CF188A From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Posted (6 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 3430 times:
As I was reading, I looked at my models on my desk and I just wondered... (my F-15 next to my A330), would winglets actually be destructive to supersonic fighter/bomber aircraft? I mean when the sound barrier is broken, they really do not need as much thrust to continuously travel at the current speed, therefore would a reinforced winglet like design actually improve airflow giving improved range etc ? The only military aircraft which came to mind given the term winglets... was the C-17 . I am sure there are more, but I am talking about present day fighters and bombers... why have winglets never been installed and could they potentially be installed or is it simply a structural issue?.... or at that would there be no improvement to efficiency?
N328KF From United States of America, joined May 2004, 6222 posts, RR: 3 Reply 2, posted (6 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 3386 times:
One large bomber did have winglets, of sorts:
When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.' T.Roosevelt
Vzlet From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 820 posts, RR: 0 Reply 3, posted (6 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 3382 times:
Wingtip-mounted missiles, pods, or fuel tanks can increase the effective aspect ration of a wing.
"That's so stupid! If they're so secret, why are they out where everyone can see them?" - my kid