Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
E3C/D Vs Wedgetail 737  
User currently offlineCHRISBA777ER From UK - England, joined Mar 2001, 5964 posts, RR: 62
Posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 5670 times:

How capable is the Wedge as against the Sentry? They are of a similar size, but is the Sentry a more capable AEW radar in terms of a more powerful and agile radar system?


What do you mean you dont have any bourbon? Do you know how far it is to Houston? What kind of airline is this???
14 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineLt-AWACS From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 5674 times:

The E-3 has more scopes and with mid-term upgrades a great computer, not to mention the ESM suite and PDS systems. The AN/APY-2 is an awesome radar though granted a bit different compaired to Wedgetail.

The E-3 can do a lot more air battle management and cover a larger area but for the nations ordering the Wedgetail it is a great fit for their more regional needs and smaller aircraft control capabilities.

Ciao, and Hook 'em Horns,
Capt-AWACS, Carpe Imperium


User currently offlineEBJ1248650 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 1932 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 5644 times:

Quoting Lt-AWACS (Reply 1):
The E-3 has more scopes and with mid-term upgrades a great computer, not to mention the ESM suite and PDS systems. The AN/APY-2 is an awesome radar though granted a bit different compaired to Wedgetail.

Are there any plans to replace the E-3 in USAF service in the not-too-distant future?



Dare to dream; dream big!
User currently offlineN328KF From United States of America, joined May 2004, 6491 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 5633 times:

To be sure, the MESA radar on the Wedgetail is intended to be a template for the future U.S. AEW direction. While the E-10 project was in high gear, Wedgetail was to be the development platform. And things may change again such that the E-10 project (or a successor) may be jumpstarted.


When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.' T.Roosevelt
User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12158 posts, RR: 51
Reply 4, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 5603 times:

Quoting EBJ1248650 (Reply 2):
Are there any plans to replace the E-3 in USAF service in the not-too-distant future?



Quoting N328KF (Reply 3):
To be sure, the MESA radar on the Wedgetail is intended to be a template for the future U.S. AEW direction. While the E-10 project was in high gear, Wedgetail was to be the development platform. And things may change again such that the E-10 project (or a successor) may be jumpstarted.

Although the E-10 program is not officially canceled, it was pushed back so far to the back burner, it has actually fallen off the stove now.

But, I doubt we will see any E-3 replacement until 2020 (at least). The airframe still has a lot of life left in it, and it is easily upgraded to keep up with the latest bells and whistles.


User currently offlineVenus6971 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 1443 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 5590 times:

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 4):
But, I doubt we will see any E-3 replacement until 2020 (at least). The airframe still has a lot of life left in it, and it is easily upgraded to keep up with the latest bells and whistles.

If the E-3 airframe can get some needed upgrades such as electrical distribution , cockpit upgrades and maybe some new engines it might make it past 2020. The E-6 is light years ahead of it with air frame upgrades. The E-3 's are just now getting some TCAS upgrades and still uses a navigator. The 737-900 would be a good replacement it is about as long as an 707. The galleys would also be a nice upgrade instead of the jiffy pop ovens an inoperable potable water systems and coffee pots.



I would help you but it is not in the contract
User currently offlineN328KF From United States of America, joined May 2004, 6491 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 5587 times:

One thing's for sure, every drawing I've seen of the E-10 doesn't look nearly as sexy as the E-3 or JSDF E-767 with the big rotodome at the top.


When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.' T.Roosevelt
User currently offlineLt-AWACS From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 5571 times:

It is only the US E-3 with the water issue the others have it and it works fine. Yes a microwave would be better than the ovens. It would be nice if the US E-3s could take a page from NATO and get all the freezers to works Big grin (Ditto the Brits )

The E-3 doesn't need new engines when the Air Force has 100s of TF-33s sitting around Tinker. The E-10 is basically dead, and the E-3 was the third spiral of the program anyway. The JASDF E-767 has the same Radar as the current E-3. The An/APY-2 is an awesome radar. It is the nice scope and computer upgrades that are going to make the E-3 an even better air battle management system. NATO mid-term is on the way as is the US Block 40 upgrade. All is well with the E-3s for years to come. THe E-3 block 40 could have dumped the nav but the nav union has to keep putting navs somewhere so they let them keep a job...

Ciao, and Hook 'em Horns,
Capt-AWACS, NATO-Because someone has to drink booze at noon


User currently offlineAvsfan From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 250 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 5543 times:

Quoting Lt-AWACS (Reply 7):

 checkmark   bigthumbsup 

Very well put. Basically...the USAF E-3 Sentry is here to stay!

Louis
-Retired USAF E-3 Enlisted Weapons Controller



"Oh I have slipped the surly bonds of Earth...Put out my hand and touched the face of God"
User currently offlineLt-AWACS From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 5535 times:

Avsfan, sadly all the EWDs will be retired in about a year. Most are here at NATO as they get booted at Tinker. Really stupid decision to get rid of WDs but that is the AF. I know several that went to Gun Pigs at Hurly though.

ALL The E-3 will be around until at least 2020-2025. The only ones I could see moving are the Saudi 5 but when Pakistan offered to buy them Saudi said no so maybe even Saudi Arabia will keep theirs. I've flown on US, NATO, British and Saudi E-3s and the Saudi ones are still the most basic.

Ciao, and Hook 'em Horns,
Capt-AWACS, I have no children and the paperwork to prove it


User currently offlineAvsfan From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 250 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 5506 times:

Quoting Lt-AWACS (Reply 9):
Avsfan, sadly all the EWDs will be retired in about a year. Most are here at NATO as they get booted at Tinker. Really stupid decision to get rid of WDs but that is the AF.


Even though I retired in Mar 2005, Unfortunately I am well aware of the WD status. You are right in the fact that the USAF is doing the wrong thing.

Quoting Lt-AWACS (Reply 9):
I know several that went to Gun Pigs at Hurly though.

Some of my best friends from KTIK went to "pop bad guys" from the AC-130 Gunship. I know one of them does not regret the move and is enjoying it.

Louis



"Oh I have slipped the surly bonds of Earth...Put out my hand and touched the face of God"
User currently offlineVenus6971 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 1443 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 5446 times:

Have been retired from AWACS since Jan 03 started out in Oct 81 left Sep 84 came back in Apr 91 (962nd in Kef) then got BRAC'd back to the them Oct 93 and stayed around until I retired.
I remember about the enlisted WD's and all the money the AF was going to save having those spots as enlisted then someone came up with the idea of making those positions "rated" officers. I guess the the AF could not stomach rated enlisted. Could not get that around that BS flag on a defense apporpiations commitee, if you have rated enlisted WD's why not enlisted or warrant officer pilots, Navs. Why are we paying o-5's to fly as ACC when you can get an E-7 to do it for an whole lot cheaper. Don't give me the excuse of an college degree makes you a better pilot. Chuck Yeager didn't have a degree when he was a Capt breaking the sound barrier. I guess with all the O-5's and O-6's doing crew positons of a O-1 thru O -4 which an E could also do I guess the 40K cuts of man power are coming around to bite everyone in the butt.
I foresee on any USAF flightline in 5 years aircrew going nuts becuase they don't have enough mx troops around because of all the experiance retired and the new mx troops not having a clue because of very little experianced troops with corporate knowledge being available to train newbe's so everybody has to learn the hard way.



I would help you but it is not in the contract
User currently offlineZANL188 From United States of America, joined exactly 8 years ago today! , 3546 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 5413 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Venus6971 (Reply 11):
I foresee on any USAF flightline in 5 years aircrew going nuts becuase they don't have enough mx troops around because of all the experiance retired and the new mx troops not having a clue because of very little experianced troops with corporate knowledge being available to train newbe's so everybody has to learn the hard way.

I see that happening now in the non-MX, non-aircrew portion of the AF. Orderly rooms have been a disaster for sometime now -- you can't get a decent product out of them or PCIII/milpds as a result.



Legal considerations provided by: Dewey, Cheatum, and Howe
User currently offlineAvsfan From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 250 posts, RR: 2
Reply 13, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 5381 times:

The news I have is that all of the Enlised WDs are to be disposed of by 2008 with a lot of them that are cross-training as we speak. One of my best friends at KTIK will start his cross training at the end of this year and another will move onto load master early next year. Believe it or not, but the rated AWO community did not want to see the EWDs go away. Unfortunately when you have the higher-ups in the 5 sided building and ACC (who did not really want the EWDs around) making decisions...then guess what you get. I am really starting to feel that I made the right choice and retire when I did. My old AWACS SQ (960th Vikings) lost at least 5 Enlisted WDs within a six month time period. 2 of us were evaluators and the other 3 were at least instructors. Total experience lost was approximately 50 yrs.


"Oh I have slipped the surly bonds of Earth...Put out my hand and touched the face of God"
User currently offlineVenus6971 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 1443 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (7 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 5339 times:

Quoting Venus6971 (Reply 11):
(962nd in Kef)

I am self correcting myself, I was in the 960th in NAS Keflavik. I guess with the cutbacks I am starting to understand why the F-22 has only 2 mx specialties. Avionics and Crew Chief, they couldn't afford a jet mech and electrican/eviromental and still take delivery on the jet. I hear in my old career field of Crew Chief only 1 out 10 first termers get a CJR unless they want to xtrain into a special op's career and become a snake eater. It takes about 7 to 8 years to get a Crew Chief to really be good at his job and were kicking him out at 4 and the career NCO Crew Chief is being forced Xtrain at his midterm point in his 20 year career so he can sit in a shopping mall lying about what a great life the USAF gave him. I am glad I retired when I did.



I would help you but it is not in the contract
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic E3C/D Vs Wedgetail 737
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
A Lovely Sight - Boeing 737-7ES Wedgetail posted Tue Mar 15 2005 12:28:46 by QANTASforever
737 Wedgetail posted Sat May 22 2004 04:35:11 by VS340
Presidential Helicopters, Shipping Vs Ferrying posted Sat Oct 28 2006 16:01:14 by Boeing Nut
Boeing Mulls 767 Vs 777 Tanker Offering posted Wed Sep 27 2006 17:13:21 by DAYflyer
Fail-Safe Vs Dr.Strangelove posted Fri Sep 22 2006 19:30:52 by B741
Soyuz Vs Shuttle? posted Wed Sep 20 2006 20:30:45 by Mt99
B-1B Vs KC-135A Which Was Louder posted Sat Aug 26 2006 21:34:09 by 747400sp
Was There Any Real Talk About A KC-737? posted Sat Aug 26 2006 20:48:09 by 747400sp
F-16 Vs F/A-18 posted Thu Aug 10 2006 03:25:49 by Da man
Israeli Airforce VS Syria (and Their Airforce) posted Tue Jul 18 2006 00:39:27 by AislepathLight

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format