Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
More Delays To FSTA, Effect On VC10  
User currently offlineBennett123 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2004, 7461 posts, RR: 3
Posted (7 years 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 2654 times:

There is a report in www.vc10.net that EIS for the FSTA is now 2015.

Surely there must be limits to the life of the VC10.

The Tristar is no youngster either.

4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSaintsman From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2002, 2065 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (7 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 2612 times:

One of the problems with the VC10 when it came into service was that it was too well built and therefore not as competative (price wise) as the competition.

The fact that they were so well built (like a brick s/house) means that they are confident that it will last 50 years in service.

Mind you, they won't be cheap to maintain though.


User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12128 posts, RR: 51
Reply 2, posted (7 years 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 2593 times:

The VC-10s are very well built airplanes. The RAF should look at keeping them as long as possible. But, if that is not an option, perhaps they can look at leasing some of the KC-135s stored at DM as an interium aircraft?

User currently offlineBennett123 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2004, 7461 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (7 years 6 months 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 2493 times:

Given that the VC10's are getting very long in the tooth, I think the RAF needs to think about availability issues.

The last VC10 was built in 1970, and the last Non RAF VC10 retired in 1987. This means that the availability of Non RAF VC10 engineers and spares worldwide is zero.

However, there are Tristar's out there, ATA and the retired Saudi fleets spring to mind.

It might be worth acquiring them, for parts if nothing else.


User currently offlineConnies4ever From Canada, joined Feb 2006, 4066 posts, RR: 13
Reply 4, posted (7 years 6 months 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 2478 times:

Quoting Bennett123 (Reply 3):
Given that the VC10's are getting very long in the tooth, I think the RAF needs to think about availability issues.

I agree. How big a spares inventory is there for Conways, for example ? It wasn't exactly produced in huge numbers and IIRC the VC10 uses the highest-power version (RCo. 23???). And there aren't a lot of airframes they can cannibalize, unless they want to part out one of the existing fleet.

Is the delay in EIS for FSTA in any way related to the mooted big defense draw-down ?
(see UK To Cancel New Carriers For The Royal Navy? (by Lumberton Jan 23 2007 in Military Aviation & Space Flight) )



Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic More Delays To FSTA, Effect On VC10
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Canada To Spend $15B On Def, May Incl Attack Helos posted Mon Jun 26 2006 19:51:48 by AirRyan
Discovery To Piggy Back On A 747 To Cape Canaveral posted Tue Aug 16 2005 00:27:15 by Gilesdavies
How Much More Lift Does Shuttle Make On The 747? posted Sat Jul 16 2005 15:50:49 by Boeing nut
India Air Force Says To Rely Less On Western Jets posted Wed Feb 25 2004 15:39:16 by HAWK21M
U.S. , Britain To Ease Rules On Defense Sales posted Tue May 27 2003 23:05:23 by STT757
Congress Agrees To 10 More C-17's For Usaf posted Tue Oct 10 2006 08:23:45 by B747
"Surge" Capability To Build More Bombers? posted Sun Jan 1 2006 16:26:03 by AerospaceFan
More Insight On 787-10/Possible KC-777? posted Thu Oct 20 2005 15:17:58 by USAF336TFS
Airbus To Decide By June 23 On Jet Plant, Tanker posted Mon May 23 2005 23:23:34 by Keesje
Why Does The RAF Hang On To The VC-10? posted Sat May 7 2005 01:59:49 by LHMARK

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format