Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Fatal Plane Crash In The Keys (Tether Blimp Wire)  
User currently offlineTedTAce From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 14032 times:

I'm posting this in Mil/Space as while the plane is GA, the object it struck was military. Plus who cares about GA crashes in Civil Av? Move it f you need to mods..

That being said...

http://www.topix.com/city/cudjoe-key-fl
and
http://www.aero-news.net/index.cfm?c...5842a9-a511-43ca-a2f0-ca2332cdc21e

Quote:
It appeared the Cessna 182 (file photo of type, above) hit a cable tethering a large government radar surveillance blimp, said police. The cable was not sliced and the blimp does not appear to be damaged, according to Monroe County sheriff's spokeswoman Becky Herrin.

The site has a camera trained on the blimp and the camera captured the crash. The plane reportedly hit the cable about halfway between the ground and the blimp itself, reported the Associated Press

And the sectional from above article:
http://www.aero-news.net/FullsizeIma...5f8054-1eea-485c-a15a-83c5385dacfe

Notice that strange radial in the upper right cornerof the sectional? That is where the blimp is. What I don't get is how these morons could hit that wire when there is so much information warning them about it?

20 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineZANL188 From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 3434 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 13960 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting TedTAce (Thread starter):
What I don't get is how these morons could hit that wire when there is so much information warning them about it?

It's easy if you don't have a current sectional or if you have one and don't use it. An all too common occurence with GA pilots.

Is the blimp lit at all?.

The pilots luck/karma must have been really bad to inadvertently find that, relatively, tiny bit of cable in all that airspace and hit it in such a way that he couldn't recover.



Legal considerations provided by: Dewey, Cheatum, and Howe
User currently offlinePC12Fan From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 2378 posts, RR: 5
Reply 2, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 13911 times:

Quoting ZANL188 (Reply 1):
It's easy if you don't have a current sectional

It's been there for many years.

Quoting ZANL188 (Reply 1):
or if you have one and don't use it.

Then that's the pilots irresponsibility.



Just when I think you've said the stupidest thing ever, you keep talkin'!
User currently offlineBladeLWS From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 403 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 13885 times:

It probably is lit at night, but during the day if you aren't paying attention you probably won't see the cable until its to late.

User currently offlineF4wso From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 974 posts, RR: 12
Reply 4, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 13847 times:

Quoting ZANL188 (Reply 1):
Is the blimp lit at all?.

Correct term would be "aerostat". Blimp indicates a piloted vehicle.

Gary
Cottage Grove, MN, USA



Seeking an honest week's pay for an honest day's work
User currently offlineTedTAce From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 13804 times:

Quoting ZANL188 (Reply 1):
It's easy if you don't have a current sectional



Quoting PC12Fan (Reply 2):
It's been there for many years.

.
.
.

Quoting ZANL188 (Reply 1):
hit it in such a way that he couldn't recover.

Given the weight of the tethered vehicle involved, quite the opposite is true. You'd be lucky to hit it in such a manner that you could fly away.


User currently offlineZANL188 From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 3434 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 13755 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting TedTAce (Reply 5):
Given the weight of the tethered vehicle involved, quite the opposite is true. You'd be lucky to hit it in such a manner that you could fly away.

Relative size & weight does not necessarily dictate which airframe survives a midair, ex: Gol 737 v. Embraer in Brazil a while back.

Could just as easily have ripped off a wheel pant or a wingtip and flown away..... Had a buddy a few years back who had a midair with a 152 while flying his 182. He hit dead on center from below and behind the 152, lost his engine and he ate the windshield. He managed to pull the windshield out of his face in time to flare and deadstick into a wheat field. He walked away. 152 pilot wasn't so lucky, he was dead prior to impact due to 182 prop strikes in the cockpit.



Legal considerations provided by: Dewey, Cheatum, and Howe
User currently offlineBHMBAGLOCK From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 2698 posts, RR: 5
Reply 7, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 13745 times:

Quoting ZANL188 (Reply 1):
It's easy if you don't have a current sectional or if you have one and don't use it.

The Aerostats have been there at least 30 years. It's actually much simpler than it used to be, they used to run them from ships as well and the locations would of course vary considerably.

I love the headline calling it a weather balloon - clueless.



Where are all of my respected members going?
User currently offline3DPlanes From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 167 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 13743 times:

I wouldn't expect them to be lit at night (there's two ballons, iirc)... And there's certainly no beacon or strobes during the day. The chart says "Caution: Unmarked balloon on cable to 14,000 MSL."

Also, a 14,000 cable would have to be fairly sturdy, given the size of the balloons.

Given that it's well marked on charts (and has been since at least the 1980s), I'd say they either didn't have/read the chart, or they weren't quite certain of their position. One excellent reason to, at the least, have a portable GPS...

[Edited 2007-05-05 04:01:47]


"Simplicate and add lightness." - Ed Heinemann
User currently offlineTedTAce From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 13743 times:

Quoting ZANL188 (Reply 6):
Relative size & weight does not necessarily dictate which airframe survives a midair

I think you mis read what I said; I was referring to size/weight of the tethered vehicle, not the flying vehicle. Rationale being that if the tethered vehicle was lightweight and small; the chances are the tether would be severed by any vehicle are increased. My point was that unless the impacting vehicle was VERY significant in size/mass or just BARELY clipped the wire, any vehicle would likely suffer a fatal result as is evidenced by this crash.


User currently offlineThorny From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 13743 times:

Quoting BHMBAGLOCK (Reply 7):
The Aerostats have been there at least 30 years. It's actually much simpler than it used to be, they used to run them from ships as well and the locations would of course vary considerably

I remember seeing the TAS (Tethered Aerostat System) at Cape Canaveral throughout the late 70s and early 80s. I think that setup is the one which moved to the Keys.


User currently offlineHalls120 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 13721 times:

Quoting BladeLWS (Reply 3):
It probably is lit at night, but during the day if you aren't paying attention you probably won't see the cable until its to late.

I flew out of Key West this afternoon. The Aerostat is very easy to see, even sitting in the back of an ATR.


User currently offlineBHMBAGLOCK From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 2698 posts, RR: 5
Reply 12, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 13707 times:

Quoting 3DPlanes (Reply 8):
Also, a 14,000 cable would have to be fairly sturdy, given the size of the balloons.

The winch assembly is very substantial.

Quoting Thorny (Reply 10):
I remember seeing the TAS (Tethered Aerostat System) at Cape Canaveral throughout the late 70s and early 80s. I think that setup is the one which moved to the Keys.

I don't think so unless you're talking about one of the ship based ones. They were definitely based at Truman Annex in the 80s.

I did a little checking and it seems that Cudjoe was activated in '78. That sounds about right to me as well.



Where are all of my respected members going?
User currently offlineCorey07850 From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 2525 posts, RR: 5
Reply 13, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 13685 times:

Does anyone have a picture of these things? I've always seen them on sectionals and thought about the possibility of pilots hitting them... I believe there is another one up the West coast of Florida, up north a bit more as well...

User currently offlineTedTAce From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 13640 times:

Quoting Corey07850 (Reply 13):
Does anyone have a picture of these things?



User currently offlineThorny From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 13623 times:

Quoting BHMBAGLOCK (Reply 12):
Quoting Thorny (Reply 10):
I remember seeing the TAS (Tethered Aerostat System) at Cape Canaveral throughout the late 70s and early 80s. I think that setup is the one which moved to the Keys.

I don't think so unless you're talking about one of the ship based ones. They were definitely based at Truman Annex in the 80s.

I did a little checking and it seems that Cudjoe was activated in '78. That sounds about right to me as well.

That's about when the Cape Canaveral TAS went in, too, I think. It disappeared around 1982. I always figured they moved it further south. I stand corrected.


User currently offlineCorey07850 From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 2525 posts, RR: 5
Reply 16, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 13576 times:

Quoting TedTAce (Reply 14):

Certainly more substantial than I thought!


User currently offlineBHMBAGLOCK From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 2698 posts, RR: 5
Reply 17, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 13437 times:

Quoting Corey07850 (Reply 13):
I believe there is another one up the West coast of Florida, up north a bit more as well...

There is another active site in FL - Horseshoe Beach, just a bit north of where the Suwanee River hits the Gulf.

Quoting Thorny (Reply 15):
That's about when the Cape Canaveral TAS went in, too, I think. It disappeared around 1982. I always figured they moved it further south. I stand corrected.

No problem, you've corrected me a few times as well and I likewise would rather have it right than not.  Smile



Where are all of my respected members going?
User currently offlineSprout5199 From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 1833 posts, RR: 2
Reply 18, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 13378 times:

Quoting Corey07850 (Reply 16):
Certainly more substantial than I thought!

I wonder what they do when a hurricane threatens.

Dan in Jupiter


User currently offlinePC12Fan From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 2378 posts, RR: 5
Reply 19, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 13327 times:

Quoting Sprout5199 (Reply 18):
I wonder what they do when a hurricane threatens.

Wow, I never thought of that before! If I had to guess, I would think they'd lower it, and maybe even deflate for storage.



Just when I think you've said the stupidest thing ever, you keep talkin'!
User currently offlineMD11Engineer From Germany, joined Oct 2003, 13815 posts, RR: 63
Reply 20, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 13222 times:

The thing looks like one of the barrage balloons used to deter low altitude attacks in WW2. Back then the balloons had additional wire cables hanging down. The wires would slice the wings straight off an aircraft trying to fly below them.


A US Marine Corps Barrage Balloon from 1942 at Parris Island
(From Wikipedia) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barrage_balloon

RAF barrage balloons over Cardington airfield in the UK in WW2:
http://www.bbrclub.org/baragecardington.jpg
From
http://www.bbrclub.org/, a British veteran's organisation's website of former barrage balloon crews.


Here is an article by a modern military officer about the possible use of barrage ballonns for anti aircraft defense:
http://www.airpower.maxwell.af.mil/a...rchronicles/apj/apj89/hillson.html

Jan


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Fatal Plane Crash In The Keys (Tether Blimp Wire)
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Foreign Air Bases In The USA posted Mon Mar 19 2007 13:58:09 by BHXDTW
Fatal L-39 Crash @ Tico Airshow posted Sat Mar 17 2007 03:10:54 by TedTAce
Anybody In The Air Training Corps? posted Sat Mar 10 2007 23:02:44 by A320ajm
How Many Military 707s In The World? posted Thu Mar 1 2007 09:39:12 by Kaitak744
F16's In The Navy? posted Mon Jan 15 2007 20:03:34 by Blackbird1331
The RAF In The South Atlantic - Great Pics posted Sun Jan 14 2007 20:30:33 by GDB
It Sure Is Different In The Air Force posted Thu Jan 11 2007 14:08:28 by Army15P
F-18 Crash In San Diego posted Thu Nov 30 2006 21:58:56 by AndrewUber
F-16 Crash In Baghdad posted Mon Nov 27 2006 14:01:51 by TK787
Iranian Military Plane Crash posted Mon Nov 27 2006 13:40:18 by 7of9

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format