license cost and have found nothing. Anybody have any ideas either of where to find the info or how much the license did cost?

Mitsubishi was a subcontractor, not a licensee, I believe. It makes a big difference in the business arrangement.

This is greatly different from Mitsubishi's arrangement with Lockheed for the FSX.



When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.' T.Roosevelt
User currently offlineLaxintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 26137 posts, RR: 50
Reply 2, posted (8 years 1 week 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 6432 times:

While I am not certain about the details of the Japan F-15 deal, in general local production has more to do with offset agreements which are quite common both in the military and commercial arena requiring the seller often to purchase a % of the purchase price back in local goods.
Japan also in general has restrictions that defence products must have high local content hence why much of its equipment is often co-produced.

Another instance as such offset deals is Lockheed's sale of F-16s to Turkey. As part of the deal a production line was opened in country. The deal actually has been so successively, Lockheed has paid the Turkish aerospace industry to build additional F-16s for both Jordan and Egypt as they could be produced cheaper with better deliver dates than directly from the US production line.



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlineN328KF From United States of America, joined May 2004, 6491 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (8 years 1 week 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 6407 times:

Quoting Laxintl (Reply 2):
Another instance as such offset deals is Lockheed's sale of F-16s to Turkey. As part of the deal a production line was opened in country. The deal actually has been so successively, Lockheed has paid the Turkish aerospace industry to build additional F-16s for both Jordan and Egypt as they could be produced cheaper with better deliver dates than directly from the US production line.

Well, plus it gives Lockheed a way to produce the F-16 while Fort Worth is busy with the F-35, and Marietta is busy with the F-22.



When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.' T.Roosevelt
User currently offlineDL021 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 11447 posts, RR: 75
Reply 4, posted (8 years 1 week 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 6379 times:

Quoting N328KF (Reply 3):
Well, plus it gives Lockheed a way to produce the F-16 while Fort Worth is busy with the F-35, and Marietta is busy with the F-22.

That actually did not play much part in the decision. The F-35 facility is adjacent to the F-16 facility at GD/Lockheed's facility. There is so much space there for manufacturing that they could open another line at both the Fort Worth and Marietta plants. They built those airplanes in Turkey for Egypt as much for political reasons as anything else. It got the deal done, while supporting two allies economically as well as militarily. They build M-1 tanks in Egypt, and are able, if desired, to place those items elsewhere as well.



Is my Pan Am ticket to the moon still good?
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic How Much Did Mitsubishi Pay For The F-15 License?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
How Much More Lift Does Shuttle Make On The 747? posted Sat Jul 16 2005 15:50:49 by Boeing nut
How Does The F-15 Stack Up Against The F-16 Etc? posted Mon Jan 14 2002 17:18:08 by CX747
How Much Did Mitsubishi Pay For The F-15 License? posted Thu Dec 7 2006 04:48:59 by Garnetpalmetto
Becoming A Pilot For The US Navy posted Sat Nov 25 2006 18:16:30 by Turpentyine
Looking For The Red Flag Accident Video posted Fri Oct 20 2006 21:35:14 by RichardPrice
Replacement For The Superhornet posted Fri Sep 29 2006 17:50:02 by 747400sp
Why Did RB-57F Need The Extra J 60 Turbojets? posted Sat Sep 23 2006 23:20:31 by 747400sp
Winglets For The E-6 Mercury posted Sat Sep 16 2006 20:57:56 by 747400sp
Why Not A B-736 For The Army's Sigint? posted Tue Aug 29 2006 01:57:52 by DEVILFISH
Why No Military Name For The JT8-D? posted Wed Aug 2 2006 01:37:35 by 747400sp

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format