Chksix From Sweden, joined Sep 2005, 345 posts, RR: 4
Reply 1, posted
Mon Mar 19 2007 00:34:33 UTC (9 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 2319 times:
The Mars rovers work well although they are awfully slow. Humans on the moon again would produce huge amounts of science, exploration and prospecting in the same timeframe.
Send people in a mobile base is my advise.
The conveyor belt plane will fly
TedTAce From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted
Mon Mar 19 2007 02:32:14 UTC (9 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 2295 times:
The problem is if there is supposed to be this big puch to get 'man' out of LEO, then sending robots to the moon is about as efficient as sending robots to the bottom of the ocean without a light. Sure you mind find a few things here and there, but you are mostly going to find that only a person can give a country PRIDE that the reasearch is being done there.
Blackbird1331 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 1911 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted
Tue Mar 20 2007 01:47:59 UTC (9 years 2 months 1 week 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 2225 times:
NASA, today, 3.19.07 has announced that it has scaled back its lunar robotic program. The report can be accessed by a link via space.com.
Cameras shoot pictures. Guns shoot people. They have the guns.
HAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31875 posts, RR: 54
Reply 4, posted
Tue Mar 20 2007 12:39:00 UTC (9 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 2201 times:
Use a combitation of both.Let man control the Robots to perform some tasks difficult for Man.
Think of the brighter side!